Truthfully, it is the number on paper at seems to appeal to people more than the well-roundedness of a candidate. I am learning it the hard way now. This is unfortunate, but the reality of the situation. I have an oGPA of 3.93 and AA of 20 and my extracurriculars are not even looked out since those numbers do not seem to attract the admissions committees at the dental schools. However, although I possess a relatively competitive GPA and have a laundry list of extracurriculars (leadership roles, shadowing, research, community service....etc), all that diligence and hard work is meaningless due to the 18 I received on the reading section of the DAT. My out of classroom involvement are not even looked upon if my scores are dismissed.
Bottom line: you could have performed research at one of the most prestigious research institutions in the country, published papers, served as a mentor, volunteered at disability centers, tutored for free, shadowed countless hours, presented before professors that are masters of their discipline, be completely and wholeheartedly committed to pursuing a DDS/DMD degree, spent countless hours reading your textbook and still be overlooked.
Honestly, if you ask me, I remember both: the person with a 3.2 but was outgoing, offered to help, and committed to making a difference, and the person who maintained a 4.0, is unapproachable and chose not to share their notes when you missed class after you spent hours studying with them for the previous exam (in an attempt to weed their competition)....Yet, I view each of them under a very different light: I admire the former and look negatively upon the ladder.
Then again, there are those who maintain a healthy balance between the "numbers" and extracurriculars and are just wonderful people.