Hi guys,
I was just wondering how heat of formation could be positive? I thought that in order to make compounds, energy needs to be released thus being exothermic and negative. I think I'm most confused about maybe the wording of the term heat of formation bc I associate it with making new bonds.
Or, can the heat of formation be used to describe a whole reaction that takes place to form a compound? As in, in order to make A + B -> C we need to break bonds of A and B which is energy consuming and then the formation of bonds to make C releases less energy than it took to break bonds of A and B so the overall heat of formation is positive? If this is the case, I can't really see what the difference between Bond disassociation E and heat of formation is?
Thanks in advance guys
I was just wondering how heat of formation could be positive? I thought that in order to make compounds, energy needs to be released thus being exothermic and negative. I think I'm most confused about maybe the wording of the term heat of formation bc I associate it with making new bonds.
Or, can the heat of formation be used to describe a whole reaction that takes place to form a compound? As in, in order to make A + B -> C we need to break bonds of A and B which is energy consuming and then the formation of bonds to make C releases less energy than it took to break bonds of A and B so the overall heat of formation is positive? If this is the case, I can't really see what the difference between Bond disassociation E and heat of formation is?
Thanks in advance guys