Why is there sometimes bias against D.O?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.

iiddnn

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
28
Reaction score
38
I was wondering why some people in the healthcare field have a bias against D.Os? I mean of you look at the education, an allopathic school will teach an allopathic curriculum, and from my understanding an osteopathic school will essentially teach an allopathic curriculum + 200 hours of osteopathic stuff. Doesn't that mean that osteopathic doctors, at least on paper, have a more extensive education?
 
Working as a scribe for half a year working with numerous DOs and MDs as well as volunteering in hospital settings I personally haven't seen any bias.
The only bias I recognize is the cost difference between my state DO and MD schools with DO costing 30,000+ more for tuition.
 
Because most DO schools are only marginally less shady than Caribbean schools and have similar to worse clinical education... if we are being honest.
 
Peerinng around the DO forums, the biggest issue with DO education is their clinical years.
 
MD>DO >>>>>>> Carib.


MD >>>>>> DO >>>>>>>>> CB.

I am a DO student, I know. If I didn't happen to go to one of the state DO schools I would have severely regretted my decision to apply DO because I listened to people who said the only difference was the letters.
 
MD >>>>>> DO >>>>>>>>> CB.

I am a DO student, I know. If I didn't happen to go to one of the state DO schools I would have severely regretted my decision to apply DO because I listened to people who said the only difference was the letters.

5c2.jpg
 
I guess I should also preface my statements with I have found myself wanting to practice academic medicine in a relatively competitive specialty. If you are open / want primary care or uncompetitive - marginally competitive specialties and such there wont be much of a difference. Also we have been studying cranial omm lately so I might be a little sour.
 
MD >>>>>> DO >>>>>>>>> CB.

I am a DO student, I know. If I didn't happen to go to one of the state DO schools I would have severely regretted my decision to apply DO because I listened to people who said the only difference was the letters.

What are the major issues with your DO program?
 
I guess I should also preface my statements with I have found myself wanting to practice academic medicine in a relatively competitive specialty. If you are open / want primary care or uncompetitive - marginally competitive specialties and such there wont be much of a difference. Also we have been studying cranial omm lately so I might be a little sour.

I won’t deny that that there still exists some differences amongst schools, but the same can be said when comparing MD school so in some regard it’s not a DO vs MD thing. And yea, definitely just smile and nod during cranial section and then forget about it.

I’m a DO in an allopathic sub-sub-specialty so in the end it’s more about the individual. I had plenty of classmates go on to competitive allopathic programs.
 
What are the major issues with your DO program?

There aren't really any besides the usual annoyances that any MD / DO school will have (which is why I said if I didnt happen to go to one of the state DO schools), but knowing myself and my goals if I had ended up going to one of the DO schools without an affiliated hospital / research / clinical rotations that are quality I would have been extremely disappointed. This is not something I foresaw going into med school, and feel fortunate I ended up where I did. However, with the 5 new DO schools that are opening up every year there will be more and more students that end up with poor training / rotations making it harder on the students from the schools doing it right to succeed as there are more students competing for the DO friendly positions.
 
This has been talked about time and again. Locking as nothing good will come of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top