why so many unfilled rad onc programs?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

yowhatup

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Some of those programs were not truly unfilled (i.e. computer glitch and/or human error had them in the match, when they had no spots available for that year).

In other cases, programs grossly miscalculated how many people to interview and/or rank.
 
Some of those programs were not truly unfilled (i.e. computer glitch and/or human error had them in the match, when they had no spots available for that year).

In other cases, programs grossly miscalculated how many people to interview and/or rank.

could you then through scramble match into a rad onc program?.... Also can a rad onc doc be 100% clinical, or is research a requirement?
 
Scrambling into rad onc is probably tougher than matching into rad onc. Programs need to fill those positions in a year, not in a month.

Second, most radiation oncologists are not scientists, but most individuals who successfully match into radiation oncology have participated in research projects of some kind.
 
Top Bottom