Anuwolf said:
Maybe some of you guys could give me some insights to inspire me the reasons why some psychiatrists are complaining that treating a BPD is notoriously difficult? What makes so difficult into treating someone with BPD?
Maybe I'm showing my bias here, but I think the psychiatrist's attitude counts, too. If you go into a situation thinking, "Oh, the pt is BPD, there's nothing I can do for her, she's going to be difficult," then she's probably going to be difficult, and you're probably not going to be able to do anything for her.
Also, I've seen a lot of psychiatrists go the other way with the differential between BPD and bipolar/MDD/etc: make the BPD call before ruling out the Axis I dx. (At least, if it's a woman...) If the pt doesn't respond to the first SSRI, at the first target dose tried, there's a trend towards saying, "Ah, must be BPD, better look for signs..." After that, well, if you're looking for signs, you'll find them. (Also, seeing someone once every month or two, for half an hour, really doesn't give you enough time with a pt to make a good dx on this, IMO. Psychologists, seeing someone an hour a week, are probably in a better position to do that.)
As for what legitimately makes BPD so very difficult to work with, it's such an ingrained pattern of responses, and the BPD tends to see him/her-self as a victim of what other people are doing to her/him. It's hard to stop the emotional reaction long enough to say, "uh... Can you see how your actions might have had something to do with this?"
While it's probably hard either way, with a motivated BPD pt, you can get some good work done without too much hair loss. It's true, though, that psychology is a better place for it than psychiatry.