will OTs/PTs, and other midlevels ever supplant the roles/duties of a PMR Doc

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

copacetic

Copacetic Was Here!
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
392
Reaction score
3
Im not really all the knowledgeable of PM&R so forgive in advance for any ignorance that i may display. In my explorations of the various medical specialties, i have noticed that there seems to be a trend for midlevels to gain more and more medicinal (diagnostic/procedural/theraperutic/prescriptive etc) powers.

It seems to me (objectively speaking) that PM&R is in a unique and perhaps unenviable position whereby PTs and OTs could easily do without the services that a physiatrist provides. In essence, physiatrists seem to be around to rubber stamp alot of what PTs and OTs do. if this is indeed true, it is not unreasonable that in the future OTs and PTs in a gambit to exercise their growing leverage, and expand their medical powers and autonomy would argue that they dont need physiatrists as overseers. this would inevitably be the first step in doing away with physiatrists all together.

just how relevant are physiatrists (dont take this perosonally, im not derriding the profession, if i come across as such it is not my intention). beyond relevance, just how unique is what they do? could what physiatrists do not not easily be supplanted by broadening the horizon and scope of what midlevels do?

Members don't see this ad.
 
I think I'll let other people field this question in more detail because I just don't have the energy (it's been done to death on here).

Anyway, my question to you is: why do you want to know? Are you considering PM&R? Otherwise, this is a little insulting.
 
I think I'll let other people field this question in more detail because I just don't have the energy (it's been done to death on here).

Anyway, my question to you is: why do you want to know? Are you considering PM&R? Otherwise, this is a little insulting.

my main interest is cards, but im into academia in general. i also have a special interest in physiatry because my father has spinal stenosis, and suffers greatly from it. so yes, im have an interest in the field. also, you said this has been discussed to death? can you point me to the proper threads then?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Why don't you worry about graduating from medical school first, and leave the real work to the grownups. :sleep:
 
Solid work AXM!!!

Llenroc, we to start engaging and educating people when they're still med students. This pre-med student has a LONG way to go...and if he/she can educate others about Physiatry, that's great. Getting our name out there is the biggest battle, then it's explaining what we actually do. Instead of constantly going through the exhausting efforts of explaining it over and over and over and over on SDN, we need to produce videos that are ease to access, that are short, and that are informative. And that's exactly what the AAPM&R is talking more and more about doing.

The first video will be a simple, "What is Physiatry?".
 
Llenroc, we to start engaging and educating people when they're still med students.

I totally 100% agree, but it's really hard to keep smiling while getting asked the same question over and over. But you're right that if we react by getting snippy, which I tend to do sometimes :p, it's just going to make the problem worse.

I guess the question of why midlevels can't take over the field is present in a lot of fields. (e.g. Why can't NPs/PAs serve as PCPs? Why can't nurse anesthetists replace anesthesiologists? Why can't psychologists do what psychiatrists do? Why can't people in India read all radiology films?) Only people within the field seem to understand why it doesn't make sense.
 
I guess the question of why midlevels can't take over the field is present in a lot of fields. (e.g. Why can't NPs/PAs serve as PCPs? Why can't nurse anesthetists replace anesthesiologists? Why can't psychologists do what psychiatrists do? Why can't people in India read all radiology films?) Only people within the field seem to understand why it doesn't make sense.

EXCELLENT examples topwise!! and honestly, in many cases, midlevels CAN handle many things. i don't consider the typical Physiatrist any smarter than the typical NP...we're just better trained. and if that's true, then why can't a midlevel do what we do after getting specialty training for 4 yrs?? but that's the point, they don't get that training. they may work with a Physiatrist for 4 yrs and have him/her teach the NP a ton of things about handling our patients, but that's not the same as formal, regulated residency training. there's a good reason why we have residency training that's regulated by the ACGME, b/c the old ways of shadowing a doc resulted in too inconsistent training outcomes.

just my thoughts
 

thanks this was very informative.

Why don't you worry about graduating from medical school first, and leave the real work to the grownups. :sleep:

this is not a very productive or helpful comment from someone who claims to be a 'grown-up' :rolleyes:. im just trying to learn more about the specialty. alot of people dont know what physiatry is, or what physiatrists do. exposure is critical for the field if it is to grow and develop further. personally, i think that if more people know what physiatrists could offer their patients, it would be as competitive as derm, and generate as much exctiment in the academic and research sphere as neurology/neurosurgery. i can honestly say that a physiatrist help to save my fathers life in more ways than i can describe (figuratively and literally). i have immense respect for the field, and thus i want to know more about it. i may not know very much about the field, but i am attuned to the fact that it is at a crossroads.
 
Mid levels can do a lot of what we do. We're starting to see rehab floors staffed by PAs and NP's, while the physiatrist spends more time in clinic. Most of what we do on rehab is baby-sitting, with an emphasis on prevention of complications. Of course, our baby-sitters are very important. Would you rather have your kid baby-sat by someone with state certification, CPR training in their child-proofed home, or by a teenager more interested in other teens of the opposite sex?

PT's are trying to get direct-patient access via Doctorate in PT programs. OT's will likely watch and wait, and if succesful, follow suit. Every field of medicine is getting enroachment from non-physicians. It's a battle being fought on too many fronts, and we will start losing some of them, have lost others already.

With the decline in # of MD's and nicreasing population, midlevels are going to move in to fill the void. We specialists will be reserved for the toughest cases.
 
Mid levels can do a lot of what we do. We're starting to see rehab floors staffed by PAs and NP's, while the physiatrist spends more time in clinic. Most of what we do on rehab is baby-sitting, with an emphasis on prevention of complications. Of course, our baby-sitters are very important. Would you rather have your kid baby-sat by someone with state certification, CPR training in their child-proofed home, or by a teenager more interested in other teens of the opposite sex?

PT's are trying to get direct-patient access via Doctorate in PT programs. OT's will likely watch and wait, and if succesful, follow suit. Every field of medicine is getting enroachment from non-physicians. It's a battle being fought on too many fronts, and we will start losing some of them, have lost others already.

With the decline in # of MD's and nicreasing population, midlevels are going to move in to fill the void. We specialists will be reserved for the toughest cases.

i agree that the trend of midlevels rising applies all across the spectrum of medical specialties. invariable as you say, its ultimately due to the lack of physicians, and someone must fill the void!
 
I had to try hard not to roll my eyes when I read the original question, too. But I can tell that this med student is sincere, and this IS an opportunity to spread the word about PM&R.

I still really like what someone, I think it was Alfy Olufade (apologies if I got this wrong), had to say about the PT/Physiatry relationship. It was that a PT is to a physiatrist what a pharmacist is to an internist.

So to answer the original question, when PharmDs supplant the roles of general practioners then we'll worry.

While I'm responding, I'd just like to say that I used to think in-patient rehab was all baby-sitting until I did my private hospital rotation. My attending was AMAZING. She showed me all that PM&R has to offer beyond what other specialties might bring to rehab patients. Because her physical exam was so good she didn't miss any changes in stroke presentation, skin breakdown was minimized as orthotics were Rx'd to meet specific needs, participation was enhanced as bedside injections were performed to relieve pain, appropriate MET levels were assigned for cardiac patients and the unit worked as a team to include PT/OT/ST/SW.

Like anything, you're only as good as you prove yourself to be. PM&R has the potential to be awesome, and subsequently indispensible.
 
Im not really all the knowledgeable of PM&R so forgive in advance for any ignorance that i may display. In my explorations of the various medical specialties, i have noticed that there seems to be a trend for midlevels to gain more and more medicinal (diagnostic/procedural/theraperutic/prescriptive etc) powers.

It seems to me (objectively speaking) that PM&R is in a unique and perhaps unenviable position whereby PTs and OTs could easily do without the services that a physiatrist provides. In essence, physiatrists seem to be around to rubber stamp alot of what PTs and OTs do. if this is indeed true, it is not unreasonable that in the future OTs and PTs in a gambit to exercise their growing leverage, and expand their medical powers and autonomy would argue that they dont need physiatrists as overseers. this would inevitably be the first step in doing away with physiatrists all together.

just how relevant are physiatrists (dont take this perosonally, im not derriding the profession, if i come across as such it is not my intention). beyond relevance, just how unique is what they do? could what physiatrists do not not easily be supplanted by broadening the horizon and scope of what midlevels do?

It ultimately depends on the physician. I do medical management and I have sound clinical skills. My therapists respect me and look to me for medical advice. On my unit I make and treat diagnoses all the time, from medical conditions as simple as hypertension, to reviewing ct scans of the head, doing EMG's, utilization review of meds to improve cost measures, etc. I also do administrative work, lecture, teach, etc.

I don't babysit patients and I certainly don't feel like what I do is necessarily easy. It may look easy on the surface to non-observers. Orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons respect what I do and send patients to me for expertise within my field both inpatient and outpatient, not purely for level of care rec's ( although I am not stupid enough to turn down business if they just want to know if a patient should go to a SNF or not)

No disrespect to any therapist out there or those who may be reading this board but what I do on a daily basis took me medical school, residency, and my own reading and learning to do. What I do is medicine and not therapy.

I have a good relationship with my therapists but we both know what we do well and it is not each other's fields.

I think this debate gets blown overboard a lot. Direct access may or may not happen. If it does, are we going to roll over and die? Doubtful, people will still go to see a doctor!

A physician still has an MD/DO behind their name. That degree carries so much weight it amazes me when I hear many of my younger residents or colleagues get discouraged about it because the truth of it is it is an incredibly *powerful* degree that commands respect and opens doors. Its up to you to take advantage of that. Sitting around bemoaning others trying to get in on patient care is time you could spend developing your practice.

Bottom line, if you are good (and somewhat nice), people will come to see you. If you are not nice but you are God-like good, people will come to see you. If you are below good clinically but very nice people will still find a way to see you. If you are bad and a mean SOB then well you may have some problems.

Looking for an enemy to fight? Think - HOSPITALS. Doctors are too worried fighting each other (neuro vs pmr, anes vs pmr, cards vs rads, it goes on and on), that the hospitals play on these rivalries and now command an ever increasing powerful hold on the healthcare landscape. if hospitals have their way they can really cause some problem for us.
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
It ultimately depends on the physician. I do medical management and I have sound clinical skills. My therapists respect me and look to me for medical advice. On my unit I make and treat diagnoses all the time, from medical conditions as simple as hypertension, to reviewing ct scans of the head, doing EMG's, utilization review of meds to improve cost measures, etc. I also do administrative work, lecture, teach, etc.

I don't babysit patients and I certainly don't feel like what I do is necessarily easy. It may look easy on the surface to non-observers. Orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons respect what I do and send patients to me for expertise within my field both inpatient and outpatient, not purely for level of care rec's ( although I am not stupid enough to turn down business if they just want to know if a patient should go to a SNF or not)

No disrespect to any therapist out there or those who may be reading this board but what I do on a daily basis took me medical school, residency, and my own reading and learning to do. What I do is medicine and not therapy.

I have a good relationship with my therapists but we both know what we do well and it is not each other's fields.

I think this debate gets blown overboard a lot. Direct access may or may not happen. If it does, are we going to roll over and die? Doubtful, people will still go to see a doctor!

A physician still has an MD/DO behind their name. That degree carries so much weight it amazes me when I hear many of my younger residents or colleagues get discouraged about it because the truth of it is it is an incredibly *powerful* degree that commands respect and opens doors. Its up to you to take advantage of that. Sitting around bemoaning others trying to get in on patient care is time you could spend developing your practice.

Bottom line, if you are good (and somewhat nice), people will come to see you. If you are not nice but you are God-like good, people will come to see you. If you are below good clinically but very nice people will still find a way to see you. If you are bad and a mean SOB then well you may have some problems.

Looking for an enemy to fight? Think - HOSPITALS. Doctors are too worried fighting each other (neuro vs pmr, anes vs pmr, cards vs rads, it goes on and on), that the hospitals play on these rivalries and now command an ever increasing powerful hold on the healthcare landscape. if hospitals have their way they can really cause some problem for us.

nice post. it highlights alot of interesting points. looks like a discussion is finally rolling off the ground :thumbup:
 
I still really like what someone, I think it was Alfy Olufade (apologies if I got this wrong), had to say about the PT/Physiatry relationship. It was that a PT is to a physiatrist what a pharmacist is to an internist.

yeah. Alfy wrote that in the "the PM&R Resident" newsletter. I loved it. Great analogy!!
 
Looking for an enemy to fight? Think - HOSPITALS. Doctors are too worried fighting each other (neuro vs pmr, anes vs pmr, cards vs rads, it goes on and on), that the hospitals play on these rivalries and now command an ever increasing powerful hold on the healthcare landscape. if hospitals have their way they can really cause some problem for us.

Xardas,
Great post, and I could not agree more. That is why we MUST support the move towards more physician owned hospitals! It is our only way to fight this. (unless you all want to be employees and yes-men/women)
 
Mid levels can do a lot of what we do. We're starting to see rehab floors staffed by PAs and NP's, while the physiatrist spends more time in clinic. Most of what we do on rehab is baby-sitting, with an emphasis on prevention of complications. Of course, our baby-sitters are very important. Would you rather have your kid baby-sat by someone with state certification, CPR training in their child-proofed home, or by a teenager more interested in other teens of the opposite sex?

PT's are trying to get direct-patient access via Doctorate in PT programs. OT's will likely watch and wait, and if succesful, follow suit. Every field of medicine is getting enroachment from non-physicians. It's a battle being fought on too many fronts, and we will start losing some of them, have lost others already.

With the decline in # of MD's and nicreasing population, midlevels are going to move in to fill the void. We specialists will be reserved for the toughest cases.

I've been doing research regarding the differences between the roles of Physiatry and Physical Therapy as well. Research continues so bear with me. I still have much more to do.

I'm curious to why a physiatrist would employ a PA/NP over a PT/OT. It seems to me that if rehabilitation is the goal in mind, that a rehabilitation specialists would be called upon to work with a patient. How do you use PAs/NPs in your practice? What is the role of PTs and OTs in the process? I'd like to hear more about the "baby sitting" concept. My guess it's the PAs/NPs that are the "babysitters." What is there role in your clinic? What are the tasks that they do on a daily basis?

Thank you for your insight.
 
I've been doing research regarding the differences between the roles of Physiatry and Physical Therapy as well. Research continues so bear with me. I still have much more to do.

I'm curious to why a physiatrist would employ a PA/NP over a PT/OT. It seems to me that if rehabilitation is the goal in mind, that a rehabilitation specialists would be called upon to work with a patient. How do you use PAs/NPs in your practice? What is the role of PTs and OTs in the process? I'd like to hear more about the "baby sitting" concept. My guess it's the PAs/NPs that are the "babysitters." What is there role in your clinic? What are the tasks that they do on a daily basis?

Thank you for your insight.

PT and OT have the specific role of implimenting a treatment plan with a patient as prescribed by a physician, in this case, a physiatrist. They work hands-on with the patient in the gym, from 1 - 5 days/week, doing modalities such as ultrasound, other heat, cold, massage, tissue mobilization, therapeutic exercise and patient education. They are given a narrow scope of practice, further defined for each patient by the physician - i.e. exactly what they want the PT or OT to do with the patient.

An NP or PA works with the doctor in the clinic, seeing and assessing patients medically, with duties defined b/w the two of them. Each doctor decides how much autonomy they will allow their PA/NP. Some utilize them to do follow-up appointments, might see the doctor one visit, the PA the next, or maybe the doctor does the consult, the PA does most of the follow-ups. Other PA/NPs see the patient on their own, without the doctor ever seeing the patient, give their own diagnosis and impliment their own treatment plan, under the theoretical supervision of a doctor. I personally disagree with the use of Midlevels in that regard and believe it to beyond their scope of practice outside of primary care.

Doctors, as well as NPs and PAs see a patient, take a history, do a physical exam, make a diagnosis and offer treatment options, including medications, PT/OT, injections, surgery and similar. PTs and OTs can impliment the treatment plan portion as ordered by the doc, PA or NP, within their narrow scope of practice. They may not make diagnoses, order tests like MRI or labs, may not do injections or do surgical procedures. PAs and NPs can do all of that under the supervision of a physician.

Essentially, a PA or NP is a "physician extender" allowing the phsysician to see more patients, or concentrate on the more complicated patients, while PT and OT are the people who work hands-on with the patient implimenting the PT/oT script.

However, in Physiatry, the use of PAs and NPs is uncommon, if not rare. Very few PAs and NPs have enough musculoskeletal training to make them a financial benefit to the phsyician or organization. The rest would require prolonged training to be efficient. In my book, a PA or NP has the skill equivalent of an intern or resident depending on experience and training. With supervision, they can do well in subspecialties, given proper guidelines and training. No one comes out of PA school with the musculoskeletal skills of even a 1st year physiatry resident. Their training is aimed at primary care - coughs, colds, HTN, etc.

In my clinic, most of the orthopods have a PA who assists them in surgery and clinic, as well as rounds at the hosptial, and even hospital consults. Our rheumatologists have a PA who works fairly independently, seeing her own pts, most simple RA, gout and osteopoprosis. We have 2 podiatrists who do not have PAs, but do get podiatry residents fairly regularly. Myself (physiatry) and a FP sports med guy are the only ones at my clinic who do not utilize mid-levels or residents, and he is starting to participate in the local medical school and residency programs. They may start a sports med fellowship b/w him and the orthos.

I used to use an NP in a pain clinic, but she proved not financially beneficial. She worked slowly, could not write for opioids, and felt she had to discuss every single case with me. That and most every single patient whined "Don't I get to see the doctor today?" (Yeah, you need to see the doc to renew the meds you've been on for 3 years now...). I currently cannot see an NP or PA helping me right now. I do a lot of EMGs, which they would not be able to help with, injections under fluoro they could not do, and only about 1/3 of my time in clinic. Most of my clinic patients are short-term (I don't see many chronic patients for monthly visits) or intermittentent/episodic. I don't believe there to be an NP or PA with the skills to improve my clinic.
 
PT and OT have the specific role of implimenting a treatment plan with a patient as prescribed by a physician, in this case, a physiatrist. They work hands-on with the patient in the gym, from 1 - 5 days/week, doing modalities such as ultrasound, other heat, cold, massage, tissue mobilization, therapeutic exercise and patient education. They are given a narrow scope of practice, further defined for each patient by the physician - i.e. exactly what they want the PT or OT to do with the patient.

An NP or PA works with the doctor in the clinic, seeing and assessing patients medically, with duties defined b/w the two of them. Each doctor decides how much autonomy they will allow their PA/NP. Some utilize them to do follow-up appointments, might see the doctor one visit, the PA the next, or maybe the doctor does the consult, the PA does most of the follow-ups. Other PA/NPs see the patient on their own, without the doctor ever seeing the patient, give their own diagnosis and impliment their own treatment plan, under the theoretical supervision of a doctor. I personally disagree with the use of Midlevels in that regard and believe it to beyond their scope of practice outside of primary care.

Doctors, as well as NPs and PAs see a patient, take a history, do a physical exam, make a diagnosis and offer treatment options, including medications, PT/OT, injections, surgery and similar. PTs and OTs can impliment the treatment plan portion as ordered by the doc, PA or NP, within their narrow scope of practice. They may not make diagnoses, order tests like MRI or labs, may not do injections or do surgical procedures. PAs and NPs can do all of that under the supervision of a physician.

Essentially, a PA or NP is a "physician extender" allowing the phsysician to see more patients, or concentrate on the more complicated patients, while PT and OT are the people who work hands-on with the patient implimenting the PT/oT script.

However, in Physiatry, the use of PAs and NPs is uncommon, if not rare. Very few PAs and NPs have enough musculoskeletal training to make them a financial benefit to the phsyician or organization. The rest would require prolonged training to be efficient. In my book, a PA or NP has the skill equivalent of an intern or resident depending on experience and training. With supervision, they can do well in subspecialties, given proper guidelines and training. No one comes out of PA school with the musculoskeletal skills of even a 1st year physiatry resident. Their training is aimed at primary care - coughs, colds, HTN, etc.

In my clinic, most of the orthopods have a PA who assists them in surgery and clinic, as well as rounds at the hosptial, and even hospital consults. Our rheumatologists have a PA who works fairly independently, seeing her own pts, most simple RA, gout and osteopoprosis. We have 2 podiatrists who do not have PAs, but do get podiatry residents fairly regularly. Myself (physiatry) and a FP sports med guy are the only ones at my clinic who do not utilize mid-levels or residents, and he is starting to participate in the local medical school and residency programs. They may start a sports med fellowship b/w him and the orthos.

I used to use an NP in a pain clinic, but she proved not financially beneficial. She worked slowly, could not write for opioids, and felt she had to discuss every single case with me. That and most every single patient whined "Don't I get to see the doctor today?" (Yeah, you need to see the doc to renew the meds you've been on for 3 years now...). I currently cannot see an NP or PA helping me right now. I do a lot of EMGs, which they would not be able to help with, injections under fluoro they could not do, and only about 1/3 of my time in clinic. Most of my clinic patients are short-term (I don't see many chronic patients for monthly visits) or intermittentent/episodic. I don't believe there to be an NP or PA with the skills to improve my clinic.

Thank you for your detailed response. I'm still questioning, however, why PAs are utilized over PTs in a setting working with MSK disorders (excluding your setting).

I'm currently looking into the field of Physical Therapy and trying to learn more about their relationships interprofessionally and their role. The major theme is that that PTs started mandating the doctorate in order for the profession to move in a more autonomous direction and aquire more "direct access."

How do you see the PT profession 10 years from now? How do you see the relationship between Psyiatrists and Physical Therapists at this time? Do you see the role of PT expanding in order to help maintain healthcare costs and help subdue the shortage of Psyiatrists?

I'd like to hear from others as well. It seems to me that Psyiatry, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy should all be complementing each other in a setting working with MSK disorders. I'm not real sure why PAs would be utilized in the setting due to their very limited training on MSK disorders. Once again excuse my ignorance. I appreciate your insight.
 
The best advice I would give would be to shadow someone. Phys. Med, OT/ PT, and PA/NP do very different roles on a day in day out basis. They get confusing when you just talk about what each one does, but when you actually see what they do, you'll be able to differentiate who does what and why certain people do certain things.... confusing, but "I think" good advice. Good luck to you!
:smuggrin:
 
I'm still questioning, however, why PAs are utilized over PTs in a setting working with MSK disorders (excluding your setting).

I think you are confusing the roles of PAs and PTs here. PAs are certainly not being utilized "over" PTs for MSK patients.

The PA works as an extender, in the physician’s office. They are working under the direct supervision (supposedly, anyway) of an MD/DO, with a similar scope of practice (medicine). This allows the physician, in effect, to be in multiple places at once. See more patients. Be more productive and cost-effective.

The PT/OT is working in parallel with the physician, as an independent entity, with a different scope of practice (therapy). Like a physician, therapists rely on referrals and “direct access” to get their patients. Because of Stark laws, physicians as a rule don’t hire PT/OTs – since a physician referring patients to their employed therapists represents a financial conflict of interest.

From a gross oversimplification standpoint, think of it as PA:MD::pTA:pT.
 
Do physical therapists need physiatrist input on a treatment plan? I've worked in both skilled rehab and outpatient pain management/ortho clinics over the last 10 years and the referrals have always been general. Do what you do kind of a thing. And I'm good at my job, get results. The docs where I currently work are busy. They sign the scripts for whatever we request i.e. orthotics. They sign whatever nsg requests as well for the most part. Also, I understand the context of OT, SP. It's not hard to grasp. I'm elbow-to-elbow with em every day. At a skilled facility we collaborate weekly re: the entire pt caseload. Learn it right there, I mean come on.

Our MD's furnish medical clearance. They need to. There is a huge disparity of expertise in all therapies here. It's not a bell curve. A lot of therapists have a poor understanding of nonm/s issues. I'm a DPT, and my training in medical management was good in an introductory sort of way, which isn't good. And it was mostly textbook, not clinical. Can't learn that way. We just don't do it. I picked stuff up, and am better than average for a PT from some OJT and genuine interest. Had referrals for back pain that I caught as visceral, had prospective total hip surgical candidates get painfree from finding the SI jt culprit. If I had to order dx testing, I'd probably go overboard with some tests, and not use a barrage of other vital tests. Haven't been exposed to it. I'm not good with tools - probably one of the worst dissectors in anatomy lab, can honestly say I doubt myself re: procedures. And you don't want me prescribing or reconciling your meds.

I just read a post above stating PT's implement a treatment plan prescribed by the physician. I've never had a physician prescribe what I do unless it's an ortho i.e. furnishing restrictions re: a surgical site. I say that without emotion on the subject, I'm not offended or am attempting to offend. When we receive a script template with a bunch of tx boxes checked off, it enables us to bill for that service if we choose to use it. And if we want to use something else, we have to send another order and it gets signed. The only exception I can think of right offhand is a referral from a cardiologist re: e-stim in a pt with a pacemaker or just a script for a TENS unit and that's it. You get that, you do it. The pt came to you specifically for that one thing. But that's very rare, not even once every six months. Usually we'll recomm the TENS.

The reason this is approp, we know the pt inside/out. At a skilled facility, I tx the same pt 1 hour/daily 5 days/week. I get to know what works, what doesn't. More time = more familiarity. And it's not like I don't know essentially all of the physical therapy tools available at my clinic at my disposal. I mean, what novel input could you provide re: overlooked interventions after we've logged in 100 treatment hours?
 
Last edited:
Re: advent of the doctorate. There are numerous reasons, some better than others. I feel it's strategic vs chiropractors. Our lobbyists go at it. Chiropractors can advertise they deliver "physiotherapy", now we have the doctorate and direct access. I don't think PT's should have direct access - unless we start doing rounds. And chiropractors sure the hell shouldn't. The problem is conseq friction with the real medical community. But look at nsg. They have a doctorate now too. Every profession works together - while their lobbyists fight for territory. ATC's and PTA's go at it. Anyway, I have direct access but here's the thing. Most insurance companies won't pay for physical therapy without a script from a referring m.d. And when/if they do pay for it right out-the-gate, we may run the risk of repeating hx when the DO started re: litigation. But chiropractors do boast their low malpractice coverate rates, so we'll see.
 
Babysitting? Poor analogy. As I mentioned before, physical therapists are basically autonomous. Stating physical therapists "do exactly what the prescribing physician tells them what to do". Maybe in 1970. I've never had a physiatrist review/revise the physical therapy plan of care. Ever. Why, because I "just didn't think of something that I should have been doing". You're an attending, been in medical school now finishing residency. I've done my specific job for 10 years, including director of rehabilitation services at one of the largest skilled rehab facilities in the midwest. I'm no dummy. Neither are the people I work with. What I'm stating is you learn a job by doing a job. Objectively, no one babysits me. Therapy department meetings revolve around budget, billing, documentation, staffing, patient discharge plans: are they safe to go home. We never talk about "I really wonder if this patient should see the physiatrist, I'm really lost here". Never heard it once. Seriously, never. We contact the referring m.d. when needed i.e. vitals are not within acceptable parameters despite activity grading or if the pt doesn't appear medically stable. What we're getting is medical clearance, the kind that gets a pt discharged from a hosp to skilled rehab or home with home health when indicated in the first place. Do you know who makes discharge recommendations? Lets see, we do the home safety assessment, the cognitive workups, work with the patient in various environments and situations performing all the mobility and adl tasks at least 5 hours/week per discipline x 3 disciplines. You should be glad we do it. You'll be busy. You'll be doing other stuff we don't do. Babysitting? Sounds to me you're hung up on the m.d. title, not in the real world yet. I'm tired, better call my physiatrist. I need tucked in with a good night story book.
 
Last edited:
I think they meant babysit the patients on the acute rehab floor, not babysit the therapists... just my 2 cents...

Also, in residency, I have actually learned a lot from the therapists... so thanks
 
Babysitting? Poor analogy. As I mentioned before, physical therapists are basically autonomous. Stating physical therapists "do exactly what the prescribing physician tells them what to do". Maybe in 1970. I've never had a physiatrist review/revise the physical therapy plan of care. Ever. Why, because I "just didn't think of something that I should have been doing". You're an attending, been in medical school now finishing residency. I've done my specific job for 10 years, including director of rehabilitation services at one of the largest skilled rehab facilities in the midwest. I'm no dummy. Neither are the people I work with. What I'm stating is you learn a job by doing a job. Objectively, no one babysits me. Therapy department meetings revolve around budget, billing, documentation, staffing, patient discharge plans: are they safe to go home. We never talk about "I really wonder if this patient should see the physiatrist, I'm really lost here". Never heard it once. Seriously, never. We contact the referring m.d. when needed i.e. vitals are not within acceptable parameters despite activity grading or if the pt doesn't appear medically stable. What we're getting is medical clearance, the kind that gets a pt discharged from a hosp to skilled rehab or home with home health when indicated in the first place. Do you know who makes discharge recommendations? Lets see, we do the home safety assessment, the cognitive workups, work with the patient in various environments and situations performing all the mobility and adl tasks at least 5 hours/week per discipline x 3 disciplines. You should be glad we do it. You'll be busy. You'll be doing other stuff we don't do. Babysitting? Sounds to me you're hung up on the m.d. title, not in the real world yet. I'm tired, better call my physiatrist. I need tucked in with a good night story book.

"Babysitting" in the physiatrist arena refers to us watching patients on the rehab floor. No one means it toward the therapists. Most inpt rehab patients (at least historically) have been medically stable, and our job is to legally supervise their rehab stay. They need inpt rehab because they can't go home and function by themselves or with the available help. Insurance will only pay for inpt stay if it is "medically neccesary" and requires MD supervision. So we all play along and supervise the pts.

As insurance forces come more in to play, rehab pts are sicker now than they were in the stone ages when I was a resident. We'd watch for decubiti and DVTs and adjust coumadin doses while watching I's and O's. Mostly we documented and wrote at the end of every daily note "Continue present plan of care" or some variation. It's generally not very difficult or taxing work. So we say we are babysitting the pts.

As for therapists, physiatrists are taught at an early age that a script that says "PT: eval and Tx" is not a use of our training. PCPs, rheumatologists, orthos write that. We are taught to figure out what the problem is and how specifically PT, OT or whatever can help, and write specific orders. Some physiatrists then get out after residency and get lazy and just write "EVal and Tx." Their attendings would be ashamed of them.

I have the benefit of our large group have a large PT & OT dept, with many protocols, so for many conditions, I just mark a box. For others, though, I'll still spell out what I'd like done. If the pt and therapist want to deviate from that, try other things, I'm usually open to it.

I'll sign most of the stuff the therapists send me, as long as it's reasonable. We've all seen things we don't agree with and won't sign off on. Smart PTs, just like smart docs, know what they know and what they don't know and can quickly decide when something is out of their scope of practice.
 
"Babysitting" in the physiatrist arena refers to us watching patients on the rehab floor. No one means it toward the therapists.
I reread your post. Thats the way I read it, toward midlevels. I do appreciate your time re: clarification.

Most inpt rehab patients (at least historically) have been medically stable, and our job is to legally supervise their rehab stay. They need inpt rehab because they can't go home and function by themselves or with the available help. Insurance will only pay for inpt stay if it is "medically neccesary" and requires MD supervision. So we all play along and supervise the pts.
This level of explanation is not needed.

As insurance forces come more in to play, rehab pts are sicker now than they were in the stone ages when I was a resident. We'd watch for decubiti and DVTs and adjust coumadin doses while watching I's and O's. Mostly we documented and wrote at the end of every daily note "Continue present plan of care" or some variation. It's generally not very difficult or taxing work. So we say we are babysitting the pts.
It's just the way I misinterpreted your remark.

As for therapists, physiatrists are taught at an early age that a script that says "PT: eval and Tx" is not a use of our training. PCPs, rheumatologists, orthos write that. We are taught to figure out what the problem is and how specifically PT, OT or whatever can help, and write specific orders. Some physiatrists then get out after residency and get lazy and just write "EVal and Tx." Their attendings would be ashamed of them.
The question is, do therapists need this level of delegation. I went through school, did multiple rotations. Have had 3 full-time jobs in 10 years all with patient care including 2 managerial roles. I've never collaborated with a physiatrist. To be honest, most physician contact is less than 5 minutes long and thats the way they like it. Meat and potatoes. Do physiatrists operate only in hosp settings? Thats the only setting I haven't worked post-grad. I did a clinical rotation in a hosp as a student, no physiatrist exposure then also. I'm genuinely curious.

I have the benefit of our large group have a large PT & OT dept, with many protocols, so for many conditions, I just mark a box. For others, though, I'll still spell out what I'd like done. If the pt and therapist want to deviate from that, try other things, I'm usually open to it.
Protocols remove critical thinking. Do what the patient needs. I know you would agree with this.

We've all seen things we don't agree with and won't sign off on.
Can you think of an example. I mean this earnestly. I can't think of any orders that I request that are not signed.

Thanks for your time!
 
I reread your post. Thats the way I read it, toward midlevels. I do appreciate your time re: clarification.


This level of explanation is not needed.


It's just the way I misinterpreted your remark.


The question is, do therapists need this level of delegation. I went through school, did multiple rotations. Have had 3 full-time jobs in 10 years all with patient care including 2 managerial roles. I've never collaborated with a physiatrist. To be honest, most physician contact is less than 5 minutes long and thats the way they like it. Meat and potatoes. Do physiatrists operate only in hosp settings? Thats the only setting I haven't worked post-grad. I did a clinical rotation in a hosp as a student, no physiatrist exposure then also. I'm genuinely curious.


Protocols remove critical thinking. Do what the patient needs. I know you would agree with this.


Can you think of an example. I mean this earnestly. I can't think of any orders that I request that are not signed.

Thanks for your time!

Protocols are like templates - give you something to start with so you are not writing and/or typing the same thing over and over. All EMRs use them. They make life easier. If you use cookie-cutter medicine, you'll fail, we all know that. Every pt is an individual. That's why we docs see pts, take a Hx, do a PE, make a diagnosis, and then recommend or offer treatments, which may include PT or OT. You likely do similar.

If you don't want my input as a specialist in the field of medicine with (arguably) the best MSK diagnostic and therapeutic skills as to what I would recommend you do as a therapist, far be it from me to convince you. If your skill set is such that a vague Dx provided only for insurance purposes, such as "lumbago", is all you want so that you can treat however you want, go ahead.

If I wrote on a script I wanted the pt to try ASTYM for chronic epicondylitis, would that be an affront to your dignity? Or if I recommended iontophoresis? Or if I just asked you to work with the pt to develop a HEP? The fact that I have an excellent working knowledge of the abilities and limitations of therapists should be seen as a bonus to you, and an asset, not a denigration. What I've encountered periodically, though, is therapists who don't want the doctor's input, just "Eval & Tx." Maybe it's because they've never worked with anyone who can appreciate all that a therapist can do.

The therapists who work in our clinic, and I don't have anything to sdo with their hiring or recruitment, appear to genuinely appreciate my expertise and guidance. I appreciate their skills and education. Most of the orthos here only have a vague working knowledge of what the therapists do. The hand surgeons probably have the best working knowledge. After hand surgery, they write very specific orders to be carried out only by CHTs. I would hope you would be willing to work under such constraints and not do whatever you see fit for the pt.

I want my patients to have active therapy, not passive modalities that help them to feel better for 30 - 120 minutes. I would hope you do also. But so many pts that go to PT without a specific dx, end up with just that, and it burns up valuable insurance limits on PT.

Examples of things I won't sign off on - traction for an osteoporotic pt who has severe cervical stenosis (2 weeks ago). Continuation of PT after 2 months and no significant improvement in function, just the pt saying he feels better for a while after PT (last week). Iontophoresis on a patient who just had a steroid injection to the same area (about 3 months ago).

During my residency, we'd go down to the PT gym and study how the therapists worked with different disabilities and conditions. We learned how and why various modalities are used. I still do that when I can. The therapsis call me all the time, and I call them.

The whole goal, and I'm certainly not trying to educate you, but rather just voicing this, is to make the pt better, not to engage in a battle of wills over who decides what treatment the pt gets. Everything I write down or verbalize to a patient is just a suggestion as I see it. I can't make anyone do anything. But if I think that a certain treatment is the thing most likely to help someone, I'm going to recommend it. What they and/or you do with is free will. I am here to provide information and expertise.

There are no doubt therapists who are perfectly happy working with a small range of diagnoses with plenty of protocols to lead them, just as there are those who want complete autonomy and direct patient access. Most are likely in the middle. Some work directly for docs and are happy. Others want PTs and MDs permanently dissociated and are trying to enforce it by making laws.
 
Husker DPT – Given your lack of physiatry exposure, I respect the way you practice. To answer some of your questions, physiatrists work in all kinds of settings, not just hospitals. Inpatient, outpatient, private, academic, group, solo. Neurorehab, neuromuscular, pain, sports, spine, peds, general. Much like the diversity or subspecialty focus that can be developed with a PT practice. Physiatrists are trained to think how our treatment plan will affect function, and that thought process is generally reflected on our therapy prescriptions. When a physician (physiatrist or otherwise) writes “eval and Rx”, they completely abdicate thinking and that component of care to the therapist. Which, truth be told, for some physicians (and for the good of their patients) this may not be the worst thing in the world. :smuggrin:

I think you’d like collaborating with a physiatrist, you should try it sometime. :D We gain an in-depth working knowledge of functional anatomy, pathophysiology, and biomechanics, and use this to guide treatment. As a physiatrist, I like to think when I prescribe therapy, it becomes a team effort. I make initial recs… the therapist might think a different approach may be better… I’ll agree or disagree for the following reasons… And so on. I’ll manage pain medications so a patient can tolerate therapy. I’ll order appropriate diagnostic tests to better guide therapy. And I’ll do all of this in the context of whatever other medicolegopsychosocial problems are going on. I will often liaison between a primary service and therapists at the therapists’ request. Bridge the medical and functional knowledge gap if you will. I have a vested interest in improving my patient’s function. As do you. Hopefully we’re on the same page.

Communication is key. It’s easy to communicate with our therapists within our institution, dropping down to the gym or shooting off an email is a simple enough thing to do. I learn much from them, and them from me. Communicating with outside therapists is another matter. My initial communication is through my detailed Rx. Diagnosis, precautions, goals, modality and exercise suggestions, equipment recs, etc. I distinctly remember starting off in practice, and writing one of my first PT Rx’s to an outside therapist. He called me a few days later to comment that mine was one of the best prescriptions he’d ever seen. Said he liked the way I thought. Confided that he’d never worked with a physiatrist either (surprising considering the saturation level where I practice). Whether it was an initial marketing ploy or not, who knows? Who cares? I continue to send him patients, we continue to collaborate, our knowledge base grows, and our patients get better.

But if a therapist goes and disregards my recs, ignores my precautions, simply slaps on a hot pack, and fails to initiate any reasonable functional restoration program, then sends me paperwork asking to renew therapy for another 4 weeks – I won’t sign off, and rest assured that I won’t be sending any more of my patients to him/her. Most therapy plans are fine and appropriate, but - just like there are some incompetent or unscrupulous doctors – there are similar therapists. I’d like to see the patient/therapist give a good, honest effort before I document that they “failed conservative management”. Over the years, I’ve gotten into the habit of reading and thinking about what I’m about to endorse with my signature. Maybe I’m funny that way.
 
If you don't want my input as a specialist in the field of medicine with (arguably) the best MSK diagnostic and therapeutic skills as to what I would recommend you do as a therapist, far be it from me to convince you. If your skill set is such that a vague Dx provided only for insurance purposes, such as "lumbago", is all you want so that you can treat however you want, go ahead.
Due to apparent miscommunication, I'll keep it simple. I have never had physiatrist input. Not saying good, not bad. Is it necessary? Do you work in a hospital? Why haven't I ever experienced an encounter with a physiatrist? How mainstream is this relationship?
If I wrote on a script I wanted the pt to try ASTYM for chronic epicondylitis, would that be an affront to your dignity?
No. My point is, it's not novel.
Or if I recommended iontophoresis?
We've had reimbursement issues there. My particular clinic won't use it anymore. I've used it quite a bit in the past.
Or if I just asked you to work with the pt to develop a HEP?
Would you have to ask? Take any list of interventions for ms pathologies, go to a PT Blog and inquire about these as you have above. What you'll receive is a comprehesive list of the research on these treatments, more than you can imagine. We've catalogued this stuff according to efficacy. Not every therapist is motivated enough to use their free time and rely on CEU's for this information. I don't know, I'm trying to see this from your perspective, mine, the patients. I'm genuinely curious, is your request for a HEP necessary? Are therapists not thinking of this on their own? I mean this without hostility, it looks like you're describing what a PT does with a PTA. It must be necessary I am sure if the profession got rollin. I would be very interested in the history of this specialty and what catalyzed it.
The fact that I have an excellent working knowledge of the abilities and limitations of therapists should be seen as a bonus to you, and an asset, not a denigration.
Just reread my above posts. That's not my stance. I don't want to argue. I read blogs to learn.
What I've encountered periodically, though, is therapists who don't want the doctor's input, just "Eval & Tx." Maybe it's because they've never worked with anyone who can appreciate all that a therapist can do.
I sincerely appreciate that. I feel I can speak for most therapists, input is invaluable. It's best for the patient hands down. In my particular situation, we work with nsg and NP for medical issues. Not saying good, bad. I work at a large rehab facility. Do I think we need a physiatrist: I don't know, never worked with one. We do a great job now I can attest to that from personal experience. Well, I won't go into the rest of the post too much further. My intent was not a defensive/offensive posturing. I'm very curious if physiatrists primarily work in hosp settings and that's why I've never been exposed to this relationship.
 
Last edited:
Ludicolo. Thanks for that reply. I was actually thinking of finding a physiatrist within my region to engage in a relationship i.e. following him/her for a day or something to get some exposure. It's my field, I feel I should know something about it. I agree with you on your perspective re: failed conservative management. There is a lot of 'camps' in physical therapy. Low back pain for example. You have directional preference, abdominal stabilization with at least 3 separate philosophies to the optimal approach, mobs, manips, modals...I'm not trying to impress you with this list so I'll stop but you get the point. A patient may receive hot packs and hammy stretches and lets call it good he needs surgery. That's far from evidence based practice.
 
If I wrote on a script I wanted the pt to try ASTYM for chronic epicondylitis...

Interesting example. Was this tried on the patient you described in the Case Discussions forum?
 
Thank you for all the replies. Everyone is busy, especially a resident in medical school. As I did mention, I use blogs to learn and your comments are all helpful. In my role, I have to conduct marketing lunch n learns. It has occurred to me to add physiatry to the list. If physiatrists are not affiliated with a particular SNF, that looks like a viable referral source. Maybe we'll engage in more physician communication, I'll come right out of the gates with that as a statement of purpose. Any other ideas would be welcome!
 
Ludicolo. Thanks for that reply. I was actually thinking of finding a physiatrist within my region to engage in a relationship i.e. following him/her for a day or something to get some exposure. It's my field, I feel I should know something about it. I agree with you on your perspective re: failed conservative management. There is a lot of 'camps' in physical therapy. Low back pain for example. You have directional preference, abdominal stabilization with at least 3 separate philosophies to the optimal approach, mobs, manips, modals...I'm not trying to impress you with this list so I'll stop but you get the point. A patient may receive hot packs and hammy stretches and lets call it good he needs surgery. That's far from evidence based practice.

Gosh, I leave this forum for a week, and actually see a good discussion!

Husker, DPT, You would be stunned how often I have a patient referred to me for "chronic LBP" who has had 12 weeks of "shake and bake" therapy, and was given a sheet of exercises for stabilization which included SITUPS! These are people who's surgeons are planning a 3 level fusion and the patient requests a 2nd opinion. You obviously are one of the good guys, and I personally would love to work in conjunction with you. There are some PT clinics in my area where they do NOT follow my orders, and like PMR MSK said, they do not get my referrals. I have been in practice for more than 10 years as well, and know what works and what doesn't. The best relationships I have are with PT's who have been in practice for a long time and are willing to learn new things. I have some great PT's who's shoulder programs have improved because of things I taught them (using a sports based scap stab program for elderly patients). They also continue to teach me lots of stuff. That is what makes the relationship good.
 
Interesting example. Was this tried on the patient you described in the Case Discussions forum?

yes, several months ago, worked for a while, pain came back
 
Thank you for the kind comments Roukie. And everyone. Appreciate the opportunity to post on this board. That shake n bake therapy. I know it. I've seen it. I don't know if it can be attributed to educational deficits, poor clinical rotation exposure, just plain laziness. It's out there. And we are seeing a change in approved insurance auth. for specific dx. If I can see a given procedure with DC 2 goals met in 8 visits, and the guy down the street requires 20 visits, the guy down the street will experience reimbursement denials.
 
Top