Sanman
O.G.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2000
- Messages
- 6,535
- Reaction score
- 10,869
I personally do not find the additional treatment resources at the VA to help with the dissatisfaction I feel about malingering. The resources are nice for other reasons, but the people who are malingering are not helped by the resources. They will utilize therapy, residential treatment, etc. not to attain a higher level of function, but to get documentation of how sick and dysfunctional they are. Not being the one responsible for service connection determinations does not really make this malingering easier to bear. In fact, it is more galling. Perhaps I ended up unlucky with my patient panel and have a larger proportion of patients who are not interested in improvement, which means that I have fewer opportunities to feel satisfied about the plentiful resources for patients who want to get better.
Obviously, I’m still at the VA, meaning that I’ve determined that the pros outweigh the cons for now. However, very independent and entrepreneurial people would not do well at the VA, because the inefficiencies and the malingering would be much more painful to them.
I would add that the clinical record can be used as a part of C&P evaluations, and can also come up in medicolegal cases outside VA. When VA clinicians then state that a patient has a certain condition, and particularly if that diagnostic decision arises from a relatively poor evaluation and/or out of a desire to advocate for the patient (or not wanting to upset them by telling them they don't have PTSD/dementia/etc.), that very well can contribute to financial payouts.
I'd also say that the readily available resources at VA can lead to resource overutilization. The treating provider sees that what they're doing "isn't working," so they refer to all sorts of other services that also eventually find their interventions don't work, which in situations that don't involve outright malingering can induce very real iatrogenesis.
Edit to add that the above, in my experience, applied to a minority of patients at VA, but it was a sizable minority (and varied by service). Most patients were great
RE: CPRS, I may be in the minority, but I actually liked it once I got used to it. But I also grew up with DOS and Windows 3.0.
Alllll that said, there are definitely worse places to work than VA; it has its perks, it just may have a shelf life for many doctors.
I definitely agree about the malingering and the "what can I get for free" culture of some patients that often breeds non-compliance. That said, from a mental health perspective it balances out compared to some of the insurance shenanigans I have also dealt with on the outside. These problems tend to come up less in other specialties because of the lack of concrete work-ups (bloodwork, imaging, etc). That said, things like low SES also are less of an issue with mental health as many folks with more severe forms of mental illness fall into the same low SES background. It won't compare to a cash PP or a higher SES clientele, but I find it to be one of the best places to be employed if you want to work with a population that is historically low on resources.
The one thing I will say is that telehealth at the VA has been much easier to implement and one of the reasons I have chosen to stay here longer than expected.