I'm new on here and also new with pursuing pharmacy. I currently work as a pharmacy technician. I'll be returning back to school in the fall to take trigonometry and intro chemistry. I can't afford to do school full-time during the first three semesters because I do need to work atleast 32-35 hours a week for about 6 months. Is it frowned upon for not being a full time student by pharmacy schools admission during your entire pre pharmacy course work?
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Working full-time while pre-pharmacy
Started by RPhT2RPh
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I'm new on here and also new with pursuing pharmacy. I currently work as a pharmacy technician. I'll be returning back to school in the fall to take trigonometry and intro chemistry. I can't afford to do school full-time during the first three semesters because I do need to work atleast 32-35 hours a week for about 6 months. Is it frowned upon for not being a full time student by pharmacy schools admission during your entire pre pharmacy course work?
FROWNED upon? Heck no. Particularly if you get really good grades. I mean, think about it... If you're deciding between two applicants, and one of them not only accomplished the pre-requisite coursework well, but did it while having other significant draws on his/her time, wouldn't you give the nod to the one who has proven can handle the rigor? I mean, sure, the other student MIGHT be able to... but there is absolutely, positively no way to argue around the fact that your work is subtracting 32-35 hours of concrete time from your schedule.
I think that even in a situation with less than stellar grades (Say you got Bs instead of As b/c of work) it is absolutely fine. Finding time to work to support a family and better your education at the same time is a value at the core of what it means to me to be an American.
So yeah in short... there's no palpable disadvantage, IMO, to working while doing the pre-requisites except for, well, having less time to spend with the subjects, etc. But that's a personal thing. From an admissions standpoint it'll be A-OK.
FROWNED upon? Heck no. Particularly if you get really good grades. I mean, think about it... If you're deciding between two applicants, and one of them not only accomplished the pre-requisite coursework well, but did it while having other significant draws on his/her time, wouldn't you give the nod to the one who has proven can handle the rigor? I mean, sure, the other student MIGHT be able to... but there is absolutely, positively no way to argue around the fact that your work is subtracting 32-35 hours of concrete time from your schedule.
I think that even in a situation with less than stellar grades (Say you got Bs instead of As b/c of work) it is absolutely fine. Finding time to work to support a family and better your education at the same time is a value at the core of what it means to me to be an American.
So yeah in short... there's no palpable disadvantage, IMO, to working while doing the pre-requisites except for, well, having less time to spend with the subjects, etc. But that's a personal thing. From an admissions standpoint it'll be A-OK.
You should run for office
You should run for office![]()
Ha ha ha. 😎
No thanks, I don't like compromising my values and ideals to appease special interest lobbyists.
Or follow your wife to LS. I'm sure you can get a few people off the hook in a courtroom. 😀You should run for office![]()
Or follow your wife to LS. I'm sure you can get a few people off the hook in a courtroom. 😀
Frankly, the LSAT scares me.