• The site has been updated!

    If you see any bugs, please report them in this thread.

Other WSJ: The Key to Reducing Doctors’ Misdiagnoses

Lawpy

30% Full Member
7+ Year Member
SDN Ambassador
Jun 17, 2014
56,041
146,655
326
Replacement Chat
forums.studentdoctor.net
From the Wall Street Journal: Healthcare Report

HE-AA421A_DIAGN_9U_20170908185106.jpg
 

Lucca

Will Walk Rope for Sandwich
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
7+ Year Member
Oct 22, 2013
8,562
19,684
526
City of the Future
Status (Visible)
  1. MD/PhD Student
The article focuses on technology and its role in improving care and reducing errors, which makes sense given that WSJ is a business journal, but one of the physicians quoted makes a passing reference to "learning healthcare systems" which are a very interesting topic on their own and, arguably, more immediately beneficial as a concept to healthcare as a whole than AI barely being piloted at a small number of hospitals.

Not enough time to go into the whole topic now, but in 2012 the Institute of Medicine (one of the National Academies) released a consensus report on revamping the healthcare system to become a "learning" system. Here's a link to a summary of the recommendations:

http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report Files/2012/Best-Care/Best Care at Lower Cost_Recs.pdf


Most importantly, it should be emphasized that a core part is fundamentally changing the way we handle clinical data which is currently treated as a private asset held by hospitals and insurers in order to obtain a competitive advantage but when made free and open allows for easier, faster information exchange leading to faster, broader consensus and faster scientific innovation/generation of knowledge. To an extent this kind of system already exists in a form in pediatriatic oncology's consortium model of scientific collaboration.
 
Last edited:
About the Ads
This thread is more than 3 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.