Well, in regard to the responses, yes, I am upset. But that was the point right? How are students feeling about the school? But I got to make my say, so I feel a lot better. I'll make a few quick comment, and I'll stop stirring up this thread.
1. I'm not quite sure what is meant by the course not being approved. It has been, 4th year class has started the new curriculum, and you can find more info at:
http://www.upstate.edu/courseware/casestudy/ms4/ms4instruct/
2. I do not know how the new advisory thing works for real. No one does, it was implemented starting this year, so we'll find out in a year's time. My guess is, they can't legally force you to apply, but I suspect they'll write that you ignored their counsel on the Dean's letter. My bet is, that's not going to sit well with the residency directors.
I'm gonna leave you with this message, sent by the president of the 4th year class to students of all years, president of upstate, all the deans, the course directors, and pretty much everyone. I'd figure I let you hear from someone else's voice.
Dear All,
The Class of 2011 recently raised concerns over the construction of a new
MLC-III curriculum that we felt would detract from our fourth year
internships and thereby interfere with our ability to match into competitive
residencies. While changes were eventually made (albeit 87.8% of 124
student respondents to an online survery are still unhappy about the current
MLC-III curriculum), the Class of 2011 realized that no objective process
exists for students to voice their concerns. Student dissatisfaction with
faculty response to their concerns was highlighted in the recent LCME
survey, and was highlighted again for our class, with 92.6% of the 124
respondents being unhappy with how the faculty responded to our concerns
with MLC-III. We have exhausted all channels available to students, and at
the end realize that none of them were objective, and that none of them took
into account the motto "Students First", which was adopted shortly after our
class started school at Upstate. 79% of those respondents now believe it
wise to abstain from interviewing medical student candidates for the Class
of 2015 because of the inability of the faculty to objectively respond to
student concerns. We consider this action a positive influence on our
school, as it highlights a problem that, if addressed, will enable the
faculty to work hand in hand with students towards common goals. If an
objective process is created, and if our concerns about MLC-III are viewed
in this light, then the Class of 2011 will gladly return to interviewing
students. Importantly, we wish to make clear that all student support
measures, from tutoring/mentoring underclassmen to supporting student
scholarships via the Alumni Foundation, will continue as before. We are
still grateful for our education at Upstate, and hope that this action
further enhances the student experience.
Sincerely,