And it's weak. The correlation with BS is higher. So, if one scores poorly on verbal, which isn't that uncommon, but does well on BS then there is hope. So, your condescending post was unneeded. This is coming from someone who got a 12 on verbal. I'm old (26) and have 30+ plus friends who are third or fourth year med students. At least 10 scored greater than 250 and had verbal scores of 8 or 9. And gasp, 7/10 of those students scored 32 or worse on the MCAT. The reality is that the MCAT is a great weeder exam. It doesn't determine what you can do in med school, provided you have certain ability. Whereas, everyone on this site assumes a 38 vs a 30 means the former is more qualified and will be a better doctor. From my experience, once you hit 30 you are good enough. So, in closing, your disparaging remark about UCSD interviewing individuals with low verbal indicates you know very little about who can or can't succeed. UCSD is an amazing school and if they interviewed these students then you can be sure that the admission's committee saw something in them that suggested that applicant's ability to succeed in medicine. I say this sitting here without an invite despite having an MCAT score worthy of an interview invite according to your view.