2014 billing update

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
We're going to at the very least need down pricing in cost of SCS leads in order for SCS in office to make any sense at all. What are the best lead prices people are getting at present? I've been able to get $250 per, but this was from someone who aggressively wanted to work with me. As of Jan 1, it's going to have to be significantly lower.

Any other thoughts on commercial payers continuing to pay for L-code in 2014? Do we have examples in the past for other modalities in which this was the case?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Update: 2014 Medicare IPM cuts


Trigger

20552- $53.08
- 4.88% vs 2013

20553- $61.24
-5.26% vs 2013


ESI

62310-$105.13
-58.24%

62311-$103.43
-51.20%


TF

64483-$214.00
-7.91%

64484-$85.06
-6.37%


C facets

64490-$186.45
-7.74%

64491-$91.52
-6.27%

64492-$92.20
-5.90


L facets

64493-$168.41
-7.82%

64494-$84.04
-6.08%

64495-$84.38
-6.06%


C RF

64633-$418.48
+.57%

64634-$189.
+.72%


L Rf

64635-$412.70
+1%

64636-$171.48
+1%

Kypho

22524- $7111
-11%


Stim leads

L code- $0
-100%

Stim CPT code

63650-lead 1, $1,281
Subsequent leads, $641
(An increase in CPT, minus 90% overall if L-code included)



Man, after reading this I think I might throw up. Does anyone have the confirmed numbers/ changes for ASC based professional fees by way of comparison?
 
If this is true, it will seriously affect all our practices.
I just started 10 weeks ago and was kind of getting excited. Practice is growing and am doing about 30-35 procedures a week.
See about 20-22 patients a day including 6-8 procedures a day. Slightly heavy medicare population but right now, Ill take what I can get

AND NOW THIS ... And my billed has just confirmed.

Wow, how did you get so busy 10 weeks into practice?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Wow, how did you get so busy 10 weeks into
Wow, how did you get so busy 10 weeks into practice?
Dunno..... Did marketing for about 2 months ... Started making appointments a month before I started. I made it a point to meet with each and every PCP in a 20 mile radius.

Read through each and every post on this board going back a few years. Honestly, this board has all the info you need, both clinical and practice management.... And followed all the advice that you guys have given us newbies. Can't THANK YOU guys enough. I can truly say that this board has played a huge role in helping setup my practice.
 
We're going to at the very least need down pricing in cost of SCS leads in order for SCS in office to make any sense at all. What are the best lead prices people are getting at present? I've been able to get $250 per, but this was from someone who aggressively wanted to work with me. As of Jan 1, it's going to have to be significantly lower.

Any other thoughts on commercial payers continuing to pay for L-code in 2014? Do we have examples in the past for other modalities in which this was the case?
That's a great deal. Which company?
 
Without revealing the names of the company, I think we can share the cost of the leads.

I am paying $350 per lead and the rep has already told me that they would have to drop the prices down further.
 
I want the the specific names of the committee members of the AMA RUC. How do we get this?? There has to be some accountability/transparency for this $hit. They should be required to have an open review by all the leading pain organizations and medical subspecialty organizations for that matter. They have WAY too much power and should be required to thoroughly explain the rationale behind their recommendations. Can we open a class action law suit?
 
Last edited:
I want the the specific names of the committee members of the AMA RUC. How do we get this?? There has to be some accountability/transparency for this $hit. They should be required to have an open review by all the leading pain organizations and medical subspecialty organizations for that matter. They have WAY too much power and should be required to thoroughly explain the rationale behind their recommendations. Can we open a class action law suit?

Here is a list of the current members on the RUC.

http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/rbrvs/ruc-members-current.pdf
 
AAPM&R assumes other organizations will take care of interventional. ASIPP and NANS are the two best organizations to defend stim.
 
I think the problem is that historically, CMS would usually accept the recommendations of the RUC.

That doesn't seem to be the case anymore.
 
I think the problem is that historically, CMS would usually accept the recommendations of the RUC.

That doesn't seem to be the case anymore.

No I think that IS the problem. The AMA has sold out to special interest groups to use their name as an endorsement. The AMA no longer receives a majority of its funding from physicians but rather from these interest groups and therefore has no reason to act in the best interest of the physicians its suppose to represent. I assume Stanley Stead MD is the one we can thank for the draconian cuts?

Here's the most likely guy who screwed us all! Want to get mad? Blame this bozo. Seriously, a CESI now pays the same as an ILESI. Whoever decided that has never done either in his/her life!!

http://stanleywstead.info/Stanley_W._Stead,_MD,_MBA/www.StanleyWStead.info.html
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
What do we do now... We do procedures that pay ... Push more towards facets.
We adapt.. Everyone gets a transforaminal from now on... I really wanted to practice ethically... Did not know that I would have to start playing the game this early..

Effing pissed right now...
 
The payors can see that some patients go to some doctors and get conservative treatment and report about the same numerical pain scores and customer satisfaction numbers or whatever as other patients with the exact same diagnoses going to other doctors who do all kinds of expensive procedures on everyone but then get the same "8-10/10" chronic pain results. That coupled with an aging population that's exploding, fewer people working (is there anyone over 20 in this country not looking for social security disability?), Obamacare, and other factors all lead to payment cuts.

No sense in getting mad. It's not personal. That money that you thought was gonna be there just isn't there and never will be.
 
emd says Kypho 22524- $7111, decreased -11%. Millie says it's been "slashed". Which one of you is right?


It went from 9000 to 5000. I consider that "slashed".
 
Last edited:
You can expect that for now, it takes time for them to catch up with Medicare. Think about TENS units, granted not the same price range but still an example. They shouldn't be touched for 2014 but of course no one knows for sure. My prediction is that they'll be adjusted for in 2015. As you know, you can and should continue to bill the L code out to commercials at your current rate. If they cut it, they cut it but they'll just reduce it in the adjustment and you'll find out on the next EOB. However, from what I know, and I was the first to mention the L code (several months ago) and caught a lot of slack for it (no apologies received just yet), commercials should remain steady for 2014. I could be wrong because anything could happen at any time but for now this is the way it's looking.


Obviously no one knows for sure but I give them 3-6 months to catch up. I agree to still bill L code to commercial but everyone needs to run their practices with the assumption that it is gone.
 
This is the first major shot fired in the war to rid our country of the private practice physician (which at one point was a stated goal of POTUS). The first step in the process is to get rid of the specialists. Remember, these cuts are affecting all specialties. PCPs are somewhat immune because they are not billing codes that are affected by the MEI (which is where most of the cuts are coming from). This will wipe out a lot of solo docs especially the ones who are not well run or unfortunately just starting. So far the plan is working. Make the docs create the language (ie meaningful use, etc.) that will ultimately be used against them. What will happen next?


Either

1) They will succeed. Private practice will go extinct. Docs will be hospital employed and the government will then be able to wield more influence over hospitals and the doctors.
-or-
2) There will be a massive "revolution" where a lot of docs stop seeing medicare and go to private pay models (hard for pain management).
-or-
3) Practices with lots of ancillaries will rule and will be highly sought after by both new docs and established docs (already happening).
-or-
4) Docs will head for the exit signs and retire.


No matter what the war has begun. Please position yourselves to avoid the kill shot. Now is not the time to be an ostrich. We need to wake up and all come up with a battleplan. Otherwise medicine as we know it will be disappear in 3-5 years.
 
No I think that IS the problem. The AMA has sold out to special interest groups to use their name as an endorsement. The AMA no longer receives a majority of its funding from physicians but rather from these interest groups and therefore has no reason to act in the best interest of the physicians its suppose to represent. I assume Stanley Stead MD is the one we can thank for the draconian cuts?

Here's the most likely guy who screwed us all! Want to get mad? Blame this bozo. Seriously, a CESI now pays the same as an ILESI. Whoever decided that has never done either in his/her life!!

http://stanleywstead.info/Stanley_W._Stead,_MD,_MBA/www.StanleyWStead.info.html

Wonderful, this guy is from my city...
 
This is the first major shot fired in the war to rid our country of the private practice physician (which at one point was a stated goal of POTUS). The first step in the process is to get rid of the specialists. Remember, these cuts are affecting all specialties. PCPs are somewhat immune because they are not billing codes that are affected by the MEI (which is where most of the cuts are coming from). This will wipe out a lot of solo docs especially the ones who are not well run or unfortunately just starting. So far the plan is working. Make the docs create the language (ie meaningful use, etc.) that will ultimately be used against them. What will happen next?


Either

1) They will succeed. Private practice will go extinct. Docs will be hospital employed and the government will then be able to wield more influence over hospitals and the doctors.
-or-
2) There will be a massive "revolution" where a lot of docs stop seeing medicare and go to private pay models (hard for pain management).
-or-
3) Practices with lots of ancillaries will rule and will be highly sought after by both new docs and established docs (already happening).
-or-
4) Docs will head for the exit signs and retire.


No matter what the war has begun. Please position yourselves to avoid the kill shot. Now is not the time to be an ostrich. We need to wake up and all come up with a battleplan. Otherwise medicine as we know it will be disappear in 3-5 years.


Easy for us to all think extreme, but I predict that what will happen next is a combination of your points 2 and 3.
 
Wonderful, this guy is from my city...

If that's the case, I would seriously contact Fishman and Dr Mahajan and all the other faculty at UC Davis and force this deuce to sit down and explain what just happened. Then lynch him ;)
 
Obviously no one knows for sure but I give them 3-6 months to catch up. I agree to still bill L code to commercial but everyone needs to run their practices with the assumption that it is gone.

I don't see how they can reduce just like that. Remember, you have a contract with them and they must be committed to their fee schedule to some degree at least until the contract expires. Unless they have a stipulation saying they can arbitrarily reduce their payments to you they will be in breach of contract.

Nonetheless, at this point, it's not looking like commercials will reduce their fees for the L code in 2014 but I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
 
I guess I am a racist as well... isn't that the next response from a clueless liberal.

some other "clueless" liberals:

Albert Einstein
George Washington
JFK
MLK
Linus Pauling
Susan B Anthony
Mark Twain
Warren Buffet
Steve Jobs



But hey, what do THEY know?
 
Remote historic comparisons are BS. JFK was about as liberal as Reagan. And are you referring to the George Washington who owned slaves or are we discussing someone else?

Here are the words of famous liberal Albert Einstein in 1949. Who agrees with his fantasy of a benevolent central government that brainwashes its citizens and efficiently manages the economy? He should have just stuck with math.

"I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate (the) grave evils (of capitalism), namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow-men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society."
 
I guess I am a racist as well... isn't that the next response from a clueless liberal.
Obviously my absurd comment was in response to your tiresome and equally absurd comments that "The Bogeyman" is responsible for all ills
in medicine. You either have a short memory or have not been around long enough to realize that neither the Left or the Right is a friend
to Physicians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I guess I am a racist as well... isn't that the next response from a clueless liberal.

just like a true conservative. change the topic of conversation to one delving into namecalling and nonsense.

lets redirect and focus, for once, on the thread and how it affects our livelihoods, not inane political mumbo jumbo.

anyone know anyone at ASIPP that can either give info or help us to organize, respond to this CMS (not like they will listen - they have not before to other IPM complaints).
 
Has anyone noticed that if you go to the actual CMS link on this final fee schedule, it says, "CY 2014 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule with Comment Period"

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeeSched/index.html

Does anyone know where the link is to comment?

Although I'm not super hopeful commenting will help, I think we should all comment, to let it be known how wrong it is for them to arbitrarily and drastically make cuts like they are, and if for no other reason, to vent some steam at the source that caused this.

Also, as a member of ASIPP, I think it's completely unacceptable, that this CMS rule has been released for almost 2 weeks now and they are silent on this.

Where is ASIPP on this ???????????

I've gotten 4 or 5 emails from ASIPP this week: one about ASIPP news, one about a webinar, one about the meeting in April, one about the Cigna policy, but not one about the final Medicare fee schedule, and whether or not epidurals are cut 58%, L code cut 100% (confirmed now by the device companies) and whether or not the rest
of our procedures are also slashed 4-8% (accept for 1 which stays the same: RF).

How come I was able to get a leaked CMS fee schedule, but 12 days have gone by and they can neither confirm nor deny it?

Where
Is the leadership?

The silence is deafening.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Why are we all not on the phone calling these dipwads that make up the AMA RUC. I am taking the week of Christmas off and will be making personal phone calls and writing letters to ASIPP, ISIS, RUC members and anyone else who will listen. Is this a waste of energy? Are emd and myself the only ones ready to stage a coup? I've got 30 more years of this $hit. Oh how I wish I were closer retirement.
 
According to a post I read on the path forum (see "CAP webinar"), this may have had nothing to do with the RUC. Apparently there is a section of the ACA that allows CMS to make these RVU changes without consulting the the RUC. I have not investigated to confirm any of this.
 
According to a post I read on the path forum (see "CAP webinar"), this may have had nothing to do with the RUC. Apparently there is a section of the ACA that allows CMS to make these RVU changes without consulting the the RUC. I have not investigated to confirm any of this.
Not to beat a dead horse, but where the hell are ANY of our professional societies? All of a sudden everyone's head is in the sand...
 
It's official. ASIPP has confirmed my numbers to the penny. These fees are final. They do not include any SGR cuts that will be reversed. In fact, if the SGR isn't fixed, they go down more. These are the final payments. Even fluoro guidance (spine) and new patient visits will go down.

http://www.asipp.org/documents/Physicians2014F.pdf

Buckle up.
 
Last edited:
just like a true conservative. change the topic of conversation to one delving into namecalling and nonsense.

lets redirect and focus, for once, on the thread and how it affects our livelihoods, not inane political mumbo jumbo.

anyone know anyone at ASIPP that can either give info or help us to organize, respond to this CMS (not like they will listen - they have not before to other IPM complaints).

redirect what? our field has been destroyed by medicare.... all insurance are tied to this reimbursement scheme. Obama gutted medicare and 15 advisory members decide where funds go. Congress can't even help us anymore due to ACA and 'cost cutting' by a handful of dirt ball physicians. You voted for this crap, so in the end I hope you progressives suffer the most. Anybody that voted for this administration is responsible for this mess.
 
And no actual statement from ASIPP, AAPM, etc? They just quietly post the fee schedule to the web page without even a mention of it on their home page? F**k them! Lets see if any of them get a penny from me ever again.
 
okay, i looked at the 3 proposed fee schedules, and it seems like what is being nerfed is the physician portion of procedures. of course, this kills office based proceduralists who are garnering global fees.

if you look at the ASC and the HOPD schedules, there is actually an increase in payment for them. for example, 64483 (lumbar/sacral transforaminal epidural injection)

physician payment non-facility down 7.9% (232.38 down to $214)
physician payment facility down 3.8% ($115 down to $110.57)

ASC up 16.6% ($317.46 up to $370.07).
HOPD up 18.4% ($669.9 up from $565.8)

they did get rid of add on levels for ASC and HOPD. it also looks like they tried to equalize all the injections for ASC/HOPD - ie $354 for almost all the peripheral nerve blocks.

office based procedures is trouble...

----------

fyi stim4u, the topic is the draconian cuts enacted by CMS. not pinning the blame on "progressives" or liberals.

got something meaningful to add?


didnt think so.
 
You think this has no influence from the Obumacare? Now Medicare care rates is about the same as Medicaid rates. You have no excuse to not see Medicaid patients! PPO will follow.
 
C'mon, there's gotta be something we can do?? We just gonna roll over and take it in the ass?
 
December 10, 2013


Dear Ligament :

Usually around this time we panic about sustainable growth rate (SGR) cuts which are scheduled to be 20% pay cut again unless congress fixes it temporarily or permanently. However, we have a much bigger problem this time.


As a Thanksgiving gift on November 27, 2013, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the 2014 final rules for physician payments as well as hospital outpatient and ambulatory surgical center payments the day before Thanksgiving. New rates will be effective January 1, 2014.

It is all about universal health care and administration attempts to go to single payor system with consolidation of hospital industry with elimination of physician practices. [thanks Obama supporters!!!!!!!!!]

  • This may put 40% of pain physicians out of practice
  • Reduce access to care
  • Increase Medicare expenses by $187 million.
It is an understatement to say that the cuts are draconian and it will be devastating. Unless we act upon the issue this may be the end of interventional pain management practice for almost 40% of the physicians who base majority of their practices out of office setting.

With these unforeseen reckless cuts, we have entered the perfect storm. We are no longer over the cliff, we are in deep waters. This is not an exaggeration. The cuts for physician payment for cervical and lumbar epidural injections in the office setting are 58 and 51% respectively and, and also significantly reduced in the ASC/Hospital as well 36 and 23 % respectively. This does not include the potential 20% SGR cuts. This will also likely shift care into more expensive sites of services setting, namely hospitals and ASC's and have devastating effects on physician reimbursement. This will further empower hospitals under Affordable (Obama) Care.

Recently we have been hit with multiple problems:

1.Noridian developed national local coverage determinations (LCDs) and threat of national coverage determinations (NCDs) with severe restrictions.
2. Cigna and other insurance coverage issues essentially are limiting interventional pain management either in duration or indications.
3. The usual threat of SGR cut of 20.1%.
4. ICD-10, RACs, OIG, single-dose vials, EHRS, and continuing expansion of HIPAA

5. Now the mother of all, physician payment final rule for 2014 with whopping cuts -- we are facing as high as 36% for physician payment and over 58% when the procedure is performed in an office for most commonly performed procedures - namely epidural injections (CPT 62310, 62311, 62318, and 62319). We are also facing some cuts for transforaminal epidural injections as well as facet joint interventions; however, these are much less compared to caudal or interlaminar epidural injections.

Essentially, hospitals will be reimbursed at $669.90 for the epidural procedure performed in the hospital setting; whereas, in office setting, after removing the portion designated for the physician professional fee, office practice expense will be reimbursed at $30.28 to $34.36 a whopping 2,315% to 2,668% with SGR cut and 1931% to 2312% without SGR cut more in the hospital setting.

Other cuts are related to spinal cord stimulators. When trials are performed in an office setting, starting January 1, 2014, there will also be a huge reduction in reimbursement approaching 60% for a single lead and 75% for a dual lead trial. While CMS will continue to reimburse under Medicare with CPT code 63650 and expected to be reported for each lead insertion procedure and trial, L8680 will no longer be reported for the device component. The new global payment in the office setting for 63650 has been reduced to $1,281.65 nationally. A 50% modifier will still be applied for a second lead in a dual lead trial.

In the proposed rule, as well as in the final rule CMS also has erroneously considered percutaneous adhesiolysis - 1 day (CPT 62264) similar to ambulatory surgery center (ASC) moving it from neurolytic blocks APC group to epidural and facet joint Ambulatory Payment Classification (APC) group reducing the payment to epidural levels in hospital as well as in ambulatory surgery center settings. For many hospitals this may be okay because these are performed in a small room, without all the expenses ASCs have to go through, but it continues to be devastating for offices and represents a significant disadvantage for ASCs.

Remember, this does not include the possible 20.1% cut expected for implementation of SGR.

Make no mistake - this will be followed by every carrier nationally.

This will again lead to explosion of pill mills

All of the details are provided in the fact sheet.

It is time to act now. If you do not act now, probably you will never have an opportunity to act later.

You are the best lobbyist for yourself and for IPM and your office is the lobby central. Immediately without wasting a single minute start advocacy on behalf of yourself, your patients, and your staff for the future of interventional pain management.

Based on the available information, as of now:


  • The RUC process showed decreased times, but did not involve all stakeholder physician groups. Even then, the AMA RUC recommended continuing the same payment schedule. (I.e. - these changes were made by CMS and not the RUC in large part.
Data was available in 2012, yet the proposed schedule in July did not include the proposed cuts.
Consequently, there was no comment period even though it is required.
  • Medicare has not taken into consideration Medicare Economic Index (MEI) which has been increasing substantially. Now the gap with SGR cuts will be 90% and without SGR cuts will be 70% between expenses and the revenue.
  • Medicare has not taken into consideration MedPAC concerns of a widening gap between hospitals and physician payments and specific recommendations for CMS to address these issues.
  • Hospitals have increased their payment by almost 20% for the same procedures, whereas in-office procedures are facing almost a 60% cut, with no change in operational expenses (and the threat of SDV causing increased costs of care
  • In fact, moving these procedures from in an office setting to hospital outpatient department (projected to move at least 80%), will increase the costs so substantially that the patient copay itself is 4 times higher than the entire payment in an office setting, and was equivalent to full payment with proposed rates.
    • In addition, the total costs of these procedures will increase based on 2011 statistics which showed 412,799 of 1,114,458 epidurals (only 2 codes 62310 and 62311) were performed in office setting in Medicare population. If 80% of these procedures (330,239) were performed in HOPD setting, the cost of these 2 procedures increased over $187 million per year considering the reimbursement in the proposed rule of $85-$105 per procedure
  • This may even lead to with kickback as hospitals receiving much higher facility payments and offering physicians occasionally a portion of these revenues, which will lead to troubles at a later date.
  • This change will also fuel pill mills with increasing deaths.
  • Consequently, we request Congress to act swiftly and decisively to request Medicare withdraw the proposed final rule for the family of codes 62310-62319 and allow the public time to comment, as required within the Medicare Integrity Manual, before implementing more reasonable changes in 2015.
Click here for 2014 Final Physician Fee Schedule.

We have set up Capwiz letters for physicians and patients. You should customize and describe your own situation in physician letters. Make sure each and every physician writes a letter. Even physicians who are not interventional pain physicians may write them

Capwiz Letter for Physicians

Capwiz Letter for Patients

You should customize and describe your own situation in physician letters. Make sure each and every physician writes a letter. Even physicians who are not interventional pain physicians may write them.

This should be followed by all your staff members, their relatives and friends.

Finally, the most important aspect is the access to care, so we have to get our patients involved as our partners in this survival journey. It is not just the patients, but their family members and their friends.

Please go to ASIPP Web site for more information on how to start your letter-writing campaign.

We need to work on this issue vigorously and with full force. Justice is on our side, interventional pain management is not experimental, it is essential and evidence-based. We have to protect the access to all Americans.

Fighting these issues cost significant money and funding this battle is essential. As you all know, ASIPP spends all its money on the business of preserving interventional pain management. Consequently, we request you to contribute liberally to Save IPM campaign (Save IPM fund).

Register for the Annual Meeting (brochure).Hopefully, issues will be resolved by then.

Thank you. Start acting immediately. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us.




Hans C. Hansen, MD

President, ASIPP

Medical Director

The Pain Relief Centers, LLC

224 Commerce St

Conover, NC 28613

Phone: (828) 261-0467

Fax: (828) 261-7293
[email protected]







Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, ASIPP

Medical Director, Pain Management Center of Paducah

Clinical Professor, Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine

University of Louisville, Kentucky

2831 Lone Oak Road

Paducah, KY 42003

Phone: 270-554-8373 ext. 101

Fax: 270-554-8987
[email protected]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Although I am usually too cynical to engage policymakers, I took the time to draft a letter:

Dear ____,

I am a board-certified pain physician who opened my own medical practice earlier this year in _____, seeking to fulfill a lifelong dream of serving an under-recognized and suffering patient population. It has been a long journey: 4 years of college, 4 years of medical school, 4 years of residency, and a year of fellowship. It was not easy. I used to work two full-time jobs, with nights spent on-call as a volunteer at a crisis hotline office because I could not afford rent, so that I could save enough money to afford the expensive medical school application process. Yet I graduated from medical school with over $250,000 in student debt. Working 80 hours/week as a resident and fellow for 5 years, half of my after-tax income was spent on student loan payments.

This August, after finally completing the training process, I opened _____, a medical office dedicated to the comprehensive treatment of chronic pain. It has been a tiring but rewarding process. I am able to offer my patients a range of advanced pain therapies, including epidural injections and spinal cord stimulation, which spare my patients the pain of intensive surgeries and the medical risks associated with long-term narcotic medication use. As an independent clinician, I am able to spend as much time with my patients as needed, free from administrators that force doctors in hospital-owned facilities to see X patients per hour, regardless of their patients' individual needs. Unnecessary spine surgery is also a large financial burden on our healthcare system and I believe that the services I provide often lead to significant cost savings.

I was dismayed to learn that CMS has instituted very large (over 50% in some cases) cuts in payments for these important pain treatments; changes that were not included in the July proposed schedule for 2014. When I started my practice, I understood that some changes might occur from year to year, but had no way of anticipating such a sudden and radical cut. It is simply not practical for me to make business plans or hire new employees when I am at risk for such unfair modifications to occur out of the blue. As a new physician in my community, my income is quite modest compared to most doctors. With this major cut, I am worried that I may not be able to sustain my new medical practice at all. We have a new baby at home and my family is concerned about this sudden economic uncertainty.

It is particularly insulting to see how little of a value is placed on the knowledge and technical expertise required to perform interventional spine procedures. For instance, cervical epidural steroid injections are procedures which require me to maneuver large needles within one or two millimeters from the spinal cord in the neck. In the wrong hands, such a procedure could paralyze and permanently disable a patient. But with my training, this procedure has helped my patients to safely remain at work and avoid risky and expensive spine surgery. Nevertheless, the 2014 proposed schedule has cut reimbursement for this procedure (CPT code 62310) by over 58%, to $105. For physicians who perform this procedure in a surgery center or hospital, the payment will be reduced to a mere $70. My patients pay more than this for a massage!

Adding insult to injury, and for reasons I simply do not comprehend, the same fee schedule increases payment for the same procedure to hospitals by 18%, from $566 to $670. In other words, if a cervical epidural injection is done in a medical office, CMS makes a single payment of just $105, but if the exact same procedure is done in a hospital, the cost to the government will be increased to a whopping $740 ($670 to the hospital and $70 to the physician)! I do not understand the rationale for incentivizing a more expensive way of providing the same service to Medicare patients. Hospital executives stand to profit handsomely at the expense of taxpayers and independent physicians. Ironically, if I am forced to close my practice, I will likely go to work for a hospital, where the same services I provide Medicare patients will now cost the government several times as much as they do now!

I do not believe that I am entitled to become rich at Medicare’s expense. I simply ask for fair compensation for work that requires certain expertise, and enough stability and predictability in payment trends that I am not in constant fear of an unexpected catastrophic change in my business revenue. As a small business owner, I don’t know how to plan for the future when such changes are made without warning or even an opportunity to comment in advance. As a doctor, I can’t promise my patients that I will continue to be available to help them manage their chronic health problems in the years to come. It is in the best interest of patients and taxpayers that costs be kept in check by reigning in spending on unnecessary hospital facility fees, rather than the physicians who are already paid much less for providing the actual medical service.

Sincerely,

_____
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Although I am usually too cynical to engage policymakers, I took the time to draft a letter:

Dear ____,

I am a board-certified pain physician who opened my own medical practice earlier this year in _____, seeking to fulfill a lifelong dream of serving an under-recognized and suffering patient population. It has been a long journey: 4 years of college, 4 years of medical school, 4 years of residency, and a year of fellowship. It was not easy. I used to work two full-time jobs, with nights spent on-call as a volunteer at a crisis hotline office because I could not afford rent, so that I could save enough money to afford the expensive medical school application process. Yet I graduated from medical school with over $250,000 in student debt. Working 80 hours/week as a resident and fellow for 5 years, half of my after-tax income was spent on student loan payments.

This August, after finally completing the training process, I opened _____, a medical office dedicated to the comprehensive treatment of chronic pain. It has been a tiring but rewarding process. I am able to offer my patients a range of advanced pain therapies, including epidural injections and spinal cord stimulation, which spare my patients the pain of intensive surgeries and the medical risks associated with long-term narcotic medication use. As an independent clinician, I am able to spend as much time with my patients as needed, free from administrators that force doctors in hospital-owned facilities to see X patients per hour, regardless of their patients' individual needs. Unnecessary spine surgery is also a large financial burden on our healthcare system and I believe that the services I provide often lead to significant cost savings.

I was dismayed to learn that CMS has instituted very large (over 50% in some cases) cuts in payments for these important pain treatments; changes that were not included in the July proposed schedule for 2014. When I started my practice, I understood that some changes might occur from year to year, but had no way of anticipating such a sudden and radical cut. It is simply not practical for me to make business plans or hire new employees when I am at risk for such unfair modifications to occur out of the blue. As a new physician in my community, my income is quite modest compared to most doctors. With this major cut, I am worried that I may not be able to sustain my new medical practice at all. We have a new baby at home and my family is concerned about this sudden economic uncertainty.

It is particularly insulting to see how little of a value is placed on the knowledge and technical expertise required to perform interventional spine procedures. For instance, cervical epidural steroid injections are procedures which require me to maneuver large needles within one or two millimeters from the spinal cord in the neck. In the wrong hands, such a procedure could paralyze and permanently disable a patient. But with my training, this procedure has helped my patients to safely remain at work and avoid risky and expensive spine surgery. Nevertheless, the 2014 proposed schedule has cut reimbursement for this procedure (CPT code 62310) by over 58%, to $105. For physicians who perform this procedure in a surgery center or hospital, the payment will be reduced to a mere $70. My patients pay more than this for a massage!

Adding insult to injury, and for reasons I simply do not comprehend, the same fee schedule increases payment for the same procedure to hospitals by 18%, from $566 to $670. In other words, if a cervical epidural injection is done in a medical office, CMS makes a single payment of just $105, but if the exact same procedure is done in a hospital, the cost to the government will be increased to a whopping $740 ($670 to the hospital and $70 to the physician)! I do not understand the rationale for incentivizing a more expensive way of providing the same service to Medicare patients. Hospital executives stand to profit handsomely at the expense of taxpayers and independent physicians. Ironically, if I am forced to close my practice, I will likely go to work for a hospital, where the same services I provide Medicare patients will now cost the government several times as much as they do now!

I do not believe that I am entitled to become rich at Medicare’s expense. I simply ask for fair compensation for work that requires certain expertise, and enough stability and predictability in payment trends that I am not in constant fear of an unexpected catastrophic change in my business revenue. As a small business owner, I don’t know how to plan for the future when such changes are made without warning or even an opportunity to comment in advance. As a doctor, I can’t promise my patients that I will continue to be available to help them manage their chronic health problems in the years to come. It is in the best interest of patients and taxpayers that costs be kept in check by reigning in spending on unnecessary hospital facility fees, rather than the physicians who are already paid much less for providing the actual medical service.

Sincerely,

_____
 
Or you could say.....I and many other docs have chosen reluctantly to opt out of medicare. Good luck............
 
Letters written to President Obama, Secretary Sebelius, my Congressman, my Senator, Senator Rand Paul, and multiple major news organizations (with my real name, course) by email and through the Capwiz letter linked by the ASIPP email.

This madness has to stop.

Why?

Most of all, it's bad for patients and will drastically limits access to care for senior citizens in pain, limits access to pain relieving procedures which are alternatives to narcotics, and as a result promotes worsening of the prescription opiate epidemic by promoting narcotic prescribing. It will also waste funds on expensive hospital based care which could have been used for further healthcare treatments for other patients.
 
Last edited:
Well said, well said. I wish I could compose something like this that was not seething with anger and my loathing of federal mishandling of all things healthcare....

Although I am usually too cynical to engage policymakers, I took the time to draft a letter:

Dear ____,

I am a board-certified pain physician who opened my own medical practice earlier this year in _____, seeking to fulfill a lifelong dream of serving an under-recognized and suffering patient population. It has been a long journey: 4 years of college, 4 years of medical school, 4 years of residency, and a year of fellowship. It was not easy. I used to work two full-time jobs, with nights spent on-call as a volunteer at a crisis hotline office because I could not afford rent, so that I could save enough money to afford the expensive medical school application process. Yet I graduated from medical school with over $250,000 in student debt. Working 80 hours/week as a resident and fellow for 5 years, half of my after-tax income was spent on student loan payments.

This August, after finally completing the training process, I opened _____, a medical office dedicated to the comprehensive treatment of chronic pain. It has been a tiring but rewarding process. I am able to offer my patients a range of advanced pain therapies, including epidural injections and spinal cord stimulation, which spare my patients the pain of intensive surgeries and the medical risks associated with long-term narcotic medication use. As an independent clinician, I am able to spend as much time with my patients as needed, free from administrators that force doctors in hospital-owned facilities to see X patients per hour, regardless of their patients' individual needs. Unnecessary spine surgery is also a large financial burden on our healthcare system and I believe that the services I provide often lead to significant cost savings.

I was dismayed to learn that CMS has instituted very large (over 50% in some cases) cuts in payments for these important pain treatments; changes that were not included in the July proposed schedule for 2014. When I started my practice, I understood that some changes might occur from year to year, but had no way of anticipating such a sudden and radical cut. It is simply not practical for me to make business plans or hire new employees when I am at risk for such unfair modifications to occur out of the blue. As a new physician in my community, my income is quite modest compared to most doctors. With this major cut, I am worried that I may not be able to sustain my new medical practice at all. We have a new baby at home and my family is concerned about this sudden economic uncertainty.

It is particularly insulting to see how little of a value is placed on the knowledge and technical expertise required to perform interventional spine procedures. For instance, cervical epidural steroid injections are procedures which require me to maneuver large needles within one or two millimeters from the spinal cord in the neck. In the wrong hands, such a procedure could paralyze and permanently disable a patient. But with my training, this procedure has helped my patients to safely remain at work and avoid risky and expensive spine surgery. Nevertheless, the 2014 proposed schedule has cut reimbursement for this procedure (CPT code 62310) by over 58%, to $105. For physicians who perform this procedure in a surgery center or hospital, the payment will be reduced to a mere $70. My patients pay more than this for a massage!

Adding insult to injury, and for reasons I simply do not comprehend, the same fee schedule increases payment for the same procedure to hospitals by 18%, from $566 to $670. In other words, if a cervical epidural injection is done in a medical office, CMS makes a single payment of just $105, but if the exact same procedure is done in a hospital, the cost to the government will be increased to a whopping $740 ($670 to the hospital and $70 to the physician)! I do not understand the rationale for incentivizing a more expensive way of providing the same service to Medicare patients. Hospital executives stand to profit handsomely at the expense of taxpayers and independent physicians. Ironically, if I am forced to close my practice, I will likely go to work for a hospital, where the same services I provide Medicare patients will now cost the government several times as much as they do now!

I do not believe that I am entitled to become rich at Medicare’s expense. I simply ask for fair compensation for work that requires certain expertise, and enough stability and predictability in payment trends that I am not in constant fear of an unexpected catastrophic change in my business revenue. As a small business owner, I don’t know how to plan for the future when such changes are made without warning or even an opportunity to comment in advance. As a doctor, I can’t promise my patients that I will continue to be available to help them manage their chronic health problems in the years to come. It is in the best interest of patients and taxpayers that costs be kept in check by reigning in spending on unnecessary hospital facility fees, rather than the physicians who are already paid much less for providing the actual medical service.

Sincerely,

_____
 
Letters written to President Obama, Secretary Sebelius, my Congressman, my Senator, Senator Rand Paul, and multiple major news organizations (with my real name, course) by email and through the Capwiz letter linked by the ASIPP email.

This madness has to stop.

Why?

Most of all, it's bad for patients and will drastically limits access to care for senior citizens in pain, limits access to pain relieving procedures which are alternatives to narcotics, and as a result promotes worsening of the prescription opiate epidemic by promoting narcotic prescribing. It will also waste funds on expensive hospital based care which could have been used for further healthcare treatments for other patients.

Do you think King O, Sebelius or anyone in this administration care about you, us or our complains? Majority of Americans don't want Obamacare and we are force to take it in the chin. Hey folks, suck it up or go home. The only glimmer of hope is to repeal Obamacare and you know the only way to make it happen is to vote out these Dems and liberals.
 
Top