- Joined
- Mar 18, 2006
- Messages
- 389
- Reaction score
- 479
I can count
I can count on one finger the number if times I gave an abx for these cases. Unless he had a cardiac issue that required abx, which should NOT be done in an office setting, the treatment is extraction.Not an anesthesiologist. Not a dentist.
Multiple teeth extraction for an infected gum. (The part that hasn't been mentioned yet is that there are a lot of pediatric dentistry scammers out there; if true then this at least seems to be indicated.)
“they gave [redacted] the [redacted] and that is when his right cheek swelled up”
30 minutes in. A reasonable dentist should be finished around that time. Sounds to me like they gave an IV antibiotic, there was anaphylaxis and they were late in recognizing it.
According to the report, the doctor who performed the dental procedures said he had never seen anything like this in his career, especially in someone without any known allergies.
This sure sounds to me that the dentist thought it was anaphylaxis. Could he be wrong? Absolutely.
But the timing, the reported observations, and these statements to me sound like they were unable to treat anaphylaxis in a sedated patient. That to me at least is actually worse that not being able to deal with LAST or more involved anesthesia complications.