Are there less competitive ROAD-lifestyle specialties for the average student?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
33% seems pretty significant, but I wonder what the burnout rate is across the board in medicine. It seems like a lot of docs burnout, no mattew what their specialty. Personally I haven't had an ER rotation yet, but just spending a few days here and there in the ER on my down time of other rotations, I can see how it could run you down. I also see how getting about half the days in a month off and never taking call could keep you fresh. Are 12 hour shifts more daunting than being in private practice and working 8-5, plus being on call 24/7? And surgery, particularlly gen surgery, or ob/gyn. Talk about burn out, I can't imagine getting called at 3am and having to go to an operation. Its kind of the nature of the beast in medicine, there aren't a lot of cake schedules.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Each different specialty of medicine definitely has it's pros and cons.

I think what I don't like the most is the absolute lack of control one has in the ED. That, and the pure idiocy of some of the complaints, and the fact you can't just tell them to leave so people that are actually sick don't have to wait.

But, every specialty has it's headaches. The key is finding the one you tolerate the best. A wise person told me to "choose what you don't mind doing at 3am".

Well, my intention is to not take call and be outpatient only. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So n=10 med student shifts? Pretty low power my man.

Before med school I worked as a ED tech in major trauma center with high-power academics. I'd say the average age of the attendings was about 45-55 with a spread of low/mid 30s to the low 70s (and the guy is great doc). All were residency trained and loved their job. There were tons of weeks where I worked 70-80 hrs/wk due to short staffing and so I got to know many of them pretty well (and the overtime $ didn't hurt). Would things get stressful at times? Sure. Did these docs enjoy their work? Yup.

What's the moral of the story? Different strokes for different folks.

The EM burnout myth is a tired one indeed.

You may think it's a "tired myth", but I've personally encountered a handful of physicans that started off EM, burned out, and ended up doing FM, IM, etc. And many of their reasons for abandoning EM echo the types of comments MJB has been making.

Bottom line: just because you worked with some docs who loved their time in the ED doesn't mean everyone else in medicine is going to. Different strokes, remember?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
You may think it's a "tired myth", but I've personally encountered a handful of physicans that started off EM, burned out, and ended up doing FM, IM, etc. And many of their reasons for abandoning EM echo the types of comments MJB has been making.

Bottom line: just because you worked with some docs who loved their time in the ED doesn't mean everyone else in medicine is going to. Different strokes, remember?

It depends on what you call "burnt out". I know lots of EM guys who leave EM for cushy FM jobs with set hours. EM often seems cool when you are young, but in saturated cities, working the evening shift in EM wears off when you start having children that don't see you much. Many of these EM guys aren't "burnt out" in my opinion. They are just moving towards a more standard 8-5 job to see the kids.

Any field of medicine that leaves you working evening/night shifts will have a higher drop-out rate because life happens. If your wife works 8-5 and you work 5pm-2am, when do you spend quality time?
 
It depends on what you call "burnt out". I know lots of EM guys who leave EM for cushy FM jobs with set hours. EM often seems cool when you are young, but in saturated cities, working the evening shift in EM wears off when you start having children that don't see you much. Many of these EM guys aren't "burnt out" in my opinion. They are just moving towards a more standard 8-5 job to see the kids.

Any field of medicine that leaves you working evening/night shifts will have a higher drop-out rate because life happens. If your wife works 8-5 and you work 5pm-2am, when do you spend quality time?


Precisely why I don't understand it being considered a "great lifestyle"...

I don't consider anything that has worse hours than a job I would have had in High School or during undergrad a "lifestyle"...to me, "lifestyle" is making decent money (and anything over 100K is decent money) and having normal hours with minimal weekends, holidays, and nights (if any).
 
lifestyle typically implies predictable work hours
 
As for burnout, it's not as high as some may think, but it seems rather significant.

http://www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=44050
yeah but look at what they considered burnout

"Nearly one-third (32.1 percent) showed a least one component of burnout, most commonly emotional exhaustion, the core component of career burnout. High anxiety, caused by concern for bad outcomes was the single greatest predictor of career burnout. This was chiefly attributed to their strong emotional involvement with their patients and a deep sorrow when the patient fares poorly. "

I wonder what I'd find if I polled ped-onc, neurosurg, or pallative care
 
yeah but look at what they considered burnout

"Nearly one-third (32.1 percent) showed a least one component of burnout, most commonly emotional exhaustion, the core component of career burnout. High anxiety, caused by concern for bad outcomes was the single greatest predictor of career burnout. This was chiefly attributed to their strong emotional involvement with their patients and a deep sorrow when the patient fares poorly. "

I wonder what I'd find if I polled ped-onc, neurosurg, or pallative care


I noticed that as well....and what struck me is that most people I have met working in the ED couldn't give a damn about anything but "admit, or discharge".

Now, there are many other fields I could see where emotional burnout would be a problem.


As for EM, what would burn me out is that it's anything but "emergency" medicine in my experience. I have a ton of respect for people who can tolerate that type of clientele and environment for more than a couple of weeks, let alone as a career.
 
I completely agree on the "different strokes" thing. I knew a LONG time ago that I wouldn't like the ED. Now, if it were TRULY "Emergency Medicine", that would be a different story. I've done quite a bit more ED work in other rotations (Community Med), and volunteer....one ED is the same as any other.

If you wanna do trauma, be a trauma surgeon. Wanna do a walk-in clinic? Do EM.

I'm just glad there are folks out there that like to do it, cause I don't have any desire. Why it's a required rotation in med school is beyond me...it's been a total waste of time for me. People that like/thrive in the ED are a different breed from me, which is fine. I'm bored to death, even when all the rooms are full and the waiting room is full of more ungrateful seekers. Stressful? Other than the type of"customers"? no.

As for burnout, it's not as high as some may think, but it seems rather significant.

http://www.acep.org/content.aspx?id=44050


All that being said, I do see why things such as FP/EM, IM/EM, etc...residencies are popular. At least with those you have the option of doing something other than working shifts in the ED.

Last night was at least decent. I met some patients that actually had REAL problems and weren't total asshats.

Burnout among general surgeons: 30-38% (http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/371)

Gynecologist: 59% (small study) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293663

Burnout comparison among residents in different fields: 50% overall with a high 75% (OB/GYN) to a low 27% (fp) http://ap.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/28/3/240

Suicide rate among surgeons (6% up to 16%----the general population is 3%) http://www.khou.com/news/health/Study-Errors-lead-surgeons-to-contemplate-suicide--113951389.html


There are also many studies on burnout rates for FP and psych. ALL medicine has burnout.

From a paper in 2007: Though burnout rates can change depending on
organisational context and specific samples,many studies
report high levels of burnout in doctors,with psychological
morbidity ranging from 19% to 47%, compared with a rate
around 18% for the general employed population
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...orMqg4SOg&sig2=_snPrWuaOgd0mTuu8fUwGQ&cad=rja

The moral of the story is don't let "burnout" dictate your future career choice. If you went into medicine with the right of idea of what you were getting into then none of this should stop you.

As an aside, I would also like to venture that 99% of all interns have passed the point of burnout and are walking zombies...at least I am.
 
Last edited:
New resident bothering to do legwork to put together this type of post.

Take notes people.


Burnout among general surgeons: 30-38% (http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/371)

Gynecologist: 59% (small study) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293663

Burnout comparison among residents in different fields: 50% overall with a high 75% (OB/GYN) to a low 27% (fp) http://ap.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/28/3/240

Suicide rate among surgeons (6% up to 16%----the general population is 3%) http://www.khou.com/news/health/Study-Errors-lead-surgeons-to-contemplate-suicide--113951389.html


There are also many studies on burnout rates for FP and psych. ALL medicine has burnout.

From a paper in 2007: Though burnout rates can change depending on
organisational context and specific samples,many studies
report high levels of burnout in doctors,with psychological
morbidity ranging from 19% to 47%, compared with a rate
around 18% for the general employed population
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...orMqg4SOg&sig2=_snPrWuaOgd0mTuu8fUwGQ&cad=rja

The moral of the story is don't let "burnout" dictate your future career choice. If you went into medicine with the right of idea of what you were getting into then none of this should stop you.

As an aside, I would also like to venture that 99% of all interns have passed the point of burnout and are walking zombies...at least I am.
 
As for EM, what would burn me out is that it's anything but "emergency" medicine in my experience. I have a ton of respect for people who can tolerate that type of clientele and environment for more than a couple of weeks, let alone as a career.
In pretty much all but the biggest trauma centers, I consider most ED work to be more along the lines of ambulatory care. Yeah you might get some cases that are more along the lines of what you see on TV, but the vast majority won't be much different than what you see as a primary care physician (which is why a lot of the FM docs I know moonlight in the smaller ED's to make some extra money certain times during the year.)
 
You may think it's a "tired myth", but I've personally encountered a handful of physicans that started off EM, burned out, and ended up doing FM, IM, etc. And many of their reasons for abandoning EM echo the types of comments MJB has been making.

Bottom line: just because you worked with some docs who loved their time in the ED doesn't mean everyone else in medicine is going to. Different strokes, remember?

Yeah, not only do I "remember" but it's exactly my point.


MJB: I totally agree with you--EM is just one field and it's not for everybody. And I dig the 3am suggestion.

Jamers: Thank you for taking the time to put up those links.

I think the bottom line is that you'll find disgruntled/burnt-out docs (based on whatever your definition is) in EVERY field.

Pick whatever field you truly think you'll be happiest in for the long haul and the rest will follow.
 
My roomie is a 3rd year psychiatry resident and she is often catching medical problems that the ER docs, hospitalists and internists miss.

So yes, it is very possible to keep those skills fresh. She might be (probably is?) unusual, but I'm guessing it depends on you & how much you learn in the first place, and then how much you decide to apply it or forget it later on. :cool:

consult psych: the art of asking "well, did you get a UA?"
 
Members don't see this ad :)
PM&R . People applied this year told me its "Plenty of Money & Relaxation" ...:oops:
 
PM&R . People applied this year told me its "Plenty of Money & Relaxation" ...:oops:

This is true, but supposedly the job market took a crap recently and is horrible. Physicians now can't get a job? Unfortunate.
 
This is true, but supposedly the job market took a crap recently and is horrible. Physicians now can't get a job? Unfortunate.

Where did you hear this? All of my classmates got jobs pretty easily this year.
 
I'm going to advocate for sleep as a lifestyle subspecialty. Plenty of ways to get in (neuro, IM, FM, pulm, psych), short fellowship, and lots of options post-fellowship. Want to put your name on a bunch of sleep labs and score offsite? Easy. Want to open up a sleep center and see patients all day, take call all night? Easy-ish. You can take call every night, work with a group and take no call or limited call, and your drive sets your income limits.
 
I'm going to advocate for sleep as a lifestyle subspecialty. Plenty of ways to get in (neuro, IM, FM, pulm, psych), short fellowship, and lots of options post-fellowship. Want to put your name on a bunch of sleep labs and score offsite? Easy. Want to open up a sleep center and see patients all day, take call all night? Easy-ish. You can take call every night, work with a group and take no call or limited call, and your drive sets your income limits.

Sleep seems awesome.
 
I'm going to advocate for sleep as a lifestyle subspecialty. Plenty of ways to get in (neuro, IM, FM, pulm, psych), short fellowship, and lots of options post-fellowship. Want to put your name on a bunch of sleep labs and score offsite? Easy. Want to open up a sleep center and see patients all day, take call all night? Easy-ish. You can take call every night, work with a group and take no call or limited call, and your drive sets your income limits.

Sleep is a pretty cool and underrepresented specialty. My PI is one of the top sleep experts in the country and he looooves it. However, he has said that most of the sleep cases seem to get turned over to pulm, and they really don't see much but sleep apnea cases.

Sleep seems awesome.

Totally agree, and I still can't believe that there are so few specialists for and information about an area that occupies 1/3 of our life and has so many complex issues involved within it.
 
Where did you hear this? All of my classmates got jobs pretty easily this year.

It was stated in this thread and a FP at my school told me the same. I'm not sure exactly how true it is though - just word of mouth.
 
Thanks much for the insight! I will add those to the list:

EM, Path, Psych, PM&R, FM, IM Hospitalist, Neuro, Sleep, Endo, Rheum, Allergy

In your opinions, which one(s) out of this list are more orientated towards the detail-oriented type of person?
 
Path, (some) IM, Path, Neuro, Path, endo, path.

It's very detail oriented.


I'm not sure how detail oriented Neuro is. Sure you need to know details, but I would say the others (Path, Renal, etc.) would be much more detail oriented.
 
I'm not sure how detail oriented Neuro is. Sure you need to know details, but I would say the others (Path, Renal, etc.) would be much more detail oriented.

Just out of curiosity, why would you say neuro is not? I would think because of all the tracts and potential lesions and small abnormal deviations from norm that it would be no?
 
Practically, knowing the generalities of the tract would be somewhat important, but an MRI is going to target your lesion, and it really doesn't change the tx plan all that much.

I'd say Rheum if you can avoid the fibromyalgia patients. and Path.
 
Just out of curiosity, why would you say neuro is not? I would think because of all the tracts and potential lesions and small abnormal deviations from norm that it would be no?

I think DrBowtie covered the basics, because your job will be much more reliant on imaging. However, your assessments will be very methodical, but to me that doesn't mean "detail oriented." I think neuro, once you have the basics of functional neuroanatomy down, is more of an art form, kind of like IM of the brain. This is why I say that I think some of the other specialties would be considered more detail oriented. That is not to say that a detail oriented person wouldn't enjoy neuro, but it's just not the specialty I think of when someone asks for a detail oriented one.
 
I think DrBowtie covered the basics, because your job will be much more reliant on imaging. However, your assessments will be very methodical, but to me that doesn't mean "detail oriented." I think neuro, once you have the basics of functional neuroanatomy down, is more of an art form, kind of like IM of the brain. This is why I say that I think some of the other specialties would be considered more detail oriented. That is not to say that a detail oriented person wouldn't enjoy neuro, but it's just not the specialty I think of when someone asks for a detail oriented one.
That does make sense. I see why now. Thanks for the input!
 
I think DrBowtie covered the basics, because your job will be much more reliant on imaging. However, your assessments will be very methodical, but to me that doesn't mean "detail oriented." I think neuro, once you have the basics of functional neuroanatomy down, is more of an art form, kind of like IM of the brain. This is why I say that I think some of the other specialties would be considered more detail oriented. That is not to say that a detail oriented person wouldn't enjoy neuro, but it's just not the specialty I think of when someone asks for a detail oriented one.

Yea but I got a different read on it from the neurologist at my school. He admits that his daily work is a bunch of strokes, tract lesions, and syncope cases. But he added that neurologists are the ones called on to identify every zebra out there in the hospital. And those zebras are where the need to be very observant and detail oriented come in handy.

But he wasn't referring to Neuro zebras. He was referring to GI, Oncology, nephrology, etc zebras. His take on it is that a lot of these more rare diseases present in ways that are rather confusing to the enterologist/oncologist/nephrologist/whateverologist. And they have a hard time nailing it down. But the second they can't figure it out and they see any change of mental status or parasthesia they send it over to the neurologist. The way he put it was that the CNS/PNS is so complex that all of these rare diseases may present in complicated ways in other systems, which makes it hard to diagnose, but that the specific mental presentations are all unique and diagnostic. The neurologist just has to know to look beyond his normal realm of stuff.

He gave a few examples. The one that sticks with me is a woman who felt somewhat ill for a few days but didnt go to the physician because it wasn't that disturbing. Then she suddenly had a massive change in mental status that was a blend of psych patient craziness and various CNS deficiencies. Every brain imaging test out there would come out normal. The doc didnt take long to rule out a bunch of more common things and then took some blood. The finding was anti-hu (or was it anti-yu?) antibodies. It's a really rare neoplastic syndrome of (usually) lung cancers and tends to show up in small tumors that wouldn't even show up on imaging tests unless you were looking for it.

I dont disagree that it can get methodic. But he definitely stressed that you get to do an awful lot of diagnosing of real zebras that would normally be outside the realm of your specialty if not for so many things getting into the CNS and causing hell.
 
Yea but I got a different read on it from the neurologist at my school. He admits that his daily work is a bunch of strokes, tract lesions, and syncope cases. But he added that neurologists are the ones called on to identify every zebra out there in the hospital. And those zebras are where the need to be very observant and detail oriented come in handy.

But he wasn't referring to Neuro zebras. He was referring to GI, Oncology, nephrology, etc zebras. His take on it is that a lot of these more rare diseases present in ways that are rather confusing to the enterologist/oncologist/nephrologist/whateverologist. And they have a hard time nailing it down. But the second they can't figure it out and they see any change of mental status or parasthesia they send it over to the neurologist. The way he put it was that the CNS/PNS is so complex that all of these rare diseases may present in complicated ways in other systems, which makes it hard to diagnose, but that the specific mental presentations are all unique and diagnostic. The neurologist just has to know to look beyond his normal realm of stuff.

He gave a few examples. The one that sticks with me is a woman who felt somewhat ill for a few days but didnt go to the physician because it wasn't that disturbing. Then she suddenly had a massive change in mental status that was a blend of psych patient craziness and various CNS deficiencies. Every brain imaging test out there would come out normal. The doc didnt take long to rule out a bunch of more common things and then took some blood. The finding was anti-hu (or was it anti-yu?) antibodies. It's a really rare neoplastic syndrome of (usually) lung cancers and tends to show up in small tumors that wouldn't even show up on imaging tests unless you were looking for it.

I dont disagree that it can get methodic. But he definitely stressed that you get to do an awful lot of diagnosing of real zebras that would normally be outside the realm of your specialty if not for so many things getting into the CNS and causing hell.

Very interesting. I guess my question was somewhat subjective. It will vary based on opinion obviously. I could see it going both ways...
 
First, let me say that the ObamaCare thing is incredibly difficult to figure out, and I don't think anyone 100% understand it yet. Me included.

The fear that some have is that there are not enough FM docs to handle the issues out there if all of a sudden EVERYONE has crappy ObamaCare insurance and needs to see a FM doc. This is why Obama wants PA's and NP's to be able to practice FM without supervision. If this all eventually comes to fruition, why would a medical group pay an MD when a PA/NP can do the same thing?

The same reason why people go to MD Anderson or MSK for a second opinion. The general public perceives MD > PA/NP so most people with money will try to find a MD. Whether or not this perception is true (even most of the time) is questionable when discussing bread and butter cases. Don't worry, PA/NP will never replace MD. The reason we go through more school and training is for the Zebras and I for one am tired of dealing with boring horses all day.
 
Neurology is a good choice. Hours during residency and the career itself are great, and the pay is also competitive.
 
Neurology is a good choice. Hours during residency and the career itself are great, and the pay is also competitive.

I could be wrong but from reading a number of posts it seemed to me that the pay in neurology is one reason for why grads avoid the field.
 
I could be wrong but from reading a number of posts it seemed to me that the pay in neurology is one reason for why grads avoid the field.

I guess it depends on perspective. Neurology earns on average $250K. It's not a competitive field per se. For a 3-4 year residency, it seems like a good option for some. Also, you could specialize in neuroradiology etc for a salary boost. Of course, work environments will vary.
 
I guess it depends on perspective. Neurology earns on average $250K. It's not a competitive field per se. For a 3-4 year residency, it seems like a good option for some. Also, you could specialize in neuroradiology etc for a salary boost. Of course, work environments will vary.
I thought neuro residency was 4 years... Are there some 3-year residency as well?
 
I thought neuro residency was 4 years... Are there some 3-year residency as well?
Some people call it 3 because you do one year of medicine before. Some people include that year and call it 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I guess it depends on perspective. Neurology earns on average $250K. It's not a competitive field per se. For a 3-4 year residency, it seems like a good option for some. Also, you could specialize in neuroradiology etc for a salary boost. Of course, work environments will vary.

250k is great, especially considering that neurology one of the fields with long career longevity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Word is that, overall, neurology residency is not a walk in the park.

Sure, it isn't the most intense of specialties... But I've heard plenty of residents working 70-80 hour weeks.
 
I guess it depends on perspective. Neurology earns on average $250K. It's not a competitive field per se. For a 3-4 year residency, it seems like a good option for some. Also, you could specialize in neuroradiology etc for a salary boost. Of course, work environments will vary.

Pretty sure neuroradiology is a subspecialty within radiology, not neurology. I'd recommend against completing two separate residencies.
 
Pretty sure neuroradiology is a subspecialty within radiology, not neurology. I'd recommend against completing two separate residencies.

Perhaps, he/she meant Interventional Neuroradiology. However, a neurologist would need to complete either a Stroke or a Neurocritical Care fellowship first. All in all, it could cost 8-9 years of postgraduate training.

http://radiology.ucla.edu/body.cfm?id=120

Ain't nobody got time for that!
 
Anesthesia, pm&r, pathology and, even, radiology are not dreadfully competitive and offer a pretty good lifestyle. Radiology can be pretty brutal, though, at least in number of cases you need to read per day.

Psychiatry and some IM subspecialties, like rheumatology, allergy, and endocrine, are also pretty laid back 9 to 5 type specialities.
 
Anesthesia, pm&r, pathology and, even, radiology are not dreadfully competitive and offer a pretty good lifestyle. Radiology can be pretty brutal, though, at least in number of cases you need to read per day.

Psychiatry and some IM subspecialties, like rheumatology, allergy, and endocrine, are also pretty laid back 9 to 5 type specialities.

im guessing those latter 3 would be ultra competitive, right?
 
I Got Lucky managed to resurrect a 3-year old thread by just quoting an old post without writing anything himself... pretty impressive.

I've heard that PM&R is becoming increasingly competitive, especially in the DO world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Well first and foremost, I would say you can add EM to the ROADE for sure.

Personally, I had my fate down to Psy, IM and EM. But, EM is out for me now. Just got told the average at my home residency was a 240 last match. And, you better have a 225+ just to get a look. EM is not all numbers but if you are average it definitely is getting much harder. Also, I really do not want to work the flipping schedule. I did that before medicine and it is a bitch on the body.

I am almost positive I am doing Psy. I learned of EM Psy and C/L Psy. Have shadowed both are felt that was it. Still get to use my medicine knowledge and see crazy ass patients...

Now, what are some hidden gems. None really......they are all mentioned in this thread I believe.

Personally, I think Psy is one for sure if you have the personality for it. PM&R is probably the best hidden secret for most. Many of my fellow students still do not know what they do or even heard of it. IM-Endo is another good option.

I do not think Path is a good option bc of the job market. Anes is really not that competitive. But, it is not the best lifestyle to me. Being a surgeon's bitch in the OR and being in the OR all day do not sound great to me. But, I think it is the least competitive of the ROADE.

Hospitalists can be a good option too if you like that kind of lifestyle where you just show up. And do not want the EM.

Urgent Care is even an option if you do not want all the hell of the EM.

IM-Rheum is also a good option and I personally like Nephro. Neuro could be considered. FM in the RIGHT situation.

Sleep and Pain are also good fellowship options.

Do not ask me anything about OB, Peds...........I try and stay away from that....and do what I have to do only.
 
Well first and foremost, I would say you can add EM to the ROADE for sure.

Personally, I had my fate down to Psy, IM and EM. But, EM is out for me now. Just got told the average at my home residency was a 240 last match. And, you better have a 225+ just to get a look. EM is not all numbers but if you are average it definitely is getting much harder. Also, I really do not want to work the flipping schedule. I did that before medicine and it is a bitch on the body.

I am almost positive I am doing Psy. I learned of EM Psy and C/L Psy. Have shadowed both are felt that was it. Still get to use my medicine knowledge and see crazy ass patients...

Now, what are some hidden gems. None really......they are all mentioned in this thread I believe.

Personally, I think Psy is one for sure if you have the personality for it. PM&R is probably the best hidden secret for most. Many of my fellow students still do not know what they do or even heard of it. IM-Endo is another good option.

I do not think Path is a good option bc of the job market. Anes is really not that competitive. But, it is not the best lifestyle to me. Being a surgeon's bitch in the OR and being in the OR all day do not sound great to me. But, I think it is the least competitive of the ROADE.

Hospitalists can be a good option too if you like that kind of lifestyle where you just show up. And do not want the EM.

Urgent Care is even an option if you do not want all the hell of the EM.

IM-Rheum is also a good option and I personally like Nephro. Neuro could be considered. FM in the RIGHT situation.

Sleep and Pain are also good fellowship options.

Do not ask me anything about OB, Peds...........I try and stay away from that....and do what I have to do only.
Well first and foremost, I would say you can add EM to the ROADE for sure.

Personally, I had my fate down to Psy, IM and EM. But, EM is out for me now. Just got told the average at my home residency was a 240 last match. And, you better have a 225+ just to get a look. EM is not all numbers but if you are average it definitely is getting much harder. Also, I really do not want to work the flipping schedule. I did that before medicine and it is a bitch on the body.

I am almost positive I am doing Psy. I learned of EM Psy and C/L Psy. Have shadowed both are felt that was it. Still get to use my medicine knowledge and see crazy ass patients...

Now, what are some hidden gems. None really......they are all mentioned in this thread I believe.

Personally, I think Psy is one for sure if you have the personality for it. PM&R is probably the best hidden secret for most. Many of my fellow students still do not know what they do or even heard of it. IM-Endo is another good option.

I do not think Path is a good option bc of the job market. Anes is really not that competitive. But, it is not the best lifestyle to me. Being a surgeon's bitch in the OR and being in the OR all day do not sound great to me. But, I think it is the least competitive of the ROADE.

Hospitalists can be a good option too if you like that kind of lifestyle where you just show up. And do not want the EM.

Urgent Care is even an option if you do not want all the hell of the EM.

IM-Rheum is also a good option and I personally like Nephro. Neuro could be considered. FM in the RIGHT situation.

Sleep and Pain are also good fellowship options.

Do not ask me anything about OB, Peds...........I try and stay away from that....and do what I have to do only.

Just some food for though on this whole post:

If we are defining ROAD as "the hours worked are more reasonable than most and the pay is better than most, with potential for one to be very good" then we have one conversation. If we are defining BOTH hours worked or amount earned as being "very favorable" then we have an extremely different conversation (the conversation starts and ends with me telling you "youre kidding yourself") To do a quick summary: Radiology - great hours, reasonable-to-no in hospital call, good pay. Exceptional pay if youre interventional but that is a VERY hard thing to get. Ophtho - This right here is everything its cracked up to be. Barring a change in medicare payments, this one is *the* field you discuss when you discuss "road". Anesthesia - The hours are NOT as good as you have been lead to believe and call is a very real thing. But the pay is comically large. Assuming CNRA's dont steal the field it looks to stay exceptionally well paid. Derm - every derm I know states that its a field where what you make is how hard you hustle. Its profit margin "per hour spent hustling" is good, but I know poor dermatologists. And they dont suck, they just dont feel like getting their hands dirty with running medical spas or doing cosmetic procedures. Without having a robust cosmetics business it pay is not there. And obviously the hours (if you hustle when you are working) are among the best.

BUT with all of that said. None of the four above can be said to have a "downside" at either pay or hours worked (which no other field can say). Hell I'd say they are the 4 best "hours + pay" fields. But they are not uniformly "good for lifestyle". 3 of the 4 of them have an area where they are average among the two aspects. "lifestyle fields" dont really exist, outside of ophtho; get that silly thought that they do out of everyone's head and we can talk a bit.

So now to touch on Emergency Medicine. 1) You need to have the right personality for emergency medicine. I could talk for ages about it, but its true. Though you need a certain personality quirk to want to work on orbital trauma as well... so ophtho sort of understands the 'we collect a certain kind of person' mentality. 2) No field works less than EM... so woohoo. It scores big time on the hours worked metric. It must be super lifestlye right? 3) most other fields out there eventually stop working crappy shifts like holidays and overnights. "Call" and "home call" dont exist in EM. You cant be the attending who phones it in to the resident or nurse on christmas day. The price of entry for the fewest hours per week is that you dont get to decide WHEN those hours are. 4) The pay for EM isnt quite what people think it is. Its above the mean. Definitely above the mean. You're dealing with minimum salaries of 200K, but absolute maximums are about 350K. Technically many people are paid per hour and *could* earn many K more, but study after study of incomes shows that no one ever does for any sustained period of time. Pretty much all EM docs end up at about 225-275K and very few exist within the extremes of that pay range. Thats fantastic per hour, but a pittance compared to what Derm (potentially), optho and anesthesiology make. And also pennies compared to what surgeons make. Its a field where there is a income roof.

So if you want to put emergency medicine in there since it gets paid well (but FAR from great by physician standards) and works very little, then go ahead. I hesitate away from doing that, but I can see the logic in it.

Onto PM&R. I know TONS of PM&R docs and they all qualify their work the exact same way. They must get paid the most money for the least work of any field. BUT working more than the 'required' amount does not yeild more income (obviously major exceptions apply, but im generalizing here and its how they usually phrase it). PM&R docs can definitely be 'entrepreneurs' and make money through non-classical methods... but we need to stick to the bread-and-butter stuff here. I cant anticipate you being a good businessman, only a competent physician. Lets lay this out there: PM&R DOCTORS DO NOT MAKE A LOT OF MONEY (by physician standards). But what they do have is a job where there is a set amount of 'stuff' to do per day and once its done they can call it a day and leave barring one of the post-stroke patients re-infarcting. For the amount of work they do, they get paid exceptionally well. But if youre looking at the paycheck at the end of the month? They are not a particularly dazzling field for flat out income. Now what do you do with all that extra time? Apparently PM&R private practice outpatient stuff isnt all that lucrative. Its necessary, but not that lucrative. Most do that for a little boost. But im sure plenty do lots of 'non-classical' tangents of PM&R to really boost the income. I would definitely *not* put PM&R into the ROAD group. I would say that it is a great option for those that like short days (or at least, potentially short days) and neurology.

Endocrinology: I have no idea why you threw this out. Endo is one of the most poorly paid specialties out there and they are generally overwhelmed with patients. Endo belongs no where in this conversation. If you love endo, good for you. Do it. God bless you. May all of your patients have highly-billable disorders. But don't count on it. hypercalcemia managment for years pays less (combined!) than a 30 minute parathyroidectomy.

Psych I have no real commentary on. All I know is that my psych resident friends tell me that inpatient psych pays terribly and outpatient psych pays wonderfully. They actually comment that this is why inpatient psych physicians tend to be so clueless about general medicine (as always, exceptions apply), because the smarter psych graduates have the ability to go outpatient. No clue about the lifestyle dynamics to either.

Jumping back to anesthesia: You called gas easy at one point. Anesthesia and EM are about the same for competitiveness, I would say. Both have some easy to get into programs which makes the whole field "seem" easier, but generally speaking youre talking about needing a 240 on one of your usmle's to stand a legit chance at a mid-level program or better. I think calling anesthesia easy to get into is incorrect, but it does have a good number of small programs with more variable acceptance standards. Theyre also both similar in that I wouldnt suggest going AOA for either of them. I know controversial comment. But I know in EM there are basically four AOA programs really worth their salt and the rest vary from "a bit lacking" to "how the hell is that still accredited". I hear in anesthesia that number is basically one program that is comperable to ACGME. Its why I didnt mention the comlex above, because if youre thinking gas or emergency, you should be thinking USMLE. I know I'm gonna get hell for this, but I have heard pretty much unanimous commentary from DO residents in both gas and emergency that the AOA world is horribly lacking for these fields except for super limited examples of strong programs (including commentary from DO residents in AOA programs in these fields).

Hospitalists: You can make a crap ton of money, but 4 out of 5 people dont. Generally speaing hospitalists are getting the shaft with potential income and BIG TIME getting the shaft with hours required. But.... they get vacation time galore, so when they are off they are truly off. Also about 20% (thus the 4 out of 5) are basically hospital mercenaries. If you are willing to travel a lot and go where the jobs are, there is some IMMENSE money to be made in locums tenens. But this is *horrific* for lifestyle when youre on service. Its nice to work 2 or 3 weeks and then have a month or more off and make a boatload of money for it, but it is hard to pack up and move to north dakota, central PA, or Maine every other month to get that boatload of money. Living out of hotels gets tiring very quickly.

Urgent Care: If youre not *owning* or *running* the urgent care, then youre making peanuts and some other physician is profiting off of you. Working in urgent care as a physician is failing unless youre the one at or near the top of the food chain.

Rheum: Dont know a ton about it.

Neuro: All neuro fields pay horribly. There is an evolving field of interventional neurology that might go the way of IR and IC. But as of right now, its super niche and not showing signs of expanding yet. Its basically one big innovation away from blowing up. But until it does, neuro pays pretty terribly and asks a lot of time from you.

Peds: know what pays worse than sick patients? Healthy ones. Peds is notoriously the lowest paying 'major' field of medicine. Again, dont know how this field snuck into the convo.

FM: People give FM too much of a hard time. If you hustle and are a businessman, you'll make more money than you know what to do with in FM. But you need to be a *very good* business man. Most of us arent.

Pain medicine: This is an amazing fellowship. I have nothing negative to say. If youre in Anesthesia, PM&R or (as of Friday. literally two days ago) Emergency Medicine this is a hell of a field. Now it is *exceptionally* hard to get, but if you get it, you'll have a nice life as long as you get past the huge number of malingering patients.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Just some food for though on this whole post:

If we are defining ROAD as "the hours worked are more reasonable than most and the pay is better than most, with potential for one to be very good" then we have one conversation. If we are defining BOTH hours worked or amount earned as being "very favorable" then we have an extremely different conversation (the conversation starts and ends with me telling you "youre kidding yourself") To do a quick summary: Radiology - great hours, reasonable-to-no in hospital call, good pay. Exceptional pay if youre interventional but that is a VERY hard thing to get. Ophtho - This right here is everything its cracked up to be. Barring a change in medicare payments, this one is *the* field you discuss when you discuss "road". Anesthesia - The hours are NOT as good as you have been lead to believe and call is a very real thing. But the pay is comically large. Assuming CNRA's dont steal the field it looks to stay exceptionally well paid. Derm - every derm I know states that its a field where what you make is how hard you hustle. Its profit margin "per hour spent hustling" is good, but I know poor dermatologists. And they dont suck, they just dont feel like getting their hands dirty with running medical spas or doing cosmetic procedures. Without having a robust cosmetics business it pay is not there. And obviously the hours (if you hustle when you are working) are among the best.

BUT with all of that said. None of the four above can be said to have a "downside" at either pay or hours worked (which no other field can say). Hell I'd say they are the 4 best "hours + pay" fields. But they are not uniformly "good for lifestyle". 3 of the 4 of them have an area where they are average among the two aspects. "lifestyle fields" dont really exist, outside of ophtho; get that silly thought that they do out of everyone's head and we can talk a bit.

So now to touch on Emergency Medicine. 1) You need to have the right personality for emergency medicine. I could talk for ages about it, but its true. Though you need a certain personality quirk to want to work on orbital trauma as well... so ophtho sort of understands the 'we collect a certain kind of person' mentality. 2) No field works less than EM... so woohoo. It scores big time on the hours worked metric. It must be super lifestlye right? 3) most other fields out there eventually stop working crappy shifts like holidays and overnights. "Call" and "home call" dont exist in EM. You cant be the attending who phones it in to the resident or nurse on christmas day. The price of entry for the fewest hours per week is that you dont get to decide WHEN those hours are. 4) The pay for EM isnt quite what people think it is. Its above the mean. Definitely above the mean. You're dealing with minimum salaries of 200K, but absolute maximums are about 350K. Technically many people are paid per hour and *could* earn many K more, but study after study of incomes shows that no one ever does for any sustained period of time. Pretty much all EM docs end up at about 225-275K and very few exist within the extremes of that pay range. Thats fantastic per hour, but a pittance compared to what Derm (potentially), optho and anesthesiology make. And also pennies compared to what surgeons make. Its a field where there is a income roof.

So if you want to put emergency medicine in there since it gets paid well (but FAR from great by physician standards) and works very little, then go ahead. I hesitate away from doing that, but I can see the logic in it.

Onto PM&R. I know TONS of PM&R docs and they all qualify their work the exact same way. They must get paid the most money for the least work of any field. BUT working more than the 'required' amount does not yeild more income (obviously major exceptions apply, but im generalizing here and its how they usually phrase it). PM&R docs can definitely be 'entrepreneurs' and make money through non-classical methods... but we need to stick to the bread-and-butter stuff here. I cant anticipate you being a good businessman, only a competent physician. Lets lay this out there: PM&R DOCTORS DO NOT MAKE A LOT OF MONEY (by physician standards). But what they do have is a job where there is a set amount of 'stuff' to do per day and once its done they can call it a day and leave barring one of the post-stroke patients re-infarcting. For the amount of work they do, they get paid exceptionally well. But if youre looking at the paycheck at the end of the month? They are not a particularly dazzling field for flat out income. Now what do you do with all that extra time? Apparently PM&R private practice outpatient stuff isnt all that lucrative. Its necessary, but not that lucrative. Most do that for a little boost. But im sure plenty do lots of 'non-classical' tangents of PM&R to really boost the income. I would definitely *not* put PM&R into the ROAD group. I would say that it is a great option for those that like short days (or at least, potentially short days) and neurology.

Endocrinology: I have no idea why you threw this out. Endo is one of the most poorly paid specialties out there and they are generally overwhelmed with patients. Endo belongs no where in this conversation. If you love endo, good for you. Do it. God bless you. May all of your patients have highly-billable disorders. But don't count on it. hypercalcemia managment for years pays less (combined!) than a 30 minute parathyroidectomy.

Psych I have no real commentary on. All I know is that my psych resident friends tell me that inpatient psych pays terribly and outpatient psych pays wonderfully. They actually comment that this is why inpatient psych physicians tend to be so clueless about general medicine (as always, exceptions apply), because the smarter psych graduates have the ability to go outpatient. No clue about the lifestyle dynamics to either.

Jumping back to anesthesia: You called gas easy at one point. Anesthesia and EM are about the same for competitiveness, I would say. Both have some easy to get into programs which makes the whole field "seem" easier, but generally speaking youre talking about needing a 240 on one of your usmle's to stand a legit chance at a mid-level program or better. I think calling anesthesia easy to get into is incorrect, but it does have a good number of small programs with more variable acceptance standards. Theyre also both similar in that I wouldnt suggest going AOA for either of them. I know controversial comment. But I know in EM there are basically four AOA programs really worth their salt and the rest vary from "a bit lacking" to "how the hell is that still accredited". I hear in anesthesia that number is basically one program that is comperable to ACGME. Its why I didnt mention the comlex above, because if youre thinking gas or emergency, you should be thinking USMLE. I know I'm gonna get hell for this, but I have heard pretty much unanimous commentary from DO residents in both gas and emergency that the AOA world is horribly lacking for these fields except for super limited examples of strong programs (including commentary from DO residents in AOA programs in these fields).

Hospitalists: You can make a crap ton of money, but 4 out of 5 people dont. Generally speaing hospitalists are getting the shaft with potential income and BIG TIME getting the shaft with hours required. But.... they get vacation time galore, so when they are off they are truly off. Also about 20% (thus the 4 out of 5) are basically hospital mercenaries. If you are willing to travel a lot and go where the jobs are, there is some IMMENSE money to be made in locums tenens. But this is *horrific* for lifestyle when youre on service. Its nice to work 2 or 3 weeks and then have a month or more off and make a boatload of money for it, but it is hard to pack up and move to north dakota, central PA, or Maine every other month to get that boatload of money. Living out of hotels gets tiring very quickly.

Urgent Care: If youre not *owning* or *running* the urgent care, then youre making peanuts and some other physician is profiting off of you. Working in urgent care as a physician is failing unless youre the one at or near the top of the food chain.

Rheum: Dont know a ton about it.

Neuro: All neuro fields pay horribly. There is an evolving field of interventional neurology that might go the way of IR and IC. But as of right now, its super niche and not showing signs of expanding yet. Its basically one big innovation away from blowing up. But until it does, neuro pays pretty terribly and asks a lot of time from you.

Peds: know what pays worse than sick patients? Healthy ones. Peds is notoriously the lowest paying 'major' field of medicine. Again, dont know how this field snuck into the convo.

FM: People give FM too much of a hard time. If you hustle and are a businessman, you'll make more money than you know what to do with in FM. But you need to be a *very good* business man. Most of us arent.

Pain medicine: This is an amazing fellowship. I have nothing negative to say. If youre in Anesthesia, PM&R or (as of Friday. literally two days ago) Emergency Medicine this is a hell of a field. Now it is *exceptionally* hard to get, but if you get it, you'll have a nice life as long as you get past the huge number of malingering patients.

I enjoyed reading this post immensely and would like to know your input regarding surgical subspecialties. I realize that, for the most part, surgery isn't a lifestyle field. However, there's a day and night difference between general surgery and, say, ENT, Uro, or even Ortho. I read that many Uro attendings work only 4.5 days a week. Same thing for sport ortho. In ENT, one can choose to do mostly office-based procedures and still lead a great lifestyle.

What do you think? Where do these field fall within the "lifestyle" spectrum?
 
Top