- Joined
- Oct 18, 2014
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 109
Thank you! I have a couple other questions that I am curious about, if you don't mind.
Have you ever become frustrated with your work becoming routine? One hesitation I have about RO is that there doesn't seem to be much diagnosis work. Are there still "puzzles" that you need to solve? enough to keep things interesting?
Also, in private practice, how much pressure do you feel from other stakeholders? Are you ever frustrated with the business side impacting the way you practice? e.g. I have heard that a few treatments of high cGy can be as effective as many treatments at low cGy, but that physicians get some pressure to go the route of more treatments for more $.
I personally love my work and do not consider it routine . . . but ask me again in 10 years! Part of it depends on your expectations and philosophy - personally I find the 'diagnosis-puzzle' approach via Internal Medicine to be boring. To each his own.
NCCN is considered the 'benchmark' of acceptable cancer treatments in the United States. As long as you conform to these guidelines in your decision making I think you are safe from a efficacy and liability point of view. That being said, there are major differences in reimbursement between the high end and low end. Each of us must be comfortable with either treating 'aggressively' and earning more or treating 'conservatively' and sleeping better at night. Every one of us has a different philosophy and threshold. Though, to a certain extent, the 'aggressive' partners are the ones keeping the practice afloat. If everyone became 'conservative' overnight, the practice would fold.