- Joined
- Apr 20, 2008
- Messages
- 737
- Reaction score
- 205
Every year there are a couple of threads by MS3's/rising MS4's about whether or not to do an away rotation at a program they may want to go to for residency. In these threads the advice always seems to be something along the lines of "away rotations are a double-edged sword, because if you do an away rotation, if you are absolutely stellar then you'll end up as their #1 choice, but if you are not stellar then you are going to fall way down that place's ranklist or be DNR'd"
This always struck me as a bit odd, because by definition most MS4's are going to be average MS4's, and the large majority of average MS4's who go into psych are going to do just fine. So my question is, why is it so bad to go to a place on an away rotation and be an average MS4 without any personality issues that are toxic to the workplace and why is the thinking that if you are average then you get dropped off someone's ranklist? And also for residents/faculty on here, have you ever seen a med student do an away rotation and it didn't really end up affecting their ranking at a program (presumably because they were pretty average for their level of training)? I generally am not super involved with recruitment at my program so I generally have no idea which of the folks applying did an away with us.
I'm an upper level resident now so I have no dog in this fight. Just was curious as this seems to be the prevailing thinking not just in psych but in a bunch of different specialties.
This always struck me as a bit odd, because by definition most MS4's are going to be average MS4's, and the large majority of average MS4's who go into psych are going to do just fine. So my question is, why is it so bad to go to a place on an away rotation and be an average MS4 without any personality issues that are toxic to the workplace and why is the thinking that if you are average then you get dropped off someone's ranklist? And also for residents/faculty on here, have you ever seen a med student do an away rotation and it didn't really end up affecting their ranking at a program (presumably because they were pretty average for their level of training)? I generally am not super involved with recruitment at my program so I generally have no idea which of the folks applying did an away with us.
I'm an upper level resident now so I have no dog in this fight. Just was curious as this seems to be the prevailing thinking not just in psych but in a bunch of different specialties.