- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Messages
- 884
- Reaction score
- 649
I’ll have a chuckle if she ends up in a DO program.What’s with premeds publishing articles on no-name sites that aren’t even HTTPS? If it’s to pad an application, it’s going to be a bad look.
Pretty sure she just assured herself that will never happenI’ll have a chuckle if she ends up in a DO program.
I give TrinitySOM till March 2020 to remove this article once they get hit with a reality check.
Or they can do whatever this job is lolI met two Caribbean grads last week at a medical office working as administrative assistants. They told me they got their MD and wanted to go into the business side of healthcare thus decided not to go through with residency .... one of even gave me their business card (MD after their name) while introducing themselves.
I'll also add that many former AOA programs have osteopathic prerequisites of 100+ hours, which will eliminate many of these Carib applicants.Don’t necessarily disagree with either “article” here. Next year IMGs will be in previously unfilled former AOA spots. Not bc IMGs are desirable applicants, but just a program needs to fill. Although I’m sure some will be preferred over our grads. We beat out MDs for spots so it’s logical IMGs could do the same to us. But it’s not like they’ll be preferred over DOs just on the basis of their degree lol.
Vivian sounds like a tool, but we all know the holistic stuff is nonsense so I’ll agree with her there.
Overall, it’s just sad that things like this are published to deceive the unsuspecting pre med into thinking the Carib is a good option. Plenty of complaints to be made about DO schools, but the crap at Carib schools should be illegal.
It's like how when you're interviewing for med school, residency, fellowship etc, one of the worst things you can do is trash other programs. She just trashed thousands of physicians with one poorly-thought out article.So that's ballsy of Vivian. To post an article crapping on DO's with a giant picture of her face.
If she is gunning for Harvard it is probably a non-issue, but I know many state schools with DOs on their roster who do interviews. Also way down the line there are plenty of ACGME programs that have DO PD's. Smart move.
To her benefit, there is a NYT reporter with the same name. So she might be able to bury this one without too much difficulty, should the need arise (and oh, how I can't wait to see it arise).It's always a good idea to burn bridges before you even become a doctor /s.
Anytime she is googled this article will show up. Does she not expect to ever work with any DOs? What an idiot.
Hmm, Trinity University that keeps spamming my email with their mission of “helping each student achieve his or her personal goals for medical practice”.
I feel disgusted by such schools. I want to feel bad for those who fall into the trap, but I don’t. If you’re too dumb/stubborn to realize you’re not medical school material, you deserve what happens to you, I guess.
I don’t know but I feel like they know that the time go to the carribean for Med school is coming to an end and this is their last ditch effort to get people to buy inI'll also add that many former AOA programs have osteopathic prerequisites of 100+ hours, which will eliminate many of these Carib applicants.
Anyone know if TRIs are medicare/medicaid funding nuetral like transition years? I.e. you can complete a TRI but maintain 100% funding for whatever residency you match into?Caribbean students will almost certainly benefit from the merger. They will fill undesirable TRI-turned-ACGME transition year spots. The real question is whether this will negate the struggles that will inevitably come with increased competition from the ever-growing population of domestic medical grads. I suspect that it will not.
Vivian’s point is well-taken. The “DO difference” is a sham—just a weak, silly rationalization for the separation of two degrees that really should be one and the same. There’s nothing particularly “holistic” or philosophically unique about how DOs approach medical care. The only thing that truly makes DOs unique is their training in OMM, which is pseudoscientific alternative medicine that should be left to chiropractors.
The number of new DO grads that match (assuming NRMP match rate of 85% like 2019) since the start of the merger has already exceeded the number of open TRIs and other residencies that were unfilled prior to the start of the merger. There was an increase of ~1500 DO grads between 2014 and 2019. There were ~900 unfilled AOA residency spots in 2014. In 2019 >1000 more DOs matched than they did in 2014. At this point, DOs are filling more spots than the number the excess unfilled spots that existed prior to the merger.Caribbean students will almost certainly benefit from the merger. They will fill undesirable TRI-turned-ACGME transition year spots. The real question is whether this will negate the struggles that will inevitably come with increased competition from the ever-growing population of domestic medical grads. I suspect that it will not.
Vivian’s point is well-taken. The “DO difference” is a sham—just a weak, silly rationalization for the separation of two degrees that really should be one and the same. There’s nothing particularly “holistic” or philosophically unique about how DOs approach medical care. The only thing that truly makes DOs unique is their training in OMM, which is pseudoscientific alternative medicine that should be left to chiropractors.
To her benefit, there is a NYT reporter with the same name. So she might be able to bury this one without too much difficulty, should the need arise (and oh, how I can't wait to see it arise).
Unfortunately, most premeds believe they are medical school material until reality hit them in the face...Hmm, Trinity University that keeps spamming my email with their mission of “helping each student achieve his or her personal goals for medical practice”.
I feel disgusted by such schools. I want to feel bad for those who fall into the trap, but I don’t. If you’re too dumb/stubborn to realize you’re not medical school material, you deserve what happens to you, I guess.
I only appreciate opinions if they're from a source that has knowledge about the subject. Vivian literally states so many falsehoods off the bat, her opinion is invalid.
Dude, if your a DO student a. You need to slow your roll and b. You know better. All of OMM is not quackery, some of it is for sure, but a large part of actual manipulation is similar to PT and has shown efficacy in msk complaints.I can’t find any factual claims in the article that are untrue. Most can be confirmed in minutes just by visiting the AACOM website.
The only weakness I see in the article is that she neglected to mention OMM. She should have added a paragraph or two explaining that OMM is disgraceful, anecdote-based quackery that belongs strictly within the confines of a museum.
Dude, if your a DO student a. You need to slow your roll and b. You know better. All of OMM is not quackery, some of it is for sure, but a large part of actual manipulation is similar to PT and has shown efficacy in msk complaints.
Your gonna be asked about this on interviews for residency at some point and more than likely by MDs who have no idea about chatmans but have seen benefit from actual manipulation. The kind of answer you put out here will not fly. I suggest you lighten the disgust, DO friendly residency tend to be OMM friendly also.
Not only that, but her whole article is based on this idea that DO education emerged purely as a means to provide "alternative tracks to medical school to meet the primary care demand of the rapidly aging U.S. population". That may be how they advertise now to open up new schools, but it has nothing to do with how DO schools emerged as a professional education system. She has no idea at all about the history of DO schools, i.e. how they actually emerged, the historic significance of them in American medicine, and the fact that at the time, they were very much different than the traditional "heroic" medicine of the time, in that they prioritized prevention, health maintenance, and the concept of self-regulation. That stuff was not a priority for traditional medicine in the late 19th century (even though it had been in older iterations of medical practice).
The whole article functions on a false premise.
Plus, that last line, come on? Seriously, DO schools aren't pushing for preventative medicine? You're joking. Half of my curriculum emphasized that and primary care.
This is not only a pedantic point, but it’s also based on a misreading of what the article actually says. The part of the article you’re referring to says, ‘the emergence of “Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine’ (D.O.) schools in the world of medicine has largely been explained by the increased need for alternative tracks to medical school to meet the primary care demand of the rapidly aging U.S. population.” She’s clearly not making a claim about the objective historical founding of osteopathic medical profession; she’s describing how people tend to rationalize (“explain”) DO schools’ existence as they constantly open.
While AACOM claims that preventative medicine is at the core of osteopathic medicine, there is no evidence that DO physicians put more emphasis on preventative care than MD physicians, nor is there any data comparing MD and DO curricula when it comes to emphasis on preventative care.
Until it’s been proven otherwise through hard data, the “DO difference” doesn’t exist. DOs (who don’t practice the alternative medicine known as OMM) are functionally equivalent to MDs.
. She has no idea at all about the history of DO schools, i.e. how they actually emerged, the historic significance of them in American medicine, and the fact that at the time, they were very much different than the traditional "heroic" medicine of the time, in that they prioritized prevention, health maintenance, and the concept of self-regulation. That stuff was not a priority for traditional medicine in the late 19th century (even though it had been in older iterations of medical practice).
The whole article functions on a false premise.
Plus, that last line, come on? Seriously, DO schools aren't pushing for preventative medicine? You're joking. Half of my curriculum emphasized that and primary care.
iight viv when youre 4yrs post grad working as a kaplan mcat tutor with 500k in debt looking for "clinical enrichment experience in the US" at my DO office ill keep this in mind
you have to EARN the right to talk shi* about DO school BS by going through 100s of hours of cranial and chapmans
Edit: just realized shes not a carib med student, not even a med student yet. Why burn bridges so early viv?
I met two Caribbean grads last week at a medical office working as administrative assistants. They told me they got their MD and wanted to go into the business side of healthcare thus decided not to go through with residency .... one of them gave me their business card (MD after their name) while introducing themselves.
But seriously what is their plan for work?
Those things are heavyI feel bad for them, but they want to "grow" their current company and believe they are important to the operations. One of them is in charge of switching out the containers for the water dispensers ...
iight viv when youre 4yrs post grad working as a kaplan mcat tutor with 500k in debt looking for "clinical enrichment experience in the US" at my DO office ill keep this in mind
you have to EARN the right to talk shi* about DO school BS by going through 100s of hours of cranial and chapmans
Edit: just realized shes not a carib med student, not even a med student yet. Why burn bridges so early viv?
She's a brand-new opinion columnist for a college newspaper. Who cares what she has to say? Lord knows I wrote my share of bad columns when I was an undergrad.D.O.’s and medical education revisited
Several weeks ago, I wrote a piece titled “D.O. schools lack originality and purpose,” which, in hindsight, was a rather rash title as it did not quite connique.net
Looks like she's trying to backpedal now.
D.O.’s and medical education revisited
Several weeks ago, I wrote a piece titled “D.O. schools lack originality and purpose,” which, in hindsight, was a rather rash title as it did not quite connique.net
Looks like she's trying to backpedal now.