So on the interview trail I have noticed that a good 80-90% of people being interviewed are nontrads, many of whom already hold masters and PhD degrees. There have been multiple interviews where I am the only one still in school, with most people greatly enhancing their application by gaining a year of research/volunteering etc. I think at this rate medical schools will soon just start enforcing this, requiring that applicants have graduated by the time they apply. My beef with this is that it really is just giving more and more leverage to the wealthy applicants. Who can afford to live in the Boston or San Francisco area doing volunteer research for a couple years? who can afford to go on year long volunteering trips and not have to fund raise for years to do it? Who doesn't have to worry about an ailing and indebted family pushing you to get your degree and get out in the real world as fast as possible? And yet somehow all the nontrads I meet who take a year or more off are able to be doing these incredibly expensive things.
So basically, I applaud people for gaining way more experience than they normally would have been able to if they were a traditional applicant, and I wish I had realized that being a nontrad was actually kind of the normal way to go so that I could have done these things and enhanced my application. But I am just curious what people think the effects of this will be on class diversity/socioeconomic makeup of the classes. And for the record, every urm I have met has been a traditional applicant.
So basically, I applaud people for gaining way more experience than they normally would have been able to if they were a traditional applicant, and I wish I had realized that being a nontrad was actually kind of the normal way to go so that I could have done these things and enhanced my application. But I am just curious what people think the effects of this will be on class diversity/socioeconomic makeup of the classes. And for the record, every urm I have met has been a traditional applicant.