- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
i think i've confused myself with a practice question but can someone explain to me:
let's say a condition/disease is recessive. because both genes are defective, no protein is made and something goes wrong physiologically. (correct?)
if a person is heterozygous for a gene, does that mean that one chromosome produces the protein and so everything is alright?? or something else happens?
so writing this out confused me even more ....
when you have a double helix, the double helix represents one chromosome, right? like, the chromosome you inherited from your dad (forgetting crossing over).
so in a diploid cell you have all 46 + sex chromosomes being transcribed and translated?
wahh i dunno why i'm getting confused over such a simple topic. i feel like genetics (macro) and molecular genetics (micro) are getting mixed up in my brain.
let's say a condition/disease is recessive. because both genes are defective, no protein is made and something goes wrong physiologically. (correct?)
if a person is heterozygous for a gene, does that mean that one chromosome produces the protein and so everything is alright?? or something else happens?
so writing this out confused me even more ....
when you have a double helix, the double helix represents one chromosome, right? like, the chromosome you inherited from your dad (forgetting crossing over).
so in a diploid cell you have all 46 + sex chromosomes being transcribed and translated?
wahh i dunno why i'm getting confused over such a simple topic. i feel like genetics (macro) and molecular genetics (micro) are getting mixed up in my brain.