India launches its 2nd proton therapy center

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Foiled by autocorrect yet again. Where‘s that second coffee… it’s like when GTV peeks out of CTV.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
So, I don’t think we’ve met but a patient of mine wanted a proton opinion and our patients tend to prefer driving to Flint rather than Detroit suburbs. Sent him to Flint. He claimed that he was told it had to be conventional fx, that the 5 fx I had recommended was not possible. So he came back to me.
5Fx for what?
 
Members don't see this ad :)
So, I don’t think we’ve met but a patient of mine wanted a proton opinion and our patients tend to prefer driving to Flint rather than Detroit suburbs. Sent him to Flint. He claimed that he was told it had to be conventional fx, that the 5 fx I had recommended was not possible. So he came back to me.
Thanks Simul, we do use protons for SBRT, but usually just for re-irradiation or with mets where we can't meet Xray constraints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Ah okay. This was a prostate case. I wasn’t clear in original message. I’m sure we will cross paths eventually !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
There are certainly centers that are willing to accept IMRT rates for protons.
This is literally a definition of underbilling.

How many times on Twitter, in real life, and even here on SDN have rad onc people set their hair on fire going off on how wrong and illegal this is.

But hey, when proton centers underbill, suddenly these centers and attendings feel virtuous.

I cannot tell anyone if underbilling is illegal or not. It would sure be nice if people were consistent with their sanctimony though.

Btw, IMRT goes for about $350 a fraction and protons about $1100 a fraction. Any center who says they only bill $350 for a proton fraction is pre-lying for pre-auth.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
This is literally a definition of underbilling.

How many times on Twitter, in real life, and even here on SDN have rad onc people set their hair on fire going off on how wrong and illegal this is.

But hey, when proton centers underbill, suddenly these centers and attendings feel virtuous.

I cannot tell anyone if underbilling is illegal or not. It would sure be nice if people were consistent with their sanctimony though.

Btw, IMRT goes for about $350 a fraction and protons about $1100 a fraction. Any center who says they only bill $350 for a proton fraction is pre-lying for pre-auth.
usually in this scenario the imrt rates are much higher and probably surpass CMS proton rates
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I am going to keep posting this. And we know that at least one of the authors is credible.
Modern proton techniques with invasive rectal procedures (balloons/space oar)= 10% rectal bleeding requiring laser coagulation..

 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I am going to keep posting this. And we know that at least one of the authors is credible.
Modern proton techniques with invasive rectal procedures (balloons/space oar)= 10% rectal bleeding requiring laser coagulation..


UW does not have CBCT in the PTC as far as I know but someone correct me if im wrong. The UF data has image guidance and more follow up, more patients. Devils advocates would argue: have you ever seen such a cure rate for IR?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I am going to keep posting this. And we know that at least one of the authors is credible.
Modern proton techniques with invasive rectal procedures (balloons/space oar)= 10% rectal bleeding requiring laser coagulation..

Those are terrible results! Even 3D conformal wasn't that bad.

We know that rectal balloons are worse than SpaceOAR for rectal bleeding, something like 15% vs 3%, but I think something else is at play.

I agree with carbonionangle that IGRT may be part of it, as very few centers built prior to 2016 or so have CBCT at isocenter. I think Seattle is one of the old Procure multiroom centers from 2010 to 2015ish that went belly up and got bought out.

I think margin size may have something to do with it as well. If you don't image, you tend to use bigger margins like over 5 mm posteriorly. I have previously turned down a job offer because the Linac didn't have CBCT, and I think IGRT is even more crucial with protons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

UW does not have CBCT in the PTC as far as I know but someone correct me if im wrong. The UF data has image guidance and more follow up, more patients. Devils advocates would argue: have you ever seen such a cure rate for IR?
Seems like a weird thing to reference. Cure rate? I don't event know how this data adds much to anything other than the remarkably good IPSS scores of men in FL.

Do Florida men piss better? Apparently so!!!

These guys didn't even have BPH much less life threatening prostate cancer!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Seems like a weird thing to reference. Cure rate? I don't event know how this data adds much to anything other than the remarkably good IPSS scores of men in FL.

Do Florida men piss better? Apparently so!!!

These guys didn't even have BPH much less life threatening prostate cancer!
Florida is known for “straight shooters”
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users

UW does not have CBCT in the PTC as far as I know but someone correct me if im wrong. The UF data has image guidance and more follow up, more patients. Devils advocates would argue: have you ever seen such a cure rate for IR?
which is why I dont trust it. Even if you have 100% local control, which you cant, 10-20 (at least)% will fail in nodes, bone etc . Not going to get into the weeds, but very sketchy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top