Well, sometimes, we must stand up and just say no, just because it may have social consequences means nothing if it goes against all that you stand for. An attending, who outside of hospital policy wants a med student to wear a mask because it is their personal beliefs that masks should be worn forever, does not cut it. Sure, the attending can make life tough, but I say if the hospital policy does not support it and it bothers you that much to put the mask on, you go right ahead and don't put it on This is not to say you do it because you are looking for trouble, but the last time I checked, we are free to do what we want when it does not violate any law, policy, regulations or social norms and no, just because you believe in something, albeit, not mandated does not mean I have to comply, sorry.Ummm... yes? Social consequences have always differed from professional consequences and legal consequences.
Plenty of objectively crummy actions don't have professional or legal consequences, but that doesn't mean we all have to withhold our thoughts and judgements. This isn't remotely new.
A med student gets a speeding ticket. Will there be legal consequences? Yes. Professional consequences? No. Social consequences? No.
A med student shows up late to rounds. Legal? No. Professional? Yes. Social? No.
A med student goes to an attending's house and makes a somewhat off-color joke. Legal? No. Professional? No. Social? Yes.
A med student refuses to wear a mask after an attending asks them very politely to do so. Legal? No. Professional? No. Social? Yes, obviously.
I think you are severely underestimating our patient population and probably underestimating the effect of masks on your own histories. I work in several hospitals with diverse patient populations. Non-native speakers are much less of a problem with masks at most hospitals, but couple that with severe mental health and socioeconomic factors and communication becomes paramount. We recently diagnosed someone with a very rare cause of heart failure based on a piece of history that was only picked up because someone pressed the patient on a particularity after seeing their facial expression while taking history.
It's hard to know what you're missing. Can you say for certain you haven't misunderstood a patient or missed a subtlety in the history?
For reference, out of 100+ healthcare professionals I've worked with, not a single one has expressed any degree of upset over the fact that our patients at this hospital take their masks off (since vaccine rollout, anyway). It's extremely common for attendings these days to ask patients to doff the mask during history, especially if the patient is socially complicated and limited health records exist for them.
Communication is one of the most important pieces of patient care, and masks absolutely hinder communication. The tradeoff is something that should be discussed with nuance, based on the situation, not off-handed, blanket statements about how it "shouldn't be an excuse."