- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 3,015
- Reaction score
- 2,224
I think it's far more nuanced than "if you have a pulse you can walk into whatever job you want" vs "if you don't go to In-N-Out you'll never get a job". Obviously things have changed dramatically in the past several years, especially the past 12 months and they'll continue to change.This seems to be contradictory to the consensus on this board for the last several years when this question comes up. I've been following these posts ever since I was a medical student. I followed them again when applying to residencies. I followed them when applying for jobs as a resident. I followed them again when looking for other jobs after residency. I've never seen any attendings on here state you can't get a good job easily if you train at the wrong residency.
Are you basing your diverging opinion on what you predict will happen now that the market is more competitive? I have never encountered a community ED that used name of a residency program to determine whether they wanted to hire a doc or not. That sounds like an exception, not the rule.
I think it's going to get harder and harder to get a job with a good group w/o connections. I'm not saying that people use the name of the residence you attended as a sole criterion to decide whether or not to extend an offer. But if you don't have personal connections to a group, then the reputation of your training matters. Most people would presume that someone coming out of Cincy, Indiana or Denver is well trained. But if you're applying for a position with a group where you don't know anyone and no one there has ever heard of your program, you probably aren't getting the job unless they have no other options.