OCHEM meso

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

OSUkid

Membership Revoked
Removed
7+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
505
Reaction score
251
How in the world is cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane a meso compound. If you convert the wedges into dashes, vice versa it becomes an enatiomer and cannot be superimposed.
How??
Because I know cis-1-methylcyclohexane with an OH group on one of the carbons is an enatiomer. So how is this any different .

Please reply

Members don't see this ad.
 
How in the world is cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane a meso compound. If you convert the wedges into dashes, vice versa it becomes an enatiomer and cannot be superimposed.
How??
Because I know cis-1-methylcyclohexane with an OH group on one of the carbons is an enatiomer. So how is this any different .

Please reply
First of all, your naming in the second compound is off, if it has an OH it should be a cyclohexanol and if the methyl is adjacent to the OH it would be cis(or trans) 2-methylcyclohexanol.

The reason for cis 1,2-dimethylcyclopropane being a meso compound is the inner line of symmetry and if you were to draw the mirror image and flip it over, it would be identical to the original stereochemistry. Even if you were to put in dashes for wedges, you could then just flip the molecule over and rotate to give you the identical compound.
 
Bro I know if you flip it over its identical hence why I think its an enatiomer but it cannot be superimposed hence why i thinks its not meso
Ok so what about cis-1-methylcyclohexanol
It's cis and can be wedged or dashed and it an enatiomer, so whats the difference?
And how is cis-1,2-dimethycyclohexane a meso , but cis-1-methylcyclohexanol is an enantiomer. Also I am doing internal plane of symmetry, so the triangle cant have internal plane of symmetry if two substituents are next to each other as to why I think when mentioned before 1,2-dimethylcycloprone is not meso
 
Last edited:
How in the world is cis-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane a meso compound. If you convert the wedges into dashes, vice versa it becomes an enatiomer and cannot be superimposed.
How??
Because I know cis-1-methylcyclohexane with an OH group on one of the carbons is an enatiomer. So how is this any different .

Please reply


Cis-1, 2-dimethylcyclopropane has chiral carbons.....AND a plane of symmetry. No symmetry is present in the 2-methylcyclopropanol.

Hope this helps.

Dr. Romano
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
upload_2015-6-9_21-31-15.png

How are these molecules achiral? You cant superimpose them unless you rotated it right,? I would think there just enatiomers.
I spent too many damn hours studying these stupid concepts its so annoying!
THATS AN ENATIOMER!!!!!!!
lol I am so heated
 
Last edited:
View attachment 192861
How are these molecules achiral? You cant superimpose them unless you rotated it right,? I would think there just enatiomers.
I spent too many damn hours studying these stupid concepts its so annoying!
THATS AN ENATIOMER!!!!!!!
lol I am so heated

These are meso compounds and they represent the same molecule
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
So both of them are there own meso? Since you cant have two meso's only one.
Yea meso is always to itself. Enantiomers and diastereomers are comparing 2 separate compounds. Somewhat correct me if I'm wrong but that's how we did it in class.
 
So both of them are there own meso? Since you cant have two meso's only one.

For this problem there is only a single meso compound. In advanced organic chemistry, it is possible for a molecule to have meso 1 and meso 2, but you will never encounter something like this for the DAT. For an exercise, prove this is a meso compound. Simply establish R/S configuration at these carbons. You will find half the molecule is an R and half is an S. Since the same groups are attached, you have a meso compound. Many organic text books will show examples of meso compounds.

Dr. Romano
 
Top