- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 0
Could someone clarify this for me? It seems contradictory. This is page 86 of the EK Ochem book (lecture 4).
"Since Tollens reagent must react with the open-chain form of a sugar, glycosides (which are closed ring acetals) do NOT reduce Tollen's reagent, while nonglycosides do."
"Disaccharides and polysaccharides are glycosides where the aglycone is another sugar...A disaccharide or polysaccharides will only react with Tollens reagent if there is an anomeric carbon that is not involved in a glycosidic bond and is free to react"
If disaccharides and polysaccarides are glycosides then according to the first paragraph they can never react with Tollens. Can someone give me a simpler explanation? Maybe I'm reading it wrong. Is a glycosidic bond the linkage between two glycosides or is it the bond that forms the ring?
"Since Tollens reagent must react with the open-chain form of a sugar, glycosides (which are closed ring acetals) do NOT reduce Tollen's reagent, while nonglycosides do."
"Disaccharides and polysaccharides are glycosides where the aglycone is another sugar...A disaccharide or polysaccharides will only react with Tollens reagent if there is an anomeric carbon that is not involved in a glycosidic bond and is free to react"
If disaccharides and polysaccarides are glycosides then according to the first paragraph they can never react with Tollens. Can someone give me a simpler explanation? Maybe I'm reading it wrong. Is a glycosidic bond the linkage between two glycosides or is it the bond that forms the ring?