i totally agree with you. if there was a first come first serve basis then its not stealing the spot at all. its the other applicants fault for not applying early so they could get in. if they wanted to have a life in EMT/paramedic work, they shouldve been able to apply early etc...
btw, howelljolly..i have no idea what you were talking about in the last paragraph.
Sarcasm doesnt translate well into print.
I totally think you are an ignoramus. (and Im not being sarcastic there) "Stealing" doesnt mean the same thing as if you were to steal a tube of PreparationH from the drugstore. And I already said that its not the major point. I also said a few times that you are
abusing the seat.
The purpose of the seat in EMT school is that 5 years from graduation, there will be an experienced EMT on an ambulance somewhere. By taking a seat, you are "stealing" (if you will) one EMT out of the system. If a particular county plans to put 100 EMTs into the workforce each year, you are taking one EMT out of that pool.
The frustrating thing here is that you cant seem to put together a logical argument.
-your first-come-first-served line is nonsense, we've told you many times, that this is region specific, and some areas have a selection process not unlike college, and some have a waiting list. A waiting list does not equate to first-come-first-served. It means that there is a very specific control over who becomes an EMT. Thats an even stronger reason for YOU not to be an EMT. Try another arguement regarding how you claim that you are not abusing the public safety system for your own personal gain. End the "spot stealing" talk
-I told you that regardless of how much volunteering or working as an EMT you might do, it will not prepare you for med school. It will not give you valuable skills that you can translate to becoming a physician. Knowing how to take vitals isnt better. You asked "is it not better?" The answer is NO. It is not better. It makes no difference. Its as if you had previous experience as a model, and can stare at a camera without blinking. It is not a skill, and it is not useful.
"What about intubating?" You ask.... "Surely thats useful" No. If someone needs to be intubated, you will not be doing it. You will be observing an intubation 100 times during med school, and letting the intern, ER resident, IM resident, CC fellow, CRNA student, Resp Therapy student, Anesth. resident....do it. And guess what! If noone gets it, the surgery resident and ER resident both need to log a few surgical airways before they graduate. Letting you "take a shot" is the last thing thats going to happen.And each time, somone may have the courtesy to step back and show you Sellicks Manuever (again), or show you the different types of blades (again). If you do an ansesthesiology rotation, the attending will not let you touch his patient until he teaches you the ins and out of intubation
himself. It doesnt matter that youve already done it 100 times, you cant do it unless you learn
as a med student. D'you think you get to skip out on ANS Pharmacology class because you know what atropine is? Well?
-whats wrong with being an EMT for two years and being good at it? 1) its physiologically impossible to be a good EMT within two years. 2) the attrition rate for EMTs is a BAD thing, but you dont know what that means, so never mind. 3) A better question is "what's right with being a useless EMT for two years, and then getting out of the business - forcing someone with less work experience than expected to have to fill a prematurely vacated spot (in the usual student-volly-pro-burnout timeline, which is a factor in public health, but you woudnt know that since you clearly dont know anything about public health), thereby having two useless EMTs, and double on-the-job training time (aka probationary period)... where one useful EMT with one probationary period was planned for.
So, try and come up with an intelligent argument for why your plan is a good thing. Try. I know you can do it.