- Joined
- Jan 17, 2016
- Messages
- 524
- Reaction score
- 590
If only there were state-imposed pharmacist-prescription ratios and "show up" bonuses we could all waive our W-2's around...
If only there were state-imposed pharmacist-prescription ratios and "show up" bonuses we could all waive our W-2's around...
Why don't we have/create a pharmacist union to provide this type of thing?
On the other hand, there were periods where everything did come together. CAPhA (not the national) under the old ED Johnson's tenure was the reason that entering CA used to be really, really difficult and there was a cap on licenses from out of state, period (which actually survived interstate commerce lawsuit issues as CA's license only applied to the state). It was that way because Johnson was first a UAW scion and second a graduate of the third rate school in Michigan at the time where he couldn't get a job in state for oversupply reasons. IL had similar issues and got into a strong union situation which is why Walgreens has always been real afraid of that territory as the union did bust up the pay cartel which is where we started to get those decent pay raises. It wasn't as much the shortage (that came before) than basically enough pharmacists walking away from the conditions that set up the late 1990s and the nice period of the 00s. The hospital pharmacists in MN are largely unionized (except for Mayo which is an oddball for other reasons).Because it took one of the most powerful unions/organizations in the state three attempts during the 90's to get legislation passed/signed into law.
So not only do you need a union/org that is strong (not gonna happen), you need one with the sophistication to pass major legislation that would survive the onslaught of opposition from deep pocketed chains.
The best we've been able to do is being able to prescribe birth control and bill medicaid.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app