I have probably done over 30 thoracic discograms in the past 2 years. Ordered by a huge spine surgery practice where people are getting fused up to the Tspine.
It is spelled N O. Do you think you may be part of the problem and not the cure? That is just not good care. And it certainly does not appear to be based in science.
Pain Physician. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):631-42.
Systematic review of thoracic discography as a diagnostic test for chronic spinal pain.
Singh V,
Manchikanti L,
Shah RV,
Dunbar EE,
Glaser SE.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Even though the prevalence of thoracic pain has been reported to be 15% of the general population and up to 22% of the population in interventional pain management settings, the role of thoracic discs as a cause of chronic thoracic and extrathoracic pain has not been well researched. The intervertebral discs, zygapophysial or facet joints, and other structures including the costovertebral and costotransverse joints have been identified as a source of thoracic pain.
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically assess the quality of clinical studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of provocation thoracic discography.
STUDY DESIGN:
A systematic review of provocation thoracic discography.
METHODS:
A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic discography with respect to chronic, function limiting, thoracic or extrathoracic pain. Studies meeting the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) methodologic quality criteria with scores of 50 or higher were included for the assessment of the level of evidence. Level of evidence was based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for the assessment of accuracy of diagnostic studies. Based on the level of evidence, recommendations were made according to Guyatt et al's criteria.
RESULTS:
The clinical value of thoracic provocation discography is limited (Level II-3) with 2C/weak recommendation derived from low quality or very low quality evidence indicating that other alternatives may be equally reasonable.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the available evidence for this systematic review, thoracic provocation discography is provided with a weak recommendation for the diagnosis of discogenic pain in the thoracic spine, if conservative management has failed. This is qualified by the need to appropriately evaluate and diagnose other causes of chronic thoracic pain including pain originating from thoracic facet joints.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Aug 1;24(15):1548-55.
Thoracic discography in healthy individuals. A controlled prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging and discography in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.
Wood KB,
Schellhas KP,
Garvey TA,
Aeppli D.
Author information
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN:
A prospective case-control investigation.
OBJECTIVES:
To determine the responses to thoracic discography of asymptomatic individuals.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:
Literature regarding lumbar and cervical discography reveals that even morphologically abnormal discs often are not painful, whereas painful discs typically exhibit anular or endplate disruption.
METHODS:
Ten adult lifelong asymptomatic volunteers, ages 23 to 45 years, underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine, followed by four-level discography. Provocative responses were graded on a scale of 0 (no sensation) to 10 (extreme pain or pressure), and filmed discs were graded using a modified Dallas scheme. Concomitantly, 10 nonlitigious adults (6 men and 4 women, ages 31 to 55 years) experiencing chronic thoracic pain were similarly studied as a control group.
RESULTS:
The mean pain response in the asymptomatic volunteers was 2.4/10. Three discs were intensely painful (scores of 7/10, 8/10, 10/10), with all three exhibiting prominent endplate irregularities and anular tears typical of thoracolumbar Scheuermann's disease. On discography, 27 of 40 discs were abnormal, with endplate irregularities, anular tears, and/or herniations. Ten discs read as normal on magnetic resonance imaging showed anular pathology on discography. In the group with chronic thoracic pain, the average pain response was 6.3/10 (P < 0.05). Of the 48 discs studied, 24 were concordantly painful, with a pain response of 8.5/10 (P < 0.05); 17 had nonconcordant pain/pressure, with an average pain of 4.8/10 (P < 0.05); and 5 had no response. On magnetic resonance imaging 21 of the 48 discs appeared normal. However, on discography, only 10 were judged as normal.
CONCLUSIONS:
On discography, thoracic discs with prominent Schmorl's nodes may be intensely painful, even in lifelong asymptomatic individuals, but the pain is unfamiliar or nonconcordant. Thoracic discography may-demonstrate disc pathology not seen on magnetic resonance imaging.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/96284-workup#a0721 Whoever wrote this crap for Medscape took Wood's article and tried to spin it positive as useful. (It was Malanga)
An update of the appraisal of the accuracy of thoracic discography as a diagnostic test for chronic spinal pain.
Vijay Singh,
Laxmaiah Manchikanti,
Obi Onyewu,
Ramsin M Benyamin,
Sukdeb Datta,
Stephanie Geffert,
Allan T Parr,
Frank J E Falco
Spine Pain Diagnostics Associates, Niagara, WI; Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; Mid Atlantic Spine & Pain Physicians of Newark, Newark, DE, and Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA;
Pain physician (Impact Factor: 10.72). 11/2012; 15(6):E757-76.
Source:
PubMed
ABSTRACT Even though the prevalence of thoracic pain has been reported to be 13% of the general population and up to 22% of the population in interventional pain management settings, the role of thoracic discs as a cause of chronic thoracic and extrathoracic pain has not been well studied. The intervertebral discs, zygapophysial or facet joints, and other structures including the costovertebral and costotransverse joints have been identified as a source of thoracic pain.
A systematic review of provocation thoracic discography.
To systematically assess and update the quality of clinical studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of provocation thoracic discography.
A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic discography with respect to chronic, function limiting, thoracic or extrathoracic pain. The available literature on thoracic discography was reviewed. A methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL). The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited (or poor) based on the quality of evidence developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles.
The evidence and clinical value of thoracic provocation discography is limited (poor) with a paucity of evidence, with only 2 studies meeting inclusion criteria.
The limitation of this study continues to be the paucity of literature.
Based on the available evidence for this systematic review, due to limited evidence, thoracic provocation discography is rarely recommended for the diagnosis of discogenic pain in the thoracic spine, if conservative management has failed and facet joint pain has been excluded.
BOTTOM LINE: If some surgeon wants to fuse the T-spine for disc pain, that is his problem and the patient's problem. Pretending we have any science to assist in that endeavor is pure crap. But if you had 30 negative discograms, I apologize straight away....