- Joined
- Apr 2, 2014
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 2
I find it that when I attempt the TPR practice tests I am more often required to refer back to the passage regardless of how well I understood the main point or authors attitude/tone. On the AAMC practice tests, if I am really engaged with the psg and understood the point the author intended to make I am able to answer most of the questions without much problem. I find it that the TPR tests require paying significant amount of attention to the nuances and details of the psg more so than the AAMC or Examkrackers. Does anyone else who is using TPR for verbal feel the same way?
btw I took the TPR course and learned about their approach but personally, it did not help me.
I am not gonna lie though, I found that their psgs make me a much more critical and attentive reader.
btw I took the TPR course and learned about their approach but personally, it did not help me.
I am not gonna lie though, I found that their psgs make me a much more critical and attentive reader.
