Why do pharmacists get paid so much?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not a dude! :eek: And you did not out troll me since I wasn't trolling. :rolleyes:

Plus, you are here 24/7, 365, who are you trying to kid that you have things to do? :laugh:

Have a wonderful day!

You are also not Raven Riley.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I can school your dumb pill counting ass. :smuggrin: "Clinical decision support" :laugh:

Pre-med, huh? Pretty big achievement, I could see you've earned the right to act the way you do.

I'm not going to hold it against you. You probably have no idea just how in depth and complicated medicine is.
 
Stupid pre med posters. Look if you don't understand the benefit of having a well trained pharmacist then you clearly have not started learning about medicine. They are an integral part of the team. Trust me you don't want to learn about as much about drugs as they do or you wouldn't be able to spend the time you need on patient care. We're all on the same team if you don't get that yet you don't understand medicine.

-
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Members don't see this ad :)
I'm not trying to start a riot but what factors shaped the market to dictate these sort of salaries? While I know some doctors can make a lot of money, the majority of medical graduates enter family medicine and internal medicine and majority of pharmDs enter retail pharmacy.

Nope never took Econ and I'm not anti pharmacist or anything but I do think the compensation levels are rather high especially with no malpractice insurance, 9-5 job and technicians doing all the work.

Pharmacists do have to pay malpractice insurance, it's lower, but it's there. It's just not 20k+ like a family physician's would be. Technicians also do not do "all the work." Techs assist the pharmacist, they cannot do the final checks, DURs, or handle clinical issues. They can't counsel on medications (which is mandatory in some states), give immunizations, provide recommendations or discuss medical issues with patients. Every pharmacist I have worked with spent their 12-13 hour shift on their feet working the entire time and not slacking off letting techs run the show (doing so would be illegal). Yeah, there are some lazy pharmacists, but there are lazy anybodies in any profession. Most pharmacists do not work a typical 9-5, many work the entire opening day which in my case was 8-9 (13 hour shift). Places may differ, but rarely will you find someone working in retail/community pharmacy working 9-5 Monday through Friday.

Why should physicians get compensated so high anyway? Nurses do all their work. When I go to their office the nurse takes my BP, asks my symptoms, discusses my history, preps my info, and spends more time with me than the physician. The physician just comes in, sticks his stethoscope on me for a bit, tells me what he thinks is wrong and has his nurse write or phone in a prescription. In and out in 5 minutes. What about the NPs and PAs that do the physician's job too? They come in, diagnose and treat me and all the physician does is "supervision" as per the legal requirements for them to do so. If you ask me the physicians have it easy, Nurses and mid-levels do all the work. By the way, the entire paragraph above is complete sarcasm. I know this isn't how family medicine is run and I know the responsibilities of the physician and their time is more than this. I say this though to illustrate how anyone from the outside looking in could quickly judge a profession and do so with bad info because they themselves don't understand it, somewhat how you view the typical day of pharmacy practice when it comes to retail/community. You are entitled to your opinion, you can think that pharmacists are overcompensated because our compensation is close to or may exceed that of a family physician's. However, behind every credible opinion there should be reliable info and facts backing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I've worked as a pharmacy technician so my opinion isn't just based off of nonsense. There are some pharmacists that work a lot and very knowledgeable and an integral part of the healthcare team, but most of the pharmacists I worked with just liked to stand back and watch. They mostly stood there talking on the phone and I think the counseling is increasing but wouldn't a patient rather talk to a doctor about their pain or pathology? Pharmacists would be able to comment on the drug which the doctor or PA could also tell you.

Also, in some areas pharmacists are paid $60-75 per hour with double/triple on holidays not to mention the $20-30,000 sign on bonus and more money for night shifts.
 
Last edited:
I've worked as a pharmacy technician so my opinion isn't just based off of nonsense. There are some pharmacists that work a lot and very knowledgeable and an integral part of the healthcare team, but most of the pharmacists I worked with just liked to stand back and watch. They mostly stood there talking on the phone and I think the counseling is increasing but wouldn't a patient rather talk to a doctor about their pain or pathology? Pharmacists would be able to comment on the drug which the doctor or PA could also tell you.

What kind of pharmacy was it where they were all working 9-5? A pharmacist cannot legally just sit back and watch. They are the limiting step when it comes to approving a prescription because only the pharmacist can do so. Was it personal conversations on the phone? Many times it's patients calling about medically related questions, an office phoning in a prescription or other pharmacy related issues.

Your question is also one which is personal. Some patients trust their pharmacist more, some trust their physician more. Many state laws mandate that the pharmacist counsel on new medications and that counselling be offered. It's one of the responsibilities a pharmacist has. We are also more easily accessible than the physician and sometimes are the first healthcare professional someone discusses an issue with.

Sure, the physician, PA, or NP may know their drugs for their practice, but as far as training goes the pharmacist is taught more. We take many years of pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, biopharmaceutics and other pharmacy specific topics. PA's and Physicians focus more so on diagnostics and pathology since that is their scope. Sure, they get some pharmacology just like pharmacists get some diagnostics and pathology but that's not their area of expertise just like the pharmacist's area of expertise is not diagnostics or surgical procedures. I've had some physicians put patients on tramadol telling them it was non-drowsy. They were wrong and we had to properly inform the patient during counselling. I know a pediatrician that wrote for a very high dose of antibiotics for a child to treat an ear infection. The pharmacist caught it, called the office, was degraded by the pediatrician when she suggested changing the med or going with ear drops, and the kid wound up in the ER the next day because she reacted to the very high dose even though she wasn't allergic. It's also kinda hard to explain to a male patient how they need to use their vaginally inserted drug that the physician wrote for...

Physicians make mistakes, pharmacists make mistakes. The reality is that we are all on the same team treating patients with different areas of expertise. Physicians diagnose and plan a treatment. Pharmacists review the treatment and help ensure the safe and effective use of medications. Physicians specialize in their area, pharmacists in theirs. We do different jobs. You don't have to appreciate pharmacy, you don't have to recognize what we learn or our value, you can think we are lazy and overpaid for our labor and training, but the fact remains that pharmacy isn't going away (and is likely going to be taking expanded scopes) and that utilizing everyone's specialty and training to the max will most likely provide the best patient care. Physicians have a 4 year doctorate MD/DO. Pharmacists have their 4 year doctorate PharmD. We learn different stuff with some overlap and have different scopes on the same healthcare team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I've worked as a pharmacy technician so my opinion isn't just based off of nonsense. There are some pharmacists that work a lot and very knowledgeable and an integral part of the healthcare team, but most of the pharmacists I worked with just liked to stand back and watch. They mostly stood there talking on the phone and I think the counseling is increasing but wouldn't a patient rather talk to a doctor about their pain or pathology? Pharmacists would be able to comment on the drug which the doctor or PA could also tell you.

Also, in some areas pharmacists are paid $60-75 per hour with double/triple on holidays not to mention the $20-30,000 sign on bonus and more money for night shifts.

Our family physician had my father, a man in his 40's with minor back pain, on several hundred hydrocodone a month. He continually escalated the dose to treat my father's addiction rather than suggest alternative therapies or recommend a specialist.

There are poor practitioners in every field. I know I've worked with my share of old pharmacists who didn't want to keep up or change with the times, continuing to practice like it is the 70's where all that was expected of them was to count pills and elegantly label a bottle. I've also worked with incredibly passionate and intelligent pharmacists whose expertise and attention to detail improve patient outcomes and ease the burden on already over-stressed physicians.

A lot of the ire in this thread is directed towards the condescending and arrogant poster who apparently registered just to troll, not towards you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
not to mention the $20-30,000 sign on bonus and more money for night shifts.

do post some job listings with these mythical $30,000 sign on bonuses--alaska and the midwest don't count, actually...post those too, i want to see.

don't internal medicine physicans make $300,000/yr and play golf every afternoon too?
 
I'm not trying to start a riot but what factors shaped the market to dictate these sort of salaries? While I know some doctors can make a lot of money, the majority of medical graduates enter family medicine and internal medicine and majority of pharmDs enter retail pharmacy.

Nope never took Econ and I'm not anti pharmacist or anything but I do think the compensation levels are rather high especially with no malpractice insurance, 9-5 job and technicians doing all the work.

Yeah, you're not trying to start a riot or be anti-pharmacist which is why you asked us if pharmacists get paid 6 figures because we lobby better than the AMA or if the system is just messed up. Change the station, you're not worth it.
 
I've worked as a pharmacy technician so my opinion isn't just based off of nonsense. There are some pharmacists that work a lot and very knowledgeable and an integral part of the healthcare team, but most of the pharmacists I worked with just liked to stand back and watch. They mostly stood there talking on the phone and I think the counseling is increasing but wouldn't a patient rather talk to a doctor about their pain or pathology? Pharmacists would be able to comment on the drug which the doctor or PA could also tell you.

Also, in some areas pharmacists are paid $60-75 per hour with double/triple on holidays not to mention the $20-30,000 sign on bonus and more money for night shifts.

Everything that leaves a pharmacy is the pharmacist's legal responsibility. The tech may be doing all the typing, and counting, but the prescription does not leave the pharmacy without a pharmacist's verification. Obviously, you would want someone who is well trained to catch potential errors, and drug related problems. But, if a medication occurs, who is the patient going to sue? It's the pharmacist and the pharmacy. So even though the pharmacists may be "standing around" or talking on the phone, it is still their job to make sure that the medication that leaves the pharmacy is safe for the patient.

Yes, the prescriber should teach their patients about their prescriptions, but a lot of times they do not. Even if they do, a lot of times the patients come in and have no clue what medications they were given, and why they were given these medications.

The salaries are really dependent on their location and demand. For any position, if they're desperate for personnel, they're going to offer more money.
 
Nope never took Econ and I'm not anti pharmacist or anything but I do think the compensation levels are rather high especially with no malpractice insurance, 9-5 job and technicians doing all the work.[/QUOTE]

We have a few pharmacists in special positions (director, infectious disease, residency director) who work a straight day shift schedule but that is certainly not the norm.

Most of our pharmacists spent 7-8 years in school + 1-2 years of residency and we have a skeleton crew of technicians. The techs perform tasks like making the IVs and filling automated dispensing cabinets. We also have a skeleton crew of pharmacists in the pharmacy to perform final checks on these items along with verifying orders. Most of the pharmacist hours are spent on rounds with physicians, responding to codes, running the anticoag and aminoglycoside dosing services, working as key members on the med rec team (primarily discharge at this time), training pharmacy students and residents, etc.

The market dictates salary and pharmacists are paid what the market will support. This is the simple answer to our salaries. If you really want to know why the market will support it...salary increases were driven by a shortage of pharmacists during an expansion in retail pharmacy. In my area it was Walgreens driving that train. When I became a pharmacist $48,000-$52,000 was the going rate for a clinical pharmacist and retail was $60,000-$65,000. My 1st full year out (1998) I made right around $50,000 as a staff clinical pharmacist. 3 years later I was making $80,000. This excludes any OT - and there was a ton to be had b/c we were losing pharmacists left and right to retail. Our salaries were raised to keep us from leaving. Retail raised salaries to try to convince pharmacists to work for them. Apparently people don't like it when they want their Vicodin but the local pharmacy had to close early because they had no pharmacist to work.

But the market works in both directions. Now we have a surplus of new graduates and retail is not expanding like it was. Our turnover is low because there aren't as many opportunities. Salaries for experienced pharmacists are stagnant. The retail pharmacies have figured out they can offer less and the new grads will happily accept because of their student loan burdens.

I feel like I entered the profession at a great time. Low student loans that were paid off early. Huge pay increases as I was starting my family. Our younger pharmacists all have around $200,000 in student loans. Making $120,000 sounds awesome until you factor that kind of debt and stagnant wages into the picture. But the ridiculous cost of pharmacy school now is a topic for another thread...
 
Most of our pharmacists spent 7-8 years in school + 1-2 years of residency and we have a skeleton crew of technicians. The techs perform tasks like making the IVs and filling automated dispensing cabinets. We also have a skeleton crew of pharmacists in the pharmacy to perform final checks on these items along with verifying orders. Most of the pharmacist hours are spent on rounds with physicians, responding to codes, running the anticoag and aminoglycoside dosing services, working as key members on the med rec team (primarily discharge at this time), training pharmacy students and residents, etc.

I hate to break it to you, but apparently Kravitz is more than capable of doing all of this already as a pre-med. We have a future surgeon general right here, folks.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Automated pill dispensing systems can verify and fill prescriptions and have a smaller error rate than pharmacists.
 
Automated pill dispensing systems can verify and fill prescriptions and have a smaller error rate than pharmacists.

If you honestly think that all a pharmacist does is verify and fill prescriptions, then I would recommend you educate yourself.

If you honestly think that you will never make a mistake that could endanger someone's life, then I would recommend that you get over yourself.

I see you are still a student, so I can only hope that this attitude is borne out of ignorance and not arrogance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Automated pill dispensing systems can verify and fill prescriptions and have a smaller error rate than pharmacists.

The automated dispensing cabinets are profiled. They cannot dispense anything to a nurse unless an active order exists for the patient. Orders are only active after being verified by a pharmacist.

The meds the techs put in the cabinets are also checked by a pharmacist before they go out.

But the dispensing process is a small portion of the pharmacist duties. Most of our FTEs are for clinical functions. We must be doing something right because we are a valued member of the healthcare team at my institution.
 
Automated pill dispensing systems can verify and fill prescriptions and have a smaller error rate than pharmacists.

I am shocked this is coming from someone who is going to be a physician...
 
OP, if you really want to bitch about people being overpaid look up CRNA's. You'll find people making $150,00+ for a 2 year Master's in nursing.
 
With all due respect, what's the point of having mods and admins if they aren't going to take care of obvious trolls?

  1. He comes onto the pharmacy section to insult pharmacists.
  2. He asks us if the system is messed up as to why pharmacists make six figures.
  3. Now he says robots are more efficient than humans when it comes to dispensing prescriptions but still claims he's not "anti pharmacist".

There is a difference between honest discussion and anger baiting. This is the latter.
 
I don't know why people are becoming so defensive about what I'm saying. It's my opinion and pharmacists are well paid and many students go into pharmacy for this reason. It's a lucrative profession and medicine is also for specialists. I just don't think 5-6 year pharmacy programs deserve such high compensation. Yes, some people take 8 years but most complete the 6 year program.
 
Just wondering why pharmD's that study only 6 years after high school or less even for some programs, get paid around 100-150 thousand and more for some places while doctors get paid so little compared to the years of training and education (takes about 11-12 years for smallest 3 year residency) needed to become a licensed physician. Especially when a family medicine doc makes around 150-200 thousand.

Are the doctors lobbying in DC not doing as good of a job as the pharmacists? or is the system just messed up?

You're probably better off arguing that a family medicine doctor is underpaid, as opposed to the pharmacist being overpaid.

Actually, a better argument would be that med-school applications should operate in the same manner as Pharmacy schools- that is, students should be able to apply to med-school after completing all their pre-requisites, instead of having to chug through four years of undergrad. But that's an unrelated point.
 
I don't know why people are becoming so defensive about what I'm saying. It's my opinion and pharmacists are well paid and many students go into pharmacy for this reason. It's a lucrative profession and medicine is also for specialists. I just don't think 5-6 year pharmacy programs deserve such high compensation. Yes, some people take 8 years but most complete the 6 year program.

Seriously, just take a look at basic economics for 2 minutes. Why is [insert sports star] paid $50 million a year? THE MARKET. Get over it. If you can't understand that simple concept, how the hell do you expect to diagnose accurately in the future? Stay the eff out of my state if and when you get licensed.
 
I hate to break it to you, but apparently Kravitz is more than capable of doing all of this already as a pre-med. We have a future surgeon general right here, folks.

Actually, I can! :laugh:

With all due respect, what's the point of having mods and admins if they aren't going to take care of obvious trolls?

  1. He comes onto the pharmacy section to insult pharmacists.
  2. He asks us if the system is messed up as to why pharmacists make six figures.
  3. Now he says robots are more efficient than humans when it comes to dispensing prescriptions but still claims he's not "anti pharmacist".

There is a difference between honest discussion and anger baiting. This is the latter.

So, you want posters to be banned for stating the fact? :eek:
 
Essentially all medical professions are overpaid, and in additions doctors get all kinds of additional perks and benefits. The other day I saw a pediatrician at my hospital and wondered what the hell was he doing there; turned out he was there "just for lunch", because doctors in our hospitals eat for free. You'd think with the salary he's making the cheap **** could afford something better than cafeteria food. Unfortunately, that's just how things work in America, and you have no sense of perspective because you were probably born here. The salary health professionals make is a combination of many factors that you should already be aware of, so don't go around asking stupid questions like this and expect not to look dumb.
And as far as you thinking pharmacists will be replaced by robots, you are wrong. The techs will get replaced by robots.
 
Last edited:
Essentially all medical professions are overpaid, and in additions doctors get all kinds of additional perks and benefits. The other day I saw a pediatrician at my hospital and wondered what the hell was he doing there; turned out he was there "just for lunch", because doctors in our hospitals eat for free. You'd think with the salary he's making the cheap **** could afford something better than cafeteria food. Unfortunately, that's just how things work in America, and you have no sense of perspective because you were probably born here. The salary health professionals make is a combination of many factors that you should already be aware of, so don't go around asking stupid questions like this and expect not to look dumb.
And as far as you thinking pharmacists will be replaced by robots, you are wrong. The techs will get replaced by robots.

Pathetic. Rich people have to eat like kings? I make a lot of money and still think a Whataburger hamburger combo is delicious. I have to eat steak everyday because I can afford it? Youth of America must be brainwashed.
 
It's funny how everyone keeps saying the same thing...market dictates salaries, instead of acknowleding that pharmacists are overpaid. Also, for pharmacists working in retail, stop complaining about the long hours or the annoying things you have to do. You have a choice to work in hospitals or other areas for less money but you want more money.
 
It's funny how everyone keeps saying the same thing...market dictates salaries, instead of acknowleding that pharmacists are overpaid. Also, for pharmacists working in retail, stop complaining about the long hours or the annoying things you have to do. You have a choice to work in hospitals or other areas for less money but you want more money.

Guess what? You are overpaid. Nurses do most of the work anyway. Your nurse examines the patient, you google the symptoms on your phone, walk in and write a prescription. Sickening.
 
It's funny how everyone keeps saying the same thing...market dictates salaries, instead of acknowleding that pharmacists are overpaid. Also, for pharmacists working in retail, stop complaining about the long hours or the annoying things you have to do. You have a choice to work in hospitals or other areas for less money but you want more money.

It's a fact. Our salaries are market driven. A retail pharmacy generates a lot more revenue that any family practice. When you have retail pharmacies generating $4-7M employees are compensated.

Pharmacists make more right out of school, but our salaries are essentially capped. You have the potential to make a considerably higher salary depending on your specialty.

Since you have this hard-on for people making more money than you feel they have earned, how about the CEO with an MBA from the University of Phoenix making a salary in the $100M because his daddy set him up. That should really piss you off.
 
Guess what? You are overpaid. Nurses do most of the work anyway. Your nurse examines the patient, you google the symptoms on your phone, walk in and write a prescription. Sickening.

:laugh: Nice try! Google symptoms???? Pharmacy schools certainly accept gems.

OP, if you really want to bitch about people being overpaid look up CRNA's. You'll find people making $150,00+ for a 2 year Master's in nursing.

Yes, the difference is that these professionals are competent practitioners. They don't have to look everything up.
 
Last edited:
It's a fact. Our salaries are market driven. A retail pharmacy generates a lot more revenue that any family practice. When you have retail pharmacies generating $4-7M employees are compensated.

Pharmacists make more right out of school, but our salaries are essentially capped. You have the potential to make a considerably higher salary depending on your specialty.

So basically your saying the people love their drugs! The doctors are prescribing them but being the pharmacist, you deliver the goods hence the high salaries!

I don't think family doctors make considerably a lot more. It all depends on reimbursement rates. I mean if your practice is doing well, then I'm sure you will make more but that's just how retail chains will give bonuses/incentives with stores that are filling more prescriptions.
 
:laugh: Nice try! Google symptoms???? Pharmacy schools certainly accept gems.

Yes, the difference is that these professionals are competent practitioners. They don't have to look everything up.

I know for a fact that is what doctors do. I have worked in a doctor's office before and seen it first hand. You act like you know everything, but really you have to go look up every symptom you see to "diagnose" your patients. It's sickening that you get paid as much as you do. Luckily society has caught on to this scam and we have nurse practitioners to handle our medical concerns without robbing us blind.
 
There are a lot of things that go into pay for any profession- supply/demand, wage stickiness, liability, politics, etc.

Ironic that you are talking about pharmacists being overpaid right now though when this whole RUC thing has hit it big in health economics circles in the past couple weeks:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...134e3a-eda8-11e2-9008-61e94a7ea20d_story.html
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/july_august_2013/features/special_deal045641.php

Special interests lobbying so that doctors get paid for several times the time a procedure actually takes- primary docs just haven't lobbied effectively against the rest of the specialties which is why they are in a worse situation.

Now my opinion is that one of the issues with health professionals in the US in general is education is too expensive- bring down those costs, and then lower wages suddenly become okay. That along with moving to an outcomes-based model (which we seem to be doing) and things could be better for everyone (except the special interests).
 
Every state in the union has a law that says only an RPh (or physician in certain cases) can fill scripts. This is why they make so much.
 
What I don't get, OP, if you are so jealous of pharmacist workload/salary, why don't you figure out what you need to do to become a licensed pharmacist, and then get a job as a pharmacist? :idea:

If I was a shallow thinker, I could think of a lot of jobs that are "overpaid" for the "work" they do.....hospital CEO, sports athlete, etc.....but ya know what, I couldn't/wouldn't want to do any of those jobs, and apparently a lot of other people can't do/don't want those jobs either, which is why they offer the compensation they do.

It makes no sense to be jealous and complain because you think the grass is greener on the other side of the fence....if you really believe that, nothing is stopping you from climbing over the fence to the other side.
 
I'm not jealous as I would never pursue pharmacy. IMHO it's too boring. People always complain about how much doctors are paid and there's tons of threads about that so I was just wondering why people don't complain about pharmacist's compensation. I'm not complaining. This was supposed to be a discussion about why they are paid so well and it's because of the market and current supply/demand as we have discussed.

People became defensive and started bragging about the profession when all I asked was why do they get paid so much.
 
I'm not trying to start a riot but what factors shaped the market to dictate these sort of salaries? While I know some doctors can make a lot of money, the majority of medical graduates enter family medicine and internal medicine and majority of pharmDs enter retail pharmacy.

Nope never took Econ and I'm not anti pharmacist or anything but I do think the compensation levels are rather high especially with no malpractice insurance, 9-5 job and technicians doing all the work.

Can I have this job?

Just kidding, I love my job. And I have malpractice insurance, definitely don't work 9-5, and there's no way a technician can do what I do.


Also, if technology was trusted completely, many of my patients would be underdosed on their chemotherapy, necessary medications would be stopped because of drug interactions that aren't significant, and clinically relevant interactions would be missed. But those aren't important... (And the majority of the physicians I work with appreciate pharmacy. They're asking for more of us. We have to be doing something helpful, right?)
 
I know for a fact that is what doctors do. I have worked in a doctor's office before and seen it first hand. You act like you know everything, but really you have to go look up every symptom you see to "diagnose" your patients. It's sickening that you get paid as much as you do. Luckily society has caught on to this scam and we have nurse practitioners to handle our medical concerns without robbing us blind.

Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have found the winner!!! I am quite certain that the field of pharmacy is proud to have this gem in their camp. :eek:

Looks like you win. Here is all of my money and the keys to my car. If you need me I'll be sleeping in a ditch.

No thank you! I can do without a Ford Focus. :smuggrin:


What I don't get, OP, if you are so jealous of pharmacist workload/salary, why don't you figure out what you need to do to become a licensed pharmacist, and then get a job as a pharmacist? :idea:

Pure genius! That's why you get paid big bucks. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I'm not jealous as I would never pursue pharmacy. IMHO it's too boring. People always complain about how much doctors are paid and there's tons of threads about that so I was just wondering why people don't complain about pharmacist's compensation. I'm not complaining. This was supposed to be a discussion about why they are paid so well and it's because of the market and current supply/demand as we have discussed.

People became defensive and started bragging about the profession when all I asked was why do they get paid so much.

I don't want to offend anyone, but this (the bolded part only) is actually how I feel reading this thread. I feel a little bad for him because some people were kind of mean about it.
 
Are the doctors lobbying in DC not doing as good of a job as the pharmacists? or is the system just messed up?

I'm not trying to start a riot but what factors shaped the market to dictate these sort of salaries? I do think the compensation levels are rather high especially with no malpractice insurance, 9-5 job and technicians doing all the work.

I just don't see the value in paying pharmacists as much as they work...

I just don't think 5-6 year pharmacy programs deserve such high compensation. Yes, some people take 8 years but most complete the 6 year program.

. I feel a little bad for him because some people were kind of mean about it.

These quotes are why people were being "mean."
 
People always complain about how much doctors are paid and there's tons of threads about that so I was just wondering why people don't complain about pharmacist's compensation.

Really? I have never seen a thread in the pharmacist section complaining about how much doctor's are overpaid. I'd be interested in seeing the links to these "tons of threads" that you say exist.
 
Pathetic. Rich people have to eat like kings? I make a lot of money and still think a Whataburger hamburger combo is delicious. I have to eat steak everyday because I can afford it? Youth of America must be brainwashed.

Reading comprehension isn't your forte so ill summarize my rant for you. In our society the privileged abuse perks such as eating for free, while less privileged people have to pay for that same food. Ive heard of several doctors doing this and it probably happens at every hospital.
 
Last edited:
How is eating for free in the cafeteria, a hospital policy, abusing a perk? :confused:

You can complain about the policy I guess but I don't see how you can complain about the doctor who is choosing to receive the perk.
 
While I definitely don't agree with everything he said, maybe I'm just being too naive/silly, we could let him know why we are valuable in a way that's not that bad right? anyways, just an opinion when I first read his first post I thought he just wants to know why and his main purpose in the beginning wasn't to make people angry without knowing it sounds offensive. I guess I feel sympathy since my brother asked me the same question before (about the salary) and he is also a medical student and he just really doesn't know why. I also have a lot of non-pharmacy friends that were surprised by how much we made since most of them only knows pharmacist at the retail settings, but after letting them know how much we know and the value of pharm. they actually felt a little embarrass about what they were feeling about pharmacist. welps! :) back to studying for hopefully the last test!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top