- Joined
- Mar 25, 2004
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm curious to know what other MSTP students think about the effect of middle authors on publications. Given that you are first author, and your mentor is last author, does having middle authors "dilute" the prestige / impact of your publication? For an PI, it seems to be a hard line to draw when considering what is worth an authorship, an acknowledgement, or neither. What policies are in place in your lab? I'm not talking about "gift" authorships, where the additional people in question contributed nothing to the work. Also, does the effect of middle authors vary depending on what the publication is (ie. high tier primary data paper vs. short data letter vs. a review vs. a chapter in a methods book, etc). Just curious to what other peoples' perspectives are...