- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 4,586
- Pre-Medical
- many more males than females affected (since the former are hemizygous)
- may be partially penetrant in female carriers (e.g., patches of skin affected due to lyonization)
Now what do you mean partially penetrant in female carriers.
When you say penetrance, are you referring to the genetic term? Why would that be?
If anything, you'd think that carriers (an individual), would show partial expressivity.
Just curious 😳
The idea that carrier females never show x-linked recessive trait is false because of dosage compensation. Describing lyonization with penetrance is appropriate, since it refers to the actual presence of trait. Expressivity would refer to the degree of expression for a given trait, and is conditional to penetrance.
Refer to Friedman et al., 1994 Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus: An X Chromosome-Linked Dominant Inheritance Pattern [but recessive gene] with a Vasopressin Type 2 Receptor Gene that is Structurally Normal: "The incomplete penetrance in female obligate carriers is most likely related to variable lyonization (X-inactivation) of the normal...."
Refer to Russell et al., 1995 Inherited restrictive cardiomyopathy in a 74-year-old woman: A case of Fabry's disease: "Most likely incomplete penetrance is the result of lyonization of the normal X chromosome...."
The idea that carrier females never show x-linked recessive trait is false because of dosage compensation. Describing lyonization with penetrance is appropriate, since it refers to the actual presence of trait. Expressivity would refer to the degree of expression for a given trait, and is conditional to penetrance.
Refer to Friedman et al., 1994 Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus: An X Chromosome-Linked Dominant Inheritance Pattern [but recessive gene] with a Vasopressin Type 2 Receptor Gene that is Structurally Normal: "The incomplete penetrance in female obligate carriers is most likely related to variable lyonization (X-inactivation) of the normal...."
Refer to Russell et al., 1995 Inherited restrictive cardiomyopathy in a 74-year-old woman: A case of Fabry's disease: "Most likely incomplete penetrance is the result of lyonization of the normal X chromosome...."
While I'm impressed with your analysis here, am I wrong in assuming that for MCAT purposes, we should rely on the Bio I concept that an X-linked recessive trait is something that generally won't be expressed in a female unless both parents have it?
anyone have an example of one. i think i got it, but i can't really find any sources to test myself on it.

Here are my notes from my human heredity class. I know most of this has been said, but here it is anyway. 🙂
- Describe autosomal dominant inheritance
- A trait can appear in either sex (at least one parent has trait if a child has trait as well)
- Do not skip generations
- Describe autosomal recessive
- Can appear in either sex
- Homozygous recessive genotype
- Heterozygotes, or carriers, wild type allele masks expression of the mutant allele
- Can skip generations
- If both parents affected, then we will see all kids affected as well
- X-linked recessive
- Much more common in males, skips generations
- X-linked dominant
- Much more common in females because they are twice as likely to be affected
- Affected father will have all daughters affected
- Y-linked inheritance
- All sons affected and no daughters affected
- Mitochondrial inheritance
- Mother passes on disease to all children and males don't pass it on
How come for Autosomal Recessive, if both parents have it, the kids will have it?