This is a poster/presentation question, and also a quick general question.
1. I have presented at two regional/national undergraduate conferences. I know these aren't as prestigious as the larger more professional ones, but I'm listing both under one spot. Same research.
I doubt one is any more prestigious than the other, so while I've been advised here to list the national one in the organization one, then the regional one, I have sort of a different situation.
At the regional one (which happens to be an "older" conference too), I won the award in my division. Also, there is a definite person who can be listed in the contact information box. I did not win an award at the national one (they didn't give any).
Would it be better to list the regional one first in this case?
I'm pretty confused on how to present it. I've perused through this thread, and was wondering if something like this would be appropriate
Experience Type - Poster/Presentation
Experience Name - Regional/National Undergraduate Research Presentations
Etc Etc
Organization - Regional Conference Name
Description
1. [Citation]
Presented by myself.
Won award for [Award]
2. Also presented at [National Conference Name]
Presented by myself.
Date, Location, Division.
1a. Should I at all mention what I presented on? I figured I'll already be covering that in the "Significant Experience" part of my main research.
2. It's clear that there are many ways of describing your experiences. The WashU webinar suggests reflections, while
LizzyM and others suggest descriptions. I currently have all activities in paragraph form, but resume style (ie. Organized blah blah blah. Collaborated with blah blah.). Is this acceptable, to save space and also so that I can leave all anecdotes, reflections, and heavy details for secondaries and interviews?
Thank you very much! This thread is incredible.