Why can't we use Avelox for UTI? Give me a good reason then prove it.
Why can't we use Avelox for UTI? Give me a good reason then prove it.
active drug doesn't appear in the urine at concentrations sutible to treat an UTI
ehh...good try mike. But not exactly.
Sanford says 20%....I was closeish. I overestimated the hotness of my chicks. And why is that bad outisde of not killing said bug in bladder... you've got the rare possibility of quinolone resistance via that whole mechanism where it sets up that efflux protein thingy that spits out the antimicrobial molecule...I bet it's fun to watch if we ever set up a microscope that could see it happen...
article said:Although these newer fluoroquinolones exhibited similar in vitro activity against these uropathogens, only those compounds with the highest urinary concentrations (gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) produced prolonged UBA against both strains of P. aeruginosa. The findings from this study suggest that both microbiological activity and urinary concentrations are important parameters to consider when choosing a fluoroquinolone for empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs).
....but...but....I just looked it up and it said it's because insufficient unchanged drug reaches the bladder....
It wouldn't surprise me if there is some other explanation...but that's what they told me at a random hospital a few months ago, too...
EDIT: Oh, wait, you were talking about my arbitrary guess...yeah..it's a guess...
And what % is eliminated unchanged? How many step mutation does it require for resistance with Avelox vs other quinolones? How do you know it's not bactericidal in urine? Are you sure?
Reference: Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones in healthy volunteers
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, Volume 24, Issue 2, August 2004, Pages 168-172
Gary E. Stein and Sharon Schooley
Facts and Comparisons also states that 20% of unchanged drug appears in the urine
I really dont know and my brain hurts really bad...Whats the answer??
And what % is eliminated unchanged?
I don't know...never really interested enough to find out.How many step mutation does it require for resistance with Avelox vs other quinolones?
As Doctor M said so eloquently...the guidelines say its useless, dammit...that's enough for me. Though I guess the concentrations needed to have bactericidal effects would likely have patient-specific (renal failure, hepatic failure) and bug-specific implications (already quinolone resistent...), too.How do you know it's not bactericidal in urine?
Clearly not.Are you sure?
The book said 20%...
I don't know...never really interested enough to find out.
As Doctor M said so eloquently...the guidelines say its useless, dammit...that's enough for me. Though I guess the concentrations needed to have bactericidal effects would likely have patient-specific (renal failure, hepatic failure) and bug-specific implications (already quinolone resistent...), too.
Clearly not.
That's all I know personally...I COULD go look it up, but somebody else will and post the answer to which you ask...probably pretending they actually knew the answer off the bat...which is fine with me....I just really don't like doing actual work at 11:45PM on a school night...
I glanced at the article. From my moderately competent understanding of ID. It looks like Moxi is ok against E.coli (The most common UTI pathogen) IT looks poorer against K. Pneumo and Psuedomonas. The guys is also paid by every other quinolone maker except Bayer
Edit: So, sure use it for a UTI if you want
I glanced at the article. From my moderately competent understanding of ID. It looks like Moxi is ok against E.coli (The most common UTI pathogen) IT looks poorer against K. Pneumo and Psuedomonas. The guys is also paid by every other quinolone maker except Bayer
Edit: So, sure use it for a UTI if you want
and M... dood.![]()
He's a graduate...he doesn't give a flying **** anymore...I'm sure I'll be the same way...
I personally hate therapeutics. I find it incredibly boring. I dig the pure receptor-intermediate-whathaveyou pharmacology and biochemistry, though. I just need to figure out a way to get a job involving those two areas without actually getting a PhD in pharmacology.

Im still pissed about that B**ch from the docs office...All I ever see is Bactrim, cipro and macrobid...Yes I named all name brands cause Im too lazy to type out the generics![]()
be honest..you know you can't spell Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Nitrofurantoin.
Stupid Doctors receptionist....😡
Chit if I know..I got it from Google!![]()
more importantly... is she hot?

Nah..thread is over. Answered correctly. My intention was to learn you guys something new today.
but was it answered 100%?? I just want to hijack a thread...😀
If it was a therapeutics question... I would give 93 out of 100.
no one will ever answer my question 100% unless you're reading my mind.
but npage was scary close...even cited the article I was using to base my argument. Kwinkadinka? Perhaps to a degree... but an educated conicidence.
A conspiracy...btw, you should be an academic professor...No one would ever get an "A".
cute girls will always get an A...
Yeah, I would say so...Id have to agree.
I grade on a beauty curve..
Thats how I decide who gets their controls early...😀 j/k