Destroyer OC #152 vs. Kaplan

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DRHOYA

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
746
Reaction score
1
This is a pretty straightforward question in Destroyer. The answer is D, the highly branched hydrocarbon. However, straight out of Kaplan's book, it says "increased branching decreases boiling point and melting point" ?? Destroyer's explanation clearly says that while increasing branching does lower boiling point, it raises the melting point because branched molecules can fit better into a crystal structure. These two materials completely contradict each other. I know the answer is D based on the symmetry, and that the branched choice D happens to be copletely symmetrical. So when comparing for melting point, does symmetry take precedence? Little things like these make me nervous to what the answer would be on the real DAT.......this should be an easy question. What say you??

Members don't see this ad.
 
I am not 100% sure what the destroyer says and what Kalpans says but if there is a discrepancy definitely go with destrpyer. Everyone knows that Kaplans is riddled with mistakes.
 
yea ive taken into account that mistake made by kaplan as well...

Basically destroyer says the MP will be higher the more branching you have because you can pack the molecule better, however the BP will be lower for branched molecules...

Just know that branched molecules have higher MP but lower BP...
 
Destroyer is correct! Kaplan is mistaken her.

The main reason why a more branched structure which contains symmetry has a great melting point is because it can fit nicely into a crystal form, tightening it's bonds. Once those bonds are broken which takes a lot of energy, therefore melting point is high, to boil the molecule isn't as hard. Also that molecule has much less dispersion force compared to for example a molecule with no branching, which will have a greater dispersion force, therefore making a molecule higher in it's boiling point.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/archive/index.php/t-221544.html
i found this:


Short answer: Branching will decrease mp and bp. Condensing and freezing happen for alkanes because of dispersion forces caused by temporary, induced dipoles, which are the only intermolecular forces holding nonpolar molecules like alkanes together in the liquid and solid states. Branched alkanes have smaller dispersion forces compared to straight-chain alkanes of the same MW, so they will be harder to liquify or freeze.

Long answer: Let's imagine that we are cooling down a gaseous alkane like hexane that is straight-chained, versus another of the same MW that is branched, like 2,3-dimethylbutane. Remember that gases don't have any intermolecular interactions, at least not if they're ideal. As we lower the temperature, the molecules stop moving as much, and they begin to have intermolecular interactions that are due to induced, temporary dipoles (http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showpost.php?p=2872471&postcount=10) called London dispersion forces.

Ok, so now we need to consider what kinds of molecules will have the strongest induced dipoles. The strength of the induced dipoles is directly proportional to the surface areas of the molecules that are coming into contact. This is intuitive, because if contact can be made over a greater area, there is a greater chance that electrons will distribute unequally at some point over that surface, causing the temporary dipole and inducing dipoles in the neighboring molecule. You may know that the shape with the smallest surface area-to-volume ratio is a sphere. So molecules that are more spherical (ie, highly branched) do not have very much surface area relative to molecules that are long and extended (straight chains). That is why branched molecules have weaker dispersion forces versus straight-chains. Since they have weaker dispersion forces, the branched molecules will tend to want to stay in the gaseous phase longer, and you'll have to cool them further to force them to condense into a liquid. This means that branched compounds have a lower bp (condense at a lower temperature) versus straight chains.

As we continue to cool, the molecules continue to move closer and closer together, and their interactions continue to increase. Eventually, we reach a point where they begin to crystallize, or at least form an amorphous solid. So we need to consider how well the molecules pack together at this point. Branched compounds are like little spheres, or like porcupines. It's hard to get them to pack well, and this means that you will have to cool them to a lower temperature to freeze them (lower mp) compared with straight chains, which can stack up nicely, more like a cord of firewood. So the mp of a branched compound will be lower than that of a straight chain, assuming that they have the same MW.

Caveat: This information is probably beyond what you'd be expected to know about isomer properties for the MCAT, but I wanted to clarify this issue since a few people have asked about it. Please note that the effect of chain branching on alkane melting points is much harder to predict compared to its effect on alkane boiling points. In general, branching lowers van der Waals overlap between the two molecules, and therefore also lowers melting points. For example, n-pentane (mp = -130 C) has a higher mp than 2-methylbutane (mp = -160 C). However, some highly symmetrical branched alkane isomers will have abnormally high melting points because of their excellent packing properties. For instance, 2,2-dimethylpropane (mp = -17 C) has a much higher mp than either n-pentane or 2-methylbutane for this reason.
 
well, i know from my notes, longer hydrocarbon chains increase bp/mp with length since the bonds are harder to break, branching decreases bp/mp.

for alkenes, its a bit different..
trans alkenes pack better in sold state so their mp is higher, but boiling point is lower because theres no polarity to overcome. For cis alkenes, there is a net polarity so boiling point is higher here because it will takes more to overcome those bonds. Cis alkenes have lower melting point since they dont pack as well as trans.

actually i just realized this was from kaplan. go wtih destroyer. lol
 
Last edited:
^ Ok??!!??

Anyway, so from what I've gathered, simply put based on destroyer's reasoning. Increasing the chain length obviously increases BP and MP. Increasing branching decreases the BP, but increases MP. Hydrogen bonding increases BP. Ionic compounds will have higher BP compared to hydrocarbons. That should be it. I'm glad this error is rectified.
 
Top