applying disadvantaged??

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

meanderson

Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2003
Messages
681
Reaction score
0
What are the general guidelines for applying as disadvantaged? I certainly didn't feel disadvantaged growing up, but I'm just curious what sort of situation most applicants who apply as disadvantaged were in growing up.
 
It usually means severe hardships. I would think physical handicaps or financial hardships would fall under this line.

I claimed myself disadvantaged. Briefly, cause I don't have much time, my life went something like this:
My mother is a schizophrenic and my father had a stilll experimental liver transplant and a boatload of other procedures when I was growing up. Both spent extended periods in the hospital. Because of this, I bounced from family member to family member in the city. My family was lower class to begin with, and even when I could live with my parents we really had no money. We lived on government assistance, which is something AMCAS asks about in the disadvantaged section. My public city schools were a joke, and the state actually closed down my high school after I dropped out.

Some told me not to apply as disadvantaged. I don't think putting that onto AMCAS really helped me, though my family background probably helped me at interviews because I had plenty to talk about.
 
I'm not sure(that's why I asked the question), but I'm pretty sure it would be unwise to put disadvantaged because of

1) parents divorced
2) parents couldn't pay for college and had to work/take out loans

I think disadvantaged in this case is probably referring to things like a significant amount of time spent in foster care. If every applicant who had to work during college or whose parents broke up could be counted as disadvantage a large % of applicants would be disadvantaged...thus negating the advantage.
 
If you go disadvant. status because of income, you should at least qualify for the FAP to prove that you indeed have financial need. The divorce rate is high, but that doesn't mean you can't use it as one of the criteria; that said, it shouldn't be your only criteria. My parents are divorced, my dad is always in and out of jail because he uses drugs, my mother is always in between jobs as a secretary. I've worked since I was in elementary to help the family. My interviewers had no doubt that I was indeed disadvantaged. In fact they found my story unique. So not everyone's parents are divorced. When I was applying, some people told me not to go as disadvantaged. Don't let anyone talk you out of it if you think you deserve it. You're not asking for handouts. You're just letting them know that you've had to work harder than the average applicant to get here and that you were able to overcome obstacles with flying colors. It's something significant that the committees should know about you.
 
Financial need alone should not be criteria, unless like others have stated you were on welfare. Also there is no excuse for having a subpar application. I have worked all through college with no support, and got by with a pretty loaded resume. However if you are first generation (no prents finished college in the US) or had family health problems that caused a great deal of struggle these could qualify you. It should be more then just low income.
 
post a poll to find out. 😀
 
Originally posted by Yogi Bear
post a poll to find out. 😀

I knew that was coming from you Yogi Bear (official poll-keeper of SDN)! :laugh:
 
Originally posted by chibihamsta
If you go disadvant. status because of income, you should at least qualify for the FAP to prove that you indeed have financial need.

This is not true. FAP deals with ones financial standing at the time of application. Where as disadvantaged statues relates to one's childhood.
 
Top