Why do DO stuednts do allo residencies?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

muscme

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
If I decide on the DO school i got into, i feel like i would go into an AOA residency because i like to have a pre-set path laid out for me - it feels more comfortable. Plus, I wouldn't have to take the usmle along with the comlex if i go AOA.

Why do DO students go to allo, ACGME residencies (or whatever it's called) instead of AOA, osteo residencies, anyway?
 
If I decide on the DO school i got into, i feel like i would go into an AOA residency because i like to have a pre-set path laid out for me - it feels more comfortable. Plus, I wouldn't have to take the usmle along with the comlex if i go AOA.

1. Having a "pre-set path" (whatever that means) and "feeling more comfortable" won't mean jack when you have trouble getting hospital privileges or a job because of AOA board certification status (as opposed to ACGME).

2. You don't HAVE to take USMLE to get into ACGME residencies - plenty of uncompetitive ACGME programs will be happy to take you with COMLEX scores. Most of us advocate taking the USMLE in order to facilitate entry into more competitive programs.


Why do DO students go to allo, ACGME residencies (or whatever it's called) instead of AOA, osteo residencies, anyway?

1. More residencies in more locations
2. BETTER residencies overall. Top AOA residencies compare, at best, to mid-tier ACGME programs.
3. ACGME board certification (the standard in this country) which will make your future career a lot easier in terms of getting a job and hospital privileges.
 
1. Having a "pre-set path" (whatever that means) and "feeling more comfortable" won't mean jack when you have trouble getting hospital privileges or a job because of AOA board certification status (as opposed to ACGME).

2. You don't HAVE to take USMLE to get into ACGME residencies - plenty of uncompetitive ACGME programs will be happy to take you with COMLEX scores. Most of us advocate taking the USMLE in order to facilitate entry into more competitive programs.




1. More residencies in more locations
2. BETTER residencies overall. Top AOA residencies compare, at best, to mid-tier ACGME programs.
3. ACGME board certification (the standard in this country) which will make your future career a lot easier in terms of getting a job and hospital privileges.

Please elaborate on the Job/Privileges thing if you don't mind. This is the first I've heard of such a problem.
 
Anesthesia, for instance, some hospitals only allow ABA board certified anesthesiologists on staff.
 
Is the AOA BC thing really that big of an issue? The only field I've heard any issue with is Gas? Do people foresee a lot of problems working for hospitals without ACGME cert, or is this really going to limit your options??
 
When I finished at NYCOM in '06, there were not enough osteo residencies for all graduates from osteopathic schools to enroll. I suspect this is still the case.

Don't be afraid to stray from the path. I see too many students who avoid far superior ACGME programs because of fear they won't be able to practice in certain states or because they don't think they will get a competitive speciality or subsequent fellowship.

Bottom line: You will see that where you go to residency is very important. go to the best place you can get into. In many cases, I don't think AOA programs will be able to compare.
 
Some residencies are only available ACGME... example: genetics. There are no osteopathic genetics residencies. Also, as everyone has mentioned, there's the geographic location thing.
 
1. Having a "pre-set path" (whatever that means) and "feeling more comfortable" won't mean jack when you have trouble getting hospital privileges or a job because of AOA board certification status (as opposed to ACGME).

I too would like for you to delve further into this. Take out Anesthesia, and is this even an issue?
 
Please elaborate on the Job/Privileges thing if you don't mind. This is the first I've heard of such a problem.

Anesthesia, for instance, some hospitals only allow ABA board certified anesthesiologists on staff.

Is the AOA BC thing really that big of an issue? The only field I've heard any issue with is Gas? Do people foresee a lot of problems working for hospitals without ACGME cert, or is this really going to limit your options??

I think by the time we (c/o 2014) finish our residencies, discrimination against osteopathic residencies will be so diminished that it won't matter. Just like I posted in a thread a few days ago, Carolinas Medical Center in my state just recently adopted a policy to give privileges to AOA certified physicians.
.

I too would like for you to delve further into this. Take out Anesthesia, and is this even an issue?

I'm a little surprised that that particular comment elicited all these responses. Honestly, I thought that students and residents were somewhat aware of this already.

The answer is yes, some (not all) hospitals don't recognize AOA board certification and won't allow AOA-certified physicians to have staff privileges. My experience (based on classmates who trained at ACGME surgical programs) is that this is more of an issue with surgery and surgical specialties nowadays because it has to do with the different standards that the boards use for certification. The number of surgical cases required for surgical board certification is supposedly different for AOA surgical programs vs. ACGME, and some areas that the ACGME surgical programs require exposure to are not required by the AOA boards. As a result, some feel that AOA-trained surgical specialists have inferior training.

A good argument can be made that the differences in curricula don't necessarily translate into better or worse outcomes for patients, but from my point of view it isn't worth training hard in residency to have your credentials questioned. My opinion is that DOs should pursue ACGME training whenever possible to avoid this issue completely.
 
I'm a little surprised that that particular comment elicited all these responses. Honestly, I thought that students and residents were somewhat aware of this already.

The answer is yes, some (not all) hospitals don't recognize AOA board certification and won't allow AOA-certified physicians to have staff privileges. My experience (based on classmates who trained at ACGME surgical programs) is that this is more of an issue with surgery and surgical specialties nowadays because it has to do with the different standards that the boards use for certification. The number of surgical cases required for surgical board certification is supposedly different for AOA surgical programs vs. ACGME, and some areas that the ACGME surgical programs require exposure to are not required by the AOA boards. As a result, some feel that AOA-trained surgical specialists have inferior training.

A good argument can be made that the differences in curricula don't necessarily translate into better or worse outcomes for patients, but from my point of view it isn't worth training hard in residency to have your credentials questioned. My opinion is that DOs should pursue ACGME training whenever possible to avoid this issue completely.

Agreed.
 
i'm 100% sure that i want to do primary care. do you still think AOA certification would be a problem if i do AOA psychiatry or I.M. or something? Aren't AOA residencies in primary care considered to be good?
 
Just typing psychiatry into the DO residency website http://opportunities.osteopathic.org shows that there are only 9 osteopathic psychiatry residencies in the entire US! I can't comment on the quality of these programs, but that just shows one reason why doing an osteopathic residency may not be ideal. If you are doing IM and decide you want to do a competitive IM fellowship like cardiology or GI, you will certainly want to do an allopathic IM residency as there are many more allopathic fellowship opportunities than osteopathic fellowships. I'm doing pediatrics and researching the programs, I found that many of the osteopathic pediatric residencies weren't even at free-standing children's hospitals!

I also wanted to mention to the OP that since you haven't even started medical school yet, you can't be "100% sure" that you want to do primary care. Shadowing or volunteering is nothing like actually working in family medicine, or surgery, etc etc. I have seen several of my classmates who were hard-core family medicine go into surgery.....you just don't know until you start doing clinical rotations. Good luck!
 
Last edited:
I'm a little surprised that that particular comment elicited all these responses. Honestly, I thought that students and residents were somewhat aware of this already.

The answer is yes, some (not all) hospitals don't recognize AOA board certification and won't allow AOA-certified physicians to have staff privileges. My experience (based on classmates who trained at ACGME surgical programs) is that this is more of an issue with surgery and surgical specialties nowadays because it has to do with the different standards that the boards use for certification. The number of surgical cases required for surgical board certification is supposedly different for AOA surgical programs vs. ACGME, and some areas that the ACGME surgical programs require exposure to are not required by the AOA boards. As a result, some feel that AOA-trained surgical specialists have inferior training.

A good argument can be made that the differences in curricula don't necessarily translate into better or worse outcomes for patients, but from my point of view it isn't worth training hard in residency to have your credentials questioned. My opinion is that DOs should pursue ACGME training whenever possible to avoid this issue completely.

I personally wasn't aware of it, and I can only assume from the response, that many others were not as well. I'm afraid this issue still doesn't look too cut and dry to me. Seems like it could matter for some fields, not as much for others. Some hospitals may care, others could really care, some could ask to check into what AOA BC means, others could be completely fine with it, etc. I get the point of 'go ACGME' it is just safer, but the reality is that this may not be an option for everyone. Especially in surgical fields. I'd like to think this issue will resolve itself or that the AOA is 'working on it,' but I find it a little disheartening. Granted, I've always 100% planned on working in private practice, but it's frustrating to hear after 8 years of schooling and 3-god knows how many years of residency ... that any opportunity in your respective field would be closed to you. Does anyone have any stats on hospitals that care, or is this more regional, anecdotal, etc? Thanks for the advice too.
 
i'm 100% sure that i want to do primary care. do you still think AOA certification would be a problem if i do AOA psychiatry or I.M. or something? Aren't AOA residencies in primary care considered to be good?

Well, first of all, Psychiatry isn't primary care. Primary care residencies are IM, FP, Pediatrics, and (maybe) Ob/Gyn.

Secondly, Bitsy is absolutely correct. Most medical students go into school thinking they want to do a particular field (myself included) and end up doing something different, many times completely different.

Consider this article:
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/300/10/1154

There's a reason American grads, both MD and DO, are running away from primary care. Reimbursements are not great compared to specialties, and the stress , workload, and unfortunate lack of respect associated with primary care practices have driven MD and DO students away.

As far as AOA training goes, there's a phrase in DO's Eat Their Young that goes something like "the apex of osteopathic training is the nadir of allopathic training". No matter what the specialty, you're more likely to get better training at a top ACGME program than at a top AOA program. Even if you want to do primary care, would you rather be a physician who trains with leaders in the field at Mass General or Wash U, or one who trains in an obscure AOA program? If you were a patient choosing your personal primary care physician, which program's graduate would you choose (honestly)?

I personally wasn't aware of it, and I can only assume from the response, that many others were not as well. I'm afraid this issue still doesn't look too cut and dry to me. Seems like it could matter for some fields, not as much for others. Some hospitals may care, others could really care, some could ask to check into what AOA BC means, others could be completely fine with it, etc. I get the point of 'go ACGME' it is just safer, but the reality is that this may not be an option for everyone. Especially in surgical fields. I'd like to think this issue will resolve itself or that the AOA is 'working on it,' but I find it a little disheartening. Granted, I've always 100% planned on working in private practice, but it's frustrating to hear after 8 years of schooling and 3-god knows how many years of residency ... that any opportunity in your respective field would be closed to you. Does anyone have any stats on hospitals that care, or is this more regional, anecdotal, etc? Thanks for the advice too.

I doubt there are any publicly available statistics available to answer your question. And it is true that training in certain ACGME programs as a DO isn't always an option. I just think it's important for students to understand that ACGME training and AOA training aren't necessarily equivalent, despite what many people (with hidden agendas) will tell you. The AOA and osteopathic school clinical faculty have no interest in letting students know about these things. Being entirely honest about this would further discourage students from applying to AOA residencies, the last thing that these folks want to happen.

Keep in mind, also, that even physicians who work in private practice need hospital privileges...
 
I doubt there are any publicly available statistics available to answer your question. And it is true that training in certain ACGME programs as a DO isn't always an option. I just think it's important for students to understand that ACGME training and AOA training aren't necessarily equivalent, despite what many people (with hidden agendas) will tell you. The AOA and osteopathic school clinical faculty have no interest in letting students know about these things. Being entirely honest about this would further discourage students from applying to AOA residencies, the last thing that these folks want to happen.

Keep in mind, also, that even physicians who work in private practice need hospital privileges...

Again, I seem to find this answer inconclusive, and I think that is the best I can get out of it. Since, as you said, there are no statistics or surveys or anything for that manner explaining this issue, I have to chalk it up to anecdotal situations. Also, since I rarely hear of DOs through AOA residencies not able to work, and I know these people aren't all in hospitals in the midwest, I have to think they are doing alright??? I can only assume it's going to be a case by case situation, and for people who want to go into a lot of surgical fields, rads, derm, etc, AOA is the best option. I guess I don't really know what to make out of the situation, nor do I think the situation will stay constant in the future. Guess it's just a big 'shrug.'

Also, are you saying it is impossible to go into practice in any field without hospital privileges somewhere? If you're a dermatologist, for example, do you have to have hospitals privileges somewhere to stay BC err something? Again, I'd never heard this.
 
"Also, since I rarely hear of DOs through AOA residencies not able to work, and I know these people aren't all in hospitals in the midwest, I have to think they are doing alright???"
Its not like they can't find work, its just that they can't work anywhere they want to in the US. They maybe able to work in California, yes. Just not at certain hospitals where they may want to.
 
Again, I seem to find this answer inconclusive, and I think that is the best I can get out of it. Since, as you said, there are no statistics or surveys or anything for that manner explaining this issue, I have to chalk it up to anecdotal situations.

from http://courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt/Press/May2005.pdf

FISHER v W.A. FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (case no. 126333)
Attorney for plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, D.O.: Philip Green/(734) 665-4036
Attorney for defendant W. A. Foote Memorial Hospital: Susan Healy Zitterman/(313) 965-
7905
Attorneys for amicus curiae American Osteopathic Association, Michigan Osteopathic
Association, and American College of Osteopathic Surgeons: Robert L. Weyhing, III, Paul C.
Smith/(313) 965-8300
Trial court: Jackson County Circuit Court
At issue: The plaintiff, a board-certified osteopathic surgeon, applied for privileges with the defendant hospital’s surgery department. The department denied his application, based on its requirement that a staff physician must have completed a certain type of residency program; the department also requires a staff physician to have an allopathic board certification. The plaintiff sued, alleging that the defendant discriminates against osteopathic surgeons in violation of MCL 333.21513(e), part of the Public Health Code. Does this statute give the plaintiff a private cause of action against the hospital?
Background: Plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, a licensed osteopathic surgeon, applied for staff privileges with defendant W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital’s department of surgery. To be eligible as a staff physician in that department, a candidate must have successfully completed a residency training program approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The surgery department also required that a candidate be certified, or eligible to be certified, by the American Board of Surgery. This certification policy places the burden on the applicant to establish that his or her education, training, experience and competence is equivalent to ACGME training and certification. The hospital’s board of trustees denied Fisher’s request for a waiver of these requirements; the board concluded that his training and experience did not meet the specified criteria. Fisher then sued the hospital, claiming that the hospital illegally discriminated against him based on his status as an osteopathic physician and contrary to a provision of the Public Health Code (MCL 333.21513(e)). The statute provides
in part that a hospital “… shall not discriminate in the selection and appointment of individuals to the physician staff of the hospital or its training programs on the basis of licensure or registration or professional education as doctors of medicine, osteopathic medicine and surgery, or podiatry.” The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of the hospital and dismissed
Fisher’s claim on the ground that a hospital’s staffing decisions were not subject to judicial review. The trial court also held that Fisher failed to establish that he was subjected to discriminatory treatment based on his status as an osteopath, in light of the evidence that the hospital regularly awarded staff privileges to osteopathic physicians. The Court of Appeals
affirmed the trial court’s ruling, but for a different reason. It held that MCL 333.21513(e) does not create a private cause of action. Fisher appeals.



Also, are you saying it is impossible to go into practice in any field without hospital privileges somewhere? If you're a dermatologist, for example, do you have to have hospitals privileges somewhere to stay BC err something? Again, I'd never heard this.

Not always needed, but a pain if you do need hospital privileges and can't get them.
 
"Also, since I rarely hear of DOs through AOA residencies not able to work, and I know these people aren't all in hospitals in the midwest, I have to think they are doing alright???"
Its not like they can't find work, its just that they can't work anywhere they want to in the US. They maybe able to work in California, yes. Just not at certain hospitals where they may want to.

Yeah, I mean ... I'm not going to sit here like a fool and deny it is a reality, but I was looking at hospitals in CA last night and even ones that had very, very few DOs on board (and those that were, did ACGME), still had a little blurb in the glossary or whatever, where BC was through AOA or ACGME, which leads me to believe that technically, legally, etc, they do take AOA BC DOs. I guess the lesson here is just to be realistic about your training and realize, that for better or worse, that as of right now, there are some places where being BC through AOA can cause an issue in some sense???
 
from http://courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt/Press/May2005.pdf

FISHER v W.A. FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (case no. 126333)
Attorney for plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, D.O.: Philip Green/(734) 665-4036
Attorney for defendant W. A. Foote Memorial Hospital: Susan Healy Zitterman/(313) 965-
7905
Attorneys for amicus curiae American Osteopathic Association, Michigan Osteopathic
Association, and American College of Osteopathic Surgeons: Robert L. Weyhing, III, Paul C.
Smith/(313) 965-8300
Trial court: Jackson County Circuit Court
At issue: The plaintiff, a board-certified osteopathic surgeon, applied for privileges with the defendant hospital's surgery department. The department denied his application, based on its requirement that a staff physician must have completed a certain type of residency program; the department also requires a staff physician to have an allopathic board certification. The plaintiff sued, alleging that the defendant discriminates against osteopathic surgeons in violation of MCL 333.21513(e), part of the Public Health Code. Does this statute give the plaintiff a private cause of action against the hospital?
Background: Plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, a licensed osteopathic surgeon, applied for staff privileges with defendant W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital's department of surgery. To be eligible as a staff physician in that department, a candidate must have successfully completed a residency training program approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The surgery department also required that a candidate be certified, or eligible to be certified, by the American Board of Surgery. This certification policy places the burden on the applicant to establish that his or her education, training, experience and competence is equivalent to ACGME training and certification. The hospital's board of trustees denied Fisher's request for a waiver of these requirements; the board concluded that his training and experience did not meet the specified criteria. Fisher then sued the hospital, claiming that the hospital illegally discriminated against him based on his status as an osteopathic physician and contrary to a provision of the Public Health Code (MCL 333.21513(e)). The statute provides
in part that a hospital "… shall not discriminate in the selection and appointment of individuals to the physician staff of the hospital or its training programs on the basis of licensure or registration or professional education as doctors of medicine, osteopathic medicine and surgery, or podiatry." The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of the hospital and dismissed
Fisher's claim on the ground that a hospital's staffing decisions were not subject to judicial review. The trial court also held that Fisher failed to establish that he was subjected to discriminatory treatment based on his status as an osteopath, in light of the evidence that the hospital regularly awarded staff privileges to osteopathic physicians. The Court of Appeals
affirmed the trial court's ruling, but for a different reason. It held that MCL 333.21513(e) does not create a private cause of action. Fisher appeals.

Sounds like a mess.


Do you mind sharing what field you are in???
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a mess.
EDIT: Didn't realize this was in Mississippi (love spelling that word). Isn't the South known for their large DO discrimination?? Nearly every example I've heard of in the last few years comes from down there.

Do you mind sharing what field you are in???

It's in Michigan (Jackson, Michigan to be specific). Not really surprising being one of the notorious five.
 
I'm only a pre-pod so take my comments with a grain of salt.

As I understand it, DPMs also face discrimination in some hospitals...not sure how widespread this is...but I have heard a lot of stories of DPMs fighting for surgical privileges by showing their surgery log from their residency training. I have also heard of instances where DPMs have invited the Ortho department to 'supervise' some of their surgeries in order to show that they are qualified. So I would imagine that a lot of these policies are not so cut and dry.

Basically what I'm saying is that you can convince hospitals to give you hospital and surgical privileges even though they normally would not grant them to you. There are ways to change these policies and end the discrimination.
 
It's in Michigan (Jackson, Michigan to be specific). Not really surprising being one of the notorious five.

Whoops. Ugh, don't know where my head is at. I find it funny that some of the biggest DO areas have problems like this. I think Philly had some funny thing on the books until very recently where PAs working for DOs couldn't write the same scripts as those working under MDs. For some reason I thought it was Jackson, Mississippi. Are DO issues in Michigan common?
 
Whoops. Ugh, don't know where my head is at. I find it funny that some of the biggest DO areas have problems like this. I think Philly had some funny thing on the books until very recently where PAs working for DOs couldn't write the same scripts as those working under MDs. For some reason I thought it was Jackson, Mississippi. Are DO issues in Michigan common?

I thought Michigan was really DO friendly since they have like 12097218947421 DO residency spots.
 
I thought Michigan was really DO friendly since they have like 12097218947421 DO residency spots.

Me too. Maybe the old' boy MD surgeons up there really don't like DOs because of how many programs there are in state, etc, so stuff like this happens? I really have no clue. I'm gonna focus on school/the stuff to get to the residency process before I put TOO much thought into these sort of issues (though I'll try to be as aware of them as possible).
 
from http://courts.michigan.gov/supremecourt/Press/May2005.pdf

FISHER v W.A. FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (case no. 126333)
Attorney for plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, D.O.: Philip Green/(734) 665-4036
Attorney for defendant W. A. Foote Memorial Hospital: Susan Healy Zitterman/(313) 965-
7905
Attorneys for amicus curiae American Osteopathic Association, Michigan Osteopathic
Association, and American College of Osteopathic Surgeons: Robert L. Weyhing, III, Paul C.
Smith/(313) 965-8300
Trial court: Jackson County Circuit Court
At issue: The plaintiff, a board-certified osteopathic surgeon, applied for privileges with the defendant hospital’s surgery department. The department denied his application, based on its requirement that a staff physician must have completed a certain type of residency program; the department also requires a staff physician to have an allopathic board certification. The plaintiff sued, alleging that the defendant discriminates against osteopathic surgeons in violation of MCL 333.21513(e), part of the Public Health Code. Does this statute give the plaintiff a private cause of action against the hospital?
Background: Plaintiff Lowell R. Fisher, a licensed osteopathic surgeon, applied for staff privileges with defendant W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital’s department of surgery. To be eligible as a staff physician in that department, a candidate must have successfully completed a residency training program approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). The surgery department also required that a candidate be certified, or eligible to be certified, by the American Board of Surgery. This certification policy places the burden on the applicant to establish that his or her education, training, experience and competence is equivalent to ACGME training and certification. The hospital’s board of trustees denied Fisher’s request for a waiver of these requirements; the board concluded that his training and experience did not meet the specified criteria. Fisher then sued the hospital, claiming that the hospital illegally discriminated against him based on his status as an osteopathic physician and contrary to a provision of the Public Health Code (MCL 333.21513(e)). The statute provides
in part that a hospital “… shall not discriminate in the selection and appointment of individuals to the physician staff of the hospital or its training programs on the basis of licensure or registration or professional education as doctors of medicine, osteopathic medicine and surgery, or podiatry.” The trial court granted summary disposition in favor of the hospital and dismissed
Fisher’s claim on the ground that a hospital’s staffing decisions were not subject to judicial review. The trial court also held that Fisher failed to establish that he was subjected to discriminatory treatment based on his status as an osteopath, in light of the evidence that the hospital regularly awarded staff privileges to osteopathic physicians. The Court of Appeals
affirmed the trial court’s ruling, but for a different reason. It held that MCL 333.21513(e) does not create a private cause of action. Fisher appeals.




wow, this is scary. Do you think things have changed for the better 5 years after the ruling?
 
seems like the AOA has got our back though in the form of "legal assistance" although who knows with all that happened in michigan of all places:

https://www.facos.org/scriptcontent/aboutacosdenpriv.cfm

Remember that you'll never hear stories of the hospitals where this doesn't happen,AOA BC docs have privileges, and everything is fine (which I can only assume would be the majority). My guess is to be aware of this, but don't fear it and take everything with a grain of salt. Opinions run high all over the site. People will tell you that you will have no problems, then others will counter with opposite opinions, etc, etc. Truth probably lies somewhere in the middle, and most people probably have very specific situations from which they form an opinion.
 
In response to the OP - because we can.
 
Whoops. Ugh, don't know where my head is at. I find it funny that some of the biggest DO areas have problems like this. I think Philly had some funny thing on the books until very recently where PAs working for DOs couldn't write the same scripts as those working under MDs. For some reason I thought it was Jackson, Mississippi. Are DO issues in Michigan common?

As far as I know being an OMS-0, not really. I've volunteered and worked at numerous Michigan hospitals owned and operated by different groups and have seen DOs from all over the country working in various departments. Though I have no idea what they had to do to get there (ACGME or not, etc).
 
Some residencies are only available ACGME... example: genetics. There are no osteopathic genetics residencies.

Same for pathology.

Daedra22 said:
Also, as everyone has mentioned, there's the geographic location thing.

I am somewhat surprised at how concentrated certain DO residencies are in some parts of the country. OB/GYN, for instance:

California - (1)
Illinois - (1)
Michigan - (12)
New Jersey - (2)
New York - (4)
Ohio - (4)
Oklahoma - (2)
Pennsylvania (2)

Of course, if you are interested in OB/GYN, you have much bigger problems than that. 🙄
 
Can someone shed some light on a typical DO hospital with residency programs, and how they differ with comparable ACGME accredited hospitals? No, I'm not referring to the small community ones, but more like the tertiary care centers.

I've not really seen the "big DO centers," so I was curious to hear how different or similar things are.
 
1
3. ACGME board certification (the standard in this country) which will make your future career a lot easier in terms of getting a job and hospital privileges.

Excuse my naivety, however, does ACGME board certification mean that you went through an ACGME residency, or does it mean you have to complete all the USMLE board exam steps in conjunction with completing an ACGME residency?
 
Excuse my naivety, however, does ACGME board certification mean that you went through an ACGME residency, or does it mean you have to complete all the USMLE board exam steps in conjunction with completing an ACGME residency?
Completion of an ACGME residency and that specialty's boards (FM boards, IM boards, Surgery boards, etc). You don't have to pass all the USMLEs. Some ACGME programs take COMLEX scores, but completion will make you ACGME board certified. I'm about 85% sure bout this, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Completion of an ACGME residency and that specialty's boards (FM boards, IM boards, Surgery boards, etc). You don't have to pass all the USMLEs. Some ACGME programs take COMLEX scores, but completion will make you ACGME board certified. I'm about 85% sure bout this, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
completing the residency is what makes you board eligible. there is no requirement for DO's to take the USMLE. also going this route, you can't sit for the DO boards (unless you go to a dual accredited program)
 
...also going this route, you can't sit for the DO boards (unless you go to a dual accredited program)

You can in some specialties, like IM. I don't know about others, but Resolution 56 provides for it.


From the AOBIM said:
The Examination – The examination for certification in internal medicine through this pathway is administered annually and is a computer-based examination offered at 200 sites nationwide. The 2010 certifying examination will be held on September 16, 2010.

Deadline for Application – To qualify for the 2010 examination, one must complete the application process to the AOA for Resolution 56 approval and to the AOBIM for the exam by April 1, 2010. An additional fee of $200 will be added to all applications postmarked after April 1, 2010. Late registration deadline is May 1, 2010. No applications will be accepted after May 1st, but will be considered for the examination given during the next calendar year.
 
why do AOA trained anesthesiologists have trouble getting into hospitals more than other fields?
 
why do AOA trained anesthesiologists have trouble getting into hospitals more than other fields?
they don't. If they are board certified, then it's a personality thing. I've met many a DO anesthesiologist at some very good hospitals.
 
Why do people have fun asking questions that are untrue in an attempt to stir up trouble on anonymous forums?


not trying to stir up problems. i'm going to be a DO class of 2014, so no beef. i was just reading some posts earlier on by Jagger and some others regarding aoa gas. i may have just misunderstood them.
 
DOs that did acgme gas residencies don't have very many problems, but those who do AOA residencies sometimes are automatically disqualified from some jobs. It comes down to numbers and training. The DO program i'm familiar with doesn't get trauma, neuro, or transplant exposure.
 
Yeah, to be honest, the only issues I've ever heard were:

-concerning gas ... people were just saying ACGME is the 'gold standard,' so I took it that some hospitals had issues with AOA BC.

-I once heard an EM attending saying his group had plenty of DOs, but they'd never hired one from AOA residency. I don't know if this meant that they wouldn't or they just hadn't.

-A few comments about surgery in this thread, but I'd never heard that outside of here and I asked about it in the g-surg forums and no one really replied so ... dunno???
 
DOs that did acgme gas residencies don't have very many problems, but those who do AOA residencies sometimes are automatically disqualified from some jobs. It comes down to numbers and training. The DO program i'm familiar with doesn't get trauma, neuro, or transplant exposure.

Which program is this? I am looking into anesthesiology, so I am very curious. Thanks
 
Top