- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 735
- Reaction score
- 81
So I've been mainly using TPRH for bio content and BR bio for passages. I read the TPRH enzyme/metabolism chapter and got all of the in-text questions correct as I was going. So then I flip through BR's analogous chapter to compare. Looks like they go WAY in dept about a lot of crazy math having to do with enzyme kinetics and the Lineweaver-Burk plot. Needless to say, those passages were pretty beyond me because I hadn't studied it. I muddled through and did OK-ish but didn't feel I had a good understanding (lots of POE and deductive reasoning, not much "oh, I know why this is right", etc.) Is there any reason to think that reading the BR bio books in general would be a worthwhile use of time? I usually mainly focus on TPRH and then when I go back to do the second third of the passages, I'll review my notes and thumb through BR just to fill in gaps. It seems that people prefer TPRH bio for content though, just wondered why this is... is it because BR bio is TOO in-depth and goes off on tangents?