I'm not bitter at all, I'm just warning you all that it's no guarantee like some people make it out to be. As I said, I was told by several folks at Missouri who either are or were on the adcom that even a thesis based masters degree does not necessarily help you get in. So it's a warning that it's not a free ticket and so to be careful of signing up for something that may be expensive, won't help necessarily you get in, and may be a waste of your time. I wouldn't be surprised if some schools with plan B programs pushed them to applicants lower in the pool as a cash cow more than anything.
I clearly NEVER said that everyone needs to get a masters degree, thesis based or no.
🙄 What my point is that these plan B programs may not even help and from what I've seen of the requirements and the coursework, they're not really any much different than taking 5 years to graduate than 4 years.
You're absolutely right. I did put a lot of hard work and effort into mine, which is why I maintain that a 1 year plan B "masters" should be differentiated from a 2-3 year research based masters. People can do them if they like, that's just fine, but if someone claims that their 1 year plan B program is the same as the work in research based masters, that's like a communication major saying their program was just as intense as a honors biochemistry major. They are just not the same. Heck, they couldn't even spell "masteres" right on that St. Joseph College site.
🙄
I did mine not to improve my application for anywhere, but because I was in between going to law school straight away (I already had my spot in law school) or doing a PhD and it was a good segway as I liked research, but didn't absolutely love it. If you just want to improve your app, there are MUCH MUCH less painful ways of going about it.

Anyway, point is, they should just call it something else. Simple as that. It could be a Diet Coke Masters. Or a research masters could be a Mini PhD. Whatever works. It's just confusing nomenclature which IMO needs to be clarified because it seems misleading one way or the other.