Last edited:
People from Northern Africa (who don't have ties to the black racial groups in africa) are considered Caucasian.Are you serious? Last time I checked Egypt is on the continent of Africa, it is an African country, and, therefore, she is African American. She is not cheating or lying about her ethnicity because that is how she may identify herself and rightfully so. I also hope you know that being racially insensitive and being priveleged is not exclusive to non - minorities. I don't know what was the purpose of stating that. Also, even if it was a situation where she was lying, mind your own business and worry about yourself.
Well Egypt is in Africa. I know so many people that do this it isn't even funny. It's obvious that the application is asking whether they are black but people love taking advantage of "loopholes". If you go off telling people it probably wouldn't even really accomplish anything because your "friend" could just say they misunderstood. Also I refuse to believe that person got into med school solely for being Native American. They probably got in because they were a well qualified applicant.
I didn't mean there was no race factor or URM advantage. I also didn't mean every well qualified applicant gets in. I simply meant that usually if an applicant gets in they will be well qualified regardless of whether or not they are URM.Plenty of well qualified people don't get in. Undoubtly race changes if people get accepted or not. I'm not saying its wrong or right. I'm not saying that these people wouldn't have got into medical school anyway. But race is clearly a factor in admissions.
Anyway this is just going to turn into another classic urm debate.
Egyptian isn't considered African American. I have friends that tried to claim this also.
Interesting point. Also: to everyone else in this thread: what about an ivory white South African pulling the same stunt?their fault for making stupid distinctions like that
wonder what they're going to do with all these mixed race kids
I really don't know what to do. This girl I know has been lying about being African American for all of undergrad (I found this out because her name just got announced for the african american scholarships) and has been getting scholarships for it. Now for medical school, she is applying as African American when she is really Egyptian. The thing is, i'm afraid she might actually get away with it since she kind of looks dark skinned and has been getting away with it for all of college and been getting all these scholarships that should be going to actual African Americans. She brags about how white she is and how she only has white friends, and says very racially insensitive things. She only gets mediocre grades and a mediocre mcat (a 27) even though she comes from a privileged family so she doesn't have actual disadvantages like actual minorities but doesn't work hard because she knows she can still get in.
Should I snitch on her? idk what is the right thing to do. I feel like she is taking away a spot from someone who will actually contribute to their community.
[citation needed]Interesting point. Also: to everyone else in this thread: what about an ivory white South African pulling the same stunt?
From what I've heard these people usually are forced into primary care because they can barely pass the step. Then they are more likely to actually do what so many doe-eyed premiers say they will and they return to their communities to practice medicine in underserved areas. On the other hand if they pull off a good step score and have honors etc. clearly they belonged in med school anyway.
Don't worry about it.
https://www.aamc.org/download/401814/data/aug2014aibpart2.pdf 30% more likely to practice in poverty. 20% more likely to practice in primary care. ~40[citation needed]
Mixed race kid checking in. My grandmother was born in Kenya, but is ethnically Indian (a large contingent of Indian farmers migrated to Nairobi). Had a cousin claim to be african-american (guess he could pull out the death certificate that showed place of birth), but the rest of the family thought that was bogus.their fault for making stupid distinctions like that
wonder what they're going to do with all these mixed race kids
How does one distinguish ethnicity? Is it colour? Is it their hair? Is it a specific gene? Is it their name? No, it's not. So what right have you got to tell someone that they are not the person who they claim to be? Furthermore, what qualification do you have that makes you an expert in these matters?I really don't know what to do. This girl I know has been lying about being African American for all of undergrad (I found this out because her name just got announced for the african american scholarships) and has been getting scholarships for it. Now for medical school, she is applying as African American when she is really Egyptian. The thing is, i'm afraid she might actually get away with it since she kind of looks dark skinned and has been getting away with it for all of college and been getting all these scholarships that should be going to actual African Americans. She brags about how white she is and how she only has white friends, and says very racially insensitive things. She only gets mediocre grades and a mediocre mcat (a 27) even though she comes from a privileged family so she doesn't have actual disadvantages like actual minorities but doesn't work hard because she knows she can still get in.
Should I snitch on her? idk what is the right thing to do. I feel like she is taking away a spot from someone who will actually contribute to their community.
Agreed with the first part. But don't think the rest is the case from observations.Anyway, all the race/ethnicity stuff pales in comparison to your socio-economic status, IMHO. I think med schools look to what community you identify with by your volunteer and ECs and disadvantaged status. Med schools are a bit more thoughtful about admissions than undergrad.
You can't put African American/Black unless you are physically black.How does one distinguish ethnicity? Is it colour? Is it their hair? Is it a specific gene? Is it their name? No, it's not. So what right have you got to tell someone that they are not the person who they claim to be? Furthermore, what qualification do you have that makes you an expert in these matters?
I don't see anything about them being forced into primary care, though.https://www.aamc.org/download/401814/data/aug2014aibpart2.pdf 30% more likely to practice in poverty. 20% more likely to practice in primary care. ~40
Asians seem to be the reverse, much less likely to practice in primary care. Interesting.
Also: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22708247/
First of all, all of the proper nouns you listed above are NATIONALITIES, not RACES/ETHNICITIES. You would do well to remember that an EGYPTIAN person can be either NEGROID or CAUCASOID. So, the EGYPTIAN under discussion could be either NEGROID or CAUCASOID. I've seen tons of black people who look white.Agreed with the first part. But don't think the rest is the case from observations.
Egyptians, North Africans, Middle Easterners are not seen as AA/Black for medical school. They are NOT URM. I know bc I'm one and this is what I been told by adcoms.
Also: SDN wisdom from LizzyM. See here:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/does-being-egyptian-classify-you-as-urm.908221/
Should I snitch on her? idk what is the right thing to do. I feel like she is taking away a spot from someone who will actually contribute to their community.
SNITCHES GET STITCHES YO
THE VAST MAJORITY OF Egyptians DEFINE THEMSELVES AS ARABS and ARABS AREN'T BLACK FOR AMCAS and ARE NOT UNDERREPRESENTED IN MEDICINE. This is directly from adcom members I know. I asked bc I am North African.First of all, all of the proper nouns you listed above are NATIONALITIES, not RACES/ETHNICITIES. You would do well to remember that an EGYPTIAN person can be either NEGROID or CAUCASOID. So, the EGYPTIAN under discussion could be either NEGROID or CAUCASOID. I've seen tons of black people who look white.
This person might be misrepresenting herself, but how are you going to snitch on her? Will you write a letter that says, "Hey AMCAS, A B C might be misrepresenting her racial info" ? I doubt that's going to get far. Unfortunately, I don't think that there's anything you can realistically do in this situation so I think you should let it go and focus on your own application.
If she reveals that her family is from Egypt on AMCAS or in an interview, I'm sure that adcoms can make their own determination of her race and their overall feeling of her as an applicant. No snitching necessary.
![]()
![]()
THE VAST MAJORITY OF Egyptians DEFINE THEMSELVES AS ARABS and ARABS AREN'T BLACK FOR AMCAS and ARE NOT UNDERREPRESENTED IN MEDICINE. This is directly from adcom members I know. I asked bc I am North African.
Your seeing "tons of black people who look white" has NOTHING to do with the question.
It actually has everything to do with the question. The person in question may not be Arab at all. She may actually be black, because other than Arab people, there are also many black people in Egypt. She might also be a black person, who looks white or Arab, which has resulted in this discussion. Im also from Africa, so it doesnt make you any more of an expert.THE VAST MAJORITY OF Egyptians DEFINE THEMSELVES AS ARABS and ARABS AREN'T BLACK FOR AMCAS and ARE NOT UNDERREPRESENTED IN MEDICINE. This is directly from adcom members I know. I asked bc I am North African.
Your seeing "tons of black people who look white" has NOTHING to do with the question.
Don't let this dissolve into a yelling match. Everyone with two eyes and a brain understands that AMCAS means Black people when they put Black/African-American; however, they do allow people to then check other boxes below this designation (i.e. Afro-Caribbean, African, African-American).
If OP's classmate decides to put Black/African-American then African they will be designated as URM. As my experiences showed this designation will make you a target for diversity outreach, as a part of that outreach they will pour through the applicant's background to determine the exact affiliation he/she has. At this point 99% of people who have falsified URM designation will be found out and not offered interview. For the 1% who make it thru the screen - they will likely have to interview with a diversity person at the school while they are there. At this point they will likely be uncovered.
Let them take the risk. Not your problem.
n=1, but with my experience at his school, I was interviewed by someone in the multicultural department. My experience was similar at other schools. At two of the schools, even though the person wasn't directly affiliated with the multiculturalism department, one interviewer interviewed all of the minority students (eg. there were 2 other African Americans, all of us were interviewed by the same person). It could very well be a coincidence in that case however.Do you have any firsthand experience with the bolded, or do you know if this happens at your institution/other medical schools? At least from my experience, I know plenty of students from African immigrant backgrounds who have checked off African American and made it into medical school without being called out on it.
Do you have any firsthand experience with the bolded, or do you know if this happens at your institution/other medical schools? At least from my experience, I know plenty of students from African immigrant backgrounds who have checked off African American and made it into medical school without being called out on it.
If you're Black African then you're fine. I meant Arab, South Asian, or White people from Africa who put down African American.
AA, Afro-Caribbean, Afro-Latino, Black African are all considered "Black/African-American" by AMCAS
This is very interesting to me. Essentially, you can be as African as the kid next door, living in the same neighborhood, same disadvantages etc., but if he happens to produce more melanin than you based on his genetic heritage, he has an advantage? Please correct me if I am wrong. It's just according to that statement, it seems this whole movement has everything to do with aesthetics and nothing to do with actually getting qualified people with different cultural backgrounds.
Are you arguing that if a black and a white South African living in the same neighborhood in SA (unlikely but okay) were to move to the US they would face the exact same challenges in our society?
That was the assumption in the hypothetical. And why is it any more likely that the "blacker" one will have more challenges than the "whiter" one?
That was the assumption in the hypothetical. And why is it any more likely that the "blacker" one will have more challenges than the "whiter" one?
By the way, now we're introducing issues of SES and disadvantage, which really can be looked at independent of race. I wanted to talk about getting cultural diversity in the schools, which I thought is what this whole URM thing is about. If so, why does one get an advantage over another from the same culture based on pigment? Or is this even true? I'm just going off what you were saying and trying to understand the logic behind it.
Pretty sure that based on op's concerns, the individual is not arab. If she was a black Egyptian of non-Arab descent she would be fine. But the Arab populations of North Africa are considered ORM.You're right that a majority do but... there's still a pretty sizable black Egyptian community (at least where I am currently located in the US). They don't consider themselves Arab nor do they really look Arab. To make things more confusing there are black Arabs (descendents of Sub-Saharan African slaves/immigrants to Arab countries), as well.
Well, there is some merit to the surface being more important to many diversity committees than the background. Most URM students are not the idealized underprivileged inner city AA or Hispanic, but rather from affluent families. But that is a discussion for another day- this is about whether the AAMC considers African Arabs URM, which they do not.This is very interesting to me. Essentially, you can be as African as the kid next door, living in the same neighborhood, same disadvantages etc., but if he happens to produce more melanin than you based on his genetic heritage, he has an advantage? Please correct me if I am wrong. It's just according to that statement, it seems this whole movement has everything to do with aesthetics and nothing to do with actually getting qualified people with different cultural backgrounds.
Maybe add this to interviewers' notes? http://nis.princeton.edu/downloads/NIS-Skin-Color-Scale.pdfI don't know. Afro-Arabs look pretty "black" in their wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Arab
IMO, we should just stop pretending. They (adcoms and other AA supporters) want to give preferences based on darker skin color. So stop with the vague social constructs and just go ahead and take a skin biopsy of every applicant and put it through a spectrophotometer to get a color reading. Then cross out the indian-sounding names, and you're done. Might as well vs. arguing about who is and isn't "black enough" for a special admissions advantage.
Good luck finding out where "my people" were in in 1491. I don't even know where they were 4 generations ago. And I don't care, and I'm befuddled at why you do.Maybe add this to interviewers' notes? http://nis.princeton.edu/downloads/NIS-Skin-Color-Scale.pdf
I don't think so. It is about race and ethnicity, not skin color. It is about whether your ancestors came from sub-Sahara Africa. Where were your people in 1491?
Egyptians are classified as "white" which is a classification for people who have ancestry from the peoples of Europe, North Africa or the Middle East; it is a category not a color.