18 admits a night as nocturnist

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HordeStrife

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2016
Messages
13
Reaction score
5
Going on an interview in a few days for a nocturnist position with a schedule of 3 on and 6 off. The schedule is great for my lifestyle and family.

No procedures. Codes are handled by ED. H&Ps on remaining patients not finished at night will be done by daytime rounders. The daytime rounders also handle floor calls on established patients. Tuck in orders would need to be written on patients that are not seen. Average 12 to 18 admits as the only nocturnist on staff for each shift.

My biggest concern is the 18 admits per shift by myself. Is this doable with the above mentioned? I am also concerned about putting in orders without even seeing the patient. That seems like a big legal liability if something goes terribly wrong.

My wife is actually excited about this because the schedule really works well for our routines. However, I am having second thoughts about going on the site visit even though they already booked my airfare and hotel.

Can any nocturnist give me some input on this? Much appreciated.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Last edited:
1:2 schedule is a unicorn that should raise concerns. Who covers icu? Does er actually walk away from a packer er to drop a central line in a septic patient? How many people do the daytime rounders take care of and how on earth are they taking overnight calls outside of the hospital? Are they going to be paging you every night to go see a dwindling patient?

Not putting in orders does not absolve you of an obligation to care for someone who is on the floor ostensibly under your care. Refusing to place orders and having something bad happen is worse than ignoring the patient and letting something bad happen since that is completely indefensible. I'd be very worried that there is already a plan to staff people you don't get a chance to see because it's so busy. Those 6 days off may sound nice but don't underestimate the toll 3 days of hell on earth can take on you over time.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Night shift at my hospital is one nocturnist for 12 hours. Average admits is 10/night. Cross cover around 90 floor patients. Respond to rapid response, code blues. Closed icu, no procedures. 10 admits per night is doable with not much downtime. Definitely had a few nights a year with 14-15 admits which are pretty exhausting and stressful and top of what one nocturnist can do safely in a night IMO.

Average of 12-18 admits/night sounds terrible and not something I’d ever get myself into. I’m Not fan of writing holding orders for lots of patients which I haven’t seen.
 
This sounds horrible. I would avoid this job at all costs
 
Going on an interview in a few days for a nocturnist position with a schedule of 3 on and 6 off. The schedule is great for my lifestyle and family.

No procedures. Codes are handled by ED. H&Ps on remaining patients not finished at night will be done by daytime rounders. The daytime rounders also handle floor calls on established patients. Tuck in orders would need to be written on patients that are not seen. Average 12 to 18 admits as the only nocturnist on staff for each shift.

My biggest concern is the 18 admits per shift by myself. Is this doable with the above mentioned? I am also concerned about putting in orders without even seeing the patient. That seems like a big legal liability if something goes terribly wrong.

My wife is actually excited about this because the schedule really works well for our routines. However, I am having second thoughts about going on the site visit even though they already booked my airfare and hotel.

Can any nocturnist give me some input on this? Much appreciated.

this job is a BIG nope

too many admits for one guy - don't put yourself in that situation
 
They are paying $2,300 per shift. Anesthesia is in house 24/7 to do central line, intubation and etc. They tell me that this is a new program as in they currently do not have any nocturnist and not everything is set in stone yet. I am wondering how likely can I negotiate better terms on my contract with a lawyer.

All your advices make sense and I should probably tell them no asap. But the 3 on 6 off schedule would really help with my wife including not needing to hire a babysitter and spending more time with the family. And the housing market, neighborhood and school district over there are ideal for us from what my wife researched.

For my current job, which is also my first job out of residency, I signed the contract without a lawyer and without negotiation. For those of you that did negotiation with offered contract, were you able to receive better terms on things like patient cap?
 
Last edited:
Patient cap is probably not negotiable especially if that means they have to hire more docs.

Getting a lawyer to review your contract however is a very good idea.
 
They are paying $2,300 per shift. Anesthesia is in house 24/7 to do central line, intubation and etc. They tell me that this is a new program as in they currently do not have any nocturnist and not everything is set in stone yet. I am wondering how likely can I negotiate better terms on my contract with a lawyer.

All your advices make sense and I should probably tell them no asap. But the 3 on 6 off schedule would really help with my wife including not needing to hire a babysitter and spending more time with the family. And the housing market, neighborhood and school district over there are ideal for us from what my wife researched.

For my current job, which is also my first job out of residency, I signed the contract without a lawyer and without negotiation. For those of you that did negotiation with offered contract, were you able to receive better terms on things like patient cap?

To good to be true is very real in medicine. There is a reason nobody else does a 3/6 schedule--it is part time. There's a lot of red flags here and I think you know that which is why you asked here--ignore them at your own peril.
 
They are paying $2,300 per shift. Anesthesia is in house 24/7 to do central line, intubation and etc. They tell me that this is a new program as in they currently do not have any nocturnist and not everything is set in stone yet. I am wondering how likely can I negotiate better terms on my contract with a lawyer.

All your advices make sense and I should probably tell them no asap. But the 3 on 6 off schedule would really help with my wife including not needing to hire a babysitter and spending more time with the family. And the housing market, neighborhood and school district over there are ideal for us from what my wife researched.

For my current job, which is also my first job out of residency, I signed the contract without a lawyer and without negotiation. For those of you that did negotiation with offered contract, were you able to receive better terms on things like patient cap?

So open icu with bigtime volume? At 2300 for 12 hr shift?

Big nope.

I get 2800 for moonlighting 12hr night shift for closed icu, 4-8 admits a night, 40-50 crosscover census (and cover RRTs) in suburban area hospital. I am the only nocturnist, no backup admitters.

You will honestly need to pay me $4500 a night to take on the liability and duties you describe. (Roughly $200/pt, 100/hr for crosscovering)
 
Last edited:
To good to be true is very real in medicine. There is a reason nobody else does a 3/6 schedule--it is part time. There's a lot of red flags here and I think you know that which is why you asked here--ignore them at your own peril.

I have been offered a job like his before, offered 10 shifts a month for full time benefits nocturnist position, the same ridiculous expected volume and acuity. Turned it down, it’s guaranteed burnout and liability risk. I would only ever moonlight those kind of gigs
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Going on an interview in a few days for a nocturnist position with a schedule of 3 on and 6 off. The schedule is great for my lifestyle and family.

No procedures. Codes are handled by ED. H&Ps on remaining patients not finished at night will be done by daytime rounders. The daytime rounders also handle floor calls on established patients. Tuck in orders would need to be written on patients that are not seen. Average 12 to 18 admits as the only nocturnist on staff for each shift.

My biggest concern is the 18 admits per shift by myself. Is this doable with the above mentioned? I am also concerned about putting in orders without even seeing the patient. That seems like a big legal liability if something goes terribly wrong.

My wife is actually excited about this because the schedule really works well for our routines. However, I am having second thoughts about going on the site visit even though they already booked my airfare and hotel.

Can any nocturnist give me some input on this? Much appreciated.

This job sounds terrible.

The amount of liability you are taking on is ridiculous. All you need is one lawsuit to tank you.

This job sounds like a two person job honestly. Of course the hospital leadership is being cheap because if a lawsuit occurs, do you know do gets named? You and the hospital. Not the CEO, CFO e.t.c.

Money is not worth it.
 
This job sounds terrible.

The amount of liability you are taking on is ridiculous. All you need is one lawsuit to tank you.

This job sounds like a two person job honestly. Of course the hospital leadership is being cheap because if a lawsuit occurs, do you know do gets named? You and the hospital. Not the CEO, CFO e.t.c.

Money is not worth it.

Agreed. And two person job means you better be paid for two persons worth of pay if you decide to accept.
 
if this is a new program, what were they doing prior to this? Whats the turn over for the hospitalists? And how acute care this hospital this? Regardless 18 admits is a nightmare. You have to sleep 1 day to recuperate one night shift. Anything above 12 is terrible night. Agree they should be paying you double.
 
Nope nope nope...
18 is just not sustainable and frankly you will be leaving admission for the day people to do and even if they say they are ok with that...they are not.

And if they actually say 18 it’s really 20.

Remember it’s your license...those pts you write “tucking in” orders...they are your patients at that moment...one of them dies before the morning, they are your responsibility even if you didn’t see them.
Your wife is not going to excited when you are worthless for 2 days that it’s going to take you to recover from those 3 days.
 
I think they have the daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage and now trying to hire nocturnists so that the hospitalists don't have to do nights anymore.

Thanks for all the input, I appreciate it. I just wrote an email to the recruiter to cancel my site visit.
 
Late to the thread but this is literally insane. OP I'm a nocturnist now and you should try doing a night of even 12 admissions and see how it goes. Personally, I consider under 5 to be a walk in the park, 5-8 to be average, and anything over 10 to be a lot. I had two nights of around 20 admissions and literally it was non-stop work from midnight till 8 AM. Think about it, even if you work at the speed of light and assuming you're just getting CAPs and UTIs, you may be able to finish an admission in 30 minutes (seeing pt, note, admission orders), and this is already assuming an easy pt load and really optimizing your workflow. 18 admissions would be 9 straight hours of work, and I'm not even cross-covering (there's floor PAs). Add in a few crashing-but-not-quite-critical care patients and toilet breaks, and you're easily stretching your admissions past half hour.

You'll get really burned out on this kind of schedule, and the 6 days off means nothing. Also for future reference, you can't "negotiate patient caps." You're not a daytime hospitalist with team quotas. The solution to having a better and reasonable patient load at night is for the hospital to hire more nocturnists.

It's honestly quite unfortunate that many hospitals are taking advantage of new grads from residency with these kind of offers which are unsafe for both the nocturnist and patients. Like someone stated above, if they paid me a million (realistically >500K) I'd think about it, but not anything less. The risk is not worth it.
 
The recruiter got back to me and told me that the group is still interested in me and would like to work something out so that I can still come to the site visit. She said the following things in her email:
1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.

I am surprised that they are willing to modify their expectations. This is a new nocturnist program as they only have daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage right now. I am guessing that's why there is more wiggle room in adjusting their expectations. I know recruiters can be sweet-talking and whatever said is not on the paper. But this does sound better.

What do you think?
 
the risk is yours. You can do site visit but unless they give all of this in writing, none of what he says matters. They are desperate to find someone to do nocturnist work. If they are really having 18 admits a night, they should already have a NP/PA. if they dont, then the plan still sounds fishy and more so to entice you into signing something.

I am not surprised that they are changing stance coz what they offered initially sounded horrible. If this is your first job, you are going to be in a rude shock when you realize the dirty games management plays with physicians. they only focus on bottomline and you are just a replaceable cog in their profit wheel. Good luck
 
The recruiter got back to me and told me that the group is still interested in me and would like to work something out so that I can still come to the site visit. She said the following things in her email:
1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.

I am surprised that they are willing to modify their expectations. This is a new nocturnist program as they only have daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage right now. I am guessing that's why there is more wiggle room in adjusting their expectations. I know recruiters can be sweet-talking and whatever said is not on the paper. But this does sound better.

What do you think?

I see unreasonable crazy number of patients, but that is because I am a partner expanding our group's reach and taking on more contracts. There is an expectation for me to do this to help our group grow, but I will also get the fruits of the the labor (and risk as well). Let me point out a few things :

1. Tuck in orders are DANGEROUS unless you have a very good working relationship with said ER physicians. Like Internists, ER physicians are not created equally. Some are downright lethal. There have been quite a few times they presented cases where if I put in tuck in orders for the dx they were describing, patient would've died. Not because we weren't treating, but the treatment would have killed them flat out. It's your license, if you're new this is a dangerous way to start off your career.
2. Unless you are used to this workload, it's burnout central with a very high likelihood of a mistake.
3. I would be extremely cautious with what the recruiter is offering. They can change it very easily within a few weeks.
4. NP/PA likewise unless you have a good working relationship are a mixed bag, and ultimately your license.
5. Unless they're offering massive bonuses and guaranteed partnership track or something really juicy I would firmly stay away.
 
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.

Easy for the recruiter to say. She isn’t the one who will be named in any potential lawsuits cause you’re trying to see 12-18 admissions a night.

Also, don’t put too much into their message that 10/night is more sustainable and they’ll add a np/pa if volume continues. Why is there a need to wait to see if volume continues before they add proper staffing levels? If you were quoted 12-18 admissions, that’s the volume they’re seeing and if anything, the number is probably higher as recruiters always found down.

Also, not sure why you think it’s unusual what the recruiter said. In reality, they didn’t guarantee you higher and commensurate salary for the tough work you’re doing and didn’t guarantee that they would add an additional provider now to ensure that you see reasonable and safe number of patients.

My recommendation: it sounds like in the back of your mind, you have a strong feeling that this job doesn’t sound good. You have many doctors saying it sounds terrible. Feel free to speak to a couple of the current doctors doing the night shifts as fellow doctors will tell the truth even if it’s bad usually. But it sounds like even after speaking with the recruiters new tactics, I’d look for a better opportunity.
 
The recruiter got back to me and told me that the group is still interested in me and would like to work something out so that I can still come to the site visit. She said the following things in her email:

1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.

I am surprised that they are willing to modify their expectations. This is a new nocturnist program as they only have daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage right now. I am guessing that's why there is more wiggle room in adjusting their expectations. I know recruiters can be sweet-talking and whatever said is not on the paper. But this does sound better.

What do you think?

1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
Talk to them, but take things with a grain o salt...after all they are trying to get you to work there.

2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
Well, 10 is stil a busy night, but more reasonable, but unless they have another physician with you, then you are supervising the midlevels and you are still medically responsible for the pts that the mid levels admit. You also need to make sure that this is in place before you start and if not, then how are they going to compensate you if you are doing the extra work as the sole nocturnist

3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
She is wrong...there is a difference between giving a pt some extra insulin because his/her BG is 400, its another to write essentially admission orders on a pt stating that they are stable for the floor you are sending them...the ED will say (or more importantly not say) what they need to to get a pt out of the ED and on a floor...sure there are going to be places where you learn that the ED guys are through and what they say is what has happened with the pt (or you at least learn who to trust and who not) but you won't know that until you have worked a while...you will be the one responsible for that pt once they leave the ED and if that pt dies, on the floor, because you wrote the orders to get them out of the ED , they are now your pt, not the ED's...hyperbolic? maybe...until you have it happen...and it happens. Remember, if you don't document, then it didn't happen...and if they want you to do "tuck in" orders, its because they want a quick disposable out of the ED and not willing to wait til you see the pt and do orders.

4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.
this is not a bad idea.

Frankly, I would not take a nocturnist job, especially a solo job as your first job out of residency...that first year out of residency as an attending has a STEEP learning curve...think med student to intern, but more...there are a lot of things you don't know and you just don't know that you don't know...
 
The recruiter got back to me and told me that the group is still interested in me and would like to work something out so that I can still come to the site visit. She said the following things in her email:
1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.

I am surprised that they are willing to modify their expectations. This is a new nocturnist program as they only have daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage right now. I am guessing that's why there is more wiggle room in adjusting their expectations. I know recruiters can be sweet-talking and whatever said is not on the paper. But this does sound better.

What do you think?

Honestly, it sounds like they’re desperate, and you’re desperate. A good match for both?

If you really still want to consider the job, I would go to the site visit and stay an entire night to see what the job is like. Try to candidly speak to as many current daytime hospitalists as possible about night coverage but also take what they say with a grain of salt (hey, you’ll become their coverage after all). What the recruiter said about tuck-in orders as cross-coverage is BS — cross-coverage is on established patients who have been on the floor for awhile, and even so sometimes adverse events happen during cross-coverage since orders were written without fully evaluating the pt, much less a brand-new patient who has been in the hospital for mere hours and can still clinically change quickly. I highly advise you especially as this is your first job out of residency to never write any admission orders without seeing the patient in person first.

If you are starting to get the sense that it’s gonna be 18 admissions rather than 10 the vast majority of the time after shadowing and talking to people, I would not take this job without additional support at night hired now, not as a vague promise in the future. It’s easy to over-promise and under-deliver, shouldn’t you know this from residency? Do you know what bait and switch means?
 
People blowing off cross cover have probably not worked in an environment like this job. I worked a nocturnist job where the day staff was massively under-resourced (30 pts per doc) usually with 4 admits pending for 3 or more hours the second I walked in the door every night. On a number of occasions I got phone calls very early in the evening (never any signout) where one of the floor pts had been deteriorating for hours and had hit a tipping point (icu transfer in every case and in one case someone died that night; I was also the overnight icu doctor). This on top for 4 people leaving the er under my name and 2 new concurrent er admit pages out made me quite grumpy but those were the worst days. My nightly average was 8ish. 18? No way would I have been able to safely do that. Do not underestimate how shoddy daytime care can be if the day hospitalist have high census.

Stop responding to the recruiter and move on.
 
Those are all really good insights. Thanks for that, it's very useful to get input here.

I emailed the recruiter and told her that I will not consider the job unless the group is willing to put into the contract that there will be another provider to share night admissions with me on each shift when I start. And I thanked her for her time. They probably will not agree to it, but it's a polite way to decline.
 
Why do so many people here keep saying that “it’s not safe, unless they are paying you a certain salary.”

Is it safe or unsafe? That should be the ONLY question. No ifs ands or buts. If it’s unsafe, then no amount of money should turn around and make it now safe.

Why are we so damn money hungry?

If we were on the other side as the patient, what would we want and expect?
 
Night shift at my hospital is one nocturnist for 12 hours. Average admits is 10/night. Cross cover around 90 floor patients. Respond to rapid response, code blues. Closed icu, no procedures. 10 admits per night is doable with not much downtime. Definitely had a few nights a year with 14-15 admits which are pretty exhausting and stressful and top of what one nocturnist can do safely in a night IMO.

Average of 12-18 admits/night sounds terrible and not something I’d ever get myself into. I’m Not fan of writing holding orders for lots of patients which I haven’t seen.
That is a nightmare...
 
I work some nights admitting at a Level 2 Trauma facility.

The last 7 nights on that I worked, I didn’t admit 18 combined...over 7 days!
 
8-9 solo admits in 12 hours is a stretch in terms of doing a reasonably thorough job on complex medical patients IME. It seems like hospitalism is getting ridic and may need a general strike of some kind.
 
The recruiter got back to me and told me that the group is still interested in me and would like to work something out so that I can still come to the site visit. She said the following things in her email:
1). She gave me the contact info of 2 hospitalists working there and told me to ask them about the night coverage if I had questions.
2). She said the group agreed that 18 admits a night is not sustainable and that 10 admits per shift is a more reasonable expectation. They would add another NP/PA or physician if the volume is too much as the program continues.
3). She said the tuck-in orders are no different than the cross coverage phone calls. Nocturnists don’t go see every patient they take a phone call on, and if they are uncertain or worried about writing tuck-in orders on a patient, they can go see them and do the h&p, or go see them and skip the h&p and just write tuck in orders and a sentence or two.
4). She said I can shadow the night shift for a few hours when I come for a site visit to see what it is like at night at their hospital.

I am surprised that they are willing to modify their expectations. This is a new nocturnist program as they only have daytime hospitalists rotating for night coverage right now. I am guessing that's why there is more wiggle room in adjusting their expectations. I know recruiters can be sweet-talking and whatever said is not on the paper. But this does sound better.

What do you think?

HARD pass, my friend.

They're hiring you to do the job of 2-3 nocturnists, they'd just rather grind you to the bone and put you under unsafe and high risk conditions to save themselves some cash. They're halfway to sobering up to this fact as evident by them offering you midlevel support.

I have a 1:2 schedule as well, 10 shifts a month. I see an average of 7 patients a night, everything beyond that goes towards my bonus. I've done stretches of 5-10 nights where I'd see 10-12 patients purely to pump my bonus, and start to burn out after a month or so of it. 18 a night? GTFO. There's no scenario on earth you can do 15+ admits in 12 hours safely or thoroughly, I dont care what spin they put on it.

Walk away from this job and never look back. Other gigs might pay less but you can't put a price on your sanity.
 
So open icu with bigtime volume? At 2300 for 12 hr shift?

Big nope.

I get 2800 for moonlighting 12hr night shift for closed icu, 4-8 admits a night, 40-50 crosscover census (and cover RRTs) in suburban area hospital. I am the only nocturnist, no backup admitters.

You will honestly need to pay me $4500 a night to take on the liability and duties you describe. (Roughly $200/pt, 100/hr for crosscovering)

Where is this hospital? 2800/shift for closed icu, 4-8 avg admits, 40-50 cc's? Sign me up
 
For a while now I keep seeing people freak out about having 15+ night admissions and I have been having some trouble because where I am at currently it is the rule rather than the exception and it truly does not seem that bad.
Of course, there is a great deal of variability. In my case, the culture of where I am working at there is a low threshold for admission. For instance, if I had to admit 8 patients through the night and 2 are alcoholics spending the night, 2 are chest pains rule out, 1 appendectomy, 1 really sick ICU patient, 1 pneumonia and 1 COPD exacerbation, I truly think I can do that in just 2-3 hours without providing sub-optimal care.

Now, of course, it truly depends on the hospital and the situation. If you need to go to codes and they are calling 5-6 codes a night, 20 or so non-sensical calls, 15+ admissions and you covering stuff in the ICU, that is clearly too much.

But if closed ICU, no codes/no-procedures. Just soft-ball calls at night + admissions. I think 12-15 is reasonable and 15-20 reasonable if you have some sort of assistance (residents).
 
For a while now I keep seeing people freak out about having 15+ night admissions and I have been having some trouble because where I am at currently it is the rule rather than the exception and it truly does not seem that bad.
Of course, there is a great deal of variability. In my case, the culture of where I am working at there is a low threshold for admission. For instance, if I had to admit 8 patients through the night and 2 are alcoholics spending the night, 2 are chest pains rule out, 1 appendectomy, 1 really sick ICU patient, 1 pneumonia and 1 COPD exacerbation, I truly think I can do that in just 2-3 hours without providing sub-optimal care.

Now, of course, it truly depends on the hospital and the situation. If you need to go to codes and they are calling 5-6 codes a night, 20 or so non-sensical calls, 15+ admissions and you covering stuff in the ICU, that is clearly too much.

But if closed ICU, no codes/no-procedures. Just soft-ball calls at night + admissions. I think 12-15 is reasonable and 15-20 reasonable if you have some sort of assistance (residents).
So you can talk to the ED, see the pt , write orders and write an H&P in 15 minutes or less...because to see 8 pt in 2 hours that would be all you would have...and have also answer floor pages in the time as well? They would have to be pretty soft admissions, pts that can’t talk to you, and/or have a great emr or a scribe.
 
More than 7 overnight ( 7p-7a) admissions is excessive IMO.
 
So you can talk to the ED, see the pt , write orders and write an H&P in 15 minutes or less...because to see 8 pt in 2 hours that would be all you would have...and have also answer floor pages in the time as well? They would have to be pretty soft admissions, pts that can’t talk to you, and/or have a great emr or a scribe.
That's exactly what I said. It depends on the complexity of the patients. 8 admission in my place would be horrendously slow and boring. The only way I could work for more than a few months as if I could just sleep half the night and then have a second job during the days ;D.
Now, this is only 50% joke. But the reality is about half of my admissions are straightforward, easy admissions.
I get at least one or two alcoholics every night. Guess what, they don't talk much and there is an order set for that. The only thing that I need to do is make sure they don't have trauma that the ED missed (not often, by the time I see them they got pan-scanned) and that the labs look OK to make sure there is no weird methanol or ethylene glycol or some other red herring. That doesn't take much more than 15mins. Then there are the "violent ones" which end up getting benadryl, lorazepam and haldol/zyprexa in the ED. No medical reason what so ever for admission, 100% purely psych, but because the patient got heavy sedation psych won't take them and needs to stay overnight on telemetry. Again, these patients don't talk, the orders are pretty straightforward.
The vast majority of my calls are for answering silly questions the overachiever nurse raises at night. "Patient is NPO and note from Dr. X says tomorrow EGD but there is no order for consent, should I obtain the consent?"

Not all places are the same, and I realize that. If all patients where more complex medically probably 8-10 (~1h/patient) would be reasonable.

Actually, my hardest days are not necessarily the ones with most patients but rather the ones that the admissions get all bunched up. As little as 5-6 admissions within the last 2 hours of my shifts can make the whole shift appears incredibly busy even if I end up with the same 14-15 patients that I would otherwise get.
 
Last edited:
For a while now I keep seeing people freak out about having 15+ night admissions and I have been having some trouble because where I am at currently it is the rule rather than the exception and it truly does not seem that bad.
Of course, there is a great deal of variability. In my case, the culture of where I am working at there is a low threshold for admission. For instance, if I had to admit 8 patients through the night and 2 are alcoholics spending the night, 2 are chest pains rule out, 1 appendectomy, 1 really sick ICU patient, 1 pneumonia and 1 COPD exacerbation, I truly think I can do that in just 2-3 hours without providing sub-optimal care.

Now, of course, it truly depends on the hospital and the situation. If you need to go to codes and they are calling 5-6 codes a night, 20 or so non-sensical calls, 15+ admissions and you covering stuff in the ICU, that is clearly too much.

But if closed ICU, no codes/no-procedures. Just soft-ball calls at night + admissions. I think 12-15 is reasonable and 15-20 reasonable if you have some sort of assistance (residents).

frankly i don't see how one is able to do these 8 admits in 2-3hrs, unless 80% of ur patients are healthy 40 yr olds or something. where i am 4-5 admits a night is considered busy. (7 hr shifts). i get that the cases u listed are much simpler than my typical patient, but still some pneumonia or copd'er are likely to have at least a few other medical problems, a reasonably long list of home meds to go through, even if they are stable. we also need to do a full 10 point ros for billing purposes.

here's how a typical IM admit goes for me:
0. answer the ER call, discuss case with ER, decide if patient needs admission
1. review old records in the system(possibly multiple systems)
2. talk to the patient, which involves a full 10 point RoS, their CC, family hx, code status discussion etc etc
3. med rec, often done by the MD, going over a full list of 20 meds on an 80yr old patient who brings in conflicting med lists from different dates, along with a not so great memory.
4. rec above meds
5. review current results
6. formulate a plan
7. put in orders
8. dictate or write h&p
9. follow up labs before end of shift.
10. call consultants before end of shift and discuss case over the phone.
11. type my email signout, things to f/u etc.

3+4 alone can really take up to 15minutes and drain ur energy but if u want to do a good and thorough job, u kinda have to do it. trying to get ahold of consultants early AM or in the middle of the night is a literal nightmare too.

the above is a typical patient for me, and that isn't even some unstable ICU patient that requires minute to minute attention either.

ER triage/discharges also take longer due to having to arrange all their f/u at night, write prescriptions etc.
 
frankly i don't see how one is able to do these 8 admits in 2-3hrs, unless 80% of ur patients are healthy 40 yr olds or something. where i am 4-5 admits a night is considered busy. (7 hr shifts). i get that the cases u listed are much simpler than my typical patient, but still some pneumonia or copd'er are likely to have at least a few other medical problems, a reasonably long list of home meds to go through, even if they are stable. we also need to do a full 10 point ros for billing purposes.

here's how a typical IM admit goes for me:
0. answer the ER call, discuss case with ER, decide if patient needs admission
1. review old records in the system(possibly multiple systems)
2. talk to the patient, which involves a full 10 point RoS, their CC, family hx, code status discussion etc etc
3. med rec, often done by the MD, going over a full list of 20 meds on an 80yr old patient who brings in conflicting med lists from different dates, along with a not so great memory.
4. rec above meds
5. review current results
6. formulate a plan
7. put in orders
8. dictate or write h&p
9. follow up labs before end of shift.
10. call consultants before end of shift and discuss case over the phone.
11. type my email signout, things to f/u etc.

3+4 alone can really take up to 15minutes and drain ur energy but if u want to do a good and thorough job, u kinda have to do it. trying to get ahold of consultants early AM or in the middle of the night is a literal nightmare too.

the above is a typical patient for me, and that isn't even some unstable ICU patient that requires minute to minute attention either.

ER triage/discharges also take longer due to having to arrange all their f/u at night, write prescriptions etc.

Well that's why I said that there is probably a great deal of variability and it certainly depends on what patients you are admitting.

I kid you not, my ED has a super low threshold to put patients for admission. I could hold my ground and either not accept the admission or admit and discharge both of which I have tried and I learned not to do (takes more of my time, usually the ED physician already told the patient that they are being admitted and start judging me and asking what's wrong with me, etc.) So yeah, I have been "stuck" admitting 40year old guys that have zero risks factors and and run 5miles/day for a chest-pain ACS rule out. I have been stuck admitting people for chronic pain, low risk PE, tiny kidney stones for which the pain was already controlled in the ED prior to me seeing the patient ("because they need urology consult") and so forth. Not to mention the alcoholics and psych patients that have no real medical reason (other than perhaps being intoxicated?) and they dont even talk to you because they either passed out (alcoholic) or ED sedated the crap out of them with haldol benadryl and ativan.

So yes, I could see how if you are admitting purely scleroderma renal crisis patients, ITP patients, lupus cerebritis, anca alveolar hemorrhage, etc it would take a million years.

for instance. My typical discussion with ER doc is about 3-5mins unless patient is super complicated (and often times when patient is that complicated it usually warrants ICU admission and in that case ICU does the orders/med-rec/etc)
2.- Talk to the patient, I spend the most time with this. It could be as short as 10mins on straightforward cases (kidney stone, appendicitis, relatively low risk ACS ruleout, HTN urgency, mild pneumonia)
3- Medrec is done by nursing staff. Offcourse it is always wrong so I confirm with patient but I don't usually have to put it in the computer, just make sure whatever is there is OK. On average, this does not take more than 2-3 mins. Yes it has happened that I get a 80year old on propafenone and digoxin and diltiazem DAPT and Eliquis and an EKG that looks like an EEG and I freak out and take like 20mins reviewing it twice, thrice, and then prior to going home yet again but this is perhaps once in a blue moon.
4.- as above.
5.- I am admitting. There are very few results I need to review. TYPICALLY, it is just a CBC, CMP, UA, CXR, EKG and one or two targeted tests for whatever complain they came (chest pain, CTA/troponins, headaches CT head, Stroke, CTA/CT/Carotid US, etc). Most tests are negative except those that are pertinent to their chief complain. Typically this takes me 5, maybe 10mins on complicated times and I tend to overlap this while talking to ED physician. Either I sit next to him/her while they show me during signout, or I am doing it while they talk on the phone.
5.5- what DOES takes me a long time, is sometimes when patients have been admitted a dozen times. I hated during recidency when the same guy came over and over and over with chest pain and always got an echocardiogram even though there are half a dozen echos done during the last 6 months in the system. So I do like checking previous admission. Also, I get a lot of recurrent nursing home semi-abandoned "AMS due to UTI" and there is nothing more disappointed that finding on the 3rd day of admission that ESBL grew and the patient was on cefepime all this time. I have a disgustingly low threshold for meropenem on admission.
6.- I formulate the plan as I talk to the patient 90% of the time. This does not take any additional time at all MOST of the times. In fact I don't know how to do a proper H&P if I am not thinking about the plan at the same time. Not to mention, in order to discuss with the patient "hey, I am going to give you ceftriaxone, it could give you diarrhea and in rare cases it could depress your bone marrow...." I kind of have to have the plan in my head as I talk to them.
Yes, sometimes I do need to talk to neuro IR to make sure they really don't want to do a thrombectomy and that can add time.
I do brush up on diagnosis that I have not seen in weeks or that are rare. So during a 12h shift maybe I spent 30mins in total reading 2-3 Uptodate pages on 2-3 diagnosis. But I do not have to do this, nor do I do it, for all of my admissions. Just the two or 3 that actually require it.
7.- orders is a 5mins deal and this goes for straightfoward patient as well as difficult ones. 1 admission order set + 5-10 individual orders depending on the actual reason for the admission.
8.- This, along with the H&P is what takes the longest. It could take me as little as 5mins for one of those alcoholic guys, it could take me 20 mins for a complex patient. On average, no more than 10mins I'd say.
9.- I don't necessarily follow up on all patients. I'll follow up on troponins, a CTA, or something that would require immediate action.
10.- No. Never done it, I have not met anyone else that does it. Maybe it has something to do with the very low threshold for admission that we have or something else. If the patient requires a time-sensitive consult, I'll give a call to the consultant when I admit the patient. Honestly, as I am writing this post I cannot think of any reason that is not urgent enough to require a call in the middle of the night but that I still should call at 6 in the morning when I am leaving home. If it is not urgent enough to be done at 3am, it can wait until 10 am.
11.- This is fairly short and straight to the point "this is what worries me, check on this and this prior to rounding" and that's it. If the morning doc needs anything else, very kindly I ask he reads my note which I wrote for a reason and not just for billing purposes.
 
frankly i don't see how one is able to do these 8 admits in 2-3hrs, unless 80% of ur patients are healthy 40 yr olds or something. where i am 4-5 admits a night is considered busy. (7 hr shifts). i get that the cases u listed are much simpler than my typical patient, but still some pneumonia or copd'er are likely to have at least a few other medical problems, a reasonably long list of home meds to go through, even if they are stable. we also need to do a full 10 point ros for billing purposes.

here's how a typical IM admit goes for me:
0. answer the ER call, discuss case with ER, decide if patient needs admission
1. review old records in the system(possibly multiple systems)
2. talk to the patient, which involves a full 10 point RoS, their CC, family hx, code status discussion etc etc
3. med rec, often done by the MD, going over a full list of 20 meds on an 80yr old patient who brings in conflicting med lists from different dates, along with a not so great memory.
4. rec above meds
5. review current results
6. formulate a plan
7. put in orders
8. dictate or write h&p
9. follow up labs before end of shift.
10. call consultants before end of shift and discuss case over the phone.
11. type my email signout, things to f/u etc.

3+4 alone can really take up to 15minutes and drain ur energy but if u want to do a good and thorough job, u kinda have to do it. trying to get ahold of consultants early AM or in the middle of the night is a literal nightmare too.

the above is a typical patient for me, and that isn't even some unstable ICU patient that requires minute to minute attention either.

ER triage/discharges also take longer due to having to arrange all their f/u at night, write prescriptions etc.

Having good support staff, EMR, closed ICU, and ER docs makes all the difference.

One hospital I work at is the one I'll never leave if I cut down to part time. At this hospital, the ER group is private/independent. They bend over backwards to please everyone! They will call any consult for you without hesitation - ID, rheum, endo, neuro, cards, pulm etc you name it they will do it, even at 3AM. This saves me a TON of time each shift.
And they generally try to avoid admitting people unnecessarily, our admit volume is literally 30-40% of the other similar sized hospitals I moonlight.

We also have ER pharmacists until 11:30PM that does medrec on every patient being admitted. And as a second line, the nurses on the floor also do it too, which is also helpful for any patient that is a direct transfer or admit before 11:30. They will literally call the patient's pharmacies to verify things.

Having excellent nursing staff is also key. They do not trigger rapid responses for bull-**** reasons and if our midlevel is on paid time off for the night, crosscover isn't bad either as they exercise judgment and restraint - I never get calls on "patient's family would like to speak to you", they tell them that the night doc is not responsible for answerign their laundry list of daytime complaints/questions.
Also having midlevels at night doing rapids with you saves time with rapids; they can call the ICU to transfer them for you or place the orders you tell them etc

EPIC availability also boosts efficiency like 1000x the other hospitals that don't have it. No other EMR beats it.

It's also closed ICU. If a trainwreck comes in the ER, not your responsibility. If a trainwreck develops on the floor as a rapid, send to ICU and you don't deal with it the rest of the night. This is also a crucial time saver vs the other hospitals.

With all these put together, I can crank out 8 of your average admissions in a 4 hour time span, and spend the rest of the night asleep or watching TV.
 
Last edited:
Having good support staff, EMR, closed ICU, and ER docs makes all the difference.

One hospital I work at is the one I'll never leave if I cut down to part time. At this hospital, the ER group is private/independent. They bend over backwards to please everyone! They will call any consult for you without hesitation - ID, rheum, endo, neuro, cards, pulm etc you name it they will do it, even at 3AM. This saves me a TON of time each shift.
And they generally try to avoid admitting people unnecessarily, our admit volume is literally 30-40% of the other similar sized hospitals I moonlight.

We also have ER pharmacists until 11:30PM that does medrec on every patient being admitted. And as a second line, the nurses on the floor also do it too, which is also helpful for any patient that is a direct transfer or admit before 11:30. They will literally call the patient's pharmacies to verify things.

Having excellent nursing staff is also key. They do not trigger rapid responses for bull-**** reasons and if our midlevel is on paid time off for the night, crosscover isn't bad either as they exercise judgment and restraint - I never get calls on "patient's family would like to speak to you", they tell them that the night doc is not responsible for answerign their laundry list of daytime complaints/questions.
Also having midlevels at night doing rapids with you saves time with rapids; they can call the ICU to transfer them for you or place the orders you tell them etc

EPIC availability also boosts efficiency like 1000x the other hospitals that don't have it. No other EMR beats it.

It's also closed ICU. If a trainwreck comes in the ER, not your responsibility. If a trainwreck develops on the floor as a rapid, send to ICU and you don't deal with it the rest of the night. This is also a crucial time saver vs the other hospitals.

With all these put together, I can crank out 8 of your average admissions in a 4 hour time span, and spend the rest of the night asleep or watching TV.
You have a unicorn hospitalist job... Your job is great even for 200k/yr full time
 
Top