http://www.aamc.org/data/facts/
Looks like average MCAT for matriculants edged up this year .3 to 29.9
Looks like average MCAT for matriculants edged up this year .3 to 29.9
I have a question though. When you say, 19K out of 35K, you are talking about students matriculating in M.D. schools in the U.S. That doesn't include D.O. stats (which is 21 or so schools) or the Carib schools. So, while those numbers are daunting if you are totally M.D. zealous, they are less daunting if you "just want to be a doctor."Pinkertinkle said:19,000 out of 35,000 not matriculated, that's harsh.
800 instate matriculants for 4200 applicants, sucks to live in Cali.
Pinkertinkle said:Well I'd assume the 35,000 people who applied to MD schools are mostly interested in an United States MD degree. DO schools should not be a "backup" for allopathic applicants, as the philosophy is quite different.
Code Brown said:Wow, look at the last one, the one with the school totals. UCLA had 720 students apply to med school last year! 😱 Talk about competition. Only two people are applying from my school (~7500 students).
Medikit said:Math and statistics majors kick ass but there are so few of them. Thank goodness.
me3 said:Does computer science fall in this category?
Imagine the money and time and a year on the emotional rollercoaster for nothing, it's awful. 🙁opinionkitten said:did i read this right? about 1/2 of applicants dont matriculate?! that sucks!
Tiddly of Winks said:UM's up there, too. Almost 1 in every 10 kids is a premed, no wonder this place is so hostile!
yeah, but 1/2 DO make it into med school 🙂opinionkitten said:did i read this right? about 1/2 of applicants dont matriculate?! that sucks!
Well its about 11% tops for any particular medical school.DrHopeless said:well it is a lot better than what people told me about only 11 or so % make it into medical school.
i77ac said:about 16K out of 36K is accepted to med school? this doesn't seem right. that's only a bit lower than half to get in. i thought it would be much harder... something around 10%. i mean, its about 50-50 chance to become a doc? strange...
i77ac said:its about 50-50 chance to become a doc? strange...
calstudent said:geez, we need medical schools to either expand their class sizes or get more medical schools, especially with the primary practice deficiency. our population keeps growing, but the # of medical school graduates is the same. (of course, this is where international doctors come in)
Jason110 said:A recent study found that 25% of all practicing physicians in the U.S. is foreign born.
calstudent said:geez, we need medical schools to either expand their class sizes or get more medical schools, especially with the primary practice deficiency. our population keeps growing, but the # of medical school graduates is the same. (of course, this is where international doctors come in)
jammin06 said:engineers fall in the physical science major category i assume? anyone have any stats on double majors?
BAM! said:i think there's some conspiracy theory that the US doesn't produce that many doctors in order to keep the profession in a prestigious position.
that, and also it's important that doctors are well trained.
Childe said:Arkansas only had 10 out of state matriculants (3.1%), beating only puerto rico. Wow sucks for me lol..
Interesting stats..
Jason110 said:Here's an excerpt (though condaluted) from my health economics textbook (The Economics of Health and Health Care by Folland et al.):
The Donor Preference Hypothesis by Hall and Lindsay (Journal of Law and Economics 23: 55-80.):
"In summary, we may say that organized medicine historically exerted considerable influence over the supply of trained physicians. Such influence is consistent with a view of the profession as one seeking above-normal returns by trying to control entry of new physicians. However, data in recent decades indicate that medical shcool enrollments are responsive to market forces. These data further suggest that continuing to view medical education as controlled by a monolithic of conspiratorial medical profession is somewhat implausable."
Victor Fuchs' alternative argument (in his book Who Shall Live?):
"In 1974, Victor Fuchs wrote that 'most economists believe that part [of physicians' high incomes] represents a monopoly return to physicians resulting for restrictions on entry to profession and other barriers to competition' (p. 58). Fuchs refers to the claim that physicians restrict entry to their profession in order to drive up prices for their srervices and thus themselves maker larger incomes [...] Kessel argued that monopoly power was attained by organized medicine in several ways, two of the most important being licensure and control of access to medical education. Kessel believes that control over medical education exerted by physicians is primarily through the American Medical Association."
Thoughts???