does anybody know how different is the latest(which i presume it to be 2004)
dental decks from 1998 edition?
dental decks from 1998 edition?
mekha said:hi
well i have 95 ,98 ,2001 and 2004 decks with me , well all have different points 98 decks is good, 2001 is little more explanatory and 2004 decks is ok too
personally i like 2001 decks. and 98 decks lack some points but it has some xtra points that 2001 decks or 2004 decks doesnt have so one way whatever u study be thorough with it. 95 decks is not that explanatory
I personally recommend 2001 decks
one eg efsa (ESNOPHILIC SLOW RESACTIN SUB OF ANAPHYLAXIS) is seen in 98 decks but not in 2001 and 2004 ,check cells in 98 decks IN ANATOMY .
does ur decks says 92 95 98 copyright?
EXTRA READING IS THE MUST PART GUYTON ,BRS ON EVERY SUB
KAPLAN , QUESTIONS WITH XPLAN , PILOT ALL USMLE REVIEWS
OCCLUSION BOOKS
AND A WELL PLANNED STUDY TIMETABLE
I would recommend anatomy ,physiology , biochem ,patho ,micro , and dental antomy in this order so u can corelate and study
Hmmm..there is a slight differnce in cards ....2004 has abt 50 cards more(not sure).Khurram said:Do a search for the threads that I have written...i've done an extensive review of the difference between the 2001 and 2004 decks, as i have used both...
meetlife said:Hmmm..there is a slight differnce in cards ....2004 has abt 50 cards more(not sure).
Hey,Khurram,how are u ??Long time no see....
it has9 flash cards more than 2001 i suppose makin it 1103Vrnda said:Hi
anyone having 2004 cards ..can u post how many new cards are there?
Vrnda