2014-2015 APPIC (internship) interview thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
When I was on internship three-years ago, the interns were responsible for most of the notifications. I believe APPIC has a deadline date where all rejections and acceptance for interviews need to be sent out. Seems that it was December 12 or 15 that year. The whole process is overwhelming for the internship site.
 
When I was on internship three-years ago, the interns were responsible for most of the notifications. I believe APPIC has a deadline date where all rejections and acceptance for interviews need to be sent out. Seems that it was December 12 or 15 that year. The whole process is overwhelming for the internship site.


Unfortunately, for US sites there is only a recommended date of 12/15- they don't have to follow it. They are, however, supposed to set their own date and stick with that- but clearly many don't when it comes to rejections.
 
When I was on internship three-years ago, the interns were responsible for most of the notifications. I believe APPIC has a deadline date where all rejections and acceptance for interviews need to be sent out. Seems that it was December 12 or 15 that year. The whole process is overwhelming for the internship site.

Does this imply that it's my responsibility to email sites after the deadline of notification? I find it unsettling to think that some might not send an invite or rejection; like, that 12/15 comes and I anxiously await an email and, don't get, let's say anything for the last remaining sites I applied to b/c they are rejections and sites do nor send them out to me...; that would be horrible. Hope it does not happen that way.
 
It is not a perfect system by any stretch of the imagination. Remember to check your spam email folder. I believe the sites are required to notify applicants by a certain date. The year I applied I received many emails or rejection on the deadline date. Most of my interview acceptance were notified by phone call. The year I was on internship we called all of the applicants who were accepted for interview by telephone call. Check your voice mail frequently and some will have unknown as caller ID due to being a medical setting.

When I did not receive any notification either way, I called those sites for clarification. Some indicated they had sent me rejection emails but one site wanted to interview me and I ended up matching with that site.

You need to be proactive and follow up on any loose ends as the email system of notification is not a perfect system.
 
Last edited:
-Site name: Yale School of Medicine

-Date notified: 11/24/14

-Invite or rejection: Invite

-Track (if applicable): Young Adult Service

-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Call

-Interview dates offered: 1/12/15
 
Hi everyone! People who used this forum when they applied suggested I post about this situation. I was offered an interview at Mt. Sinai St. Luke's but cannot make the date they offered me, 12/18, because I will be interviewing in a different city. I contacted Mt. Sinai and their reply suggested that I might be able to interview on another day if a spot opens up. I figured I would ask if anyone also has conflicts with the date they were offered at this site so I would know if I have a hope at this site. Thanks for any replies.
 
This is often a concern regarding interview conflicts and in the state where I did my internship the sites in that state agreed to have different days for interviews since many of the applicants applied to each site in the state. Unfortunately, some intern applicants have to cancel some interviews due to conflicts. A number of sites do not allow phone interviews anymore.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I applied last year (didn't match, hence why I'm still here) and have found quite the opposite. I never, ever received a rejection- and trust me, there were a lot of those- before someone received an interview. There were a few instances that they were sent within minutes of each other, but the vast majority came days or weeks after people received invitations. I'm happy to report that I'm doing much better this year and am observing the same pattern (i.e., people posting they received rejections days or weeks after I received an interview).

Also, FWIW, last year there were 2 instances where people had received rejections and invites and I'd heard nothing. After December 15th, I e-mailed the training directors to inquire about my status and basically, there was a rejection sent to me but they'd omitted my middle initial in my e-mail address.

Ditto. The opposite was true for me as well. After the 10th of December, most of the rejections came.
 
Just wanted to post, because @OneNeuroDoctor is posting some incorrect information about this process (he often posts incorrect information based on his own personal experiences or whatever). Rejection letters are NOT usually sent out first. Sometimes, a site might send out a mass email rejection to a small number of applicants right away because the applicants do not meet certain criteria right off the bat (e.g., applicants do not have the minimum hours required by the site, the applicant is from a non APA accredited program). What @aly cat and @psychrat said re: when the rejections came in is much more accurate. Regarding the interns being responsible for notification, I don't know what @OneNeuroDoctor was getting at with this, but it will vary from site to site how much the current interns are involved (e.g., some are involved in looking at apps, some are only involved in the Q & A sessions when the applicants come, some are involved in both). 12/15 was the deadline last year, and from my understanding, it is the deadline this year. I know that last year, Greg Keilin (of the APPIC list serv) would tell applicants to email or call sites about their status the minute the deadline for the site has passed. Some sites have their own specific deadline for notification, however, most sites seem to adhere to 12/15. If it is 12/16, and you have not heard from a site, I would email or call them first thing the next day. I would say that overall – most sites send emails, but a few will call. Also, there is snail mail – I received one rejection via snail mail last year. Good luck to everybody applying, and to those that haven't heard much either way – it still is quite early in the process.
 
I have been told the same - that many sites don't ever send out a rejection notification and that many sites send them out very, very late.
One site I noticed said they'd send out interview requests at a certain (reasonable) date and then they said that applicants who would not be coming for an interview would be notified by Jan. 1. And that may be common, I'm not sure. Sounds like what you're saying though!
 
Does this imply that it's my responsibility to email sites after the deadline of notification? I find it unsettling to think that some might not send an invite or rejection; like, that 12/15 comes and I anxiously await an email and, don't get, let's say anything for the last remaining sites I applied to b/c they are rejections and sites do nor send them out to me...; that would be horrible. Hope it does not happen that way.

Yes, this whole part of it is unsettling and I hope it does't happen to you either. However, if you haven't heard anything from a site by 12/15, I would email or call the site first thing in the morning on 12/16. There could be a number of reasons why you haven't heard – the site is running late with notifications, they emailed you previously (either invite or rejection) but the email did not go through (somebody mentioned a site omitting a letter in their email address, that's a good example), or the site just sucks and only emails out invites, not rejections. Best of luck to you.
 
Yes, this whole part of it is unsettling and I hope it does't happen to you either. However, if you haven't heard anything from a site by 12/15, I would email or call the site first thing in the morning on 12/16. There could be a number of reasons why you haven't heard – the site is running late with notifications, they emailed you previously (either invite or rejection) but the email did not go through (somebody mentioned a site omitting a letter in their email address, that's a good example), or the site just sucks and only emails out invites, not rejections. Best of luck to you.


Also, like I mentioned above (and like I think you're saying too) the APPIC recommended date is 12/15, but sites can set their own date with no issue- it's not a requirement to use 12/15. So be sure to keep up to date on changes in brochures, the late breaking news list, etc for the site's date before calling or emailing them!
 
Last edited:
Yes, this whole part of it is unsettling and I hope it does't happen to you either. However, if you haven't heard anything from a site by 12/15, I would email or call the site first thing in the morning on 12/16. There could be a number of reasons why you haven't heard – the site is running late with notifications, they emailed you previously (either invite or rejection) but the email did not go through (somebody mentioned a site omitting a letter in their email address, that's a good example), or the site just sucks and only emails out invites, not rejections. Best of luck to you.
To clarify, your recommendation is that if one does not hear from a site - either in the form of a rejection or in the form of an invite - by 12/15, it is OK and recommended to contact them on 12/16? (there are some of the sites I applied to that sent out their invites and rejections and I got neither).
 
To clarify, your recommendation is that if one does not hear from a site - either in the form of a rejection or in the form of an invite - by 12/15, it is OK and recommended to contact them on 12/16? (there are some of the sites I applied to that sent out their invites and rejections and I got neither).
I would wait for a deadline. Theoretically, you shouldn't know what was sent out or when. It's still quite early for non-BOP and VA sites.
 
Also, like I mentioned above (and like I think you're saying too) the APPIC recommended date is 12/15, but sites can set their own date with no issue- it's not a requirement to use 12/15. So be sure to keep up to date on changes in brochures, the late breaking news list, etc for the site's date before calling or emailing them!

Yes, I had two sites email and say not to expect to hear anything until 12/19.
 
Hi All - interview attire question: I recently had a baby and my post-baby (and nursing) body does not look good in a suit. What are your thoughts on *not* wearing a suit? I have lots of professional clothes that look good but can't find a suit that fits right! Do you think a suit is absolutely essential? What have your DCTs said about the matter? Thanks in advance for your advice!
 
Hi All - interview attire question: I recently had a baby and my post-baby (and nursing) body does not look good in a suit. What are your thoughts on *not* wearing a suit? I have lots of professional clothes that look good but can't find a suit that fits right! Do you think a suit is absolutely essential? What have your DCTs said about the matter? Thanks in advance for your advice!


My DCT recommends a suit, but I think the most important piece is that you feel confident in it. Is it an option for you to buy one that's slightly large and have it tailored to fit you better? That might be the best of both worlds.

Also- congratulations on the new baby!
 
Just wanted to chime in that I also received a lot of last minute rejections, but knew they were coming because SDNers had already posted about their invitations. Of course, there were two situations in which I expected a rejection but got an interview invitation because the sites had rolling interview invitations.
 
Normally most sites send out rejection letters first so if you did not receive a rejection letter you may still be offered an interview.

Stop it. This is not helpful.

You are in no position to make such a statement, as there is a wide range of practices regarding notification that is contingent upon many variables, including screening methods used and availability of support staff.
 
Last edited:
Hi All - interview attire question: I recently had a baby and my post-baby (and nursing) body does not look good in a suit. What are your thoughts on *not* wearing a suit? I have lots of professional clothes that look good but can't find a suit that fits right! Do you think a suit is absolutely essential? What have your DCTs said about the matter? Thanks in advance for your advice!

What about a jacketed dress?
 
To clarify, your recommendation is that if one does not hear from a site - either in the form of a rejection or in the form of an invite - by 12/15, it is OK and recommended to contact them on 12/16? (there are some of the sites I applied to that sent out their invites and rejections and I got neither).

Yes, both okay and definitely recommended. Assuming that the site's deadline to notify is 12/15 and not earlier (or later, as @psychrat pointed out, two sites changed their notification date to 12/19), I would call and/or email on 12/16 if you haven't heard anything. I know it is frustrating when you see on this forum that a site has sent out invites and rejections, and you haven't heard anything either way, but unless the site's deadline to notify has passed (some sites have a notification date earlier than 12/15), wait until 12/16 (assuming of course that the deadline hasn't been pushed back). It is very possible that a site sent out an invite to some applicants, a rejection email to other applicants, and have a stack of applications they are still sorting through, meaning further notifications will be coming along.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What about a jacketed dress?

I bought a suit with matching jacket, pants, and skirt so that I can have options (depending on weather or if something were to get on the pants/skirt without time to dry clean them). I applied last year, and people primarily wore pants suits, but some of the women did have on skirt suits and did not look out of place. I agree that people should wear whatever they are comfortable in. If that's a black pants suit, go for it. If that's a work appropriate dress with a jacket, that works too. I would err towards more business formal than business casual, unless the invitation specifically asks for business casual. However, that's just my personal opinion. 🙂
 
I bought a suit with matching jacket, pants, and skirt so that I can have options (depending on weather or if something were to get on the pants/skirt without time to dry clean them). I applied last year, and people primarily wore pants suits, but some of the women did have on skirt suits and did not look out of place. I agree that people should wear whatever they are comfortable in. If that's a black pants suit, go for it. If that's a work appropriate dress with a jacket, that works too. I would err towards more business formal than business casual, unless the invitation specifically asks for business casual. However, that's just my personal opinion. 🙂

Agree with this. I have always preferred skirt suits to pants suits, so I bought two skirt suits last year and wore a skirt suit to every single interview. Other women wore skirt suits as well. The more comfortable you feel with what you are wearing, the more confident you will feel, and this confidence will show during the interview. If you don't really have a preference like myself – I think having a matching skirt, pants, and jacket is a good idea – you can change it up depending on the weather, etc.
 
Updated

I agree with @psychrat and hope there is plenty of good news for everyone in the next week! (Edit: Because I've seen some new usernames posting on this thread, as an FYI, I am liking posts as a way to track what I've read; I certainly do not like negative news. I'm sending positive energy to us all 🙂 )
You are doing a fabulous job, thank you so much for your work 🙂.
 
Stop it. This is not helpful.

You are in no position to make such a statement, as there is a wide range of practices regarding notification that is contingent upon many variables, including screening methods used and availability of support staff.
well some review applications as they come in and send out rejections before acceptance for interviews. Some sites actually receive to many applications and may cut off reviewing applications after they have accepted a number of applicants to interview
 
well some review applications as they come in and send out rejections before acceptance for interviews. Some sites actually receive to many applications and may cut off reviewing applications after they have accepted a number of applicants to interview
And some do a rolling review and interview which tends to make the process longer, and rejections later. There are other methods too, so insisting that it works just one or two ways is not helpful. Sometimes it would be helpful if you either acknowledge you don't know what you're talking about, or don't say anything.
 
Just got a rejection at 12:07AM... geeze.

University of Colorado
JFK Developmental Disabilities rotation (117512)
Mass Email
12/1/14 (12:07 freaking AM)
 
Just got a rejection at 12:07AM... geeze.

University of Colorado
JFK Developmental Disabilities rotation (117512)
Mass Email
12/1/14 (12:07 freaking AM)


I really would prefer all rejections come in on a Friday night so I can have some time to mourn.. And maybe grab a cocktail or two immediately after..
 
Last edited:
Well, it's 10:07 in colorado.. But damn, I'm sorry. I really would prefer all rejections come in on a Friday night so I can have some time to mourn.. And maybe grab a cocktail or two immediately after..
You're right. I was on my way to dreamland and I got it...didn't even think of the time difference.
 
Just got a rejection at 12:07AM... geeze.

University of Colorado
JFK Developmental Disabilities rotation (117512)
Mass Email
12/1/14 (12:07 freaking AM)
I also just received a rejection via mass email for the Primary Care Psychology A. F. Williams rotation. Great way to kick off the week.

Onward!
 
When I was involved with applying for internship and as part of the cohort review team while on internship. We were commonly too busy during work hours so much of the review and notices occurred on evenings and weekends when we had time away from our busy schedule. The numbers were too high as we had close to 100 applications to review so we had to do brief screening and rate and rank the applications. The interns were mostly responsible for this part. We used a ranking system that we set up on the Portal to help screen applications. we interviewed on four days with seven to eight applicants per day. Each of the interviewers rated each applicant and they were then put in a rank order for their application day and this largely determined how each applicant was then ranked during the final ranking or selection. Unfortunately, it is almost a full time job for larger internship sites and they almost need a fulltime person during the internship application, screening, application, interview, and selection process.
 
Last edited:
I just received an invite around 11 pm this evening from University of Colorado School of Medicine AF Williams Family Medicine Track. I guess you never know what time they are coming
 
What about a jacketed dress?

Interesting idea! I don't want to stand out based on what I'm wearing but you all make a great point (about feeling comfortable and confident). I should also add that I'll need to pump during interview days (ughhhhhh), so I need something easy and quick to get in and out of so I can pump quickly on breaks without having to ask for accommodations (oh the joys of being a new mama).

Thanks for all the advice! Guess I'll keep shopping. It's a good distraction to waiting to hear back from sites anyway! 🙂
 
Last edited:
well some review applications as they come in and send out rejections before acceptance for interviews. Some sites actually receive to many applications and may cut off reviewing applications after they have accepted a number of applicants to interview

Yes, some. Variability, right? So stop it.
 
-Site name: Pennsylvania Hospital

-Date notified: 12/1

-Invite or rejection: Invite

-Track (please specify even for general tracks): General

-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Mass email

-Interview dates offered: 12/3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 29, 31 and 1/5, 8, 9, 12, 19, 22, 23, 26, 28, 29
 
-Site name: Alpert Medical School of Brown University Clinical Psychology Training Consortium

-Date notified: 12/1

-Invite or rejection: Invite

-Track (please specify even for general tracks): Child Clinical

-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Mass email

-Interview dates offered: January 5, 8, 13, 16, and 21
 
-Site name: Alpert Medical School of Brown University Clinical Psychology Training Consortium
-Date notified: 12/1
-Invite or rejection: Invite
-Track (please specify even for general tracks): Child Clinical
-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Mass email
-Interview dates offered: January 5, 8, 13, 16, and 21

Congrats! HUGE offer.

Heard the Bx Health went out too. Can anyone confirm that Peds went out as well?
 
-Site name: Alpert Medical School of Brown University Clinical Psychology Training Consortium

-Date notified: 12/1

-Invite or rejection: Invite

-Track (please specify even for general tracks): Health Psych/Beh Med

-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Mass email

-Interview dates offered: January 6, 9, 12, 15 (asked to select top 3 dates and asked to hold dates; once finalized, they said they won't change dates)
 
Last edited:
The numbers were too high as we had close to 100 applications to review so we had to do brief screening and rate and rank the applications. The interns were mostly responsible for this part.

I am on a TD listeserve (one for VA TDs and one run by APPIC) and can assure folks this is an anomoly.

And, I would argue, a wildly inappopriate use of resources and wildly unfair to applicants. Most sites get that number of apps or over and do not resort to using trainees as defacto internship committees. It sounds like your site had...problems.
 
Last edited:
-Site name: Alpert Medical School of Brown University Clinical Psychology Training Consortium

-Date notified: 12/1

-Invite or rejection: Invite

-Track (please specify even for general tracks): Adult/MIDAS

-How notified (mass email, personal email, phone): Mass email

-Interview dates offered: January 5, 6, 12, 13, 20 (asked to select top 3 dates and asked asked to hold dates; once finalized, they said they won't change dates)
 
I am on a TD listerserve (one for VA TDs and one run by APPIC) and can assure folks this is an anomoly.

And, I would argue, a wildly inappopriate use of resources and wildly unfair to applicants. Most sites get well that number of apps or over and do not resort to using trainees as defacto internship committees. It sounds like your site had...problems.

From my experience, after engaging in this process a second year in a row, I strongly agree with erg that this is a variable process and you can't make too many assumptions based on what you know about one site. Also, things change for individual sites from year to year too. For example, my application is much stronger this year, there is no doubt about it, but a site that interviewed me last year rejected me this year. I knew an intern at the site, and they let me know that the application review procedures were changed this year. Even though my application was stronger than last year, they simply weighted components of applications differently this year and decided to interview fewer applicants, and those two factors had me missing the cut. Conversly, sites that sent me rejections last year are now choosing to interview me. I also choose to believe that some sites must weed out people before looking closely at applications, because how could they not see I was a perfect fit for the site after looking at my awesome CV and essays 😛. The bottom line is, it's really a crapshoot and you just have wait and see what happens. Focus on preparing for the interviews you get, because that will be something in your control, rather than trying to predict you chances at other sites you haven't heard from or make sense of rejections.
 
Last edited:
Invite (looks mass) to the Children's Center in Salt Lake City [general]
Offered one day (January 21)
Told to wear comfy clothes because I'll be playing with the kiddos.
Super excited!
 
From my experience, after engaging in this process a second year in a row, I strongly agree with erg that this is a variable process and you can't make too many assumptions based on what you know about one site. Also, things change for individual sites from year to year too. For example, my application is much stronger this year, there is no doubt about it, but a site that interviewed me last year rejected me this year. I knew an intern at the site, and they let me know that the application review procedures were changed this year. Even though my application was stronger than last year, they simply weighted components of applications differently this year and decided to interview fewer applicants, and those two factors had me missing the cut. Conversly, sites that sent me rejections last year are now choosing to interview me. I also choose to believe that some sites must weed out people before looking closely at applications, because how could they not see I was a perfect fit for the site after looking at my awesome CV and essays 😛. The bottom line is, it's really a crapshoot and you just have wait and see what happens. Focus on preparing for the interviews you get, because that will be something in your control, rather than trying to predict you chances at other sites you haven't heard from or make sense of rejections.

Thank you for sharing those experiences! I think your advise to prepare for the interviews we already have instead of predicting interviews that we may or may not receive in the coming days is just what I needed to hear. Total crapshoot and horrendous process and I'm just crossing my fingers that I match. It's one year and it doesn't necessarily make or break our careers.
 
Top