- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 1
I got one from one of my top choices yesterday. Don't lose hope just yet!
i also heard from a program today and one last week. they're both in my home state though.
I got one from one of my top choices yesterday. Don't lose hope just yet!
Nice. What does it rhyme with?
Cancelling mine todayAnyone out there cancel there SUNY downstate interviews?
Anyone have a chance to checkout the 2016 ERAS prelim data?
It looks like total applicants were down about 6%; however, applications per person are up 8%. This has led to a slight increase in apps received per program.
I just thought it was interesting data. Fewer people sending out more apps. Wonder if there may be a bigger wave of late cancelations coming this year...
If at any point anyone decides to cancel their interview at Jackson Memorial (Miami), PM me. Please and thank you.
Can anyone comment about whether or not Vandy is still doing the behavioral interviews??
Most places that I have interviewed have at least had one person ask a behavioral type question.
Also, what is everyone's opinion on sending emails or the such to let programs know you're still very interested in them. This being after you already sent thank you cards/emails after your interview. I've heard some people be very for it and some not so much...
Really? I've only had one like that. Most of mine are pretty conversational. And I get the sense that programs are talking about you and ranking you as soon as the interview day is over
anyone interviewed at Rutgers RWJMS? I heard they are on probation. I am planning to cancel that interview if the interview was shady. Can anyone please comment on how the interview went?
Has anyone interviewed/is interviewing at Wayne State? Please PM me!
I had a program tell me something similar.Has anyone else had a program tell you that if you don't rank them #1 then you will not match there because they don't go down very far on their rank list?
It doesn't really unless they will move you up their rank list because of it.How does that make sense??
That's what I was thinking. They probably expect you to tell them you're ranking them #1 or they won't rank you to match. Which makes me not want to rank them highly.It doesn't really unless they will move you up their rank list because of it.
It might just be the difference between them ranking you #60 vs #20. If they only go down to #30 each year, then there's not really much difference between the two though.That's what I was thinking. They probably expect you to tell them you're ranking them #1 or they won't rank you to match.
Has anyone else had a program tell you that if you don't rank them #1 then you will not match there because they don't go down very far on their rank list?
Any PD that makes that statement deserves to be lied to. They are either lying to you, don't understand how the match works, are blatantly disregarding the rules of decorum in the match, preying on the poor understanding of the system that many students have, or just plain unethical. I always tell my students that, if someone tells you that your rank will depend on where you tell them that you are ranking them, it is a match violation and your only suitable recourse is to tell them you are ranking them number one. Reporting them to the NRMP may help someone in the future, but it would hurt you in the short term. Not worth it. Sometimes you just have to play the game. It is annoying that there are still PD's doing this.Has anyone else had a program tell you that if you don't rank them #1 then you will not match there because they don't go down very far on their rank list?
I agree. I really liked this program but was turned off by that statement.Any PD that makes that statement deserves to be lied to. They are either lying to you, don't understand how the match works, are blatantly disregarding the rules of decorum in the match, preying on the poor understanding of the system that many students have, or just plain unethical. I always tell my students that, if someone tells you that your rank will depend on where you tell them that you are ranking them, it is a match violation and your only suitable recourse is to tell them you are ranking them number one. Reporting them to the NRMP may help someone in the future, but it would hurt you in the short term. Not worth it. Sometimes you just have to play the game. It is annoying that there are still PD's doing this.
Maybe I'm being too naive, but I wonder if their intent was just conveyed very poorly. I've interviewed at a couple places that very bluntly stated something along the lines of "We have tons of applicants. We don't know who all really wants to come here. If you do, you need to let us know." In a way, that's basically asking applicants to let them know if they're #1 (not exactly, but again, I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt). To me this approach seems appropriate.
I've had several places say similar things. I feel like statements like that defeat the purpose of the match.Maybe I'm being too naive, but I wonder if their intent was just conveyed very poorly. I've interviewed at a couple places that very bluntly stated something along the lines of "We have tons of applicants. We don't know who all really wants to come here. If you do, you need to let us know." In a way, that's basically asking applicants to let them know if they're #1 (not exactly, but again, I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt). To me this approach seems appropriate.
Even if their heart is in the right place, people came all the way there at significant expense to interview with them. Does it really matter how bad someone wants to go there? And if every applicant puts them #1 then who does that help? No one except them. Also, it's not how the match works.
Seems that this process is all about fit.
I would advise against this, since many of the program directors know each other well. You may eventually wish to do a fellowship at some of these locations and PD's remember when they feel like they have been blatantly lied to. Above, I mentioned that the ones who game the system deserve to be lied to. I stand by that, since you have to look out for your best interests. Your goal is to be as high on the rank lists as you can at all programs you plan to rank. If a PD tells you that this is the only way to be ranked highly, then you should do what you need to do.Just tell every program they are number one.....haha
Thanks for replying. I kept my interview. I will let you know how it goes if you're interested
They are essentially two separate programs, and you as the applicant have the choice to apply to both or just one. Programs will have separate rank lists for each, and when a program decides to rank an applicant applying to both, they will be on both lists. Where the applicant falls on each list is up to the program, and may be ranked in a different order.does anyone know how the categorical vs advanced works? Like, say program A takes 24 residents. 12 are categorical, 12 advanced. Say they rank only 24, and the 24 rank them #1. Are the ones ranked 1-12 given the categorical positions unless an applicant in the top 12 specifies advanced first?
Does anyone know what is going on with UCI anesthesia? I heard their Chair has decided to step down and that they have an acting Program Director. Sounds like a mess. Any input from people who interviewed there?