- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
- Messages
- 689
- Reaction score
- 1,902
It is honestly terrifying to me that someone with a 4.0 and 519 can’t get into med school after two cycles.
It is honestly terrifying to me that someone with a 4.0 and 519 can’t get into med school after two cycles.
Again, I was hampered by a relative lack of clinical experience as well as not having a particularly great selection of schools in my geographic radius in relation to what I had on my application. It can arguably be said that at least one of those cycles I should not have applied, if not possibly both
I get it. Be that as it may, I think a lot of it is just bad luck. I feel bad for you having to go through this s*** again but I admire your perseverance. I don’t think I could do it. I really hope you’re successful this time and wish you the best.
Do you have any volunteering in underserved communities? Also does your PS come off as arrogant and self-serving? Your problem may be that adcoms can’t get a grip on who you are as a human instead of being just a good test taker. Also, due to your small school list You may able be getting yield protected by the smaller state schools and mission protected by the bigger named schools too. You need to devise a POA when applying. I feel like you were almost winging it. Adcoms can see through that.
Yes, Washington University in St. Louis.Okay I'll add both Boston and Washington, thank you; this is exactly the kind of stuff I was hoping to get out of this thread. I was initially nervous to apply to Boston because it seems like it receives a lot of applications and has higher stats comparative to others
To be clear, this is Washington in St. Louis, correct?
Yes, Washington University in St. Louis.
I’d suggest adding creighton, Rosalind Franklin, wake forest, and Vermont
It is honestly terrifying to me that someone with a 4.0 and 519 can’t get into med school after two cycles.
This has nothing to do with luck, and everything to do with poor choices.I get it. Be that as it may, I think a lot of it is just bad luck. I feel bad for you having to go through this s*** again but I admire your perseverance. I don’t think I could do it. I really hope you’re successful this time and wish you the best.
Stats get you to the door; ECs get you through.
This has nothing to do with luck, and everything to do with poor choices.
I think your stats make up for lack of service.
The OP's track record would say otherwise.
We're also not looking for merely for good medical students, we're looking for people who will make good doctors, and 4.0 GPA robots are a dime-a-dozen.
I've seen plenty of posts here from high GPA/high MCAT candidates who were rejected because they had little patient contact experience.
2 publications (not primary author), ~100 hrs clinical volunteering and shadowing, full year of working as a clinical research tech, ~250 hours non clinical volunteering, long term involvement in a professional chemistry fraternity,
I think @ Goro 's intentions are only to help. He/she is a stand up guy who i think would do anything to help people get into a medical school.
But from your original post, Im no expert obviously but I think those are not bad EC's...? I mean how much more can schools expect, really?
I'm not saying you were those people, but you haven't interviewed with them either. I have. My comments were directed at him, not you!Rather presumptuous categorizing people like me as robots.
The problems in my application have been duly noted, Goro, and RJ was obviously only offering words of encouragement.
You don't need to shut down a gesture of empathy by pointing out how much you think I've screwed up.
I’m not sure what to tell you boss TBH. Your clinical hours are good, good stats, good research. I would have suspected you to be well on your way to a T20. Only advise I can give to you is apply to some DOs this cycle so your MCAT doesn’t expire. I’ve known literally so many students get into medical school with less than you. It’s puzzling
I think your stats make up for lack of service. And if you write secondaries on what you’re doing this year to improve service it shouldn’t matter.
I didn’t apply to Vermont so idk but Is the non sci faculty letter a hard requirement?
It has to be interviews. Not saying OP is a bad interviewer - maybe they’re just not getting interviewers who they connect well with, but something is wrong regardless. Wisconsin is generally very friendly to its residents
Wow with your stats how did you not even get an interview? Like there are still medical researchers that need an MD to progress, can't believe they would stop you from getting in based on clinical experience. Lol if you need 150 hours clinical experience, that's like 1 month of full time (40 hrs/week) commitment, why do you let that stop you, when it is multiple times longer to get a 4.0 and high MCAT score? Because of the fact that you can't change your app now, you should still get involved in clinical exp greatly rn, so you can talk about it for your interviews