5th yr radiology resident fired for missing TB test

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

medpsych1

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I saw this story and it spooked me to find that a residency program would terminate a resident for this although it appears he was reinstated.
http://www.pocketfives.com/f13/i-got-fired-today-long-598020/
I know we all get busy and can forget things. But, that is on you. You live and you learn. I know too many physicians and even residents that complain and want the rules bent for them. A TB screen/PPD is well know from way back in medical school. It needs renewal within 12 months. You can get it at any number of locations. You can get it anytime, be it every 6, 9, 10+ months. You should surely have a free moment at some point over a three month period! It is unfortunate for a resident to undergo such stressors.... But, we are adults. There are mandatory minimum workplace requiresments beyond just maintaining license renewal. It is nice to be reminded of things. however, the responsibility is yours even if you are not reminded.

There are alot of automated and mandatory things. Maybe they said he was "terminated". Though, rapid re-instatement suggests he was more likely "suspended" pending compliance. Some of the things have significant health repercusions, i.e. TB. They may have compliance with local, state, fed regulations or even the institutions own standards. Keep in mind the hospital could have some costs and liability relative to ID exposures. So, continuous screening, confirming vaccinations, etc... are very important.
 
While you may be a IM/GS/OB resident you work for the hospital. The program is usually willing to extend a certain amount of slack regarding requirements depending on your standing. The hospital is not. They have rules (CMS, JC, etc) they have to follow or risk accreditation. Beware of running up against hospital policies, because it's rare for a program to have enough political capital to save a resident that does.
 
But, we are adults. There are mandatory minimum workplace requiresments beyond just maintaining license renewal. It is nice to be reminded of things. however, the responsibility is yours even if you are not reminded.
Sure, but if you were pulled over by the police and shot in the knee for going 4mph over the limit, and they cited an obscure law that states all surgeons speeding in the first month of 2011 will be shot on sight, and that this was publicly posted in the newspaper last year, you might think it was overkill.

Firing a resident for missing a single reminder about a TB test is probably overkill. I can all but guarantee that they would not fire a nurse for such a minor infraction.


Also worth noting is the fact that the hospital was violating the conditions of his contract by doing this:
Our program manual states that "before a resident physician may be suspended without pay or terminated...., the resident physician should be provided in writing with the findings which the University believes support the proposed suspension without pay, or the termination. That written notice will be provided by the residency program director and will include details concerning the findings of misconduct or the performace deficiencies. In addition, the written notice will inform the resident physician that if he or she disagrees with such findings and desires to contest the proposed disciplinary suspension or termination, he or she must inform the residency program director in writing within ten days of receipt of the written notice".
 
Sure, but if you were pulled over by the police and shot in the knee for going 4mph over the limit, and they cited an obscure law that states all surgeons speeding in the first month of 2011 will be shot on sight, and that this was publicly posted in the newspaper last year, you might think it was overkill.

Firing a resident for missing a single reminder about a TB test is probably overkill. I can all but guarantee that they would not fire a nurse for such a minor infraction...
Yes, yes, we can over dramatize and be apalled at another blog of abused resident/s. But, updated TB screen/PPD status is not an obscure rule or requirement. I dare say that a 5th year resident should know the drill. Also, while one may blogged to death about your unfair treatment or the unfair treatment you heard of in reference to someone else, we do not know the facts or the terms of every hospital residency employment.

It is nice to have everyone reminding you, wiping your nose, tieing your shoes. However, some of these basic things are still your responsibility even if your nanny forgets to remind you. I have actually seen nurses and other staff suspended for failures to meet such requirements as PPDs completion of little on-line HIPPA awareness materials, etc... I have also seen residents docked vacation dates for failure to submit time sheets/cards within established deadlines. Floating around like everything is laid back and loose and deadlines and obligations are simple guidelines/suggestions and not really so important can get individuals in trouble.

Again, I don't know the details beyond these blog reports. I don't believe any of use really can say we know.
You didn't read the thread.
I did read enough of the link. Sometimes the terminology can get confusing. Sometimes one has privileges terminated... pending compliance which is not the same as being fired, per se. However, in the first paragraph, I find the admission very informative:
FromLink said:
I apparently got an automated email (which I have no recollection of receiving b/c I may have auto deleted b/c it looked like spam) two months ago saying I needed to do the test or face potential 2 week suspension without pay followed by termination...
Some residency programs have very strick email reading requirements too. Residents and employees inh general may be required as terms of contract to review all emails (even ~hospital wide spam stuff) as a requirement. The so called, 5th year resident, victim acknowledges probably receiving a reminder two months in advance and deleting it....

Whatever the truth is, I would take a panicked and/or angry blogging senior resident's comments with a grain of salt. By their own words, the required ANNUAL screen (i.e. he/she has been required to complete the preceding 4 years) was very, very simple and he/she acknowledges very high likelihood of receiving a reminder two months well in advance. I may anger some radiology residents. But, speaking with friends in rads, I never thought it was so intense as to preclude them from getting a PPD placed at some point over a 2-3 month period.

I agree there are unfair things and malignant environments in residency. I just think at some point we should not mark every unfortunate moment up to the mean and heartless programs. There are real injustices that will only loose credibility if everyone overdramatizes and and attempts to absolve adults of very simple accountability. GME and hospitals at large have enough trouble with crossing the "t" and dotting the "i". Aside from the multitude of residents, they have nurses, students in allied health, etc... Do you really think they should be bending the rules for everyone and giving multiple reminders to everyone or just the all important residents????
 
Last edited:
I did read enough of the link. Sometimes the terminology can get confusing. Sometimes one has privileges terminated... pending compliance which is not the same as being fired, per se.

The blog specifies that the resident met with HR who had "drawn up the termination" paperwork, and "there was nothing that could be done", implying the termination was a done deal. It took an academic Dean and the poster's PD to intervene in order to halt/reverse the termination. Sounds like more than just privileges being terminated. Sounds like a firing from the program.
 
1. We only have the poster's side of the story. It's quite possible that the "real" story is different.

2. If we assume the story is accurate as written:

A. The resident wasn't "fired" from their program. Their "resident privileges" were revoked from the hospital. Without those privileges they can't work, so in the end it ends up being the same thing. This is why the PD was trying to fix things.

B. It's completely ridiculous for a hospital to terminate a resident over something like this, unless there was a pattern of such behavior over time. As mentioned above, proper notice would need to be given (which was not, per the story)
 
I'm just wondering if the HR lady had an axe to grind against this resident.
 
We have to get our PPD done every six months. I don't keep track of it. It isn't because I'm too busy, or the residency is too stressful or anything like that. It is because it really makes no difference to me. I take appropriate precautions in situations that might expose me and I would be very quick to get checked out if I thought I had been exposed, but other than that it is some administrators interpretation of a regulation that requires me to get it checked every 6 mths. Therefore, I feel perfectly justified not thinking about it until I get a little note saying that I am due (or sometimes that I am overdue because they aren't always so on top of notifying us). Then I make time to head over and roll up a sleeve. I have never gotten in any sort of trouble for this, and the one time I was really overdue (several months-the person who usually tracked it was gone and the new person was catching up, then I was out of town for a while) I got another reminder, but no mention of dire consequences. This is an example of extreme overkill. A suspension is reasonable for someone who hasn't responded to a notice (or two might be better), but termination is just crazy for a first offense.

A question JackADeli-do you go get your PPD each year without anyone mentioning to you that it is time (and your flu shot, and complete your yearly HIPAA update, and the other intermittent tasks the hospital likes for you to do)?
 
Slightly OT, but I love the way our GME office deals with this stuff.

They have contract signing "fairs" 2 or 3 times a week for a month or so in the spring. Before they'll give you your contract to sign, you have to have your PPD placed and do your TB mask fit check and make sure your HIPPA and other crap is up-to-date.

This way pretty much everyone remembers to do all this crap...much easier to remember if everyone else in your program is headed over to do it and since it's tied to something everyone actually wants to do (sign their contract so they can keep getting paid), its a much easier sell.
 
We have to get our PPD done every six months. I don't keep track of it. It isn't because I'm too busy, or the residency is too stressful or anything like that. It is because it really makes no difference to me. I take appropriate precautions ... Therefore, I feel perfectly justified not thinking about it until I get a little note saying that I am due (or sometimes that I am overdue because they aren't always so on top of notifying us)...
IMHO, that is a very unfortunate mentality to owning one's responsibilities.
...A question JackADeli-do you go get your PPD each year without anyone mentioning to you that it is time (and your flu shot, and complete your yearly HIPAA update, and the other intermittent tasks the hospital likes for you to do)?
Yes, usually. I don't get Flu shots and am not required to do so in my hospital. I have a calendar and schedule my appointments and dates. The issue is not me or If I'm perfect. Just because the guy in front of me got through a stretch of highway speeding is not an excuse when I get a ticket. It is nice to get a reminder. That is a courteousy and not necessarily an entitlement (depending on terms of employment). If I accidently delete an email reminder from med-licensing board and fail to renew on time, it is on me. The argument of, "unless your perfect then rules don't apply" is somewhat junior high juvenile.

Again, I don't know all the details of this case nor does anyone else. But, in general, these health status updates and such are required for more then just residents. It is sad to see all the snivling at the resident level for exceptions, delays, etc... This has occurred with turning in time sheets, student evaluations, etc., etc. I have seen as residents piss and moan about the program coordinator that keeps hassling them. I have watched as residents start referring to their ProgCor as B**** because she keeps after them for some admin requirement the resident is 1wk, 2wk, 2month behind on completing.

But, I have seen nurses and other allied health get suspended far easier. They usually do not have high positioned faculty/staff and division that can go to bat for them. In fact, the last few I have seen get suspended actually called the surgical department to ask the section chief to please call on their behalf.

Every hospital has different systems and depts. But, usually issues like PPD and employ health updates are system wide. There could be thousands of people that are monitored for timely renewal on annual basis. It is asking a great deal to expect the hospital admins to chase everyone with reminders and then remind again just in case for what should be easily scheduled, regular annual things required as terms of employment. Or, maybe the underlying argument is that as a resident, "you are special" and deserve a more gentle, tender approach.
...our GME office deals with this stuff.

They have contract signing "fairs" 2 or 3 times a week for a month or so in the spring. Before they'll give you your contract to sign, you have to have your PPD placed and do your TB mask fit check and make sure your HIPPA and other crap is up-to-date...
Our hospital does that for residents/students/etc... on a different calendar schedule and attendings and regular employees on an another.
 
Last edited:
I agree that it doesn't sound like he was actually "fired". One quick and easy way to get someone's attention is suspend them until things get done. You may argue about the fairness of the tactics but not the effectiveness. I'm sure a softer approach would have been as effective. To me it's one of those "professionalism" competencies "they" are always talking about. Just get your PPD. Everyone does it once a year. Figure it out. Seemingly everyone else at his program managed to not get suspended. He's a unique and special flower why?

And management/acgme being unreasonable d-bags isn't some sort of shocking discovery. That's reality, always will be. I think this is a lot of nothing to see here folks, move along now.
 
FromLink said:
I apparently got an automated email (which I have no recollection of receiving b/c I may have auto deleted b/c it looked like spam) two months ago saying I needed to do the test or face potential 2 week suspension without pay followed by termination...
...I'm sure a softer approach would have been as effective. To me it's one of those "professionalism" competencies "they" are always talking about. Just get your PPD. Everyone does it once a year. Figure it out. Seemingly everyone else at his program managed to not get suspended. He's a unique and special flower why...
Yep, apparently the softer/kinder approach didn't work as he "accidentally" failed to read email and instead deleted it. He missed a several month window to do a simple task. It is amazing the tone around here and IMHO, should be embarassing, i.e. ~we are the most educated in the hospital, we are the most valuable, we should have different rules for us cause routine scheduling is too difficult and I will cry cause my thingy hurts....

I mean, seriously, we are talking about something done regularly on a yearly basis since medical school and a senior resident can't figure it out? So now, we should all circle the wagons, be indignant, enraged and feel sorry for him/her because of the injustice of it all. How dare the hospital administration not recognize the senior residents' intellectual handicap.

I remember hearing something about "picking your fights". While, I am certain the PD wanted to help his little lamb. I am equally certain the PD is less then amused at an adult, highly educated, senior resident creating such a major incident and setting his [PD's] program up as an example for all. This should be a lesson in professionalism on the part of the resident and PD. Instead, it seems like continued rationalization and looking for excuses. It would be better if everyone learned from their mistake and just got it done.
I worked for a hospital last year that fired a bunch of nurses for failure to show up to work during a blizzard, even though streets were impassable.
This is exceedingly common at numerous hospitals around the country. Hospitals have "inclement weather" rules/guidelines/protocols. Some will directly phone and/or email employees about impending bad weather. Others require employees to contact the hospital in advance to obtain information as to the hospitals plan. It is common for hospitals to require staff to come in the night before and sleep at the hospital or the hospital pays for rooms at local hotel for employees to stay in the night before anticipated weather events. This is done around the country for numerous critical service industries including healthcare, law enforcement, firefighters, air traffic controllers, etc.... The expectation is that critical service employees behave like adults and recognize their obligations.
 
Last edited:
Jack,

Not sure why you're being so unreasonable here. A couple of observations

1. We don't know if the guy got the email or not. He says he *may* have deleted it accidently, but he also may have never got it. He doesn't know and you certainly don't know.

Since his name wasn't on the list that was later sent to the PD, it seems there is at least a reasonable chance that he never got it at all.

2. Do your really think it would unreasonable for the program or hospital to call or page him and inform him of the problem? And not as a means of "coddling the busy resident", but just as a good management practice. Calling him would certainly be faster than all the paperwork required to suspend his privileges. Also maybe he really did get the test and the hospital lost/misplaced the paperwork (that has happened to me before). Just terminating the guy without being certain that anyone has actually spoken to him is just poor management.


Now I realize that all we have is the resident's account of things, and it's possible that he isn't reporting all of the facts accurately. But based on his story, the program/hospital handled this very poorly.
 
...Not sure why you're being so unreasonable here...
😕 My opinion or anyone elses on here doesn't matter so reasonable or unreasonable isn't relavant. However, my take is that the story is very one sided and there is no reasonable way for me to take it at face value.

Based on my experiences both as a med-student, resident, attending and forum regular, it seems there are holes in this one sided, self-serving forum rant.

1. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident just dropped the ball.
2. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident hints that he got an email reminder up to 2 months earlier.... but conveniently doesn't remember receiving it and conveniently but accidently deleted it as a spam. Of course, presuming he was there 5 years, it would seem his hospital departmental email would not be accidently marked for spam filtering.
3. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident, implied by the grave injustice expressed, was fairly pristine up to this point and shocked out of the blue.... and had a draconian act perpetrated by the hospital.
4. The oh so unfortunate fairly pristine unfairly victimized FIFTH year radiology needed to go through extensive hoops to correct the injustice.

I'll leave that at 4. I don't buy it and it doesn't add up. My read on these forums and experience getting involved to help the unfortunate victims in these sort of situations has found almost 100% of the time that before all is said and done, the story is far different.

It amazes me at what lengths individuals will come out to defend exceedingly easily avoided problems. The one thing I will believe in this tale of woe is that the FIFTH year resident failed to meet a minimal employee health update and very likely did get the email. It is an easy thing to avoid. All the other moaning and groaning and excusing obscures the learning point... i.e. take care of your business. I don't see this as some HR secretary grinding an axe or in other such stories a mean program coordinator grinding their axe. They would never get to wield an axe if "we" physicians simply took care of business. There are too much "exceptions" being sought. Too often, I hear individuals wanting something special because "I am a physician" or "I am a physician (resident)"...."I am saving lives over here. All that administrative stuff is less important". In the mean time, we have progressive cuts in work hours with residents still not studying, still failing to complete their basic admin obligations (i.e. time cards, annual PPD or mask fittings, etc...). There is always an excuse.

My big issue is that these excuses are embarassing. Being a physician is more then a title. It is what you do. Why should you be given respect as a physician if you can not do what is required of all the ~lesser beings/lower echelon in your hospital. "We" should be better then that. Not better then doing our jobs. Rather, we should be better then those that fail to do the simple tasks and/or need constant reminding like children. Isn't that what physicians all to often complain about, nurses, ancillary care, etc.... failing to do their jobs or needing to be constantly reminded???? Instead, "we" get away with it. Where I see nurses get suspended (without pay) for PPD/health updates or failure to show because of weather, to often physicians have clout to get an "exception"... I would like to see med-students and residents and attendings stop crying how unfair it all is and just do your job first instead of provoking the "injustice". Just grow up and be accountable.
 
I'm with JAD on this one. Seriously, find a nurse or a fellow resident, get the PPD placed. Draw a little circle around it. Wait 2 days and get some nurse or doctor to look at it and write on a piece of paper that it was negative.

It's possibly the easiest thing you'll do all day, so just get it done.
 
...find a nurse or a fellow resident, get the PPD placed. ...Wait 2 days and get some nurse or doctor to look at it and write on a piece of paper that it was negative.

It's possibly the easiest thing you'll do all day, so just get it done.
A senior radiology resident, 80hr restrictions, by his own account possibly had up to 2 months advanced notice/reminder.... how busy could he be, seriously!!! It's embarassing. I am apalled he would go out of his way to post it publicly.

I am sure, if the story of PD having to get involved and all the other heavy weight efforts, this has now become another nose-wiping task for the program coordinator to do for the resident "children".... remind them of one more thing. He/she is now task with something else to protect the resident "children" from hurting themselves👎 They likely innacted a "new policy" requiring all residents to actually check their emails once a week too!
 
Last edited:
The one thing I will believe in this tale of woe is that the FIFTH year resident failed to meet a minimal employee health update and very likely did get the email.

It's easy to be critical of the guy, if you're not going to believe his story.

1. Can you tell my why you think it's "very likely" he did get the email, yet his name did not get placed on the list that was later sent to the PD?

2. Let's say that we were to later find out that the email was definitely never sent to him. Would that change your opinion on how this whole thing was handled?
 
We were required by our residency contracts to check emails AT LEAST weekly. And though they always sent multiple reminders for important things, the contractual obligation to check email was something the administration could and would use against you if you failed to complete something mandatory.

Several things we had to do yearly at my program:
1. ppd
2. corporate compliance things (review online policies on HIPAA, emergency response systems, etc. Mandatory quizzes included)
3. renew ID badges (security swipe) at certain hospitals
4. sign contract by certain date. Contract stipulated completion of the above 3 items.

Seriously folks, this is not an intern who didn't know any better. Everyone here is freaking out because they are afraid it could happen to them. It won't, since most people in medicine are a bit anal retentive and paranoid about consequences such as suspension of privileges, and thus will not let it come to that. Keep in mind that of thousands and thousands of people doing a yearly ppd, only a handful fail to do so in time to prevent disciplinary action. Even with a deadline, there is *usually* some leeway. An email a couple months back was mentioned, and they likely did not suspend/fire this resident on the date of the deadline, but likely sometime thereafter. This was someone who had been doing it every year since med school. From experience, I can tell you that every year around 'that time', you KNOW that you need to get it done---maybe not intern year, but definitely by the time you are a PGY5. We were always VERY aware of needing to complete these things, and other residents disappearing briefly to do the same. On slow days in may and june (our deadline), we would make it a point to get team members their ppds. Hard to believe he completely forgot and at no time over 2+ months thought to complete the ppd, nor ran into another resident/attending/student who at least mentioned it as something they had to do earlier or later that day. Or that no one mentioned it at a conference to 'make sure you get your ppd'.

However, I believe there is more to the story than what is being told by the resident as it's very hard to believe there weren't multiple reminders prior to being 'fired'. It's not that I don't want to believe the resident (I just finished residency myself, I know how busy things are), it's just that having 'been there and done that', it's a bit hard to believe.
 
FromLink said:
I apparently got an automated email (which I have no recollection of receiving b/c I may have auto deleted b/c it looked like spam) two months ago saying I needed to do the test or face potential 2 week suspension without pay followed by termination...
...1. Can you tell my why you think it's "very likely" he did get the email, yet his name did not get placed on the list that was later sent to the PD?...
First, I believe he very likely did get the email based on his own recount. I doubt he would make that statement. It is silly. If he never got the email, he would simply state, "I never got any email...". Instead, he states, "I apparently got an automated email..." and then proceeds with excuses of not remembering it and somehow spam filtering his work emails by accident.

Second, as to his story about not being on the supposed list, it exceeds all believability. See my comments earlier and Smurfettes. His classmates in his program got warnings (and put on a list) about possibly being suspended/fired over PPDs and he never heard about it over a 2 month period....really?
...2. Let's say that we were to later find out that the email was definitely never sent to him. Would that change your opinion on how this whole thing was handled?
No. Again, adult accountability. If his story is to be believed (with your caveat), his classmates/colleagues/?friends got placed on a ~no-fly/impending grounded list and he somehow knew nothing about it and/or couldn't put 1 and 1 together to get 2.
We were required by our residency contracts to check emails AT LEAST weekly. And though they always sent multiple reminders for important things, the contractual obligation to check email was something the administration could and would use against you if you failed to complete something mandatory.

Several things we had to do yearly at my program:
1. ppd
2. corporate compliance things (review online policies on HIPAA, emergency response systems, etc. Mandatory quizzes included)
3. renew ID badges (security swipe) at certain hospitals
4. sign contract by certain date. Contract stipulated completion of the above 3 items.

Seriously folks, this is not an intern who didn't know any better. Everyone here is freaking out because they are afraid it could happen to them. It won't, since most people in medicine are a bit anal retentive and paranoid about consequences such as suspension of privileges, and thus will not let it come to that. ...An email a couple months back was mentioned, and they likely did not suspend/fire this resident on the date of the deadline, but likely sometime thereafter. This was someone who had been doing it every year since med school. From experience, I can tell you that every year around 'that time', you KNOW that you need to get it done---maybe not intern year, but definitely by the time you are a PGY5. We were always VERY aware of needing to complete these things, and other residents disappearing briefly to do the same. On slow days in may and june (our deadline), we would make it a point to get team members their ppds. Hard to believe he completely forgot and at no time over 2+ months thought to complete the ppd, nor ran into another resident/attending/student who at least mentioned it as something they had to do earlier or later that day. Or that no one mentioned it at a conference to 'make sure you get your ppd'...
Exactly!
...It's not that I don't want to believe the resident (I just finished residency myself, I know how busy things are), it's just that having 'been there and done that', it's a bit hard to believe.
👍
 
Jack,

As I mentioned earlier, if you're not going to believe his account (that he wasn't on the second list), then you're really arguing about an entirely different scenario. You are really selective about what you believe as it suits your position. For example, you will absolutely believe that he got the email, but, at the same time, believing that he was not on the second list "exceeds all believability". That's convenient.

I will say that if I chose to believe the story as you apparently think it happened, my sympathy for the resident would be minimal (but clearly more than yours).

Secondly, I think you are misunderstanding part of my point here. I'm not trying to make excuses for the resident (unless you count my evaluating his story at face value an excuse). I'm saying the program/hospital handled it stupidly as far as their self-interest is concerned. Firing a resident in this way is inefficient. It is poor management and the associated costs are far greater than what it would have taken to call or page the resident and talk to him in person before taking action.

Sure the resident is an adult and has a responsibility to get this done. The question now, is what would be the best way for the hospital/program to handle this once it has occurred. Firing the guy without making sure someone has spoken to him is just poor management. This is independent of what may or may not be "fair" to the resident.
 
...As I mentioned earlier, if you're not going to believe his account (that he wasn't on the second list), then you're really arguing about an entirely different scenario. You are really selective about what you believe as it suits your position. For example, you will absolutely believe that he got the email, but, at the same time, believing that he was not on the second list "exceeds all believability". That's convenient...
No. I think you are missing the point. He did not say he never received the email. Rather, that was your caveat. Also, I am NOT arguing that his name was or was not on this list.

If I believe it at face value, with him forgetting email/deleting email/not getting email, it is still not believeable. Unless he had his head deep in a nuclear bunker for two months, I just don't see him (or any other resident in the program) NOT hearing about his colleagues/classmates/friends being on this list and not saying, "Hmmmm maybe I need one of those strange and mysterious PPD things". I also find it hard to believe that any PD/Prog coordinator would get a letter listing residents in danger of being suspended/fired and not generally reminding all residents in the program.
...I think you are misunderstanding part of my point here. ...I'm saying the program/hospital ...Firing a resident in this way is inefficient. It is poor management and the associated costs are far greater than what it would have taken to call or page the resident and talk to him in person before taking action...
I got your point. It is a matter of opinion in which we differ. I have watched over the past 15+yrs and seen that a single, well placed incident of ~excessive force goes a long way to cleaning up residents' and attendings not doing their job. Presuming, the PD didn't respond to a letter that his/her residents were in danger of suspension/termination, presuming the prog-coordinator didn't respond to a letter that his/her residents were in danger of suspension/termination, what ever the case, I am certain everyone up and down that radiology residency AND all other residecies in that hospital AND nursing/allied health folks will now be on time with health maintenance, PPDs, etc... That one incident did more then a thousand emails ever could. The residents in this program felt it. The PD felt it. The assistant PD felt it. The prog-coord felt it..... After this incident, they don't even need to phone! That is efficiency. It is the same for attendings. It only takes your privileges/cases being canceled once for you to know dictations need to be done on time.

PS: the residents would be idiots to not, in light of incident, check their emails, fix spam filters, etc..... efficiency:meanie:
 
Last edited:
I'm saying the program/hospital handled it stupidly as far as their self-interest is concerned. Firing a resident in this way is inefficient. It is poor management and the associated costs are far greater than what it would have taken to call or page the resident and talk to him in person before taking action.

.... Firing the guy without making sure someone has spoken to him is just poor management.

The argument here is, essentially, that "management" should have put an extra informal stage into their processes, in order to help the resident. I see a number of difficulties with that -

1) This would, in effect, be a personal favour to the resident. Unless someone in management who knows about the issue is a personal friend of the resident, they would have no reason to do it.

2) Management have to follow certain procedures in relation to employee issues, in order to meet the legal requirements. Those legal requirements include a degree of procedural fairness. If it could be shown that some residents got an additional personal telephone call before formal action, then pretty soon management would find themselves having to do the same for everyone in the same situation, which adds to admin time and complexity - and therefore to admin costs.

3) It doesn't feel like it when one is on the other end of what they do, but "management" are people too. They too can feel that they are skilled professionals who are overworked and underappreciated. It wouldn't be surprising if there are some managers who think that a doctor who gives them extra work to do might not be a special little snowflake to whom the rules do not apply.
 
No. I think you are missing the point. He did not say he never received the email.

I think the main problem is a misunderstanding of the English language. Here's what he said:

"I apparently got an automated email (which I have no recollection of receiving b/c I may have auto deleted b/c it looked like spam) two months ago saying I needed to do the test or face potential 2 week suspension without pay followed by termination."

Any reasonable person who reads this can conclude that one of two things happened:

1. He was never sent the email
2. He was sent the email and it was accidentally deleted.

I've read your comments earlier in the thread that if he really never received it, he might have chosen different words to describe what happened. Maybe, maybe not.

There is no way based on what he wrote he can know whether he got the email or not. How can he know that he got an email that he never saw? The bottom line is he can't know this. And neither can you.

Taking that paragraph as some sort of damning evidence that he actually got the email is being very selective, especially since he was not on the second list (allegedly).


Also, I am NOT arguing that his name was or was not on this list.

It sure sounded like that's what you were doing when you said this:

Second, as to his story about not being on the supposed list, it exceeds all believability.

I hope you can understand that when you say something "exceeds all believability" I would interpret it as you are arguing that it probably didn't happen. Your clarification is helpful.


As far as your opinion on the effectiveness of the approach, I agree that we'll probably have to agree to disagree on this one. Based on my experience, despite this resident's story, people are still going to forget PPDs. In the long run, handling it in this way is likely going to cost more time and effort than a one minute phone call.
 
The argument here is, essentially, that "management" should have put an extra informal stage into their processes, in order to help the resident. I see a number of difficulties with that -

1) This would, in effect, be a personal favour to the resident. Unless someone in management who knows about the issue is a personal friend of the resident, they would have no reason to do it.

2) Management have to follow certain procedures in relation to employee issues, in order to meet the legal requirements. Those legal requirements include a degree of procedural fairness. If it could be shown that some residents got an additional personal telephone call before formal action, then pretty soon management would find themselves having to do the same for everyone in the same situation, which adds to admin time and complexity - and therefore to admin costs.

3) It doesn't feel like it when one is on the other end of what they do, but "management" are people too. They too can feel that they are skilled professionals who are overworked and underappreciated. It wouldn't be surprising if there are some managers who think that a doctor who gives them extra work to do might not be a special little snowflake to whom the rules do not apply.

It has nothing to do with a personal favor. It has to do with what's best for the institution in terms of cost and time (and it should be a formal thing). Is it better to make a one minute phone call to get this guy to comply or is it best to fire this guy, which involves a lot of people doing a lot of paperwork and then dealing with the inevitable fight by the resident (and then if the resident is successfully fired, reallocating his work to others).
 
Jack,

One other thing I want to address. You said

" I just don't see him (or any other resident in the program) NOT hearing about his colleagues/classmates/friends being on this list and not saying, "Hmmmm maybe I need one of those strange and mysterious PPD things". "

I'm not sure why you're so sure that because other residents in the program were notified by the program director, he would have known anything about that. You seem to think that it would have been some sort of big news that everyone would talk about. When someone reminds me to get a PPD, I go get it, I'm not sure I'd really discuss such a mundane thing with everyone else.
 
It has nothing to do with a personal favor. It has to do with what's best for the institution in terms of cost and time (and it should be a formal thing). Is it better to make a one minute phone call to get this guy to comply or is it best to fire this guy, which involves a lot of people doing a lot of paperwork and then dealing with the inevitable fight by the resident (and then if the resident is successfully fired, reallocating his work to others).

If it is formal action we are talking about, the point is that what's best for the institution (and the resident) in this single case may not be what's best for the institution in the context of all the other cases it has over a period of time.
 
And congratulations, reno, you are the first person ever to get me to argue management's side.
 
I worked for a hospital last year that fired a bunch of nurses for failure to show up to work during a blizzard, even though streets were impassable.
I hope this was in an area with a glut of nurses, otherwise I'm sure they had some great staffing issues after that. Unless all of these nurses decided not to call to say they couldn't come, that's an extremely stupid way to conduct business.

"Hi, I'm physically unable to get to work right now."

"You're fired."
 
😕 My opinion or anyone elses on here doesn't matter so reasonable or unreasonable isn't relavant. However, my take is that the story is very one sided and there is no reasonable way for me to take it at face value.

Based on my experiences both as a med-student, resident, attending and forum regular, it seems there are holes in this one sided, self-serving forum rant.

1. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident just dropped the ball.
2. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident hints that he got an email reminder up to 2 months earlier.... but conveniently doesn't remember receiving it and conveniently but accidently deleted it as a spam. Of course, presuming he was there 5 years, it would seem his hospital departmental email would not be accidently marked for spam filtering.
3. The oh so unfortunate FIFTH year radiology resident, implied by the grave injustice expressed, was fairly pristine up to this point and shocked out of the blue.... and had a draconian act perpetrated by the hospital.
4. The oh so unfortunate fairly pristine unfairly victimized FIFTH year radiology needed to go through extensive hoops to correct the injustice.

I'll leave that at 4. I don't buy it and it doesn't add up. My read on these forums and experience getting involved to help the unfortunate victims in these sort of situations has found almost 100% of the time that before all is said and done, the story is far different.

It amazes me at what lengths individuals will come out to defend exceedingly easily avoided problems. The one thing I will believe in this tale of woe is that the FIFTH year resident failed to meet a minimal employee health update and very likely did get the email. It is an easy thing to avoid. All the other moaning and groaning and excusing obscures the learning point... i.e. take care of your business. I don't see this as some HR secretary grinding an axe or in other such stories a mean program coordinator grinding their axe. They would never get to wield an axe if "we" physicians simply took care of business. There are too much "exceptions" being sought. Too often, I hear individuals wanting something special because "I am a physician" or "I am a physician (resident)"...."I am saving lives over here. All that administrative stuff is less important". In the mean time, we have progressive cuts in work hours with residents still not studying, still failing to complete their basic admin obligations (i.e. time cards, annual PPD or mask fittings, etc...). There is always an excuse.

My big issue is that these excuses are embarassing. Being a physician is more then a title. It is what you do. Why should you be given respect as a physician if you can not do what is required of all the ~lesser beings/lower echelon in your hospital. "We" should be better then that. Not better then doing our jobs. Rather, we should be better then those that fail to do the simple tasks and/or need constant reminding like children. Isn't that what physicians all to often complain about, nurses, ancillary care, etc.... failing to do their jobs or needing to be constantly reminded???? Instead, "we" get away with it. Where I see nurses get suspended (without pay) for PPD/health updates or failure to show because of weather, to often physicians have clout to get an "exception"... I would like to see med-students and residents and attendings stop crying how unfair it all is and just do your job first instead of provoking the "injustice". Just grow up and be accountable.

A senior radiology resident, 80hr restrictions, by his own account possibly had up to 2 months advanced notice/reminder.... how busy could he be, seriously!!! It's embarassing. I am apalled he would go out of his way to post it publicly.

I am sure, if the story of PD having to get involved and all the other heavy weight efforts, this has now become another nose-wiping task for the program coordinator to do for the resident "children".... remind them of one more thing. He/she is now task with something else to protect the resident "children" from hurting themselves👎 They likely innacted a "new policy" requiring all residents to actually check their emails once a week too!

First, I believe he very likely did get the email based on his own recount. I doubt he would make that statement. It is silly. If he never got the email, he would simply state, "I never got any email...". Instead, he states, "I apparently got an automated email..." and then proceeds with excuses of not remembering it and somehow spam filtering his work emails by accident.

Second, as to his story about not being on the supposed list, it exceeds all believability. See my comments earlier and Smurfettes. His classmates in his program got warnings (and put on a list) about possibly being suspended/fired over PPDs and he never heard about it over a 2 month period....really?No. Again, adult accountability. If his story is to be believed (with your caveat), his classmates/colleagues/?friends got placed on a ~no-fly/impending grounded list and he somehow knew nothing about it and/or couldn't put 1 and 1 together to get 2.Exactly!👍

No. I think you are missing the point. He did not say he never received the email. Rather, that was your caveat. Also, I am NOT arguing that his name was or was not on this list.

If I believe it at face value, with him forgetting email/deleting email/not getting email, it is still not believeable. Unless he had his head deep in a nuclear bunker for two months, I just don't see him (or any other resident in the program) NOT hearing about his colleagues/classmates/friends being on this list and not saying, "Hmmmm maybe I need one of those strange and mysterious PPD things". I also find it hard to believe that any PD/Prog coordinator would get a letter listing residents in danger of being suspended/fired and not generally reminding all residents in the program.I got your point. It is a matter of opinion in which we differ. I have watched over the past 15+yrs and seen that a single, well placed incident of ~excessive force goes a long way to cleaning up residents' and attendings not doing their job. Presuming, the PD didn't respond to a letter that his/her residents were in danger of suspension/termination, presuming the prog-coordinator didn't respond to a letter that his/her residents were in danger of suspension/termination, what ever the case, I am certain everyone up and down that radiology residency AND all other residecies in that hospital AND nursing/allied health folks will now be on time with health maintenance, PPDs, etc... That one incident did more then a thousand emails ever could. The residents in this program felt it. The PD felt it. The assistant PD felt it. The prog-coord felt it..... After this incident, they don't even need to phone! That is efficiency. It is the same for attendings. It only takes your privileges/cases being canceled once for you to know dictations need to be done on time.

PS: the residents would be idiots to not, in light of incident, check their emails, fix spam filters, etc..... efficiency:meanie:
In short, we really don't have all the facts and are continually speculating, so why are you still arguing it?
 
If it is formal action we are talking about, the point is that what's best for the institution (and the resident) in this single case may not be what's best for the institution in the context of all the other cases it has over a period of time.

In case I wasn't clear, I do believe that it would be best for the institution in the "context of all the other cases it has over a period of time".
 
In case I wasn't clear, I do believe that it would be best for the institution in the "context of all the other cases it has over a period of time".

You then end up with a situation where you have an employee of the hospital saying "yes, I knew I have a contractual obligation to have this test every year, and I received the email reminder, but I didn't get a personal phonecall from someone in HR as well, so the hospital can't do anything about it."

Where does it end? There's plenty of sighing on this site over non-compliant patients. I bet there's also plenty of sighing by admin staff over non-compliant doctors.
 
In short, we really don't have all the facts and are continually speculating, so why are you still arguing it?
Looks like you wanted to participate and add to maintanance of the thread.
...It sure sounded like that's what you were doing when you said this...

...I hope you can understand that when you say something "exceeds all believability" I would interpret it as you are arguing that it probably didn't happen. Your clarification is helpful...
Yes, I understand that that one sentence out of context and devoid of the previous points can get confusing. It is not that I disbelieve his not being on the list. I disbelieve his use of not being on the list as an excuse.
...I'm not sure why you're so sure that because other residents in the program were notified by the program director, he would have known anything about that. You seem to think that it would have been some sort of big news that everyone would talk about. When someone reminds me to get a PPD, I go get it, I'm not sure I'd really discuss such a mundane thing with everyone else.
As Smurfette so eloquently put it, "been there, done that...". You can't break wind in a residency without everyone in the hospital knowing about it. Hospitals are by nature a gossip factory. The fact of this supposed 5th year rads resident getting suspended/fired has drawn plenty of conversation from everyone here that doesn't even know him/her. Residents (i.e. the others on the list) being notified they are at risk for suspension/termination would very much be part of the residency gossip. This would not be viewed as a mundane notification by the rsidents, prog-coord, PD. At least one resident would be whining how "unfair" and "unreasonable" such threats are.... In classic residency fashion, the listed residents would play the victim, running around recruiting colleagues to their view/defense of how draconian and unfair such a "threat" is. They of course will leave out the parts of the story of habitual tardiness in these things, etc... Or, the fact that the residency program as a whole has a problem of compliance leading to such a warning would be absent from the discussion. I already hear residents saying, "we are so busy and stressed. it's just not right to make threats of suspension. it adds so much stress I couldn't sleep...".
...Where does it end? There's plenty of sighing on this site over non-compliant patients. I bet there's also plenty of sighing by admin staff over non-compliant doctors.
Exactly. We are physicians saving lives so rules should bend to our convenience.👎

I don't care at all about the actual anonymous resident. I find the defense and excuses to be undignified for any adult, or adult college grad, or adult graduate student, or least of all an adult, college grad, graduate school grad, physician! I also try to reply to these things to help pre-meds/med-students get out of the easy, undergrad social justice/utopian view that lacks individual accountability and responsibility.

Remeber the story of hooves and zebras? Well, this is not a zebra. You have to make it into a zebra to buy all the excuses.... i.e. resident got a hospital/employer email but accidently (after 4 years) had it spam filtered or ?didn't get it; resident's colleagues/friends got notice of non-compliance but somehow don't talk to each other like every other program in the country; PD/Prog-coord failed to make dramatic announcement to entire program as is done by just about every program in the country when got notice of list of residents possibly being suspended for non-compliance..... There needs to be alot of stretches in the imagination to feel this residents pain.
...I'm saying the program/hospital handled it stupidly as far as their self-interest is concerned. Firing a resident in this way is inefficient. It is poor management and the associated costs are far greater than what it would have taken to call or page the resident...
I meant to respond to this one earlier.... This was likely a no cost solution to the hospital. Hospitals waste huge dollars in numerous areas. Where I stand, canceling a physicians entire day of scheduled cases for failure to dictate seems costly and inneficient. Management presumably has a better idea of the final balance sheet and costs. Maybe, between malpractice protection, JCAHO and any other accrediting body, it may be cost effective to prevent future lapses in documentation. The scenario of this resident being suspended... I am not sure where the costs are. They didn't stop reading films. The PD and others likely stayed late at night to catch up with missed work from dealing with this admin nightmare. And, in the end, admin probably has to make less kind reminder phone calls in the future. Thus, they free up their HR person to handle other business while the "residency children" grow up a little and take care of business like adults. We don't know what the actual costs are for the HR people to make multiple phone calls to all staff; attendings, residents, ancillary, etc... But, if we presume this residency resembles anything like all the other residencies in the country, it is likely the prog-coord has now added this reminder task to their list of childcare duties.... and, if it wasn't before, it is now likely part of the resident contracts and hospital bylaws. Again, the efficiency and costs savings of cold cruel but effective management.
 
Last edited:
This is absolutely ridiculous. I think residents have enough hoops to jump through during their "80 hour week" that douchey attendings and administrators should give them a break. One strike and you're out, over a late TB test? I guarantee that would not be the case for a nurse.

During preparation for a risk management presentation, I came across this number. http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/CWealth/out/1994CD07_8-7-08.pdf
CICU nurse has "consensual sex" with a postop cabg patient who's received a few doses of morphine from said nurse. Hospital fires nurse. Nurse union goes to arbiration to get his job back, because he's a stand-up guy. Arbitration states essentially that hospital doesn't have just cause to fire nurse and awards a monetary settlement to the nurse. Unreal. Luckily this is reversed by a judge. But a resident gets terminated for a late tb test?
 
...I already hear residents saying, "we are so busy and stressed. it's just not right to make threats of suspension. it adds so much stress I couldn't sleep..."...
...I think residents have enough hoops to jump through during their "80 hour week" that douchey attendings and administrators should give them a break...
:laugh:Welcome to the discussion. Better late then never......
 
Jack,

1. I think that you're overestimating the effectiveness of "residency gossip" in spreading this particular warning to the resident in question. Pretty much all of these types of things that the hospital or your PD tells you to do (TB test, flu shot, renew license, attend mandatory hospital meetings, update ACLS, etc.) comes with the implicit threat that if you don't do it, you will be fired/suspended/etc. That's not news. It's the way things are.

Maybe there was just a lot less drama in my residency program, but I can't imagine anyone making a big deal out of this (to be clear, I mean making a big deal about being warned that if you don't get a TB test by X, then you will be fired. If someone actually got fired, then yes, that would be a big deal, but the mere threat is not news and it is that news which you are suggesting this resident would have definitely received.)


2. As far as the cost issue, neither of us can prove which approach is more cost-effective. I'm pretty sure that my approach is cheaper. It is possible that your approach is cheaper, but I highly doubt it. Also, while presuming that management has a better idea of what costs less sounds reasonable, it is not convincing. Many hospitals and academic centers are epitomes of waste and inefficiency, and as such, I am reluctant to give them the benefit of the doubt on questions of cost-effectiveness.
 
I can't imagine anyone making a big deal out of this (to be clear, I mean making a big deal about being warned that if you don't get a TB test by X, then you will be fired. If someone actually got fired, then yes, that would be a big deal, but the mere threat is not news and it is that news which you are suggesting this resident would have definitely received.)

Speaking as someone who has spent several years representing highly-qualified professionals who made this mistake and paid the price for it in lost jobs, or in lost pay, privileges and respect in the organisation if I did manage to keep their job for them, if someone tells you, directly, indirectly or impliedly, formally or through the gossip mill, that your job is at risk, it is a big ****ing deal.

The resident in question may end up having to disclose his suspension/loss of privileges to a licensing board. If he does, I hope he's got a better story to tell them.
 
It ends with the call.
In other words... it ends with whatever was convenient for the resident/attending/allied health person. It ends with whatever that "last" effort, no matter what or how many before, convinces the resident/attending/allied health employee to take care of business. In otherwards, it really doesn't end until the individual decides to take responsibility or the rules bend into obscurity and irrelavence.
...I think that you're overestimating the effectiveness of "residency gossip" in spreading this particular warning to the resident in question. Pretty much all of these types of things that the hospital or your PD tells you to do (TB test, flu shot, renew license, attend mandatory hospital meetings, update ACLS, etc.) comes with the implicit threat that if you don't do it, you will be fired/suspended/etc. That's not news. It's the way things are.

Maybe there was just a lot less drama in my residency program, but I can't imagine anyone making a big deal out of this (to be clear, I mean making a big deal about being warned that if you don't get a TB test by X, then you will be fired....
Must be..... cause, I have never, ever known any residency program or cadre of residents that would just assume, "no big deal, business as usual...", when receiving word they are in danger of suspension/termination over a PPD. Plenty of folks are on this thread now talking about how unreasonable such an act would be. Do you really think residents would get a threat as such and not cry the same... i.e. it is unreasonable?
...As far as the cost issue, neither of us can prove which approach is more cost-effective. I'm pretty sure that my approach is cheaper...
Yet, you have not really cited any real examples of potential costs. I am just not seeing any real expense in this.... except maybe on the resident.

The attendings and residents getting all flustered and running around to facilitate re-instatement does not really represent a cost beyond the stress. Physicians, like attendings & PDs, get paid flat rate and stay well past 9 to 5. The resident is replaceable and I doubt radiology work stopped during this process/absence. On the otherhand, HR people are usually straight 9-5, no weekends, no after hours and not likely to get overtime for this process. The HR people being freed up from excess phone calls to do other tasks can conceivably be a cost savings. They actually do have other tasks to do beyond holding the residents' hands.
 
I had to get a PPD 3 times last year because the occupational health dept. LOST the records that I had had it. I'm not lying. Really not. The 3rd time I kept a copy myself and gave another copy to the administrator/secretary of my fellowship program just in case they called again or threatened again. I should have figured that out the 2nd time I had to do it, but at the other hospitals where I've worked, the occupational health dept. was far more efficient and didn't lose stuff like this.

The thing is, residents, fellows and attendings get threatening emails and communications all the time to the effect that if you don't do this or that dictation, immunization, etc. ASAP you won't be able to work. It would be easy for such an email to get lost. People are not perfect. I'm actually pretty OCD and the first to get my flu shot, etc. A lot of these things are driven by the state and local gov't. etc. and not necessarily by the hospital per se. However, sometimes the hospital administration can be disorganized (see above).

I didn't read the entire thread, but usually there are a certain number of people who don't get their mandatory whatever-it-is on the 1st request (human nature and time constraints being what they are) and it's usually more efficient to text page someone, page him once, or send another email in all caps or something, before resorting to just firing someone. Also, administrators also make mistakes. I was told a couple of times that I didn't do a dictation and if I didn't get it done within 24 hrs (or, once, within the next 30 minutes!) that my clinical privileges would be suspended. It turns out I did do the dictation but the transcription people somehow never transcribed it, it got lost, etc. When I told them it was done, they miraculously found it and that was that.

Hospitals are about taking care of patients, or should be. They should not be about power struggles or adminstrator/secretary types nagging people. The job of doctors and nurses is to take care of patients, not fill out forms, dictations, etc. (although that is part of our jobs). It sounds like the resident in question screwed up, but it doesn't sound like the punishment fit the crime. I think sometimes people forget that you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.
 
I had to get a PPD 3 times last year because the occupational health dept. LOST the records that I had had it.

Same here. Our affiliated peds hospital in residency required not one, but two negative PPDs. Three years in a row, there was a problem.

One of my best investments was a cheap scanner. It helped with credentialing too, when you submit the same documents to 3 different departments, none of which communicate with each other. Don't have a copy of my board certification? Check your email inbox in 30 seconds.

Ironically, I just received an email a few weeks ago cc'd to my chair that I was noncompliant with my flu shot. I'm not, and in fact when I got my flu shot they said I needed a PPD! I whipped out my iphone and offered to show the nurse the PPD form I already had scanned. She didn't even want to look at it and just checked off "negative" on her form.
 
No kidding. Thank god for the iphone's scanner app. Now I just take a picture of all those documents and convert them to PDFs that I can send the minute anybody starts giving me grief about missing paperwork.
 
Speaking as someone who has spent several years representing highly-qualified professionals who made this mistake and paid the price for it in lost jobs, or in lost pay, privileges and respect in the organisation if I did manage to keep their job for them, if someone tells you, directly, indirectly or impliedly, formally or through the gossip mill, that your job is at risk, it is a big ****ing deal.

The resident in question may end up having to disclose his suspension/loss of privileges to a licensing board. If he does, I hope he's got a better story to tell them.

I don't think you understood what I was saying. If some one said I need to get a PPD or I'm fired, then I get the PPD. I wouldn't do anything more than that. Doing anything more would, in my mind, constitute making a bid deal out of it. Are you suggesting that one should do more than just get the PPD?
 
Must be..... cause, I have never, ever known any residency program or cadre of residents that would just assume, "no big deal, business as usual...", when receiving word they are in danger of suspension/termination over a PPD. Plenty of folks are on this thread now talking about how unreasonable such an act would be. Do you really think residents would get a threat as such and not cry the same... i.e. it is unreasonable?

You should have read the part of my post right after where you cut off quoting me. The people in this thread are crying about an actual termination not the threat of a termination. If the thread was, "Resident threatened with firing if he doesn't get TB test", then everyone would pretty much say, "What's the big deal?".
 
Last edited:
Yet, you have not really cited any real examples of potential costs.

Yes, I have.

1. This firing and the associated paperwork likely took the HR people longer than calling the resident would have. You don't believe it, but I have mentioned it.

2. Just because the hospital is not paying extra dollars, doesn't mean that costs aren't borne. Costs come in other forms. In this case, it comes in the form of wasted time that could be used to doing something more productive.

It's laughable that you can see this on the HR end (i.e., "The HR people being freed up from excess phone calls to do other tasks can conceivably be a cost savings"), but when you talk about the time wasted by the PD, and other residents having to pick up the slack you say, "attendings and residents getting all flustered and running around to facilitate re-instatement does not really represent a cost beyond the stress". Just because they're not 9-5 employees doesn't mean there isn't a cost. By your logic, you could just pile on an infinite amount of extra adminstrative responsibility on the PD, because, in your view, it's essentially cost-free.


As I said in my prior post, I realize that you find all of this unconvincing. You find the above costs to be insignificant, and you think this type of snap termination will actually save in the long run. What you suggest is plausible, as is what I suggest. We're never going to resolve this on an internet message board.
 
Last edited:
You should have read the part of my post right after where you cut off quoting me. The people in this thread are crying about an actual termination not the threat of a termination...
I did read it and I do understand that. I appreciate the original premise that this resident was terminated or suspended or something. However, part of the case/argument/defense of injustice is that his/her name was not on the list of residents warned of potential adverse action for failure to comply with a simple thing like PPD. I find that argument unconvincing and actually goes against the resident. The issue is that a residency program would either

1. be filled with a bunch of non-communicating robots for colleagues to get warnings of such and this resident to not hear about them
2. or he/she would need to have their head burried in a cave to not hear all the gossip that would swirl.
3. AND have a very unusual PD/AsstPD/Prog coord in that a list of residents are targeted for potential adverse action and the program not make some moves....
...Just because they're not 9-5 employees doesn't mean there isn't a cost. By your logic, you could just pile on an infinite amount of extra adminstrative responsibility on the PD, because, in your view, it's essentially cost-free...
Hello! That is why companies go to a salaried and non-hourly pay structure. The costs of overtime, etc... are no longer an issue for the company/business. And, this is exactly what hospitals, schools, etc... do to physicians and teachers, and etc... This is what Physicians complain about as well, the un-reimbursed care and tasks they perform.... including administration, etc...
...I realize that you find all of this unconvincing...We're never going to resolve this on an internet message board...
This is probably the only thing in your characterization I wholey agree with, that and the point that we will likely not agree... The rest are over simplified positions and interpretations on your part.
 
Last edited:
Top