Blonde Girl said:What do you call the person who graduated last in their law school?? Unemployed
Future Doc B said:Or Senator/Congressman/Congresswoman
Blonde Girl said:What do you call the person who graduated last in their medical school?? Doctor
Blonde Girl said:What do you call the person who graduated last in their medical school?? Doctor
What do you call the person who graduated last in their law school?? Unemployed
I-eye said:Depends which law school...graduate last from a top ten and you can still make good $ at a big firm (the work may suck, but its a job), graduate first at a bottom tier and may still not get a decent job.
BTW--99.9% of Yale lawyers would not do any of the above advertised, and if they did they would not advertise it...
phllystyl said:Looks like we're up to 2 now...
keep em comin' guys!!!!
*munch munch munch*
kas23 said:Actually there was a thread on this forum a couple of months ago about how Affirmative Action actually hurts minorities. The thread referenced an article written by a very well respected proponent of AA who did research and found that the students who got the best grades (no matter the school), got the best jobs. This article actually argued that minorities would best be fit at schools that fit their competitiveness, then they would get better grades, thus better jobs upon graduation. He felt that letting minorities into the top schools only hurt them, because they ended up getting worse grades and thus, worse jobs.
I did not mean to turn this into an AA thread by any means. Don't let it turn into one. I was just bored.
In regards to the Yale lawyers; what, are smarter people more ethical? Don't kid yourself. I don't care if a lawyer graduated from the Vatican's School of Law, I still wouldn't put anything past them.
cytoskelement said:ratchet, ratchet... hammer, hammer.
proud of it... just preachin' the truth.
cytoskelement said:well...
one could also say: what do you call the person who graduates last in their med school class...
um, yeah. UN-matched in DERM, ENT, ORTHO, URO, GAS, or any other competitive residency. Have fun in primary care at (insert local "area") community program.
phllystyl said:get over yourself.
timtye78 said:I had to notice that you are a second-year med student. In response to your sweeping statement, I would have to comment that 'even at DO school' (and I say with a smirk) your statement is incorrect. Of course, I cannot speak for your school 😀
phllystyl said:completing the grueling 4 years that is medical school, regardless of class rank or relative grades is a success story in and of itself that is worthy of praise and should be commended.
I don't care what field you are going into. Doesn't give you the right to be condescending.
kas23 said:Actually there was a thread on this forum a couple of months ago about how Affirmative Action actually hurts minorities. The thread referenced an article written by a very well respected proponent of AA who did research and found that the students who got the best grades (no matter the school), got the best jobs. This article actually argued that minorities would best be fit at schools that fit their competitiveness, then they would get better grades, thus better jobs upon graduation. He felt that letting minorities into the top schools only hurt them, because they ended up getting worse grades and thus, worse jobs.
I did not mean to turn this into an AA thread by any means. Don't let it turn into one. I was just bored.
In regards to the Yale lawyers; what, are smarter people more ethical? Don't kid yourself. I don't care if a lawyer graduated from the Vatican's School of Law, I still wouldn't put anything past them.
phllystyl said:completing the grueling 4 years that is medical school, regardless of class rank or relative grades is a success story in and of itself that is worthy of praise and should be commended.
I don't care what field you are going into. Doesn't give you the right to be condescending.
I-eye said:Never saw the study, so I can't comment. But from experience I can tell you that in law it is not necessarily that way.
Idiopathic said:Is it a success if everybody who matriculates graduates? Should med schools have a measureable attrition rate? (several dont)
Andy Dufresne said:I feel like I've seen this joke in like three different forums now... all posted by Blonde Girl herself. 😛
kas23 said:"Second, and related, Sander says that blacks at better schools, but with poor grades, get worse jobs than they would if they were at lesser schools and had better grades. In other words, Sander argues, at all but the most elite schools, grades matter more than the school from which one graduates for black law job applicants.
The upside of attending a better school is more than outweighed - in terms of employment options - by the downside of getting weak grades at that school, compared to the better grades that could have been obtained at a less competitive school.
This nonobvious conclusion might make some sense. Legal employers do like to hire from the top, or at least the top half, of almost any law school class. A high-performing student at a second-tier school may look more attractive than a student with a mediocre record from a top school. And virtually no one is eager to hire C and D students, from even the very best school.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/01/07/amar.affirmative.action/index.html
I-eye said:I do agree with what you posted (not necessarily the race aspect, I'll leave that to somebody else and another thread). However, as the article indicated this tread applies "at all but the most elite schools." In law, that is generally considered the top 10 (there are actually 14 schools that rotate in and out of that group, so maybe top 14). At those schools the curve is very high, typically between 'B' and 'A-'. The students are distributed fairly evenly around the curve, and this produces very few grades in the 'A' to 'A+' range and very few grades in the 'C+' range and lower, so even those towards the bottom of the class usually don't have a significant # of 'Cs' on their transcripts. The jobs open to these graduates offer between 2 and 3 times the salary and/or prestige of what is being offered to the top of the class students at lower tiered schools.
I can tell you from experience that many employers don't even look at a transcript before they interview students from top 10 schools. Hiring is based primarily on personality and interview skills.
However, outside the top law schools (top 10, 14, whatever), I think what you posted is correct. Most employers see very little difference between a tier 2 and 3 school (or even lower tier 1 for that matter). And, students from these schools usually stay in the same region of the country as the law school from which they graduated because their law schools don't open doors to the national market.
Part of this problem is the result of too many law schools. I have always thought that a well-trained poodle could get into a law school, but that getting into an elite law school is on par (and maybe harder in some instances) than getting into a top graduate school in other disciplines (medicine, business, PhD). On the other hand, getting into a medical school is tougher, but there might not be a huge difference between an applicant only accepted at a middle tier med school and one accepted to an elite med school. In addition, because med students have to take the boards while in school, residency programs have more #s to compare, thereby eliminating some of the prestige factor associated with attending a top med school.
The bar exam is taken after law school and is only pass/fail in most states. I have never heard of an employer requesting bar grades. The only thing that is important is a pass.
I know this is a long post to make a nearly meaningless point, but I am bored...
kas23 said:You made some interesting points, including the one about the poodle. Does anyone know what kind of job a poodle would get upon completion of law school? Or, does it depend on its grades? Or, do poodles have lower bar scores and we shoud really be sending our border collies?