Missed that part. However, how long do you think she will be working (at least FT) once those babies start coming?
Why do you assume she won't be? She's on her second fellowship and has a challenging and rewarding career. Seems pretty chauvinist to
assume she will not work. To
question? Sure. To
assume? - Nope
Guys exaggerate to illustrate simple points. Anyway, married folks and parents would understand my point. It's usually premed feminists that are uptight about my use of language in this instant. It points to your immaturity and lack of life experience. Go out and date more guys. In fact, you should plan a trip to a legalized marijuana state and smoke a few joints. It will open up your perspective. Peace.
I'm older, married, a parent, and decidedly not uptight. But I too found your "
sex on demand" language offensive, in that it reduces a woman's role to a relatively small piece of anatomy that exists for your pleasure. You demand (you're the boss, right?), she complies (even though it sounds like she doesn't want to). Not a flattering portrayal of your marriage.
Feminist? I resemble that remark. I absolutely believe women should have equal rights, equal pay, equal responsibilities, and equal access to opportunities. Would you like to go on record as
not believing those things? Feminist is not a dirty word and should not be thrown around as if it were an insult.
I had to chime in just to say my goodness, this is horrifying. duped into paying for kids that aren't biologically yours for a woman who left you for someone else? I feel for you man
You appear to assume that this was her devious plan --
(If it was, that's nasty. If it wasn't, it's merely a very tough break...)
In fact, there are a whole lot of negative assumptions on this thread about women's motivations. How is it in any way evil for an intelligent adult to not want to assume $300,000 of existing debt plus another $300,000 in potential future debt for a largely-absentee (for the next 8 years) partner? Frankly, it would be foolish for her not to feel that way.
Selfish? Sure, but not to a '
ditch the witch' extent. Reverse the genders and imagine you're the soon-to-be-attending and your GF wants you to assume $600K of her debt -- Funny how the preponderance of advice doesn't change at all --
"Dump the gold-digging witch!" (Yes, I'm assuming, based on what I've seen here and elsewhere online.) Would that make
you selfish?
What we have in this situation is an unfortunate confluence of events -- She wants to have a baby. He wants to give up a reasonably lucrative career and pursue a dream which will put him/them hugely in debt and make him a sub-optimal (temporarily, due to time constraints) father. Both parties have reasonable wants and needs. Neither party is evil or scheming. They both just want what they want, and those wants tend to conflict.