misslonghornxo
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi! Could you provide me more information on the AAMC SJT test? How does the AAMC SJT factor into admission? Does the score expire? How many times is the test given? Thanks!
This seems like AAMC attempting to develop an internal mechanism to replicate the results of, evaluate the validity of, and combat the use of CASPER. Good. Some form of SJT would be great, but it should be internal as opposed to CASPER.Hi! Could you provide me more information on the AAMC SJT test? How does the AAMC SJT factor into admission? Does the score expire? How many times is the test given? Thanks!
At least it is not as subjective as CASPER.If this replaces CASPER, then by all means AAMC. Do your thing.View attachment 264113
If this replaces CASPER, then by all means AAMC. Do your thing.View attachment 264113
I dunno. I'd probably pick something likeIf this replaces CASPER, then by all means AAMC. Do your thing.View attachment 264113
There is no right response....that's the beauty of the thing. Reread the prompt.what's the right response to this scenario tho?
I would do 5, 1, 5, 4.I dunno. I'd probably pick something like
1) 4
2) 1
3) 4 maybe 5
4) 4
The initial data was collected over 2 years on medical students.how do they have enough data to correlate performance in medical school to performance on these situational judgement tests?
I now definitely want AAMC SJT to replace CASPER. They give you your damn score!I participated in the study they just did on the SJT. They asked us to take it in exchange for an Amazon gift card. I just received the results. Apparently there is a "right" answer to some of the questions, because it gave me a percentile score.
What? You don’t think a computer based Exam can tell people what morals they should have? Preposterous.How I loathe Casper.
How I doubt the AAMC can do better.
How I loathe Casper.
How I doubt the AAMC can do better.
Schools just need another metric to rank their applicants I guess. I have strong doubts about how useful computer based ethics tests are, but if I have to do one, at least let it not be a typing test.How I loathe Casper.
How I doubt the AAMC can do better.
Casper and SJT are a direct result of the mentality of ‘apply to however many you can afford... it reflects the same thing that has happened to the match...
At least in competitive specialties *at least according to conversations I have had* people will literally just list every single program in a specialty (>50) in hopes to match one.genuinely curious, but what does that mean? what happened to the match?
At least in competitive specialties *at least according to conversations I have had* people will literally just list every single program in a specialty (>50) in hopes to match one.
At least in competitive specialties *at least according to conversations I have had* people will literally just list every single program in a specialty (>50) in hopes to match one.
I heard the average person marching into neurosurg had around 16 interviews.
Applying to more and more residencies yields extraordinarily reduced results.yes, personally I applied to every single program in my specialty, and so did others who were applying to competitive specialties (or small specialties - like combined IM/EM, Triple Board, etc). what's wrong with that?
yes, personally I applied to every single program in my specialty, and so did others who were applying to competitive specialties (or small specialties - like combined IM/EM, Triple Board, etc). what's wrong with that?
And the reason they interview 50+ applicants for 1-3 spots is because everyone is applying to every program and applicants at this point all look the same on paper. It is part of that feedback loop.these programs may have 1-3 spots/year but then they interview everyone and everyone's mom (like 50+ people for 1-3 spots). So that necessitates going on a large number of interviews to ensure a match.
I participated in the study they just did on the SJT. They asked us to take it in exchange for an Amazon gift card. I just received the results. Apparently there is a "right" answer to some of the questions, because it gave me a percentile score.
And the reason they interview 50+ applicants for 1-3 spots is because everyone is applying to every program and applicants at this point all look the same on paper. It is part of that feedback loop.
Imagine if here was a cap - you can ONLY apply to 15 medical schools or you can ONLY apply to 15 residencies etc. The workload would be less on the residency programs so you would be more likely to be noticed by the ones you really want to go to and you would actually have to put some thought in to your list.
Not really. A million dollars from 10,000 applicants but you need 15 full time staff for 4 months plus an additional 40 staff spread across 20 different interview days plus the 7 full time admissions staff year round. Plus annual ACME accreditation fees and so on so forth. Schools don’t generate a lot of revenue off of secondary fees.Unlikely to happen. Med schools generate a lot of revenue from secondary fees.
Not really. A million dollars from 10,000 applicants but you need 15 full time staff for 4 months plus an additional 40 staff spread across 20 different interview days plus the 7 full time admissions staff year round. Plus annual ACME accreditation fees and so on so forth. Schools don’t generate a lot of revenue off of secondary fees.
Do residency applications have anything similar to secondaries? Where you have to give additional essays or payments for each program?
Applying to more and more residencies yields extraordinarily reduced results.
However, by applying to increased residencies, programs will now have more applicants they have to screen with the same number of staff. This causes them to increasingly focus on ‘objective’ metrics such as STEP1 and research achievements which then drives up the competitiveness of the specialty and it then acts as a feedback loop.
The same thing is happening with medical schools. Schools use ‘objective’ measures to screen the applicants as opposed to manually investing in every applicant.
This makes it so that students who are borderline but would otherwise have a compelling story/compelling case to not make it. This disproportionately affects those from lower SES backgrounds and URM status.
And the reason they interview 50+ applicants for 1-3 spots is because everyone is applying to every program and applicants at this point all look the same on paper. It is part of that feedback loop.
ENT programs instituted a requirement for a program-specific "love letter" two years ago.Do residency applications have anything similar to secondaries? Where you have to give additional essays or payments for each program?
Imagine if here was a cap - you can ONLY apply to 15 medical schools or you can ONLY apply to 15 residencies etc. The workload would be less on the residency programs so you would be more likely to be noticed by the ones you really want to go to and you would actually have to put some thought in to your list.
Is the love letter still required nowadays? If so, do you know if they still had unfilled spots after that year?ENT programs instituted a requirement for a program-specific "love letter" two years ago.
I believe they had 18 unfilled spots that year...
Is the love letter still required nowadays? If so, do you know if they still had unfilled spots after that year?
Not really. A million dollars from 10,000 applicants but you need 15 full time staff for 4 months plus an additional 40 staff spread across 20 different interview days plus the 7 full time admissions staff year round. Plus annual ACME accreditation fees and so on so forth. Schools don’t generate a lot of revenue off of secondary fees.
They reduced the burden a bit this year and went back to filling (as usual).Is the love letter still required nowadays? If so, do you know if they still had unfilled spots after that year?
What secondary fees go to medical schools!?Unlikely to happen. Med schools generate a lot of revenue from secondary fees. And the cost of evaluating more students isn’t that high because you just have stricter post-secondary requirements.
100% true at my schoolWhat secondary fees go to medical schools!?
They go to parent institutions.
What secondary fees go to medical schools!?
They go to parent institutions.
TuitionBut then who pays for the office space and salaries of the paid admissions staff?
Educational/Student Affairs budget. This is derived from multiple sources including research, clinical revenue and donor funds.But then who pays for the office space and salaries of the paid admissions staff?
Educational/Student Affairs budget. This is derived from multiple sources including research, clinical revenue and donor funds.
I'm going to piggyback on this apology with retracting my earlier comments about the match. I am not sure if my hypothesis applies to med school admissions, but I can see that my opinions of the match were shaped too heavily by disgruntled under-performing MS1s and MS2s.Thank you.
I apologize for my comments earlier about secondary feeds and for jumping to conclusions. I was wrong.
I'm going to piggyback on this apology with retracting my earlier comments about the match. I am not sure if my hypothesis applies to med school admissions, but I can see that my opinions of the match were shaped too heavily by disgruntled under-performing MS1s and MS2s.
what's the right response to this scenario tho?
All of the above.