AANA Dispute with APSF

Started by GaseousClay
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
GaseousClay said:
Apparently AANA does not agree with WHO anesthesia safety recommendations and will no longer send APSF (anesthesia practice safety foundation) newsletter to their members or send any funding. GOOD RIDDANCE.

A Note from the APSF President About Support of APSF - Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation

APSF Announcement to CRNA's - Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation
Click to expand...
Looks like the AANA was giving “financial support” to the ASPF and felt they could change the narrative. They felt wrong.
 
They were upset at the standard that was selected. So now they are stuck with advocating for a lower (I mean different) standard.
 
“its safe provision requires a high level of expertise in medical diagnosis, pharmacology, physiology, and anatomy, as well as considerable practical skill” and “wherever and whenever possible, anesthesia should be provided, led, or overseen by an anesthesiologist . . .”

Calling it now...Donations to the movement to change their names to nurse anesthesiologists will sharply rise, the movement will pass, and they will then claim to comply with WHO standards.
 
Urzuz said:
“its safe provision requires a high level of expertise in medical diagnosis, pharmacology, physiology, and anatomy, as well as considerable practical skill” and “wherever and whenever possible, anesthesia should be provided, led, or overseen by an anesthesiologist . . .”

Calling it now...Donations to the movement to change their names to nurse anesthesiologists will sharply rise, the movement will pass, and they will then claim to comply with WHO standards.
Click to expand...

They defined anesthesiologist as a physician trained in anesthesia.
 
coffeebythelake said:
They defined anesthesiologist as a physician trained in anesthesia.
Click to expand...

They’ll soon be raising money for a movement to change AANA to AADNPAs (American Association of Doctor Nurse Physician Anesthesiologists).

But of course it won’t be to mislead patients. They just want to be referred to by their proper credentials.
 
Urzuz said:
They’ll soon be raising money for a movement to change AANA to AADNPAs (American Association of Doctor Nurse Physician Anesthesiologists).

But of course it won’t be to mislead patients. They just want to be referred to by their proper credentials.
Click to expand...
Easy. American Association of Nurse Anesthesiologists. This is what they want.
 
FFP said:
Easy. American Association of Nurse Anesthesiologists. This is what they want.
Click to expand...

Nah dude according to the guy above the WHO recs defined anesthesiologist as a physician trained in anesthesia. Hence they need to have nurse physician anesthesiologist somewhere in there.
 
Urzuz said:
Nah dude according to the guy above the WHO recs defined anesthesiologist as a physician trained in anesthesia. Hence they need to have nurse physician anesthesiologist somewhere in there.
Click to expand...
Since when does the WHO matter in this country? Or any widely-respected and -recognized international organization? 😉
 
coffeebythelake said:
i'm not versed in legality, but can the term "anesthesiologist" be protected?
or is this something that will inevitably be eroded, such as the term physician with chiropractors and naturopaths
Click to expand...
Sure. The ASA could issue a position statement that an anesthesiologist is a physician who has attended medical school and specialized in the practice of anesthesia and any wrongful use of the term may be considered malpractice. They should be instructed to do just this if they want any further donations. Failure to take such a position would be very telling.
 
hypnosMD said:
Sure. The ASA could issue a position statement that an anesthesiologist is a physician who has attended medical school and specialized in the practice of anesthesia and any wrongful use of the term may be considered malpractice. They should be instructed to do just this if they want any further donations. Failure to take such a position would be very telling.
Click to expand...

Zero chance our society does this.
 
hypnosMD said:
Sure. The ASA could issue a position statement that an anesthesiologist is a physician who has attended medical school and specialized in the practice of anesthesia and any wrongful use of the term may be considered malpractice. They should be instructed to do just this if they want any further donations. Failure to take such a position would be very telling.
Click to expand...

misusing the word malpractice in a position statement is probably not the advisable thing to do
 
Mman said:
misusing the word malpractice in a position statement is probably not the advisable thing to do
Click to expand...
Meh. I’ve only done a few thousand hours of expert witness work, but I would say providing service under false credentials is a slam dunk.
Young docs take heed. The naysayers almost always have a vested interest in not taking strong positions. Often, they are partners in PP groups or AMC’s (which is corporate medicine, NOT private practice) that use QZ to let their nurses practice independently while telling themselves they are docs because of their diploma. Meanwhile, they are actually merely mid-level managers profiting from a “fireman” model. They want cheap “providers”.
 
hypnosMD said:
Meh. I’ve only done a few thousand hours of expert witness work, but I would say providing service under false credentials is a slam dunk.
Young docs take heed. The naysayers almost always have a vested interest in not taking strong positions. Often, they are partners in PP groups or AMC’s (which is corporate medicine, NOT private practice) that use QZ to let their nurses practice independently while telling themselves they are docs because of their diploma. Meanwhile, they are actually merely mid-level managers profiting from a “fireman” model. They want cheap “providers”.
Click to expand...

the term "anesthesiologist" is not a credential and reviewing charts does not make someone a lawyer.

I fully support the ASA emphasizing the need for anesthesiologists to provide care to all patients. I also laugh at groups that use QZ modifiers. What I don't support is dumb soundbites and ads that provide no material benefit to our argument that physicians should be in charge of anesthesia care. It's like when people post that the ASA needs to have an instant response to every post on twitter.

The word "anesthesiologist" isn't what makes us experts, it's our training that does. While CRNAs attempting to call themselves anesthesiologists is laughably stupid to anybody that understands the training and we should work to ensure it does not become commonly used by less educated people, threatening the word malpractice is just dumb.

So no, the person disagreeing with you isn't somebody trying to use CRNAs to provide cheaper care nor implement a "fireman" model.
 
Last edited:
Never Supervised. Never will. Loathe the CRNAs. But membership in the AANA should be grounds for immediate dismissal for any employed CRNA. This may not be enforceable at Academic Institutions or AMCs or any locations where the Docs can't hire/fire CRNAs. In PP it should be automatic. Their aggressive Anti-Anesthesiologist rhetoric has warranted this stance. I guarantee given the option, any CRNA would pick food on the table vs their AANA membership.
 
drdan4 said:
Never Supervised. Never will. Loathe the CRNAs. But membership in the AANA should be grounds for immediate dismissal for any employed CRNA. This may not be enforceable at Academic Institutions or AMCs or any locations where the Docs can't hire/fire CRNAs. In PP it should be automatic. Their aggressive Anti-Anesthesiologist rhetoric has warranted this stance. I guarantee given the option, any CRNA would pick food on the table vs their AANA membership.
Click to expand...

Their national board strongly pushes them into AANA membership as part of their recertification process. I'm far too lazy to look up the details myself but they make the process way quicker and easier if they are AANA members. Basically it's the equivalent of the ASA controlling the ABA.

And yes the AANA is terrible.
 
drdan4 said:
Never Supervised. Never will. Loathe the CRNAs. But membership in the AANA should be grounds for immediate dismissal for any employed CRNA. This may not be enforceable at Academic Institutions or AMCs or any locations where the Docs can't hire/fire CRNAs. In PP it should be automatic. Their aggressive Anti-Anesthesiologist rhetoric has warranted this stance. I guarantee given the option, any CRNA would pick food on the table vs their AANA membership.
Click to expand...

My old group started hiring AAs. We never hired a single CRNA after we got AAs credentialed at our hospital. I realize not everyone has that option, but it felt nice to actually do something about this nonsense for once. And we were considered a good group to work for as a mid level, so us shutting them out was a big deal at the time. Lots of drama.....
 
I doubt you could have hired any CRNAs even if you had wanted to after hiring an AA. They are a shockingly tight-knit professional community that will blackball the F&*K out of any practice that tries to fight against their stranglehold on the midlevel anesthesia provider market.
 
Block-Buster said:
I doubt you could have hired any CRNAs even if you had wanted to after hiring an AA. They are a shockingly tight-knit professional community that will blackball the F&*K out of any practice that tries to fight against their stranglehold on the midlevel anesthesia provider market.
Click to expand...

If they had to choose between putting food on their table or blackballing a practice that uses AAs, I think they'd choose the former.
 
Block-Buster said:
I doubt you could have hired any CRNAs even if you had wanted to after hiring an AA. They are a shockingly tight-knit professional community that will blackball the F&*K out of any practice that tries to fight against their stranglehold on the midlevel anesthesia provider market.
Click to expand...

When we announced the hiring of our first AA, they all attempted to band together cartel style and threaten us. We will all quit, you won’t be able to fill shifts, yada yada. We said fine, quit.
We all decided (with the exception of a couple) that we would rather work our butts off than deal with any more of their attitudes if it came down to that.
Guess how many actually quit?
There were plenty of tantrums and toddler like antics, but that was it.
We continued to get plenty of CRNA applications, so I don’t think it had any effect in the long run on our hiring prospects.
 
Last edited:
Block-Buster said:
I doubt you could have hired any CRNAs even if you had wanted to after hiring an AA. They are a shockingly tight-knit professional community that will blackball the F&*K out of any practice that tries to fight against their stranglehold on the midlevel anesthesia provider market.
Click to expand...
Let em blackball you. More openings to hire more AAs.

Man o War said:
When we announced the hiring of our first AA, they all attempted to band together cartel style and threaten us. We will all quit, you won’t be able to fill shifts, yada yada. We said fine, quit.
We all decided (with the exception of a couple) that we would rather work our butts off than deal with any more of their attitudes if it came down to that.
Guess how many actually quit?
There were plenty of tantrums and toddler like antics, but that was it.
We continued to get plenty of CRNA applications, so I don’t think it had any effect in the long run on our hiring prospects.
Click to expand...
You go, Glen Coco!
 
Block-Buster said:
I doubt you could have hired any CRNAs even if you had wanted to after hiring an AA. They are a shockingly tight-knit professional community that will blackball the F&*K out of any practice that tries to fight against their stranglehold on the midlevel anesthesia provider market.
Click to expand...
They make a lot of noise, but they're but, especially in an area with limited options, they're not going to uproot their families just to be pissy.

However - there are PLENTY of groups that have talked about hiring AAs and the CRNAs threatened to leave, and the group totally caved - like the one in Ohio recently where the nurses actually put their names on a Change.org petition. And that's in Ohio, where AAs have been working for nearly 50 years. Another group in Birmingham hired an AA and the nurses made her life miserable. They told their docs they would play nice if they agreed to never hire another AA. They agreed - 25 years later, they've still never hired another AA.

At some point, I hope the FTC takes notice of these tactics as illegal restraint of trade.
 
jwk said:
They make a lot of noise, but they're but, especially in an area with limited options, they're not going to uproot their families just to be pissy.

However - there are PLENTY of groups that have talked about hiring AAs and the CRNAs threatened to leave, and the group totally caved - like the one in Ohio recently where the nurses actually put their names on a Change.org petition. And that's in Ohio, where AAs have been working for nearly 50 years. Another group in Birmingham hired an AA and the nurses made her life miserable. They told their docs they would play nice if they agreed to never hire another AA. They agreed - 25 years later, they've still never hired another AA.

At some point, I hope the FTC takes notice of these tactics as illegal restraint of trade.
Click to expand...

This is what happened at our place. They refused to let our first AA sit at the lunch table. They refused to give him breaks or take over a case for him when it was his turn to go home. They wouldn’t speak to him in the hallway.
Fortunately he was an older former military guy who would tell you to go screw yourself right to your face, so he didn’t care. But we did.
It got so bad that we actually had our attorney write up hostile work environment statutes and told them all we would fire them on the spot if one more incident occurred. And by law, we would be shielded according to our attorney. It stopped when they realized we would follow through.
The childish nursey nurse nonsense needs to not be tolerated or it will continue.
 
pgg said:
The way strip mall CRNA mills are flooding the market with new graduates (many of them with really marginal training), I wonder if the CRNA job market is going to remain strong enough for them to be picky.
Click to expand...

its a race to the bottom for these "advanced" nursing degrees
do as little as possible - the nurses want and expect this
programs try to make the most money as possible
no standards at all
at the expense of training and experience
but indoctrinate them with this idea that they can do anything
call certificates as residencies, fellowships to bolster their name
if i was a patient i would be ****ing scared
 
It’s so easy to say “we only hire AAs” but even if we could, we have 100 anesthetists in our group - we usually have to hire 10 or so a year. There simply aren’t enough AAs out there to hire - it’s a small group, and they are highly sought-after by PPs.

And definitely talk to “trailblazing” AAs who enter previously CRNA-only practices. It’s a tough, TOUGH situation as illustrated above. Honestly, it’s not dissimilar to women entering traditionally all-male military academies 20ish years ago (the Citadel, VMI) - ridiculous hazing and only the most hardened and tough made it through.

Nurses are like this universally, though. It’s every bit as bad when ICUs traditionally staffed by NPs go off-script and hire a new PA graduate.
 
AdmiralChz said:
It’s so easy to say “we only hire AAs” but even if we could, we have 100 anesthetists in our group - we usually have to hire 10 or so a year. There simply aren’t enough AAs out there to hire - it’s a small group, and they are highly sought-after by PPs.

And definitely talk to “trailblazing” AAs who enter previously CRNA-only practices. It’s a tough, TOUGH situation as illustrated above. Honestly, it’s not dissimilar to women entering traditionally all-male military academies 20ish years ago (the Citadel, VMI) - ridiculous hazing and only the most hardened and tough made it through.

Nurses are like this universally, though. It’s every bit as bad when ICUs traditionally staffed by NPs go off-script and hire a new PA graduate.
Click to expand...
We're trying 🙂 The first Wisconsin class just finished, IU's first class is in their second year, and there are new programs in the discussion phase.

One of the best tools my group has from a recruiting standpoint is our AA student rotations. We have 10 or more students at any given time (easy with 80+ anesthetizing locations each day). If you're interested in establishing a student rotation, PM me and I can put you in touch with some program directors.
 
I would think getting training sites & rotations wouldn't really be that much of an issue for AA training programs. I know I'd be way more open to teaching an AA student than an SRNA. The real impediment is state laws that don't allow AAs to practice in 33 states.
 
AdmiralChz said:
It’s so easy to say “we only hire AAs” but even if we could, we have 100 anesthetists in our group - we usually have to hire 10 or so a year. There simply aren’t enough AAs out there to hire - it’s a small group, and they are highly sought-after by PPs.

And definitely talk to “trailblazing” AAs who enter previously CRNA-only practices. It’s a tough, TOUGH situation as illustrated above. Honestly, it’s not dissimilar to women entering traditionally all-male military academies 20ish years ago (the Citadel, VMI) - ridiculous hazing and only the most hardened and tough made it through.

Nurses are like this universally, though. It’s every bit as bad when ICUs traditionally staffed by NPs go off-script and hire a new PA graduate.
Click to expand...

Oh man, tell me about it. My wife is a trauma surgery PA, had been with an all PA group prior to moving. New job is with an all NP group, fist PA they have ever hired, it's bad to the point that she's considering switching over to CV surgery (all PA group) if things don't improve.
 
OTCAwesome said:
Oh man, tell me about it. My wife is a trauma surgery PA, had been with an all PA group prior to moving. New job is with an all NP group, fist PA they have ever hired, it's bad to the point that she's considering switching over to CV surgery (all PA group) if things don't improve.
Click to expand...

This pisses me off so much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.